b e e n r e l e a s e d
thinking required forproblem-solving.[4] However, empathy can diffuse emotions.[5]Barrett-Lennard describes a cyclical process of how empathy unfolds or builds between twoindividuals, “A” and “B”, that consists of 5 steps and 3 phases.[6] Barret-Lennard’s empathy cycleis summarized in table 1. In the first step, A is actively attending to B’s expression of experience(and hoping/trusting A will be receptive). B’s experience becomes known to A in a second step. Step Description Phase 1 A attends to B’s expression Conditions for of experience empathic process 2 A reads or resonates to B such Phase 1: empathic resonation
AC 2012-5044: INJECTING THE REAL WORLD INTO THE CAPSTONEDESIGN EXPERIENCEMr. David B. Kanipe, Texas A&M University A native Texan, David Kanipe attended Texas A&M University beginning in Sept. 1966, where he re- ceived a bachelor’s of science degree in aerospace engineering in May 1970, followed by an M.S. in aerospace engineering in Aug. 1971. He accepted a position with NASA at the Manned Spacecraft Cen- ter in Houston in Nov. 1972. He served as the Chief of the Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Division in the Engineering Directorate at the Johnson Space Center until retirement in Dec. 2010. A month after his arrival at NASA, the last Apollo mission, Apollo 17, was launched. Obviously, that was exciting
the fatigue experiments are destructive since weneed to apply cyclic loading until the failure of the structure. Also, fatigue experiments may takea long time since, in some cases, we need to apply a very large number of cycles in order tocause a fracture in the specimen. Both of these issues (i.e., cost and time) are not an issue in VLssince a) it is free for students to run as many experiments as they desire and b) theaforementioned “fast-forwarding” button allows students to conduct all experiments within amatter of seconds. Thus, in the case of the fatigue lab, we can easily plot the S-N curve based onthe VL results, whereas doing so based on the hands-on experiments alone is difficult.6. Conclusions and Future WorkIn this project, we
Paper ID #33048Gaining Industry Experience Exposure During a PandemicDr. Wm. Michael Butler, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Wm. Michael Butler is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is a 23 year aerospace industry design professional with B.S. and M.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Virginia Tech and a PhD. in Engineering Education also from Virginia Tech. His engineering education research is focused on the use of design tools and live simulation in engineering design education as a means to better prepare students for industry. He is a
, and engaging her students with interactive methods.Mr. David B Kanipe, Texas A&M University After receiving a BS in Aerospace Engineering in May 1970, followed by a MS in Aerospace Engineering in August 1971 from Texas A&M University, Mr. Kanipe accepted a position with NASA at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston and began his professional career in November 1972. A month after his arrival at NASA, the last Apollo mission, Apollo 17, was launched. Obviously, that was exciting, but in terms of his career, the commencement of the Space Shuttle Program in November 1972 was to have far more impact. As a result, David was able to begin his career working on what he says was the most interesting and
Paper ID #17304Low Cost Satellite Attitude Hardware Test BedMr. Austin B. Probe, Texas A&M Aerospace Engineering Austin Probe is a third year Ph.D. student at the Land, Air, and Space Robotics Lab at Texas A&M University under the advisorship of Dr. John L. Junkins. He acts a senior member of the LASR Lab mentoring the newer graduate and undergraduate students and volunteers supporting a local high school robotics club. He obtained both his Bachelor’s and Master’s degree from Texas A&M in 2011 and 2013 respectively. His interests include robotics, autonomous systems, computational vision, space proximity
Paper ID #7250Lessons Learned by the Aerospace Engineering Department at Texas A&MUniversity Following Its First Summer Camp for High School StudentsMr. David B Kanipe, Texas A&M University A native Texan, David Kanipe was born in Corpus Christi and attended Texas A&M University beginning in September 1966. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in Aerospace Engineering in May 1970, followed by a Master of Science degree in Aerospace Engineering in August 1971. He suspended work on a Ph.D. to accept a position with NASA at the what was then called the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston in November 1972. After
Engineering department with my bachelor’s of science and will be continuing his education with a master’s of science in finance.Mr. David B. Kanipe, Texas A&M University After receiving a BS in Aerospace Engineering in May 1970, followed by a MS in Aerospace Engineering in August 1971 from Texas A&M University, Mr. Kanipe accepted a position with NASA at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston and began his professional career in November 1972. A month after his arrival at NASA, the last Apollo mission, Apollo 17, was launched. Obviously, that was exciting, but in terms of his career, the commencement of the Space Shuttle Program in November 1972 was to have far more impact. As a result, David was able to begin
member to receive the national Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education and the recipient of the National Society of Professional Engineers’ Educational Excellence Award and the ASEE Chester Carlson Award. He is a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and the National Society of Professional Engineers.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all
the General Chair, Session Chair, TPC Chair, and Panelist in several IEEE conferences. He has served in numerous review panels. He is Senior Member of IEEE and member of OSA, SPIE, ASEE, and HKN. He is also a Profes- sional Registered Engineer in the state of Texas. He received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering in 1984 from University of Oklahoma.Dr. Thomas B. Morrow, University of Texas, San Antonio Thomas Morrow is an Adjunct Professor in the College of Engineering at UTSA. He has B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from Stanford University. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia and Texas and has worked for E.I. duPont de Nemours (Textile Fibers Dept.) and Southwest
. Sven Schmitz joined the faculty of Aerospace Engineering at Penn State University in 2010. He received a diploma degree in Aerospace Engineering from RWTH Aachen in Germany in 2002 and a Ph.D. in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from the University of California Davis in 2006. Sven spent four years as a post-doctoral researcher and project scientist at Davis before coming to Penn State. He is an expert in rotary wing aerodynamics with an emphasis on vortical flows. His research program embraces the areas of wind turbine aerodynamics and rotorcraft aeromechanics. Current activities include wind farm wake modeling, icing on wind turbines, rotor hub flows, and rotor active control.Irene B Mena, Pennsylvania State
AC 2008-1849: DREAMS TO REALITY: BRINGING "FAR-OUT" BACK INTOAEROSPACE EDUCATIONNarayanan Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology Page 13.452.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Dreams to Reality: Bringing “Far out” Back Home to Aerospace Education Through Concept DevelopmentAbstractDespite the harsh realities of the professional workplace, aerospace engineering still lights up theeyes of many. This paper argues that there is a special place for high-risk, ambitious conceptarchitecture and design in the aerospace curriculum. This is essential because of the specialcharacteristics and aptitudes of
has over 14 years of experience in applied research and teaching. Dr. Traub is the author of over 45 reviewed journal articles and 10 conference papers. Page 13.693.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 IMPACT OF RAPID PROTOTYPING FACILITIES ON ENGINEERING STUDENT OUTCOMESAbstractEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU) has formed a reputation for providingundergraduate students with a curriculum which has a strong emphasis on hands-on, applicationbased learning. In an effort to improve this learning environment, the campus has recently addeda Rapid Prototyping Laboratory which
AC 2008-122: EDUCATIONAL USES OF AIRPLANE ACCIDENT REPORTSGeorge Bibel, University of North Dakota Dr.Bibel is a professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of North Dakota in Grand Forks. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 1975 from Case Western Reserve University and his M. S. in Engineering Mechanics from the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University. Dr. Bibel, a former NASA Summer Faculty member and NASA researcher, joined the UND faculty in 1993 where he developed new courses on engineering disasters
Paper ID #33897The Impact of Doubling Department Course Offerings on Faculty Load andStudent SuccessDr. Kathryn Anne Wingate, University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Kathryn Wingate is an instructor at University of Colorado Boulder, where she teaches design and mechanics courses. She holds her PhD in mechanical engineering, and worked at NGAS as a materials scientist.Alexis Wall, University of Colorado Boulder Alexis Wall received her BS in Aerospace Engineering in 2020 from CU and is now a graduate student in the Ann and H.J. Smead Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences at CU Boulder. She has worked at CU’s Laboratory
AC 2008-1297: A “BALLOON SATELLITES” PROJECT COURSEJohn Kuhlman, West Virginia University John Kuhlman is a Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at West Virginia University. He received his Ph.D. degree from Case Western Reserve University in 1975, and his M.S. and B. S. Mechanical Engineering degrees also from CWRU in 1973 and 1970, respectively. His current research interests include spray cooling, reduced gravity fluid mechanics and heat transfer, and applied CFD. He is a course co-instructor for the WVU Balloon Satellites project course project course, and also serves as a course instructor for the WVU Microgravity Research Team project course.G. Michael Palmer, West
×n , B ∈ n ×m 6. Aircraft Standard and Non-Standard Dynamic Modes Using all of the topics contained in videos 1 -6 described above, show the qualitative characteristics of the standard dynamical modes of motion. For instance, the short period mode is the primary and most useful standard longitudinal dynamic mode. It is: Second-order Stable, or unstable High frequency, well damped when stable Exhibited mostly in angle-of-attack and body-axis pitch rate Specified in military flying qualities regulations Pitch maneuverability is based upon controlling and shaping this mode. A time history of this mode is
S y B a l l i s t
typical of aerospace use. Students are often surprised by the significant strength difference between these alloys and this experiment helps reinforce the importance of material selection. (a) dimensions (b) prior to instrumentation (c) following instrumentation Figure 2: Dimensions of stress concentration specimens used to evaluate the stress distribution near a concentration. Specimen is ¼ inch thick.Part 2: Stress Concentrations under Quasistatic LoadingThe second part of the experiment investigates stress concentration factors under quasistaticloading. • A large specimen containing a circular hole (Figure 2) is loaded in axial tension. Loads are kept low enough so that yielding does
feedback mechanisms. (5) Allow the process to evolve (curriculum and/or ABET Criteria change). (6) Provide clear instructions to faculty members using the system.Objectives (1) Identify, efficiently collect, and analyze data that allows us to clearly assess the degree to which students attain each ABET Student Outcome (SO). (B) Collect and analyze data that allow us to determine that Student Outcomes (SOs) associated with courses are being targeted by assignments in those courses, (C) Use information from both (A) and (B) above to improve the curriculum, (D) Standardize the data analysis and feedback processes. (E) Allow the system to evolve in order to make it more efficient, simpler, more
administration of the persistence in engineering survey. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 371-395. 7. Lichtenstein, G., Loshbaugh, H. G., Claar, B., Chen, H. L., Jackson, K., & Sheppard, S. D. (2009). An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision making among undergraduate engineering majors. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 227-234. 8. Committee on the National Aerospace Initiative, Air Force Science and Technology Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. (2004). Evaluation of the National Aerospace Initiative. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 9. Weigel, A. (2010). “Survey of aerospace student attitudes.” Retrieved February 20, 2011
/. [Accessed 2020].[6] Facultad de Ingenieria de la Universidad Nacional de Asunción, FIUNA, "Estudiantes y docentes de la FIUNA realizan «Taller de Diseño de Pequeños Satélites CANSAT» a Docentes en marco del Proyecto JEKUPYTY," 16 Dec 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.ing.una.py/?p=40844. [Accessed 2021].[7] Facultad de Ingenieria de la Universidad Nacional de Asunción, FIUNA, "Culminó con éxito el Taller de Diseño de Pequeños Satélites Educativos CANSAT," 28 Oct 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.ing.una.py/?p=39996. [Accessed 2021].[8] D. Ortiz, J. Moreira, L. Moreira, D. Stalder, B. Vega and J. Kurita, "CanSat Pico-satellite building workshop as an effective tool for STEAM education, a case study.," in ASEE: Proceedings
Paper ID #16431Creating and Validating a Model to Support Aerospace Engineering Stu-dents’ Coordination of Knowledge about a DesignMs. Elizabeth Scott Fleming, Georgia Institute of Technology Elizabeth ”Scottie-Beth” Fleming is an Aerospace Engineering PhD candidate and NSF GRFP Fellow in the Cognitive Engineering Center (CEC) at Georgia Tech. She graduated from Georgia Tech with a B.S. and M.S. in Aerospace Engineering. Her research within the CEC examines interdisciplinary teams within the engineering design process, training approaches for aircraft pilots, and human interaction with technology.Dr. Amy Pritchett, Georgia
one of the highest evaluated classes in the University ofColorado’s School of Engineering. Students clearly enjoy the class, the process of learning todesign a spacecraft, and the feeling of accomplishment – despite the significant workload -- bycompleting the class. For some students the work in this class has been discussed at jobinterviews and has become the basis for a job offer. Two aspects of the class receive criticismeach year: a) the in-class presentations and b) the book. A small percentage of the class,particularly those who do a good job with public speaking, view the in-class presentations as awaste of time. Most students, however, show marked improvement in speaking capability bygoing through this process.Classroom Management
methodology in Appendix A yields the analytical tool shown inAppendix B allowing students to make design decisions there are many other things that can bedone to optimize one’s glider. Some good advice comes from the article “Design of Balsa WoodGliders: A lesson in the engineering process”3 and helps students understand and make the mostof the project they are required to complete. For example the article discusses qualitativeconstruction techniques as well as testing methods and modifications that can be made once theaircraft is flown. Additionally, because the gliders are launched by hand there is something to besaid for proper throwing technique. The gliders are designed to fly at speeds ranging fromapproximately 15-20 fps. Thus, if students find
defined course outcomes or objectives. While these need to betraced back to program outcomes, you must remember that ABET is about more than simplyshowing course outcomes are being met. You must complete the loop from measuring coursedetails to program outcomes.Developing OutcomesABET has listed specific outcomes for each of the areas for applied science, computing,engineering, and technology. For engineering programs, these are referred to as criteria a-k andare listed as follows:2 (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs
somewhat subjective. Designs are scored on technical merit(need identification, concepts of operations, requirements, constraints, design alternatives, designanalyses, alternative selection criteria, final design viability, and design presentation) and teamperformance. This decides the total number of points available for the team. Individuals withinthe team are allocated points from within the total number of points based on instructorobservations, TA observations, and peer evaluations. It is not at all uncommon for some teammembers to get high grades (A or A-) while others get grades at the B or C level. Once, therewere four (A to A-) level grades and one F grade for a team of five students.Interim Individual Progress Reports -- In spring 2012
this regard. a. Boeing should sponsor an Industry-Academia Summit which will help define the role that Boeing can play in K-12. b. Teaching modules, based on Boeing case studies, can be developed for teachers. c. Boeing is perceived as a leader in Lean and 10x methodologies. It has developed several training modules in this area. Some of these could be easily designed as modules for use in schools. d. A web portal could be devised as a clearinghouse for disseminating the best practices in STEM education. e. Boeing should develop a Signature Design or Science talent competition. This would help define the Boeing brand at an early stage in a budding young engineer
the game would benefit from collaborationwith educators who can provide insights to a young student’s mind. Moving forward, the authors areworking with more teachers, especially those who do not have a background in aerospace, to obtainfeedback. Hopefully, approvals will be granted soon to allow students playing the game to be surveyed toobtain a richer set of feedback.AcknowledgementsSupport for this project was graciously provided by NSF project REvolutionizing Diversity OfEngineering (REDO-E) (project 1730693).References[1] Data USA: Aerospace Engineers. 2018.[2] Elam, M. E., Donham, B. L., & Soloman, S. R. (2012). An engineering summer program forunderrepresented students from rural school districts. Journal of STEM Education