calculations from the beginning and slow down the modeling sequence by a (a) (b) (c) Fig. 4: A series of cross-sections comparing the Colosseum model to other reconstructions. From left to right: a) the top-down model produced by Tan (2014), b) a cross-section from the Museo Page 26.546.5 Colosseo, and c) a scale model from the same museum of a sector of the monument.considerable margin. This setback ties into the most significant flaw of the top-down approach,which is that the monument is constructed as a single, monolithic piece. This means that largeamounts of data will
Exchange Quarterly, 16(4), 135-139.8. Flores, B. C., Swift, A., Brady, T., & Martinez, J. R. (2002). The effectiveness of an advisory board as a critical friend. 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, F1B11-15.9. Jones, J. W., & Fick, J. K.. (2016, November 3). Student Certification of a Campus Building through the USGBC LEED® Lab™ Program. Lecture presented at the 2016 ATMAE Conference, Association of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering, Orlando, FL.
making building blocks. This project can be readily be used as an IndependentStudy/Research for students in construction related projects.MaterialsThe kenaf fibers used in this project are shown in Figure 2. They were obtained from a kenafprocessing plant in Texas, USA. The plant manufactures kenaf products including Kenaf decks. (a) Core Fibers (b) Bast Fibers Figure 2 Kenaf FibersMagnesium Oxychloride Cement Mix DesignThe Magnesium Oxychloride Cement is the bonding agent in this work [3,4,5]. With the right mixproportions, the Magnesium Oxychloride cement binds the fibers into a lightweight solid masswith high compressive strength. The Magnesium Oxychloride Cement mix
papers were submitted. A stratified sample of 12 papers was selected, based onstudent’s final grade in the course, for coding. The distribution of students electing to completethe optional assignment was fairly evenly spread throughout the course based on final grade,with one exception as shown in Table 1. Only one student received a D for the semester, and thisstudent did not complete the assignment. Table 1. Distribution final course grade and papers selected for coding. Final Grade in Course Total Completed Papers Selected Papers A 62 32 5 B 35 16 3
faculty workload. The CM faculty workload for the last twosemesters is illustrated in Table 1. Table 1: CM Faculty Mentor Workload (2 Semesters) Faculty ID No. of Projects No. of Students A 4 10 B 1 3 C 3 7 D 3 8 E 2 6 F 1 3 G 3 9 H 2 6 Total
(%) ? X100…..…. Eq. 2 Original contract duration( Days)*Date CO resolved: the earlier of the issuance of the Change Order date or the clarification date of a request forinformation (RFI) that led to changed work with a directive from the owner to construct the change till CO is issued.Reason for the Change: There are several reasons for the owner to issue a change order. Themost common reasons for design changes are: A)To provide for major quantity differences, B)To provide for unforeseen work, grade changes or alterations in the plans, C)To change thelimits of the construction to meet field conditions D)To make the projects more functionallyoperational, and E)Deterioration or damage to the project after design.The Party
University of Washington’s Department ofConstruction Management envisions experiential learning curriculum at the Pacific NorthwestCenter for Construction Research and Education.Bibliography: 1. Allison, D., Wills, B., Hodges, L. F., and Wineman, J. “Gorillas in the Bits.” Paper presented at the VRAISAnnual Conference, Albuquerque, NM., 1997. 2. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., and Squire, K. “Constructing Virtual Worlds: Tracing the HistoricalDevelopment of Learner Practices.” Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2001, pp. 47–94. 3. Catalano, G. D. and Catalano, K. “Transformation: From Teacher-Centered to Student-Centered EngineeringEducation.” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 88, No. 1, 1999, pp. 59-64. 4. Chi, M
and supervision1. The cost of completing each unit of suchoperations decreases as the number of units completed increases. An understanding of how costchanges is needed to accurately estimate and schedule the operations. A learning curve is agraphical representation of the relationship between unit cost and the number of units produced.Learning curve theory states that when the production quantity doubles, the unit cost (measuredin hours, man-hours, dollars, etc.) will decrease by a fixed percentage from the previous unitcost. A number of mathematical models have been used to describe the learning curve, includingthe straight line power model, Stanford “B” model, cubic power model, piecewise model, andexponential model2. The learning curve
…… Generation m Sim1&2 OH2 Sim1&2&3 OH3 Sim1&…&m OHm (A) Proposed interactive probabilistic risk simulation process Parameterization Generation Sim 1 OH1 Sim 2 OH2 … Sim n OHn (B) Traditional Monte Carlo simulation process Fig. 1 Interactive Monte Carlo simulation versus traditional Monte Carlo simulationFor each parameterized variable, n random numbers (n=number of simulation trials) are generatedtogether at one time, which becomes a random number tuple (RNT) for sub-simulations (whiletraditional method generates only one random number at one time). The time needed for eachsub-simulation
following steps are necessary to examine and report on a structuralfailure: a. Determine the cause or causes of failure. b. Determine the mode or modes of failure. c. Determine the responsible parties involved in the failure. d. Document all information, data, and analysis in the form of a report. e. Disseminate information on the failure to the engineering, architectural, and contracting professions in a timely manner.In regard to Boston’s Big Dig tunnel failure, federal and state officials took upon themselves toinspect all sections of Boston’s Central Artery/Tunnel project, and conducted tests on bolts thatheld the suspended panels and ventilation fans. In a matter of six months, they reinforced suspectsections of the
important to recognize that the content of everyconstruction class may not be appropriate for all of the online tools. Online exams and quizzesmay present major challenges for numerical and application oriented classes. However, onlinediscussion boards are appropriate tools for all classes as long as the content and responses aremaintained in a timely manner.References1. Johnson, B. T., and Gunderson, D. E. (2010). "Educating Students concerning Recent Trends in AEC: A Survey of ASC Member Programs." Associated Schools of Construction Annual International Conference, and CIB Workgroup 89, Associated School of Construction, Wentworth institute of Technology, April 2010
published papers, articles, books, or accepted licensing examination items. 7. Active participation in professional or technical societies, associations, agencies, or organizations, including: a. Serving as an elected or appointed official; b. Serving on a committee of the organization; c. Serving in other official positions. 8. Patents Issued. 9. Engaging in self-directed study.Units: The conversion of other units of credit to PDHs is as follows: 1. 1 college or unit semester hour 45 PDHs 2. 1 college or unit quarter hour 30 PDHs 3. 1 continuing education unit 10 PDHs 4. 1 hour of professional 1 PDH development in course work, seminars, or professional or technical presentations made at
, C. D., & Hill, R. B. (2010). Impact of an Engineering Mentorship Program on African-American Male High School Students’ Perceptions and Self-Efficacy. Journal of Page 26.1148.8 Industrial Teacher Education, 47(1), 99–127.3. FM Accredited Degree Program Directory. (n.d.). Retrieved January 10, 2015, from http://foundation.ifma.org/academics/fm-accredited-degree-program-directory4. Kram, K. E., & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring Alternatives: The Role of Peer Relationships in Career Development. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 110.5. NRC (National Research Council). 2008. Core Competencies for Federal Facilities
motivation. In G. Gabbard, B. Litowitz & P. Williams (Eds.), Textbook of Psychoanalysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 39-52). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.11. Fielden, S. L., Davidson, M. J., Gale, A. W., & Davey, C. L. (2000). Women in construction: The untapped resource. Construction Management & Economics, 18(1), 113-121. doi: 10.1080/01446190037100412. Fielden, S. L., Davidson, M. J., Gale, A. W., & Davey, C. L. (2001). Women, equality and construction. Journal of Management Development, 20(4), 293-305.13. Ford, J. K., & Noe, R. (1987). Self-assessed training needs: The effects of attitudes toward training, managerial level, and function. Personnel Psychology, 40(1), 39-53.14. Gale, A. W. (1994). Women in non
their job well? What does ‘A’ need to know from you so ‘B’ can do their job? How do I get you to invest in my goals? How do we each define a high level of craft? What is the appropriate level of precision for the task? For the project? What are the appropriate tolerances: physically as well as socially? What are your incentives for the project? What do think are the other disciplines’ incentives for the project? What are your risks for the project? What do you think are the other disciplines’ risks for the project?The first modules will focus on group interaction, communication, leadership and conflictresolution. These will include a personality self-assessment to help students identify their ownbehaviors
day Added A 28 20 15,000 24,600 8 1,200 B 44 30 30,000 39,800 14 700 C 40 32 40,000 60,000 8 2,500 D 50 45 60,000 80,000 5 4,000 E 34 24 20,000 36,000 10 1,600 F 24 14 40,000 45,000 10
10. Dumbrava, G., Koronka, A. (2009). “Actions Speak Louder Than Words-Body language in Business Communication.” Annual of University of Petroşani, Economics, no.9(3), 249-254.11. Zhou, H., Tingpin, Z. (2008). “Body Language in Business Negotiation.” International Journal of Business and Management, Vol.3 no.2, 90-96.12. Fennis, M. B., Stel, M. (2011). “The Pantomime of Persuasion: Fit Between Nonverbal Communication and Influence Strategies.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, no.47, 806–810.13. Wikforss, Ö., Alexander, L. (2007). “Rethinking Communication in Construction.” The Journal of Information Technology in Construction, Vol.12, 337-34614. Loosemore, M., Patrick, L. (2002) “Communication Problems with Ethnic
optionsduring the construction and 2) help students to understand what are the important factorsin improving energy efficiency in a building construction. For example, students learnedthat improving the materials of roof, and HVAC is the most desired way to achieve highenergy efficiency. Also they learned that building energy efficiency is most affected byclimate factors such as HDD (heating degree days) and CDD (cooling degree days).REFERENCE1. buildingSMARTalliance (2007), “National BIM Standard 2007”, http://www.buildingsmartalliance.org2. D. Crawley, J. Hand, M. Kummert, B. Griffith (2005), Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs, Joint Report Version 1.0.3. R. Quinlan (1993), “C 4.5 Programs
C C- C Transit C C C- Aviation C- C+ D Schools N/A D- D- Drinking Water C- D D Dams N/A D- D Solid Waste N/A B C+ Hazardous Waste N/A C D+Navigable Waterways N/A D
Page 25.773.8 several key construction owners and administrators that want to become a part of that bridge system. The one thing that the educators must remember is that to invest in something the person investing must feel ownership if the outcome is going to be productive and sustainable and getting the investors involved in the actual process is a win-win for everyone involved. References 1. Blank, M. J., Johnson, S. D., & Shah, B. P. (2003, Spring). Community as text: Using the community as a resource for learning in community schools. In K. J. Pittman, N. Yohalm, & J. Tolman (Eds.), When, where, what, and how youth learn: Blurring school and community boundaries (pp. 107-120). San Francisco: Jossey
), 535-556.3. Byrne. D. B. & Fraser, B. J. (1986). Student Perceptions of Preferred Classroom Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Research, 80 (1), 10-18.4. Church, M. A., Elliott, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of Classroom Environment, Achievement Goals, and Achievement Outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (1), 43-545. Cole, D. G., Sugioka, H. L., & Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (1999). Supportive Classroom Environments for Creativity in Higher Education. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33 (4), 277-293.6. Findley, B. & Varble, D. (2006). Creating a Conducive Classroom Environment: Classroom Management is the Key. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 2 (3), 1-5.7. Holley
point A to point B when you have different things to deal with and different personality types to deal with, like architects and engineers.”Professional and Ethical Judgment Though the developmental and social reform perspectives were identified equally as the most important teaching perspective when teaching professional and ethical judgment, all of the perspectives were closely identified as important. One study participant stated, “Professional and ethical judgment goes along with students being able to develop critical thinking skills. I think using the developmental style works because it takes students time to learn and acquire those skills.” Another participant stated, “Teaching
construction FUNCTION/ROLE: Project Management Cost Management Time Management Quality Management Contract Management Safety Management 2. One of the following: a. An undergraduate (4-year BA/BS level) or graduate degree in construction management, architecture, engineering or construction science. b. A 2-year undergraduate degree (AA/AS level) or certificate in construction management, architecture, engineering or construction science AND 4 years experience in general design/construction. (This experience is in addition to the 48 month CM requirement.) c. No degree/certificate in construction management, architecture
., & Sketo, B. (2008). Building Information Modeling (BIM): Benefits, Risks andChallenges. Proceedings of the International 44th Annual Conference Associated Schools of Construction. April 2-53. Azhar, S., Sattineni, A., & Hein, M. (2010). BIM Undergraduate Capstone Thesis: Student Perceptions andLessons Learned. Proceedings of the 46th ASC Annual Conference, Boston, MA.4. Barham, W., Meadati, P., & Irizary, J. (2011). Enhancing Student Learning in Structures Courses with BuildingInformation Modeling. Proceedings of the 2011 ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering,Miami, FL., pp. 850-8575. Barison, M. B. & Santos, E. T. (2010). An Overview of BIM Specialists. Proceedings of the InternationalConference on
preferred having the freedom to determine the time and locationfor test taking, but collusion between students can be an issue. In a college algebra course,students were allowed to retake exams where they received less than a B 7. Performance wasgreatly increased for 90% of the students who took the test again. Final exam scores were alsoimproved for those retaking unit exams, though this result was not statistically significant. Alarger study involving many disciplines was performed at Ball State University where studentstook many tests on the computer and this was compared with fewer paper based tests 5. Studentsoverall preferred taking more tests during the semester and preferred taking the tests on thecomputer instead of on paper.MethodologyThe
summarized inTable 1. Passage was somewhat arbitrarily determined to be 80% of the students achieving aprofessional practice standard. Page 24.923.4 Table 1: ABET Student Outcomes Criteria as assessed through the EDP by degree program. ABET Criteria BSCE BSEE BSEnvE BSME BSE(a) an ability to apply knowledge of Xmathematics, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conductexperiments, as well as to analyze andinterpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component,or process to meet desired needs
. Students thatwere absent the date of the Mediation received no score for this component. The second part oftheir assessment grade was based upon the written research report for the case study. SeeAppendices A and B for instructions and point criterion. The typed research papers were duebefore each debate and required students to cite referenced materials, cases and summarize theirlegal position and arguments. Students had to attach any supporting articles so that the instructorcould review their sources for relevance to the case.The overall point values increased from the first to the third mediation. All mediations had a 25point verbal debate component grade. However, the written research component point valuesincreased with each subsequent
22.1649.6Using the project obtained, students had to act the role of a construction professional bypreparing a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), making an activity list and determining theproject ―logic.‖ At this stage, the groups of students: 1. Developed a WBS including: a. Identifying the major CSI divisions and code numbers. b. Having no less than 50 activities in the schedule. c. Calculating the duration for each activity by using the estimate information obtained. d. Listing any assumptions. 2. Decided the logical relationships between activities and made a summary table including following items: a. Relationships among activities - meaning the
curriculum to achieve specific outcomeobjectives. Each curriculum designer, however, should determine the level of skill to achieve anyobjectives and the unique capabilities of the institution and its faculty. Also, some items that areranked lower may be important to other constituencies and may need to be considered forinclusion in the curriculum.Appendix B contains a rank order listing of the 172 items under the eleven ABET outcomescategories which is summarized in Table 2. Reviewing the top items for each of the elevenoutcomes from Table 2 reveals more subtle yet very valuable uses for the database. From theTable 2, the results indicated that 3 to 5 yrs experienced contractors will have betterunderstanding and performance in all eleven criteria
and results ACTION Ethical Unethical I don’t know A Selecting a contractor based on lowest bid price 70.1% 20.3% 9.6% Unbalancing a bid in an attempt to get money early to B 20.2% 61.2% 18.5% finance later parts of the job Taking a subcontractors bid and showing it to another C subcontractor with the aim of getting a lower bid price 24.7% 65.7% 9.6% – i.e. bid shopping Two or more contractors agreeing before the bid to D 20.3% 68.9% 10.7% increase their bid prices A