lived experience in university–industry collaboration," Industry and Higher Education, vol. 27, pp. 163-178, 2013.[7] T. Barnes, I. Pashby and A. Gibbons, "Effective University–Industry Interaction: A Multi-case Evaluation of Collaborative R&D Projects," European Management Journal, vol. 20, pp. 272-285, 2002.[8] HKSAR Government, "The Chief Executive’s 2022 Policy Address," HKSAR Government, October 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/2022/en/p38.html. .[9] A. J. Mahardhani, B. Nadeak, I. M. Hanika, I. Sentryo and R. Kemala, "A New Approach to Curriculum Development: The Relevance of the Higher Education Curriculum to Industry Needs," International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE
, and faculty. Table 1 providesan overview of participants. To maintain anonymity, pseudonyms were used for all participants,departments have been given a letter pseudonym, and titles have been generalized to theparticipants’ overall area of expertise. Pseudonym Department/Unit Area of Expertise Amy A Advising Mia B Academic administration Billy C Academic administration Mary D Corporate engagement Tom E Faculty James E Faculty John F Corporate engagement Wendy
analyzed using the Student Responses for their top 3 ranked projects. For thisevaluation, effort was measure through a combination of: a) The RAL of all Student Responses for the respective year. b) The EKC between each Student Response and the Engineering Keywords from each respective slide from the project pitch activity. c) Whether they mentioned or not any qualification for joining the ranked project.Each effort element was analyzed independently, then aggregated for an overall analysis.RQ2: What type of project features have the most impact on students when ranking projects?For this question, Student Responses are analyzed to determine the frequency with whichstudents mention features that attracted them to the projects. The
-that-wont-be-automated (accessed Jan 1, 2022).[15] J. Meister. "How companies are using VR to develop employees’ soft skills." Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/01/how-companies-are-usingvr-to-develop- employees-soft-skills (accessed Jan 1, 2022).[16] J. Dixon, C. Belnap, C. Albrecht, and K. Lee, "The importance of soft skills," Corporate finance review, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 35, 2010.[17] M. L. Matteson, L. Anderson, and C. Boyden, "Soft skills": A phrase in search of meaning," portal: Libraries and the Academy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 71-88, 2016.[18] B. Schulz, "The importance of soft skills: Education beyond academic knowledge," 2008.[19] M. Wats and R. K. Wats, "Developing soft skills in
/w22623.[2] National Academy of Engineering, Understanding the educational and career pathways of engineers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018. doi: 10.17226/25284.[3] S. D. Sheppard, A. L. Antonio, S. R. Brunhaver, and S. K. Gilmartin, “Studying the career pathways of engineers: An illustration with two data sets,” in Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds., New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 283–309.[4] M. T. Cardador and P. L. Hill, “Career paths in engineering firms: Gendered patterns and implications,” J. Career Assess., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 95–110, 2018.[5] M. Tremblay, T. Wils, and C. Proulx, “Determinants of career path preferences among
industry/academia collaboration. Although none of these have necessarily been ground-breaking, they have built trust among participants, and trust will lead to future projects and futuresuccess. We believe that transformational change happens in a stepwise manner by people whoare invested in and inspired by an appreciative Framing Question and who build trust through co-creation.References[1] S. R. Genheimer, "The effectiveness of industry advisory boards in engineering education,"Doctor of Philosophy, Industrial Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma,2007.[2] Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, A. B. f. E. a. Technology, 2002 2003-2004.[3] K. Kramer, "Achieving EC2000 outcomes in the capstone design via structured
bifurcated based upon advisory board (a) activity and (b) strength. As can beseen in Figure 1, of the many reasons for having an advisory board, faculty / studentengagement, academic support, and research support are important hallmarks of active advisoryboards. Of these, research support is also a hallmark of strong advisory boards. While the datasuggest that industry engagement may also be an important hallmark of active and strongadvisory boards, this requires further investigation. Notably, these three motivations for anadvisory board are those that are student-centric. A conclusion then is that active boards, and tosome extent strong boards, are those that have a strong desire to support students, and are morelikely to be student-centric than
learning for students.References[1] B. Moran, “Strategic planning in higher education,” College & Research Libraries News, vol. 46(6), pp. 288-292, 2020, doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.46.6.288[2] (2025) The Penn State Strategic Plan. [Online]. Available: https://strategicplan.psu.edu/[3] C.L. Thompson, T.A. Misko, and M.R. Chance, “Training the next generation of translational scientists: The Case Western Reserve University translational fellows program,” Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, vol. 6(1), e47, 2022.[4] M. Wasko, K.A. Nearing, S.L. Neves, A. Carrillo, J. Rainwater, J.A. Croker, and R.P. Kimberly, “Training T-shaped translational scientists,” Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, pp. 1-19
Engineering Students Ready for Work?” In The Engineering-Business Nexus: Symbiosis, Tension and Co-Evolution, edited by S. H. Christensen, B. Delahousse, C. Didier, M. Meganck, and M. Murphy, Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, Vol.32, 499–520. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99636-3_22[4] Shah, R., & A.L. Gillen (03 Sep 2023). “A systematic literature review of university-industry partnerships in engineering education”, European Journal of Engineering Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2253741[5] Bae, H., Polmear, M., & D. R. Simmons (2022). “Bridging the gap between industry expectations and academic preparation: Civil engineering students’ employability
further data to be gathered. However, we hope this work showcases howindustry can support curriculum development to further ensure young engineers’ success.References[1] T. T. York, C. Gibson, and S. Rankin, “Defining and measuring academic success,” Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 5, 2019.[2] G. D. Kuh, J. L. Kinzie, J. A. Buckley, B. K. Bridges, and J. C. Hayek, What matters to student success: A review of the literature, vol. 8. National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Washington, DC, 2006.[3] “IET skills and demand in industry 2021 survey,” 2021.[4] D. I. Spang, “Curriculum design and assessment to address the industry skills gap,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference &
-tools-on-student -learning?utm_source=chatgpt.com[5] B. R. Barricelli, E. Casiraghi, and D. Fogli, “A survey on digital twin: Definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 167653–167671, 2019.[6] L. Kartashova, A. Gurzhii, V. Zaichuk, T. Sorochan, and F. Zhuravlev, “Digital Twin of an Educational Institution: An Innovative Concept of Blended Learning:,” in Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology, Kyiv, Ukraine: SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2020, pp. 300–310. doi: 10.5220/0010931100003364.[7] A. Prakosa et al., “Personalized virtual-heart technology for guiding the ablation of
, community colleges, and universities. Dr. Linvill’s research is strategically designed to address organizational challenges and create novel solutions to those challenges. Her work has been presented at national and international conferences and has been published in The Routledge Handbook of Communication and Bullying and in Communication, relationships, and practices in virtual work (IGI Global). Dr. Linvill applies an organizational communication lens to her classes on Business Principles, Ethics, Negotiation and Decision Making, Organizational Behavior, and Organizational Leadership, and to Awareness Trainings related to destructive workplace behaviors presented at local high schools. Dr. Linvill is a Member of the
development experience for the students,ensuring successful project completion, and enhancing their own professional and personalgrowth.Research QuestionsThis objective of this study is to examine the experience of students and liaisons to helpunderstand how the role of the liaison contributes towards a successful project delivery and afulfilling educational experience for both the students and the liaison. This objective is assessedthrough the following research questions.a. Are project liaisons critical for the success of student teams delivering successful projects?b. Do students appreciate liaisons who are deeply invested in their work?c. Are engineers prepared for the liaison role?d. Do engineers benefit from the project liaison
responsewould be great to share in an interview/job fair/networking event)?’ response group number of responses percent general self development 16 8% improved workflow with technology 33 16% communicated technical issues 48 24% developed better problem solving 51 25% work with others to improve assignments 55 27% (a) Junior/Senior level computational course. (b) Sophomore/Junior level dynamics courseFigure 2: End of semester optional connection exercise. Students that responded
Paper ID #41377WIP: Increasing Engagement with Industrial Advisory Board Members throughAsynchronous Assessment of Elevator PitchesDr. Walter W Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering Walter Schilling is a Professor in the Software Engineering program and coordinates the Cybersecurity Minor at the Milwaukee School of Engineering in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He received his B.S.E.E. from Ohio Northern University and M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Toledo. He worked for Ford Motor Company and Visteon as an Embedded Software Engineer for several years prior to returning for doctoral work. He has spent time at NASA
Education, 2023 Closing the Gap between Industry and Academia via Student Teams SupportAbstractA well-known challenge in engineering education is the attempt to balance the demands of industryrecruitment with the core needs of an already packed engineering curriculum. Due to timeconstraints, real-world examples and other learning opportunities that aim to develop andconsolidate the industry-desirable skills can be difficult to include in the curriculum. One way toaddress this challenge is to collaborate with industry (for example, on capstone projects, studentteam challenges, etc.) while the students are still studying. A place for these collaborations, whichcan provide benefit for both parties, is through student competitions. Student
Paper ID #39964Board 51: Utilizing Technical Competitions to Enhance Diverse WorkforceRecruitment and RetentionMs. Jacalynn Sharp, JHU APL Jackie Sharp is a mechanical engineer at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU APL) where she works in mechanical design and analysis as well as simple electronics development and integration. Jackie volunteers as a robotics instructor and mentors high school students interested in STEM from low SES and diverse backgrounds. She is the treasurer of the ASME DC Section (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) and is committee co-lead for the ASME FutureME platform
academia, and over 12 years of industrial experience, primarily in the American automotive industry, Dr. Alsayyed has a passion for innovation in education, teaching, research, and training. Integration of academia and industry goals and activities are paramount to Dr. Alsayyed. Sensing the industry needs and preparing future engineers to meet those needs and challenges is an important dimension of Dr. Alsayyed’s ac- tivities. Dr. Alsayyed has published more than forty articles in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings. He has seven granted patents. Dr. Alsayyed’s research interests are in the areas of advanced manufacturing, additive manufacturing, design optimization, quality & reliability, engineering