- copycats[5] Rogers v. Koons, 960 F. 2d 301 - Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1992, Available: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9102865469766650757&q=rogers+v+koons &hl=en&as_sdt=6,26[6] R. Metz, “AI Won an Art Contest, and Artists are Furious,” CNN Business, September 3, 2022 [online]. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/03/tech/ai-art-fair-winner- controversy/index.html[7] C. Valance, “Art is Dead Dude: The Rise of AI Artists Stirs Debate,” BBC News, September 13, 2022 [online]. Available: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-62788725[8] U.S. Copyright Office, Circular 14, Copyright in Derivative Works and Compilations, July 2020 [online]. Available: https://copyright.gov
Accreditation:2020 Edition.” pp. 1-15.[10] Castro-Cedeno, M., and Mazumder, Q. (2010). “Motivation And Maturity Of EngineeringAnd Engineering Technology Students With And Without Coop Experience.” Paper presented at2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. 10.18260/1-2--15686[11] Mosier, R., Yates, H. N., and Adhikari, S. (2021). “Student Internships During Times ofPandemic: A Historical View of Pandemics, Recession and Their Effect on Education.” Paperpresented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference.https://peer.asee.org/37745[12] Schon, D. A. (1987). “Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New DesignforTeaching and Learning in the Professions.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.[13] Wagner, M
,” • “Update assignments / Refresh Instructor,” and • “Trying to keep students engaged in the topics with hands-on class activities, videos, demonstrations, and projects.”When asked if there are any difficulties in finding material, the participants who indicated thatthey do not update the course said that the reasons are that this particular course in introductoryand the material does not change very often. Some examples of the responses were: • “Fundamental process of construction management does not change,” • “Generally, do not see a need to as I keep it very high level in the intro portions I teach and more discussion based with Q&A,” • “Basic introduction topics,” and • “The course is a standard for entrance
Assessment of Critical Properties in Existing Masonry Structures under Seismic Loads—The ARES Project,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 5, Art. no. 5, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10051576.[35] “TOWARDS AN EARTHQUAKE ARCHITECTURE.” https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:mVpIFh3OHJ8J:scholar.goo gle.com/+architecture+earthquake+structures&hl=es&as_sdt=0,5 (accessed Feb. 10, 2023).[36] A. Charleson and M. Taylor, “Earthquake architecture explorations,” in Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, CD ROM: The Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering, 2004, pp. 596–599. Accessed: Feb. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/12231/
Figure 12: Capstone final grading breakdown Breaking down student presentation grading, Fig. 13 provides data on an importance scale of whatmakes for a good presentation. Quality of organization and technical information are very important at85.7% and 78.6% of programs. The least very important ranking came from the ability of a student/team tosell their ideas while presenting. Q/A sessions of most presentations had the most balance between veryimportant and moderately important (43-50%). In Fig. 13a the data indicates that students should balancetheir presentations to encompass an array of objectives. Many times, industry and outsidementors/stakeholders are involved in capstones [10,15], particularly at presentation review stages. As