activities, such as accessing the online module files. The frequency of students’ accessing of the files was tracked and analyzed. We were particularly interested whether the use of modules is more or less favored but “A”, “B” or “C” students.Results The results presented in this paper are categorized by the above information sources. User-interface analysis and usability testing. Page 23.415.12 In tune with the Learning Object Review Instrument (LORI), the six participants created reviewson eight broadly interpreted dimensions of quality. The themes on each dimension and students’supportive
variables, self-efficacy and respectivelyperformance outcome.Notes: Significance of Standardized Path Coefficients * p < .05; ** p < .01; 1 Squared Multiple Correlations (explained variance); Figure 3. Path Coefficients for the proposed model of GIS LaboratoryGoodness-of-Fit MeasuresAll major goodness-of-fit statistics recommended in the literature (35, 36) indicated a good fitfor the proposed models, as follows: a) Goodness-of-fit index, GFI = .99, and adjusted-goodness-of-fit, AGFI = .95, are equal or higher than .95, b) Comparative fit index, CFI = .99, higher than .95, the recommended value, and c) Root mean square error of approximation, RMSEA = .02, smaller than .06, a value
Principles to Middle and High School Students Through the Design, Construction, and Deployment of water quality sensors,” Advances in Engineering Education, Summer 2012, pp. 1-34.9. Glasgow, H., Burkholder, J., Reed, R., Lewitus, A., and Kleinman, J., 2004. “Real-time remote monitoring of water quality: a review of current applications, and advancements in sensor, telemetry, and computing technologies,” Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, Vol. 300, No. 1-2 (Mar 2004): 409-448.10. Toran, F., Ramirez, D., Navarro, A., Casans, S., Pelegri, J., et al., 2001. “Design of a virtual instrument for water quality monitoring across the Internet,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Vol. 76, No. 1-3 (Jun 1, 2001
Paper ID #6691Bringing Creativity into the Lab EnvironmentDr. Clifton B. Farnsworth, Brigham Young University Dr. Clifton Farnsworth received his B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineering from Brigham Young University and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Utah. He worked as a geotechnical engineer for eight years with the Utah Department of Transportation, spent three years as an assistant professor of civil engineering at the University of Texas, Tyler, and has a current appointment as an assistant professor of construction management at Brigham Young University.Dr. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Dr. Ron
Technology at the Rochester Institute of Technology.Prof. Scott B. Wolcott P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology Page 23.977.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Preparedness of Civil Engineering Technology Graduates for Design CareersAbstractOver the last decade there has been growing debate about whether baccalaureate programs incivil engineering technology, accredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology’s (ABET) Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission (ETAC), aregraduating students who are prepared for civil
2.08 75.65 85.23 72.32 1.79 68.63 86.10 82.25 SD 11.06 4.80 14.95 16.30 25.59 5.24 14.44 10.49 15.28Note. (a) Pre-quiz is the pre-test at the beginning of the semester, and FinPre is part of the final examthat matches the prequiz; (b) PreT1 is part of the prequiz that corresponds to the end of Module 1 test,T1Pre is part of the end of Module 1 test that corresponds to the prequiz, T1Fin is part of end of Module1 test that corresponds to the final exam, and FinT1 is part of the final exam that corresponds to end ofModule 1 test; (c) PreT2 is part of the prequiz that corresponds to the end of Module 2 test, T2Pre is partof the end of Module 2 test that corresponds to the prequiz
engineeringstudents based on fundamental-principles. Advances in Engineering Education. 3 [1], p 9-44. Page 23.281.11[5] Bransford JD, Schwartz DL. Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications. Rev Res Educ.1999; 24:61–100.[6] Barry, B. E., Brophy, S. P., Oakes, W. C., Banks, K. M., & Sharvelle, S. E. (2008). Developing professionalcompetencies through challenge to project experiences. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(6),1148-1162[7] Schwartz, D. L., Brophy, S., Lin, X., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Software for managing complex learning:Examples from an educational psychology course. Educational
Paper ID #7406A Structural Engineering Master’s Program – the Trials and TribulationsDr. Cole C McDaniel, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Cole McDaniel is an associate professor in the Architectural Engineering Department at the California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.Dr. Allen C Estes, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Allen C. Estes is a professor in and head of the Architectural Engineering Department at Califor- nia Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. Until January 2007, Dr. Estes was the director of the Civil Engineering Program at the United States Military Academy
were designed to assess student learning andthe effectiveness of the new course design. In order to evaluate the student background inLLL (step 1), a survey was administered at the beginning of the semester. A copy of thesurvey is presented in Table 1. Page 23.223.4Table 1. Survey questions used to evaluate the student background and understanding of Life-long learning. Q-1 From the following four options, select the one that describe your personal knowledge of the concept of “Life-long learning”? A. Extensive B. Moderate C. Limited D.No idea Q-2
theory and/or analytical techniques that demonstrate a mastery of engineering science and/or design principles from one or more supporting engineering courses. B Complete all project deliverables and objectives. Effectively communicate (via written, oral, engineering drawings, etc.) project deliverables to your project manager and/or external sponsor. Exhibit strong team and individual performance in terms of project deliverables and objectives as well as laboratory safety, team skills, record keeping, punctuality, etc. Do all of the work you are asked to do. Develop solutions by applying theory and/or analytical techniques. Complete all project deliverables and
Paper ID #7248A Documentary Project in a Civil Engineering CourseDr. Seamus F Freyne P.E., Mississippi State University On the civil engineering faculty at Mississippi State University, Dr. Seamus Freyne teaches structures courses and his research interests include engineering education. Page 23.40.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A DOCUMENTARY PROJECT IN A CIVIL ENGINEERING COURSEOverviewAn innovative documentary project in an
Paper ID #6050The Goethals Infrastructure Challenge: A Proposal for a New Student Com-petitionLt. Col. Steven D Hart, U.S. Military Academy LTC Steve Hart is currently assigned as the ERDC Engineering Fellow and Director of Infrastructure Studies at West Point. He has taught numerous civil engineering courses including innovative courses on Infrastructure Engineering and Critical Infrastructure Protection and has authored numerous articles and a book chapter on these subjects. He is the developer and lead proponent of The Critical Infrastructure Symposium, now in its third year. He is active in The Infrastructure Security
the development of both practice-based experience and critical thinking.In order to prepare undergraduate engineering students for the ill-defined, unfamiliar types ofproblems they will face after graduating, service-learning projects can be utilized to fosterstudents’ critical thinking through providing (a) a real-world context in which to solveengineering problems, (b) realistic data sources (including information that may be ambiguous,irrelevant, or incorrect), and (c) the industry-standard analytical and design software tools withwhich to integrate realistic information in solving the real-world problem. This paper presentsthe benefits of service-learning projects for emulating real-world engineering practice and itprovides a profile of a
candidates taking these two routes to Membership, they must: (a) have obtained anaccredited honors degree or an acceptable equivalent in a recognized engineering ortechnological discipline; (b) have received adequate training; (c) have received sufficientresponsible experience; and (d) have attained the age of 25. However, most professionalinstitutions in the United Kingdom have waived the age requirement.Under the Formal Training Route, candidates are required to have two years of pre-approvedformal training followed by two years of responsible experience for all disciplines except civil,environmental, geotechnical, and structural disciplines. These four disciplines require three yearsof pre-approved formal training followed by one year of
Paper ID #5882Development and Application of a Sustainable Design Rubric to Evaluate Stu-dent Abilities to Incorporate Sustainability into Capstone Design ProjectsMary Katherine Watson, Georgia Institute of Technology Mary Katherine Watson is a Ph.D. candidate in Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) at Georgia Tech (GT). Through support from a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, she has been working to improve the quality of sustainability education in CEE at GT through development and application of a variety of assessment tools and educational interventions. In addition to research in the field
Chuck Pennoni. In particularthese committees have wrestled with the differences between the educational requirements,career expectations, capabilities, roles, and responsibilities of the graduate of four year(a) ETAC/ABET-accredited civil engineering technology programs and (b) EAC/ABET civilengineering programs.Purpose and ScopeThis is first of several coordinated papers that will be written and presented to the CivilEngineering Division of ASEE. Collectively these scholarly papers will attempt to answer thequestion: What are and what should be the differences between the capabilities and responsibilities of the civil engineering technologist (a graduate of a four-year ABET-accredited program in civil engineering technology [CET]) and
44 (50 including the added subtopics recommended by expert panel participants inRound 1 of the study) areas within the following five (plus one) general categories: A-BasicMechanics and Engineering Tools, B-General Structural Engineering Tools, C-Technology andCommunication Tools, D-Structural Engineering Topics and Tools, E-Management andProfessional Tools, F-Additional Topics. This paper describes the overall study and emphasizesthe competencies expected upon completion of the Masters-Level programs. Results specificallyaddressing the post-graduate and early experience period are presented in a companion paper.The results of the research provides very useful information to both the academic and practicingstructural engineering communities
Professor A's classoriginating from the R. C. Hibbeler's Engineering Mechanics: Statics text that is linked withMasteringEngineering®. Problem 6.7 Description: Determine the force in each member of the truss. Set P_1 = P_2 = P . (a) Determine the force in member AB. (b) Determine the force in member BC. (c) Determine the force in member BD. (d) Determine the force in member BE. (e) Determine the... Determine the force in each member of the truss. Set = = 2.9 . Page 23.308.4
the centrifuge facility and using this model for: (1)visual observation of the response of soil and soil-foundation systems, (2) learning the use ofinstrumentation, (3) interpretation of acquired data, and (4) comparing the experimental results totheoretical predictions. Specifically, a centrifuge experiment was introduced in undergraduatecourses to examine the performance of a shallow footing constructed on a deposit made of drysand. The following learning outcomes were set for the module. As a result of participating in themodule/lab, students will be able to: a) better understand current principles of geotechnical and foundation engineering by experiencing the actual response of soils and soil-foundation systems; b) design
Paper ID #5907Improving Municipal Infrastructure in Capstone Through a Consulting FirmModelDr. Daniel M. Dulaski PE, Northeastern University Dr. Daniel M. Dulaski, PE, joined the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Northeastern University in 2009. His research is primarily in transportation engineering which includes safety, roadway design, human factors, and sustainable transportation systems. He holds a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering and is a registered professional engineer in Massachusetts. He is the academic advisor for the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) student chapter, and the
Paper ID #6325A Model for Collaborative Curriculum Design in Transportation Engineer-ing EducationDr. Kristen L. Sanford Bernhardt, Lafayette College Dr. Kristen Sanford Bernhardt is chair of the Engineering Studies program and associate professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College. Her expertise is in sustainable civil infrastructure management and transportation systems. She teaches a variety of courses including sustainability of built systems, transportation systems, transportation planning, civil infrastructure management, and Lafayette’s introductory first year engineering course. Dr
Paper ID #6198The Attributes of a Global Engineer: Purpose, Perspectives, and ProgressDr. Stephen Hundley, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Dr. Stephen Hundley is chair and associate professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Communication at IUPUI’s Purdue School of Engineering and Technology.Ms. Lynn G Brown, The Boeing Company Lynn G. Brown is the Corporate Higher Education and STEM International program manager for for The Boeing Company and the Chairperson of the ASEE Corporate Members Council Special Interest Group for International Engineering Education. Selected as Boeing’s
Paper ID #7982Three Approaches to Flipping CE Courses: Faculty Perspectives and Sugges-tionsDr. Brian Swartz P.E., University of Hartford Dr. Brian Swartz has been serving as an assistant professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Hartford. He will be joining the Engineering Department at Messiah College beginning fall 2013. His technical expertise is in the structures area. He holds a Ph.D. from Penn State University and a P.E. license in the state of Connecticut.Dr. Stephanie Butler Velegol, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Stephanie Butler Velegol received her B.S. in Chemical Engineering
) so that the influence of the braces on the dynamic response ofthe structure could be studied, however, these braces were not engaged in this laboratoryexperiment. The concrete piers support the structure at the four corners (see Figure 1d). Keyconcepts such as resonance, damping, modal participation, natural frequencies and mode shapes (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 1. Bridge House (a) Exterior; (b) Interior; (c) Removable Brace Connection (N/S Page 23.628.3 Direction); (d) Concrete
) Results Seeker) -15 (17, 19) (8, 19) -20 -25 Less Outgoing (A) Figure 2 - Diagram for Assessing Communication Style6 (with example result)The following example illustrates a communication style assessment for one of the senior designcourse instructors. This individual recorded the following total number of responses for columnsA through D of the style survey: A=19; B=8; C=6; and D=17. As a check, the total number
areevaluated by some form of a final report. In the traditional civil engineering curriculum, undergraduate students take courses withboth lecture and laboratory formats. While the lecture courses provide the opportunity forstudents to absorb new information, the purpose of a laboratory is to expose students to thephysical problems associated with a course and reinforce course content. The traditional type oflaboratory has well-planned experiments, typically containing step-by-step guides leading thestudents through each experiment. Generally in groups of four or five, students in-turn conductthe experiment, regurgitate the results, and prepare a laboratory report, arguably fulfilling ABETstudent outcome (b) “an ability to design and conduct
AB and BD. A 1.5 m C Spring balance 2m B 3m D 2m
Change FlexTable columns that are displayed Page 23.733.18 Lab Activity Problems Compute the pressure at the hydrant under the following conditions. Condition Pipe Length Pipe Material Pipe Diameter Flow Demand Liquid (ft) (in) (gpm) A 2500 Cast Iron 4 180 Water, 68°F B 1500 Glass 4 180 Water, 68°F C 1500
skills in hisor her initial time in professional practice as an employee. This paper presents information from a Delphi-type survey on the additionalcompetencies expected by the structural engineering community to be gotten by the entrance-level engineer during the first 5 years of experience following completion of a masters-levelgraduate program. It does this by defining the competencies as quantified using Bloom’staxonomy [1] expected by the structural engineering profession in 44 specific subtopics within thefollowing 5 general areas: A-Basic Mechanics and Engineering Tools, B-General StructuralEngineering Tools, C-Technology and Communication Tools, D-Structural Engineering Topicsand Tools, E-Management and Professional Tools at both
program was described in the survey. Asingle reminder email was sent to the same group approximately one month later. In total, thereare 273 subscribers in the listserv. The only incentive used to encourage participation was theoffer to share a copy of related subsequent publications.Limited manipulation of the collected survey data was required. Duplicates and improperlycompleted surveys were eliminated from the data set.ResultsThe attempt to use the internet to develop a comprehensive list of civil engineeringintercollegiate competition-based learning activities generated a final list of 40 uniquecompetitions. A summary of those competitions is included in Appendix B of this document.The summary table identifies the date of inception, the