. Aidoo, “Introducing Sustainable Design Principles in Freshman CivilEngineering Design,” in ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, June 23 – 26, 2013.[6] E.R. Brown, D. B. Thomas, J. L. Smith and A. B. Dieckman, “Closing the communal gap:The importance of communal affordances in science career motivation,” Journal of AppliedSocial Psychology, Vol 45, Issue 12, December 2015, pp 662-673.[7] K.L. Boucher, M.A. Fuesting, A. B. Diekman and M.C. Murphy, “Can I work with and helpothers in this field? How communal goals influence interest and participation in STEM fields,”Frontier in Psychology, Vol 8, Issue May, Article 901, May 2017.[8] M. D. Blevins and SJ. Burian, “Analysis of the sustainability culture in civil andenvironmental engineering and
, accessed at: http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2009-10%20EAC%20Criteria%2012-01-08.pdfon January 18, 2010.3. “Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century” (2008) 2nd edition,American Society of Civil Engineers, accessed at:http://www.asce.org/files/pdf/professional/BOK2E_%28ASCE_2008%29_ebook.pdf?CFID=203847703&CFTOKEN=ef7d085f1c50253b-438B5C53-BAE8-0642-C7F998821FECEF72&jsessionid=cc301928921263853591636 on January 18, 2010.4. Bloom, B. S.(1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The CognitiveDomain. David McKay Co., Inc., New York.5. Likert, R.(1932). "A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes". Archives ofPsychology 140: 1–55.6. McGonagall, W. “The Tay Bridge Disaster
Paper ID #18570Assessing Sustainability in Design in an Infrastructure Course through Project-Based LearningCapt. Jeremiah Matthew Stache P.E., U.S. Military Academy Captain Jeremiah Stache is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from the U.S. Military Academy, West Point; M.S. from both the University of Tennessee, Knoxville and Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla; and is currently a Ph.D. student at Mississippi State University, Starkville. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the states of
AC 2012-3779: NATIONAL TRENDS IN THE CIVIL ENGINEERING MA-JOR DESIGN EXPERIENCEDr. Tonya Lynn Nilsson P.E., Santa Clara University Tonya Nilsson is a full-time lecturer in the Department of Civil Engineering at Santa Clara University. Previously, she was on the faculty at California State University, Chico where she was a tenured Associate Professor. Nilsson has a strong interest in engineering education and worked for seven years with ASCE’s ExCEED Teaching Workshops and served for four years on the national ASCE Committee on Faculty Development. She is also a member of SCU School of Engineering’s NSF ”Engage” team.Dr. Kevin D. Hall, University of ArkansasDr. Ronald W. Welch, University of Texas, Tyler Ron Welch
detailed itinerary helpedthe students to understand program expectations and budget their time while abroad.7. Pre- Program Activities – Preparing the StudentsPrior to the departure, the students attended orientation meetings to prepare them for the programand for travel abroad. These meetings were especially important for students who had nottraveled abroad before. Topics covered included: a) Passport and visa requirements b) Registering for international travel at the university c) Emergency contact information d) Cultural differences and expectations for behavior in each country e) Suggestions for packing f) Student stipends g) Pre-program surveys of expectations h) Itinerary while in the host countries8
, 1889.[4] B. A. Aldrich, K. H. Rosenfield and M. A. Walton, "Countering Threats to Licensure with ASCE’s Engineer Tomorrow Initiative," in ASEE's Virtual Conference, Virtual Conference, 2020.[5] C. N. Musselman, J. D. Nelson and M. L. Phillips, "Engineering Licensure Laws and Rules, Today and Tomorrow," in ASEE Conferene and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011.[6] National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors, "About NCEES," NCEES, n.d.. [Online]. Available: https://ncees.org/about/. [Accessed 13 February 2021].[7] National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying, "Model Law," NCEES, Clemson, South Carolina, 2018.[8] National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors, "NCEES Engineering
Class – COVID-19Edition Part 2: Planning for a Fall Like No Other”. Tyton Partners. October 2020. Available at:https://tytonpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/10.05.2020.Time-for-Class-COVID-19-Part-2-Planning-for-Fall-Like-No-Other-V2.pdf Accessed 3/5/21.[7]. Horspool, A., and Lange, C. “Applying the scholarship of teaching and learning: Studentperceptions, behaviours and success online and face-to-face”. Assessment and Evaluation inHigher Education, 37(1), 73–88. 2012.[8]. Platt, C.A., Amber, M.W., and Yu, N. “Virtually the Same?: Student Perceptions of theEquivalence of Online Classes to Face-to-Face Classes”. MERLOT Journal of Online Learningand Teaching, 10(3). 2014.[9]. Landrum, B., Bannister, J., Garza, G., and Rhame, S. “A class of
not yet been tested at the college-level. We arelooking for partners to pilot its use in a college-level introduction to civil engineering class. Wewill also be seeking funding to conduct testing to assess its impact on motivating students topersist in engineering.References[1] B. Yoder, “Engineering by the Numbers,” ASEE, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.asee.org/documents/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/2017- Engineering-by-Numbers-Engineering-Statistics.pdf. [Accessed January 13, 2019].[2] United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Employment outlook for engineering occupations to 2024,” TED: The Economics Daily, October 6, 2016. [Online]. Available https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2016
with the participants conducted after the initial goal settingactivities. The questions and responses extracted from the course documents, i.e. thestudents’ reflections, included: 1. Identification of Goals a. Goal or Objective b. Why is this goal or objective relevant to you, as a practicing engineer? c. How will you determine if you have met this goal? 2. Your Previous Work or Job Experiences a. What was your work experience? I.e. What happened? and What were you trying to achieve? b. What did you do well? And what would you like to change? c. What did you learn from that experience? How will it change your actions for the next
taken by our department, therefore, is to enhance the breadth anddepth of knowledge within the collective faculty in both theoretical and practice areas byincorporating adjunct faculty having extensive knowledge and experience in contemporaryprofessional practice including project selection, design, construction, and commissioning, aswell as in related areas of teaming and communications.Adjunct Faculty CharterWith the above goals and benefits in mind, The University of Wisconsin-Madison Department ofCivil and Environmental Engineering has developed a charter to help define the purpose ofadjunct faculty and their integration to department functions. A copy of the charter is outlined inAppendix B. The charter was formally adopted by the
AC 2011-293: AN INTRODUCTION TO INFRASTRUCTURE FOR ALLDISCIPLINESSteven D Hart, U.S. Military Academy Steven D. Hart is a Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army Corps of Engineers with over 22 years of service in both command and staff positions in Iraq, Kuwait, Panama, Germany, Korea, and the United States. He is currently assigned as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at West Point where he is currently teach courses on Infrastructure Engineering and Critical Infrastructure Protection.J. Ledlie Klosky, U.S. Military Academy, West Point J. Ledlie Klosky, P.E., is an associate professor of civil engineering in the Department of Civil and Me- chanical Engineering at
for this opportunity, please e-mail Philip by 4/01/09 with the following information: a. names of team members (with “lead” team member identified) b. team member proposed duties and payment distribution c. project time line (with “mid-term” meeting date identified)6. In addition to the emphasis-specific modules, an additional “Core Topics” module needs to be developed. Core topics include: a. Introduction of ASCE Report Card (0.5 lesson) b. ASCE Code of ethics (0.5 lesson) c. Licensure (0.5 lesson) d. Sustainability (0.5 lesson) e. Public financing (1 lesson) f. Planning (1 lesson) g. Teamwork (0.5 lesson) If you are interested in helping develop this module, please
2: Draw Whitney stress of concrete compression in Fig. (d). What is the Whitney stress distribution depth, a, andwhat is the assumed uniform stress value? (20 points).Question 3: Determine the strain and stress of the bottom reinforcement steel in tension when the beam starts failure. Andindicate the stain in Fig (b) (20 points).Question 4: Determine the total compression force of concrete Cc (20 points)Question 5: Determine the total tension force Ts in the bottom reinforcement steel (20 points)Question 6: What this failure model of this concrete member, i.e. tension-controlled failure or compression-controlled failure(20 bonus points) Fig. 2 (a) Quiz 1- Singly-reinforced beam sectionProblem : For a doubly
further created a growing concern regarding the ability ofAmerica to remain competitive. With improved telecommunications and digitization, moreengineering can be done without close proximity3. However, off-shoring is likely to have littleimpact on the most highly educated engineers. Thus, engineering education is evolving, withmore emphasis on graduate education, as outlined in a recently released series of reports by theNational Academy of Engineering4, 5. Educators recognize that undergraduate researchmotivates students to apply for graduate school.The Boyer’s Commission6 asserted that research universities often miss opportunities to enrichand strengthen undergraduate education by providing exposure to faculty research and theresearch process
development outside the classroom,incorporate contemporary issues during problem solving, and determine the impact of engineering solutionsin a global and societal context.9. Can explain professional practice issues, leadership principles and attitudes, management concepts andprocesses, and concepts of business, public policy, and public administration. Table 2 ABET Criterion 3 (a-k)Demonstration (incl. Process & Measurements) that Graduates have:(a) ability to apply knowledge of math, engineering, and science(b) ability to design and conduct experiments(b) ability to analyze and interpret data(c) ability to design system, component or process to meet needs within realistic constraints such asregulatory
Outcome Outcome (a) absent transfer (b) vertical transfer (c) concurrent transferFigure 1. Average performance scores for each outcome (2.0 = meets expectations) on early andlater reports for (a) absent, (b) vertical, and (c) concurrent transfer students.Table 3. Student writing performance expressed as does not meet (DNM), meets, and exceedsexpectations (difference from “meets expectations” score of 2.0) Outcome Transfer
tasks. Paper presented at 16th JISR-IIASA Workshop on Methodologies and Tools for Complex System Modeling and Integrated Policy Assessment, July 15–17, Laxenburg, Austria.23. Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M. and J. McGourty, 2005, “The ABET Professionals Skills – Can they be taught? Can they be assessed?” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 41-56.24. Staub-French, S., Fischer, M., Kunz, J. and Paulson, B., 2003, “An Ontology for Relating Features with Activities to Calculate Costs.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 17(4), 243-254.25. Wankat, P. C., R. M. Felder, K. A. Smith and F. S. Oreowicz, 2002, “The Engineering Approach to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,” pp. 217-237 in
Paper ID #19429Enhancing Student Meaning-Making of Threshold Concepts via Computa-tion: The Case of Mohr’s CircleMr. Hayden William Fennell, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Hayden Fennell is a Ph.D. student in the department of Computer and Information Technology at Pur- due University. He holds an M.S.E. degree in Materials Science and Engineering from Johns Hopkins University and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of South Carolina.Prof. Genisson Silva Coutinho, Instituto Federal de Educac¸a˜ o, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia da Bahia Genisson Silva Coutinho is a Ph.D. student at the School of Engineering
include these skills into engineering solutions throughout theircourse. This method of using assignments throughout the curriculum allowed faculty tounderstand how students were building their competence throughout their collegiate careers toobtain the final desired level of performance 12.B. Depth of CE ProgramsThere is also motivation to ensure students are obtaining more depth on key topics, particularly Page 25.1217.4engineering design. One university implemented a converging–diverging model of design for asophomore –level course on engineering design and technical writing. This course initially useda semester long design project, but
, Vol. 96, No. 4, 2007, pp. 283-289.4 Cruz., E. “Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. In B. Hoffman (Ed.), Educational Technology. Retrieved February 9, 2008,from http.//coe.sdsu.edu/eet/Articles/bloomrev/start.htm5 Kilgore, Deborah, Atman, Cynthia, Yasuhara, Ken, Barker, Theresa, Morozov, Andrew“Considering Context: A Study of First-Year Engineering Students” Journal of Engineering Education,Vol. 96, No. 4, Oct 2007 321-332.6 Petroski, H., “Speaking Up For Engineers,” PRISM, Summer, 2006, p. 26.7 ASCE, American Society of Civil Engineers, http://www.asce.org8 Moskal, B., Skokan, C., Kosbar, L., Dean, A., Westland, C., Barker, H., Nguyen, Q., and Tafoya, J.,“K-12 Outreach: Identifying the Broader Impacts of Four Outreach Projects,” The
functionality and are resilient to withstand most disasters and severe weather events. B: Good, Adequate For Now The infrastructure in the system or network is in good to excellent condition; some elements show signs of general deterioration that require attention. A few elements exhibit significant deficiencies. Overall, the infrastructure is safe and reliable, with minimal capacity issues and minimal risk. C: Mediocre, Requires Attention The infrastructure in the system or network is in fair to good condition; it shows general signs of deterioration and requires attention. Some elements exhibit significant deficiencies in conditions and functionality, with increasing vulnerability to risk
as type of engineeringcourse will determine if the amount and type of engineering exposure then and/or the exposurewith Architectural (Humanities Habitat) and Sustainable Living (now Year B) has had thedesired effect. The architects offer a Kid in Architecture day that is only open up to ALERTstudents and occurs on a Saturday. Here is an example of verbiage that supports high school leadSTEM activities: “The DISCOVERY Program at Spring Valley High School is a four-year Honors/AP program designed for students with motivation, interest, aptitude and commitment to academic excellence. Student participants investigate both theory and application over a broad range of academics and engage in, under the guidance
identifying the major challenges in distance learning during the rapidonline transition. Table 3 lists the survey results of Question #3. All 57 students answeredQuestion #3, and some students selected more than one choice. The total number of replies was73 for this question. Table 3: Choices and Results of Question #3 on Survey No.1 Choices # of % of the % of the Top 2 Replies Total #of Total # of Picks Students Replies A) Hardware issues: such as 21 36.8% 28.8% Yes computer, printer, and etc. B) Internet issues
AC 2012-3661: PREPARING STUDENTS FOR WRITING IN CIVIL EN-GINEERING PRACTICEProf. Susan Conrad, Portland State University Susan Conrad is a professor of applied linguistics at Portland State University, where she teaches discourse analysis courses and collaborates with civil engineering faculty and local practitioners to study writing in civil engineering.Mr. Timothy James Pfeiffer P.E., Foundation Engineering, Inc.Mr. Tom Szymoniak, Portland State University Tom Szymoniak is a Civil Engineer with 28 years of professional experience. He is currently a full-time instructor at Portland State University in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. His main area of focus is teaching the underclass students
engineering from The Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Solnosky is also a licensed Professional Engineer in PA. Ryan’s research interests include: integrated structural design methodolo- gies and processes; Innovative methods for enhancing engineering education; and high performing wall enclosures. These three areas look towards the next generation of building engineering, including how systems are selected, configured and designed.Dr. Nathan C. Brown, Pennsylvania State UniversityProf. Rebecca Napolitano, Pennsylvania State University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Teaching structures in an (almost) empty room: an assessment of strategies
results. Focus Group Questions 1. What did you like about the program that you just completed? 2. What concerns do you have about the program just ended? 3. List the top three things that you learned (within and outside of your discipline) during this program. 4.a. How many of you are motivated to go to graduate school now? – did the NSF REU influence your motivation? 4.b. How many of you intended to go to graduate school at the beginning of the summer? 5. How do you think that your communication skills improved as a result of this program? [Probing questions – Verbal? Written? Facebook? YouTube? Other?] 6. In what ways, if any, did you find the field trips informative? 7. How satisfied were you with your living environment at this university
example ofthe difficulty is that students may properly assess a situation based on proper ethicalreasoning, but there is no assurance that they will actually act ethically. Some defineprofessional skills as how we perform in professional settings, but how do educatorsdevelop and assess such skills? Does the educator possess professional experience and aprofessional engineer (PE) license? Even a PE needs a methodology understood by all tocontinually and properly assess professional practice skills. Table 2 ABET Criterion 3 (a-k)Demonstration (incl. Process & Measurements) that Graduates have:(a) ability to apply knowledge of math, engineering, and science(b) ability to design and conduct experiments(b
+ = 2.33, B- = 2.67, B = 3.00, B+ = 3.33, A- = 3.67, A = 4.00, A+ =4.33. The incoming cumulative grade point average is compared to the final grade earned in theclass by the students in each of the two groups. This provides rudimentary analysis of whethergrades are an indicator of poor performance due to the conduct of the class.To examine the students’ experience in the class, and how it relates specifically to the ExCEEdModel, we look to the course end surveys as another method of comparison between the twogroups of students. The standard questions used in the survey are listed in Table 1. The UnitedStates Military Academy (USMA) course-end feedback system is a series of questions, mainlymaking use of a Likert scale, with some short answer
engineering(CEE) works is important to many civil and environmental engineers. Geotechnical and geo-environmental engineers in particular must be able to understand and apply various aspects of thegeological sciences in their practice, but many other types of engineers also need to be confidentin understanding and applying findings of geologists with respect to their projects. This includesmanaging civil or environmental aspects of foundation systems, tunneling, mining, constructionmaterials, excavation, ground water, contaminant transport, seismicity, and mass movement,among many other applications.Because of the importance of geological science to civil and environmental engineers, it is notunusual for some engineering programs to require a course
to change the deflection of the beam.Six weights were also provided with each beam kit. These weights each weighed approximately80 g and were used to induce local transverse loads on the beam.Calculation SpreadsheetOnce a beam is chosen and constructed using the bending beam kit described previously,descriptions of its components are entered into a calculation spreadsheet which calculates and plotsthe deflection, slope, bending moment, shear, and applied load curves for the given configurationand loading case.The descriptions of the components are entered using tabular inputs wherein the followinginformation can be entered: - The stiffness of the beam (A, B, or C) - The support locations along the base channel (one end is specified