molds.6 Following the lecture on packaging and interconnections, thestudents sealed their microfluidic systems using adhesive tape after punching inlet/outlet holes inthe PDMS layer. Functional tests were performed first using a colored dye to ensure that thedevice was properly sealed before final tests were conducted using bovine whole blood(Hemostat Laboratories, Dixon, CA). In each case, the completed devices were loaded onto acustom lab centrifuge that was operated between 1,000-10,000 RPM. The result from testingone of the designs produced by the class is displayed in Figure 1, showing separation of RBCsfrom plasma. (a) PDMS (b) Blood sample
between the two paper styles. quite daunting and took a ton of effort outside of class. However, it was definitely a worthwhile experience - something I would for sure do again.”Literature cited1. Linda Dynan, T. C. The Impact of Writing Assignments on Student Learning: Should Writing Assignments Be Structured or Unstructured? Computers in Higher Education Economics Review 8, 64–86 (2009).2. Guilford, W. H. Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Adv.Physiol Educ. 25, 167–175 (2001).3. Guilford, W. H. Experimental case studies to engage higher cognitive skills. Advan. Physiol. Edu. 33, 358–359 (2009).4. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. & Krathwohl, D. R. A taxonomy of educational
to TTL levels for devicecontrol. For engineering programs that lack resources for extensive neural interface research,this game offer a less expensive, but no less educational, laboratory experience forundergraduates. The possibility for adaptation of these toys to control various devices for neuralinterface demonstrations is limited only by the imagination of an engineer.References (note to reviewers - references need formatted to ASEE standards)1 Reyes, Janet F. and Tosunoglu, Sabri, “An Overview of Brain-Computer Interface Technology Applications in Robotics” Florida Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics. May 2011.2 Velliste, Meel; Perel, Sagi; Spalding, M. Chance; Whitford, Andrew S.; Schwartz, Andrew B. “Cortical control of
. 1), as well as using a near-wall velocity gradient approximation.A sample velocity profile is given in Figure 1a.The second approach employed by students is an experimental one. Here, students are suppliedwith a variety of equipment, most of which they had used in a prior lab module, including aroller pump and pulse dampener (Cole-Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL), a rotary liquid flow sensor Page 23.1378.3(Cole-Parmer) and digital multimeter, a differential pressure transducer and strain gage meter(Omega Engineering, Inc., Stamford, CT), a catheter introducer sheath set (B. Braun MedicalInc., Bethlehem, PA), and a variety of tubing supply
4outcomes for their focus area (Appendix A-A). The aim was to motivate student teams to thinkabout design and proper execution of an experimental plan. Upon assigning students in teams,each team member was encouraged to contribute in identifying different experimentalparameters for their team project; a preliminary list of suggestions was provided by thelaboratory technician to help students narrow-down their options (Appendix A-B). Each studentwas asked to provide rationales for their ideas and to include logs of their thought progressionduring the semester using the e-portfolio, Innovation Portal13, an assessment rubric programdesigned to help students navigate through the engineering design process. This allowed us toidentify individual growth
., Sherwin, A., Langer, R. Progress in the Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Industry « Are we there yet? » Tissue Engineering Part B., 18(3), 155-166.4. NIH Database on Regenerative Medicine. http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/scireport/2006report.htm. Accessed November 28th, 2012.5. Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine (WFIRM). www.wfubmc.edu/WFIRM/. Accessed November 28th, 2012.6. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. www.cirm.ca.gov. Accessed November 28th, 2012.7. McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine. www.mirm.pitt.edu. Accessed November 28th, 2012.8. National Science Foundation (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators Report. Chapter 7 Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding. www.nsf.gov
dominatethe separation pattern, and hence alter the former separation of cells according to size.This effect can be observed in Fig. 4a where green bead settling velocity first equals, andthen surpasses turquois settling velocity. Fig. 4b depicts the change in settling pattern inthe intermediate regime. In this region the tiny and dense glass beads will settle thefastest and towards the bottom end of the elutriator, even below the largest beigeparticles. Note that the black and turquoise beads represent an azeotrope condition whereno separation between these two particles occurs. Page 23.1389.7 (a) (b)Figure 4
Paper ID #7190Work in Progress: Assessment of a Freshman Engineering Project on Con-trasting Automatic Blood Pressure Measurement ApproachesDr. Lunal Khuon, Villanova University Dr. Lunal Khuon is an assistant professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Villanova University. He received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. At present, Dr. Khuon’s professional interests are in developing new courses in biomedical engineering and conducting research and development of novel portable medi- cal electronic devices. Previous to Villanova
Paper ID #6879Work in Progress: An Engineering in Medicine Programme - Opening Engi-neering Students’ Mind Through a Living Laboratory EducationDr. Desmond Y.R. Chong, National University of Singapore Desmond Chong is currently a Lecturer in the Engineering Design and Innovation Centre (EDIC) and the Department of Bioengineering, National University of Singapore (NUS). He received his Bachelor of Engineering (Mechanical) and Master of Engineering (by research), both from the Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, and a PhD in Orthopaedic Biomechanics from Imperial College London, UK. Prior to joining NUS, he was
, andfinally post-processing results. The following laboratory-specific learning objectives weredefined for this lab: “At the end of this lab students should be able to:1. Organize a basic biotransport problem on paper and translate it to be solved in Comsol Multiphysics (CMP) a. Open CMP and select the correct application mode b. Create a geometry and apply boundary conditions and subdomain values c. Create a mesh that leads to a solution d. Solve the problem by selecting the correct solver e. Perform parametric studies2. Post process information from the CMP model using surface and integration techniques that include: a. mesh quality and surface plots (descretization error) b. concentration behavior with time and space
, S., Kuh, G. D. & Gayles, J. G. Engaging Undergraduate Students in Research Activities: Are Research Universities Doing a Better Job? Innovative Higher Education 32, 167-177, doi:10.1007/s10755-007-9043- y (2007).2 Kinkead, J. Learning Through Inquiry: An Overview of Undergraduate Research. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2003, 5-18, doi:10.1002/tl.85 (2003).3 University, B. C. o. E. U. i. t. R. Reinventing undergraduate education: a blueprint for America’s research Page 23.626.11 universities., (State University of New York, Stony Brook, 1998).4 Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L
, sinceprogramming would be the medium for solving the engineering design problem. The studentswere able to learn the big ideas for developing applications first, and then cover the small detailsto improve their work (reverse of traditional teaching). The synergy between the design projectand the technical learning was felt in other courses as well, e.g. image processing. Table 1 showsproject-related competencies which each team member enrolled in.Table 1. Project related competencies enrolled by each team member Student A Student B Student C Signal Processing Image Processing Signal Processing Image Processing Advanced Instrumentation Image
1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Post 1 Yr Post 1 Yr Post 1 Yr Post 1 Yr 1 (a) (b) (c) (d)Figure 1. Results from student surveys (Likert scale 0-4) comparing responses on post-courseand one year survey: (a) student level of knowledge regarding global health issues; (b) studentconfidence in their ability to develop solutions to global health issues; (c) student level of interest
. Major Topics: 1. Recognition of Need/Opportunity 2. Problem Formulation: Design Input a. Design in a Regulated Environment: Introduction to QSR and Design Controls b. Primary Biomedical Design Input: Biocompatibility 3. Solution Formulation: Creativity and Innovation 4. Feasibility Assessment 5. Project Management 6. Engineering Analysis and Decision Making 7. Detailed Design: Design Output 8. Construction: Prototyping 9. Testing: Verification and Validation 10. Evaluation No. BME 4800 Course Learning Outcome Corresponding BSBME Program Learning
. Consistent with the definition of Prevention through Design, theylearn to identify potential hazards and design to prevent the occurrences of accidents and injuriesfor the benefit of everyone involved. Factors affecting level of risk include: (a) likelihood of thedangerous event occurring, (b) severity of the potential impact on a person, (c) number of peoplewho might be impacted, and (d) extent to which the impacts are controllable.Two types of risk analysis are discussed in detail. The first examines risks of failure (a system orprocess or device failing to perform as intended)—important in design for reliability. MIL-STD-1629A Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) is used to assess reliability.8Students apply the FMECA method to
Paper ID #7465Work in progress: Using clinical advisory boards and an online system toprovide feedback for client-based senior design projectsDr. Richard L. Goldberg, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Richard Goldberg is a research associate professor and director of Undergraduate Studies in the Depart- ment of Biomedical Engineering. He teaches several instrumentation courses. He also teaches a senior design class in a collaborative effort at UNC and Duke University. His primary interest is in rehabilitation engineering and assistive technology for people with disabilities.Mr. Kevin Caves, Duke University
: An existing laboratory course was overhauled and refocused to boost student’sskills in design, crafting, self-efficacy, troubleshooting, and expertise in the field of MedicalElectronics. The strategy was to use problem oriented methodology in a collaborative setup.Results: The main learning objectives were fulfilled and students reported a high level ofsatisfaction with the content and the methodology of the course.IntroductionCollaboration in education is seen as joining intellectual efforts between groups of students orbetween students and instructors to achieve a common goal. Collaborative learning is the heart ofproblem-based learning, which emphasizes a more “natural learning” [2]. Cooperative learningrepresents an active field of
Paper ID #6242Works in Progress: Development of Integrated Computer Simulations andLaboratory Exercises for Teaching Human PhysiologyDr. Bradley P. Sutton, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Sutton joined the Bioengineering Department at the University of Illinois in 2006 and is currently an associate professor. He received his B.S. in General Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He earned master’s degrees in Biomedical and Electrical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Michigan in 2003. He has affiliations with the Beckman Institute, Electrical and
, and cultural and language study were identified and sharedwith all partner institutions. Curriculum options consistent with degree requirements of therespective home institutions were then reviewed for potential transfer credit. These details, aswell as contact information for two liaisons (a staff person in the respective international officeand a faculty member in biomedical engineering), are posted on a common website2 with links toeach of the consortium institutions.Student recruitment: NARETI program information is disseminated to potential engineeringstudent participants through the aforementioned website and promotional literature distributed byinternational office staff and engineering faculty. Information venues include: study