2006-2423: EVALUATING SELF-ASSESSMENT AND A PLACEMENTEXAMINATION FOR A FIRST COURSE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE: HOW DOWOMEN AND MINORITY STUDENTS FARE?Joseph Urban, Arizona State University DR. JOSEPH E. URBAN Joseph E. Urban is a professor of computer science and serves the Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering as Inclusive Learning Communities Program Director at ASU. His research areas include software engineering, computer languages, data engineering, and distributed computing.Mary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University MARY R. ANDERSON-ROWLAND is an Associate Professor in Industrial Engineering. She was the Associate Dean of Student Affairs in the Fulton School of Engineering at ASU from
for the coming years.The program typically costs $ 82,000 of which around 50% is dedicated towards studentexpenses, around 40% towards instructional expenses and the remaining towards operational andmiscellaneous expenses. The budget per student is around $4000. Refer to Appendix B for adetailed description of a sample budget.Metrics/ Measurement of SuccessIn 2002 the Diversity Affairs Office set out to track the results of four minority outreachprograms for graduate and undergraduate students. Of the four programs run by the College, theESP program is our most successful recruitment program. From 1996 through 2000, over 31%(30 out of 95) of all ESP participants enrolled in the University (UW). From 2001-2003 we havebeen able to recruit 50
diversity statement exercise is only one ofthe topics explored by program participants in the eight-week program. Two research questionsabout the diversity statement exercise guided the analyses and results reported here: 1) does thediversity statement exercise show promise as a means of enabling participants to engage withdiversity issues in engineering education?, and 2) how prepared are engineering graduatestudents to grapple with issues of diversity and teaching? The remainder of this paper is organized into background, methods, results, discussion andconclusion sections. We provide background information about diversity in engineeringeducation. Next, we provide a brief overview of our work including descriptions of the portfolioprogram and the
University, an American Indian tribal college, and the U.S. GeologicalSurvey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation Systems (EROS) Data Center, which operates theNational Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive. All five states affiliated with UMAC alsoparticipate in the NSF Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR). Theintent was to provide students in the Upper Midwest EPSCoR states with research opportunitiesthat they could not experience at their home institutions. Figure 1. Upper Midwest Aerospace Consortium (UMAC) partner institutions.The original recruiting requirements are listed as follows, although they were modified each yeardue to program constraints and lessons learned: 1. Eight (8) undergraduate research
Page 11.1403.4of the program. This GK—12 Fellows project aspires to stimulate interest in high school students towardSTEM related fields by incorporating sensing, instrumentation, and modern computingtechnologies into Active Physics, Marine Biology, Regents Physics, and Living Environmentcurricula. The project also aims to enhance student achievement on standardized exams. Thegoal is to have the students form a deep appreciation of STEM disciplines so that they canconsider career options in STEM-related disciplines. To achieve the goals of the program, 13 RAISE Fellows are deployed in four inner-cityhigh schools to serve as teaching assistants in the classrooms and labs and as science resources tothe teachers. Each RAISE Fellow
faculty, and its objectives. After overcoming traditionalbarriers, a conceptual framework for “retooling” and/or “revitalizing” the academic programsshould be outlined. What lies at the crux of the matter is: what engineering students need to learnand how can they best learn it, as well as what engineering institutions should teach and how canthey best teach it? The paper argues that various “stakeholders” in the future of engineering education(administrators, faculty, students, industry, and government leaders) as well as others - wouldeventually come to grip with the dilemma in which they are immersed, be stimulated to debate,and motivated to act along workable paths to implement widespread reform to insure theviability and currency of
the top floor, descending onefloor in each operation of formulation, blending, packaging, and shipping. An MS degreewas followed by an industry year operating small scale refinery processes, and learningcomputer programming. Page 11.1227.5 Along the undergraduate way I certainly took and survived many classes, thoughin retrospect I probably regarded most more as obstacles rather than enlightenments onmy path to engineering. My deepest learning and sense of confidence for “how stuffworks” arose largely from the easily remembered summer activities vs. the now veryhazy course topics of academia. “Hands-on” was clearly the best path for
, the challenge of a longitudinal study isto quantify how good a decision-maker a subject actually is. The recommended approach is toassemble a panel of experts from the local construction industry to serve as judges. The panelinterviews each one of the participating subjects before and after the exercise is executed todetermine if their decision-making skills have changed. Members of the panel do not know thegroup to which each subject belongs (experimental or control). Panel members should receiveproper training in order to make sure that they respond in a consistent and reliable manner. Thedecision-making skills of each subject can be evaluated through the introduction of ahypothetical situation in the same topical area as the exercise. They
path, thus resulting in more graduate students who may also be more open to workingwith undergraduates because of the benefits they earned. A second broader impact is that theproof-of-concept course will have underrepresented groups in engineering make up at least fortypercent of the participants. Yet a third broader impact is that the experience should serve toinform and promote other undergraduates about the value and opportunity of undergraduateresearch experiences. Finally, a fourth broader impact is that should this course prove successfulat enriching and promoting undergraduate research, the structure of this course should readilytransfer to other schools. In other words, the technical communication courses at many schoolswould have a
STEM topics and how they are actually applied in real-world situations • Integrate technical, engineering, and managerial issues • Improve written and oral communications skills • Foster a change in learning environment that encourages female and minority students to persevere and succeed in engineering programs • Offer a method that has a lasting impact on student learning, as measured by improved grades in subsequent semesters In addition to the benefits to students, LITEE multimedia case studies offer significantinstitutional benefits in that they satisfy the majority of the 11 outcomes specified in the ABETaccreditation criteria exceptionally well, improving ties to industry, breaking downdepartmental
possibilities for themselves, Wyoming society; and to stimulate and reward excellence in Wyoming schools [Adapted from 1].‚ Engineering Summer Program (ESP): The College of Engineering and the Wyoming Engineering Society, in conjunction with the J. Kenneth & Pat Kennedy Endowment Endowment and the University of Wyoming College of Engineering Hewlett Foundation Engineering Schools of the West Initiative offer high school juniors an opportunity to participate in a summer program of hands-on experiences in various engineering fields. For example, students may design and build a digital circuit, study solutions to an environmental issue, test the aerodynamics of a tennis racket or model rocket, fabricate advanced composite
the curriculum for theprograms to be truly successful.Over the past tens years, Rose-Hulman has made great strides in introducing entrepreneurship tothe student body. In addition to Engenius Solutions, Rose-Hulman has developed a Masters inEngineering Management, which offers classes to both graduate and undergraduate students inentrepreneurship and management, established Rose-Hulman Ventures, another LillyEndowment funded program, many departments have encouraged and supported student teams indeveloping entrepreneurial based proposals for external funding from organizations such asNCIIA. All of these programs provide entrepreneurship development opportunities for the Rose-Hulman student body.While the current programs and opportunities are
programs, nor are there studies showing any effect onincreased retention in engineering undergraduate programs for students who have participated inthese K-12 programs.Boettcher and colleagues [17] also reported increased comfort level and knowledge by teachersas a result of summer training programs. Hirsch and colleagues [19] developed and implementeda “Preparedness to Teach” survey for teachers, which was administered prior to the workshop, atthe end of the workshop, and one-year later. Results showed that teachers felt better prepared toteach specific concepts after the summer program, and teachers reported a greater comfort levelone year later after having integrated engineering concepts into their instruction
University. She is also been serving as department chair and associate director of Cal Poly's Center for Sustainability in Engineering. Her degrees are from Michigan Technological University (B.S. metallurgical engineeering, 1985) and Stanford University (Ph.D. materials science and engineering, 1991).Blair London, California Polytechnic State University BLAIR LONDON is a Professor in the Materials Engineering Department at Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo, CA. He earned a BS in Materials Engineering from Drexel University and MS & PhD degrees in Materials Science and Engineering from Stanford University. He currently teaches a variety of undergraduate engineering courses at Cal Poly