the ground up. Therewere not any instructions for step-by-step as a team we had to figure out everything thatneeded to be accomplished to get the best results. I have also learnt how to interact andplan meetings with Industry. This has helped to get a perspective on working for city. 3. How has this experience a. Increased my curiosity or awareness about the new content of issuesThis has increased my awareness on everything behind the scenes in making a cityfunction as a whole with our tax dollars. You do not really think about what happenswith you flush the toilet and where it goes, until you get to see the facility and the processit goes through to be cleaned and put back into a river or lake. b. Aroused me to seek more
. Yee, "How Service Learning Affects Students," Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, 2000, p. 21.4. J. Eyler and D. E. Giles, Jr., Where's the Learning in Service-Learning?, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1999.5. I. S. Fisher, "Integrating Service-Learning Experiences into Postcollege Choices," in Service-Learning in Higher Education, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1996, p. 209.6. S. Krishnan and T. L. Nilsson, "Engineering Service Learning: Case Study on Preparing Students for the Global Community," in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, 2012.7. B. Tempest, M. Pando, S. Loree and M. A. Hoff, "A Student
Paper ID #11126Civic Engagement as a Component of Engineering EducationDr. Shoba Krishnan, Santa Clara University Dr. Shoba Krishnan is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Santa Clara University. She has a strong interest in engineering education, and is involved in several community based activities to increase the participation of underrepresented groups in engineering. She collaborates with non-profits that are in need for technical expertise and with K-8 schools in need of STEM programs. She helped es- tablish the IDEAS (Interdisciplinary Design Engineering And Service) program and developed the course
is the past chair of the IN/IL section. He is a fellow of the Teaching Academy and listed in the Book of Great Teachers at Purdue University./ He was the first engineering faculty member to receive the national Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education and the recipient of the National Society of Professional Engineers’ Educational Excellence Award and the ASEE Chester Carlson Award. He is a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and the National Society of Professional Engineers.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette
monitoring the performance of thestudents participating in the mentorship program. This will be done in the future tocomprehensively assess the efficacy of all the different components of the overall mentorshipprogram proposed in this paper. Outcomes of the mentorship program will be assessed over thenext two years. Furthermore, benefits of the program to senior and junior students (studentmentors) who may be mentoring the sophomore or freshmen students will also be evaluated inthe future in order to seek possible means of improving the model proposed in this paper.References1. DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., Cooper, H., 2002, “Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs forYouth: A Meta-Analytic Review,” American Journal of Community
Paper ID #12002Engineering Your Community: Experiences of Students in a Service-LearningEngineering Design CourseDr. Gregory Warren Bucks, University of Cincinnati Gregory Bucks joined the Department of Engineering Education in 2012. He received his BSEE from the Pennsylvania State University in 2004, his MSECE from Purdue University in 2006, and his PhD in Engineering Education in 2010, also from Purdue University. After completing his PhD, he taught for two years at Ohio Northern University in the Electrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science department, before making the transition to the University of
HigherEducation and Society The Review of Higher Education, Volume 27, Number 4, Summer 2004.[6] Sochacka, N. Walther, J. Wilson J. and Brewer, M. “Storiel ‘Told’ about Engineering in the Media.”[7] Clewell, B. & Fortenberry, N. (Eds.) (2009). Framework for Evaluating Impacts of BroadeningParticipation Projects.[8] Weerts, D. J., Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities forcommunity engagement at research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 32 (1).[9] Bartel, Caroline A. “Social Comparisons in Boundary-Spanning Work: Effects of Community Outreachon Members' Organizational Identity and Identification” , Administrative Science Quarterly 2001 46: 379.[10] Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of
personal development, social impact, academic enhancement, university mission, andethics13. Students were asked to pick and respond to two out of five reflection prompts. Theinstrument is included in Appendix B. An open-coding approach was taken to identify emergentcategories in the reflection responses14-15. One member of the research team first read eachstudent’s response to determine a set of categories compiled into a rubric. The rubric was thenused to code each student’s response. A second rater then used the rubric to test its reliabilityacross raters. A second member of the research team coded each student’s response using thefirst rater’s codes until agreement was reached. Changes to the coding rubric were made toestablish a high inter
Paper ID #13056Exploring the Expanding Impact of a Sustainable Development EngineeringCourse Through a Critical Evolutionary ReviewMr. Kevin Orner, University of South Florida Kevin Orner is a Ph.D. student in Environmental Engineering at the University of South Florida, where he studies nutrient management of wastewater. Kevin was a Teaching Assistant and course instructor for the Sustainable Development Engineering course in Fall 2014. After obtaining a B.S. in Civil and Envi- ronmental Engineering with a certificate in Technical Communication from the University of Wisconsin- Madison, Kevin served for two years as a Peace
. Page 26.540.13Chart 1. Student Self-Assessment Skill Ratings Page 26.540.14Chart 2. Student Self-Assessment with Parametric Analysis Page 26.540.15Proposed Future Abroad Program AssessmentThe initial success of the program was the catalyst in applying for an NSF EAGER grant for twofuture engineering abroad programs to Guatemala, which was funded. The assessment for thesefuture programs will be more thorough and will include the following: • The qualitative evaluation component will include a survey and focus groups four (4) times during the program: a) prior to the preparatory meetings; b) following the preparatory
Paper ID #13869Engineering Education versus Vocational Training at a Tribal College: Im-plications for Students, School and CommunityDr. Robert V. Pieri, North Dakota State University Dr. Robert Pieri is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at North Dakota State University (NDSU) in Fargo, ND. He has many conference publications on engineering education and design. His primary interest areas include: Engineering Education, CADD, Design, Fracture Mechanics, Materials Science and Alternative Energy Options. Prior to joining NDSU, he worked for Allied-Signal Corporation and in the aircraft supply industry. Prior to his
Paper ID #11894Instituting a Community Based STEM Program at Drexel University’s Col-lege of Engineering: Understanding Factors That Determine the Success ofUniversity-Community PartnershipsMs. Alistar Erickson-Ludwig, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Ms. Alistar Erickson-Ludwig serves as the STEM Program Coordinator in the College of Engineering at Drexel University. She focuses on outreach and education programs for current undergraduates, k- 12 students, and the community. She concentrates on the Greater Philadelphia Seaperch Underwater Robotics Competition, Summer Diversity Program, Introduce a Girl to Engineering
of SurveysAs with our previous paper, we used two surveys to assess student self-efficacy with engineeringdesign and their perceived influence of service experiences on engineering learning objectives.Since the fall of 2012, all students in the GFU engineering program have completed the surveysin the first month of the fall semester each year they are in the program. Response data is shownin Tables 1 and 2. Student responses were grouped by their year in the program relative to SE: a. 2 yrs before SE (typically Freshmen) b. 1 yr before SE (typically Sophomores) Page 26.1202.9 c. Just before SE (Juniors) d. During SE (Juniors
. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009.4 Swan, C., Bielefeldt, A. R., Paterson, K., Kazmer, D. O., Pierrakos, O., Soisson, A., & Tucker, B. G. (2013). Workshops for the Engineering Faculty Engagement in Learning Through Service (EFELTS) Project: Development and Initial Findings. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013.5 Tucker, B., Kazmer, D., Pierrakos, O., Swan, C., Bielefeldt, A., Paterson, K., & Soisson, A. (2013). Faculty Perspectives on Service-Learning in Engineering Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013.6
associated polarity (+ or -) was drawn between thefactors. Figure 2 displays an example in which case Factor A was determined to have a positivepolarity on Factor B, a negative polarity on Factors D and E, and no influence on Factor C. Inthis example, the process would then be repeated for Factors B, C, D and E until all potentialinfluences were considered. The diagramming process took about 1.5 hours. The final outcomeof session 1 was a complete CLD displaying the systemic influence between factors. Page 26.1039.7 Figure 2. A visual example of the diagramming process, starting with Factor AIn the time between the first and second workshop
in service-learning assessment andstudent-learning outcomes as defined by ABET course guidelines1. A brief sampling of questionsand results are listed below: Page 26.1758.5 Figure 1. Applied classroom knowledge Figure 2. Would student choose to participate againFigure 3. Importance of project within student’s major Page 26.1758.6 Figure 4. Skills utilized within the projectFigure 5. (a) Participation breakdown by gender (b) Participation breakdown by classification Page 26.1758.7
related toengineering as a college and career choice. The program helps undergraduate engineeringstudents improve their communication and leadership skills while reinforcing the importance oflife-long career ambassadorship. Further, the program gives university alumni the opportunity togive back to their communities.The DesignThe primary motivation for creation of the HA Program was a need expressed by high schoolprincipals and guidance counselors who wanted a) feedback on how well their programs werepreparing their graduates for success as well as b) the creation of real intersections withengineers at the next level to motivate and inspire their students. These administrators want toencourage students to consider careers in fields that are
-buildcounterparts) would a) understand multifaceted characteristics of the sustainable engineering“problems” that different design-build projects are attempting to resolve, b) understand theadvantages, limitations and tradeoffs inherent to proposed solutions c) gain interest, awarenessand confidence in pursuing / participating in local sustainable development projects c) gainawareness of more options for green careers that involve STEM skills and the interest andmotivation to explore and later pursue them. We hypothesize that tributes upholding apprenticeship learning in STEM as a favorablealternative to classroom learning need to look beyond the existing consensus around theimportance of the benefits of physical and practical “hands on” experience
feedback on ideas H, J Real-life •Professors provide students with feedback on submitted work that can help problems improve the design. •Students participate in every aspect of the design including research, ideation, detailed design, analysis, fabrication, testing, and documentation. Integrated •The first two years of the design program combines math and science with Theoretical & engineering specific courses. A, B, K Experimental •Each design project requires analysis to verify the device at each stage of the Learning in a
of questions in the study related to engineers’ leadership, teaching, and mentoringskills before starting their engagement in this program and again directly after their involvementin the family science event (see Tables 2a and b). Data from the pre- and post-surveycomparisons are described here. While, in general engineers had pretty optimistic and positiveimpressions about how their skills would relate to design challenges with elementary schoolchildren and their families, a number of items stand out as being enhanced by the participation inthe program. For instance, most engineers agreed that at the outset they were fairly effective atteaching difficult concepts to non-technical people (58%). However after their experience in thefamily
, disciplinary affiliation(s), gender, non-engineering degrees in background, additional administrative roles (Deans, Directors), and institutional characteristics. 2. How are the characteristics of LTS faculty different from other engineering faculty? a. It is hypothesized that LTS faculty might be different than other engineering faculty, since differences have been found among the students who engage in LTS; for example, women might be over-represented among LTS faculty compared to engineering faculty overall. b. The demographic characteristics for LTS faculty were identified to answer research question 1. The characteristics for engineering faculty overall were taken
Paper ID #12728How Dialogue on ’Ingenuity in Nature’ Increases Enthusiasm for Engineer-ing and Science in Traditional Religious CommunitiesDr. Dominic M. Halsmer P.E., Oral Roberts University Dr. Dominic M. Halsmer is a Professor of Engineering and former Dean of the College of Science and Engineering at Oral Roberts University. He also serves as the Director of the Center for Faith and Learn- ing at ORU. He has been teaching science and engineering courses there for 23 years, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Oklahoma. He received BS and MS Degrees in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering
Paper ID #12231Volunteerism in Engineering Students and Its Relation to Social Responsibil-ityDr. Nathan E Canney PE, Seattle UniversityDr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where
Paper ID #13079Enhancing Learning by Empowering Indian Students to Solve EngineeringChallenges: An Effort by SPEED and IUCEEMr. Rohit Kandakatla, SPEED Rohit is currently studying his masters in Embedded Systems from KG Reddy college of Engineering, Hyderabad. He is the founder and CEO of Footsteps, a social organization which works towards em- powering students by providing them with tools to improve their engineering education. He is also the President of Student Platform for Engineering Education Development (SPEED).Mr. Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Student Platform for Engineering Education DevelopmentDr. Krishna Vedula