generation are accompanied by affective states such as irritation, frustration, anger,and sometimes rage when the learner makes mistakes… On the other hand, positive affectivestates such as flow, delight, excitement, and eureka are experienced when tasks are completed,challenges are conquered, insights are unveiled, and major discoveries are made... Emotions aresystematically affected by the knowledge and goals of the learner, as well as vice versa.” Theygo on to explain that a balanced system is important when learning through failure. If this formof learning is uncontrolled, students will either be in states of, “(a) engagement/flow as theypursue the superordinate learning goal of mastering the material in the learning environment or(b
Paper ID #21927Peer-Led-Team-Learning in a Mechanics I: Statics CourseDr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals in the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. His research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology (Tablet PCs) used in the classroom.Dr. Thomas D. Rockaway, University of Louisville Thomas D. Rockaway, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering
P-Value: 0.0262 Statistically significant P-Value: 0.0768 b) Race Not statistically significantFigure 4. The perceived social involvement of students by (a) gender: male and female; and (b)race: white students and non-white students.Potentially Non-Retaining Students Potentially non-retained students are included students who within the survey, selected,“I have considered/am considering leaving the College of Engineering” and “I plan to leave theCollege of Engineering, but stay at CSU”. Between potential non-retained students, 40 % ofstudents selected
average” students? After examining the overall survey results, weseparated the responses based on grades received in pre-requisite courses. We assigned values of1= No, 2= Maybe, and 3= Yes to the survey question answers and analyzed the average scoresfor each question between the two groups (A/B in pre-requisite course vs. C or below in pre-requisite course). A t-test was used to test for statistical significance. The results (Figure 5)showed that students who came into the class with a C or below felt that the tiered mentoringproject gave them more expertise (p = .02) and more confidence (p = .01) in the topics theyworked on, compared to students who came into the class with As or Bs. Figure 5. Survey responses based on pre-requisite
each course andwas administered at the beginning and end of the course to evaluate learning gains. In theenvironmental engineering course, this was structured as 18 multiple-choice true false questionswith three to four stems per question for a total of 61 responses. In the structural analysis course,this was structured as 20 multiple-choice questions. Example questions are shown in Figures 2and 3. 1. Continuously mixed flow reactors: A Represent a system where contents are instantaneously mixed T F B In these reactors, the composition of the influent is equal to the composition within the tank T F C Typically represent flow in pipes and rivers T F Figure 2. Example question from pre
Paper ID #22161Leadership for Engineers: A Course for Developing Professional and Busi-ness Skills for EngineersDr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22 years on active duty with the US Army Corps of Engineers and taught at the United States Military Academy at West Point (USMA). He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from USMA in 1994, Master of Science degrees from the University of Alaska Anchorage in Arctic
Paper ID #22178The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: Supporting ASCE’s Grand Chal-lengeDr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22 years on active duty with the US Army Corps of Engineers and taught at the United States Military Academy at West Point (USMA). He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from USMA in 1994, Master of Science degrees from the University of Alaska Anchorage in Arctic Engineering in 1998 and
Paper ID #21989Keeping a Prospect on the Line and Then in the Boat: Recruitment and Re-tention Efforts that Make a DifferenceDr. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He became the Dean of Engineering at The Citadel on 1 July 2011. Prior to his current position, he was the Department Head of Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Tyler from Jan 2007 to June 2011 as well
distribution of graduate and undergraduate students. The undergraduatestudents had an average grade of 88% and the graduate students had an average grade of 94%. Table 3: Grade distribution of graduate and undergraduate students Graduate Students Undergraduate Students A 93+ 5 5 A- 90+ 2 B+ 86.7+ 1 B 83.3+ 2 B- 80+ C+ 76.7+ 1 1 C 73.3+ C- 70
Military Academy. His current research interests include laboratory and field determination of geotechnical material properties for transportation systems and the use of remote sensing techniques to categorize geohazards. He has published over 85 peer reviewed articles relating to his research and educational activities. Dennis holds BS and MS degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (now Missouri University of Science and Technology), an MBA from Boston University and a Ph.D. from the University of Texas-Austin. He is a registered professional engineer in Arkansas and Colorado.Dr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department
MSCE/JD dual-degree programs.Dr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22 years on active duty with the US Army Corps of Engineers and taught at the United States Military Academy at West Point (USMA). He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from USMA in 1994, Master of Science degrees from the University of Alaska Anchorage in Arctic Engineering in 1998 and Missouri University Science & Technology in Civil Engineering in 1999, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University in 2004. He is a registered
thecurriculum as a whole and for individual courses (including its place in the ABET continuousimprovement criterion), the specific lessons learned after the first 3 years of implementation, thechanges to be made for the next 3 year cycle, and conclusions on how these experiences may betransferred to other programs. A mixed-methods approach is used to evaluate this first cycle ofimplementation and assessment, include comparing expected vs. actual/measured: (a) coursesevaluated in a given semester; (b) student artifacts; and (c) program learning outcomes.Introduction and BackgroundDuring the period 2013-14 and 2014-15 academic years, Texas A&M University’s civilengineering department undertook a curriculum transformation project base its program
Paper ID #22126Revising the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (BOK): The Applicationof the Cognitive Domain of Bloom’s TaxonomyDr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22 years on active duty with the US Army Corps of Engineers and taught at the United States Military Academy at West Point (USMA). He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from USMA in 1994, Master of Science degrees from the University of Alaska
) Leadership Award in 2010. At the University of Alabama, Fridley has led efforts to establish several new programs including new undergraduate degree programs in construction engineering, architectural engineering and environmental engineering, a departmental Scholars program allowing highly qualified students an accelerated program to earn their MSCE in addition to their BS degree, the interdisciplinary ”Cube” promoting innovation in engineering, and the cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs.Dr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US
average” students? After examining the overall survey results, weseparated the responses based on grades received in pre-requisite courses. We assigned values of1= No, 2= Maybe, and 3= Yes to the survey question answers and analyzed the average scoresfor each question between the two groups (A/B in pre-requisite course vs. C or below in pre-requisite course). A t-test was used to test for statistical significance. The results (Figure 5)showed that students who came into the class with a C or below felt that the tiered mentoringproject gave them more expertise (p = .02) and more confidence (p = .01) in the topics theyworked on, compared to students who came into the class with As or Bs. Figure 5. Survey responses based on pre-requisite
, ASMR, and several other professional societies. She is a certified distance education specialist and also practices and studies active learning techniques in engineering classrooms as well as the impact of climate on hydrology, water resources and related infrastructure.Calvin Wampol, South Dakota State University I am currently a graduate student at South Dakota State University (SDSU) pursuing my MS degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering with emphasis in Structural Engineering. I earned a B. S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering at SDSU in 2016. I am currently employed by my graduate advisor, Dr. Suzette Burckhard, as a Teaching Assistant and Research Assistant at SDSU. The responsibility for the
that could be applied to masters degrees Require third year student mentees to agree to serve as mentors in their fourth year to second year students Develop the program so that practicing engineers benefit more directly in terms of credit for continuing professional development.References[1] N. J. Balster, C. Pfund, R. Rediske, and J.L. Branchaw, "Entering Research: A course that creates community and structure for beginning undergraduate researchers in the STEM disciplines", Life Sciences Education, vol. 9 (2), p 108-118. doi: doi:10.1187/cbe.09-10- 0073, 2010.[2] L. Hui, N. Mickleborough, and B. Chan, "Service Leadership Community: A seedbed for nurturing a service leadership mindset
Engineering Education Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/19082[18] Seely, B. E. (1999). The other re-engineering of engineering education, 1900-1965. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(3), 285-294.[19] Sinha, K. C., Bullock, D., Hendrickson, C. T., Levinson, H. S., Lyles, R. W., Radwan, A. E., & Li, Z. (2002). Development of Transportation Engineering Research, Education, and Practice in a Changing Civil Engineering World. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 128(4), 301-313. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733- 947x(2002)128:4(301)[20] Todd, R.H., and Magleby, S.P. (2004) Evaluation and Rewards for Faculty Involved in Engineering Design
,Engineering Disasters, and Technology, Society, and Values). The Civil Engineering departmentat Oregon Tech has a strong laboratory component in its curriculum with a majority ofprogrammatic courses including a laboratory. Given the motivations of these two departmentsand mutual interest of the project faculty in bridges, and Conde B. McCullough (Figure 1) inparticular, the faculty identified the potential for a field course to tour important Oregon bridges.Emphasizing those constructed to complete the Oregon coast highway, the course brings thehistory of these bridges together with their design and construction details. Changes in bridgedesign practice were discussed as an analog to the development of civil engineering moregenerally. Figure
Paper ID #21027Making the Case for Temporary Structures as a Required Course and Rec-ommending an Instructional DesignDr. George Okere, Washington State University George is an assistant professor in the construction management program in the School of Design and Construction at Washington State University (WSU). Before joining WSU he worked for Kiewit Corpo- ration on various heavy civil projects. He received his PhD in Technology Management from Indiana State University with specialization in Construction Management. His research focus is in the area of contract administration on state DOT projects.Mr. Chris Souder MS
be formalized in an ASCE policy statement. (3) That the ASCE institutes be aligned as closely as possible with the civil engineering specialty areas. (4) That ASCE support the establishment of credentialing programs for all civil engineering specialties. (5) That each ASCE-supported credentialing program be structured as either (a) a P.E. license plus specialty area license or (b) a P.E. license plus board certification. (6) That ASCE encourage all civil engineering organizations and companies to establish policies offering appropriate professional and economic incentives for those credentialed in a civil engineering specialty area. (7) That ASCE continue its efforts to change the existing ABET
easier to meet than the existingrequirements and present increased flexibility for many programs.Criterion 3 ChangesThe current Criterion 3 (a)-(k) student outcomes1 which have been unchanged since theywere adopted as part of EC2000 are:Student outcomes are outcomes (a) through (k) plus any additional outcomes that may bearticulated by the program.(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, healthand safety, manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to
of the SHRP2. Thestudents were given bonus points for attempting these modules. All students of that class viewedthe video even though it was a bonus. The research team has made a significant effort to incorporate SHRP2 products as an inherentpart of the CEE courses. To build upon previous success and strengthen the vertical integrationmethod, the research team (1) Continued existing practice by teaching relevant SHRP2 productsimmediately after the relevant theoretical content; (2) Expanded offering of flipped classroommodel to the other five courses; and (3) Evaluated the feasibility of transferring the verticalintegration method by (a) collaborating with other institutions and (b) Integrating selected modulesin the National Summer
/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering- programs-2018-2019/.[4] K. L. Hansen and B. S. Neale, “Infrastructure Resilience in the UK: An Overview of Current Approaches,” presented at the International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure, Long Beach, CA, 2014, pp. 23–32.[5] W. H. Armstrong, M. J. Collins, and N. P. Snyder, “Hydroclimatic flood trends in the northeastern United States and linkages with large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns,” Hydrol. Sci. J., vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 1636–1655, 2014.[6] A. J. Puppala, T. Manosuthkij, S. Nazarian, and L. R. Hoyos, “Threshold moisture content and matric suction potentials in expansive clays prior to initiation of cracking in pavements,” Can
licensed in an additional area based on his or her education and experience. Alaska’s PE licensure system is an example of this method. Method B - Exam Defined Discipline, Practice Limited The next method of discipline specific licensure is based upon the PE exam that a candidate chooses to take. Each discipline is named, but not explicitly defined in most of the jurisdictions with this type of system. If a candidate wanted to practice in multiple areas of engineering, then he or she may need to pass multiple PE exams. Nevada and Vermont have similar systems in place. Method C - Exam Defined Discipline, Practice Not Limited This method of discipline specific licensure is commonly called a
and molecular representations. Science Education, 92(5), 848–867.Crowe, C. T., Elger, D. F., Williams, B. C., & Roberson, J. A. (2009). Engineering fluid mechanics . John Willey & Sons.Downey, G. L. (2009). What is engineering studies for? Dominant practices and scalable scholarship. Engineering Studies, 1(1), 55-76.Education, A. E., Committee, N. C., Ii, P., Education, E., Academy, N., Isbn, E., … Press, N. A. (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020. National Academies Press.Greeno, J. G., Moore, J. L., & Smith, D. R. Detterman, D. K., Sternberg, R. J., (1993). Transfer of situated learning. Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction, 99-167.Guan, Z., Lee, S., Cuddihy, E., & Ramey
Bachelor of Science and Master of Science from the University of Arkansas, and a doctoral degree from the University of Kentucky, Dr. Corrie Walton-Macaulay is now a Geotechnical Engineering Assistant Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Bucknell University. He teaches the traditional geotechnical courses of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, but also teaches unsaturated soil mechanics, introduction to transportation engineering and mechanics of materials. HIs research area is in unsaturated soil mechanics, energy geotechnics, and transportation infrastructure resiliency. Address: 1 Dent Drive, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bucknell University, Lewis- burg
past five years.Figure 4 shows the nature of the universities that have sent participants to this workshop.Approximately three-quarters of the participating universities have been public rather thanprivate. Almost half of the universities have been doctorate-degree schools which place a heavyemphasis on research as well as teaching. The complete listing of participating universities, thenumber of participants, and their Carnegie classification are in Appendix B. Figure 2: Number of ExCEEd applicants from 1999 to 2017 Figure 3: The number of years of teaching experience of ETW participants Figure 4: Types of universities participating in the ETWsWith the increasing demand for ETW, CFD has put
grading style at University A focused on content and method. A scoring rubric wasmade prior to grading each exam question. Extensive partial credit was given for providing thecorrect thought process and writing down the correct steps in solving the problem. Deductionsmade for mistakes were not carried through the problem. Limited points were taken off for minormath errors or units.University B University B is a midsized, public, master's university in a medium density city in theWest North Central Region (Carnegie Classification, M1). The university has sixcolleges/schools, a medical school branch, and a graduate school, which primarily offers M.S.degrees (although Ph.D. degrees can be obtained in some majors or cross-disciplinary programs
according to the targetedstudent outcomes. The following shows the description on the courses where the module isimplemented. For the purposes of maintaining the confidentiality, we will refer to the threeuniversities as A, B, C and the corresponding courses as Course 1, Course 2 and Course 3,respectively.University A (Course 1 – Fall 2017): Course 1 is a junior level required course for allArchitectural Engineering (AE) and Civil Engineering (CE) majors. Unlike undergraduatedynamics courses offered in traditional civil engineering curricula that focus solely on rigid-bodydynamics, Course 1 also covers structural dynamics over the second half of the course. Thelearning module was implemented concurrent with this half of the course, in which