. 67-73, 2017.4. K.W. Lau, P.Y. Lee, and M.Y. He, “360 degree immersive videos: a way to improve organizational learning practices,” Development and Learning in Organizations, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 8-11, 2018.5. G. Makransky, T.S. Terkildsen, and R.E. Mayer, “Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning,” Learning and Instruction, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007, 2017.6. C. Baukal, D. Basquez, M. Pappe, B. Johnson, B. Weimer, and J. McGuire, Fired Heater Flooding, presented at 2017 American Flame Research Committee Meeting, Houston, December 2017.7. B.G. Witmer and M.J. Singer, “Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire
accomplished by all involvedthrough volunteering their time, expertise, and efforts.The weekend success centers on genuine and extreme output from a unique set of individuals: 1. Program participants who have agreed to attend a minimum of two weekend retreats 2. Former program participants who volunteer to: a. Create a unique theme and program content b. Manage a budget and schedule c. Recruit and lead volunteer content developers d. Arrange executive speakers e. Solicit and guide volunteer weekend coaches f. Manage communications and logistics 3. Previous program graduates who offer their expertise as volunteers: a. Content developers b. Logistic leads c. Evaluators
Evaluation ABET Criteria 5 4.5 4 Term 3.5 3 08A Mean 2.5 09W 2 09A 1.5 1 0.5 0 a b c d e f g h i j k ABET category Engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain
Paper ID #8611Educating Engineering Educators to Nurture 21st Century Indian EngineersProf. Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma Farrokh Mistree holds the L. A. Comp Chair in the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, Oklahoma. Farrokh’s passion is to have fun in providing an opportunity for highly motivated and talented people to learn how to define and achieve their dreams. Farrokh received his B. Tech (Hons) degree in Naval Architecture in 1967 from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur and his Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of California
participants’ knowledgeabout student learning and best pedagogical practices and b) facilitating the integration of thosebest practices into participants’ teaching practice. Evidence exists that participation in an FLCcan change faculty practice,10 but a great deal more study is needed to fully understand how, towhat extent, and under what conditions FLCs support change, both short-term and sustained. It is our hypothesis that reflective work is essential for faculty professional development; Page 25.1087.2linking the knowledge faculty acquire through participation in an FLC with their teachingpractice. We contend the development of STEM
-Hill.7 Grady, J. (1993). System Requirements Analysis. San Francisco, CA., McGraw-Hill.8 Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling. 10th ed. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons (p. 83).9 Blanchard, B. S. & Fabrycky, W. J. (2011). Systems Engineering and Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall (p. 34). Page 24.335.15
the years and changes in society the needs of the work force have changed, which alsochanges the demand for certain degrees at the collegiate level. The information provided fromForbes describes the top five worst degrees based on unemployment rates for recent graduates[22]. 1. Anthropology and Archeology a. Unemployment rate: 10.5% b. Median earnings 28k 2. Film, Video, and Photographic Arts a. Unemployment rate: 12.9% b. Median earnings 30k 3. Fine Arts a. Unemployment rate 12.6% b. Median earnings 30k 4. Philosophy and Religious Studies a. Unemployment rate 10.8% b. Median earnings 30k 5. Liberal Arts a. Unemployment rate 9.2% b. Median earnings 30kThe combination of the
apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of the discipline to broadly-defined engineering technology activities b. An ability to select and apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to engineering technology problems that require the application of principles and applied procedures or methodologies c. An ability to conduct standard tests and measurements; to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments; and to apply experimental results to improve processes d. An ability to design systems, components, or processes for broadly-defined engineering technology problems appropriate to program educational objectives e. An ability to function effectively as a member or
be more widely used.Acknowledgments. The creative and energetic participation of the ‘students’ overcamemany deficiencies in organizational foresight and made the experience productive andlasting for everyone.Bibliography 1. K M Wright, “Emergence of a services marketplace and the need for ‘T’ shaped individuals”, ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, 2008. 2. R Valerdi, B Boehm and D Reifer, “COSYSMO: A constructive systems engineering cost model coming of age”, INCOSE 2003 Symposium, Washington DC. 3. The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) is available at : http://public.itrs.net 4. For example, for good examples from HP, see: http//h10134.www1.hp.com/insights/casestudies. 5
function into the excel spreadsheetTransportation Noise Lab Data CollectionEach group member is expected to collect information at the following locations & times:a. Inside residence during the dayb. Inside residence at nightc. Outside of residence during the dayd. Outside of residence at nightFor each location, the student must do the following:a. Record 3 mins of soundb. Record the time of data collectionc. Note any irregularities in sounds that you notice such as people yelling, car horns,motorcycles, etc.[B] Civil EngineeringCourse: Environmental Engineering Lab 1: pH, ACID, and BASESAn experiment on determining the pH values of different solutions was conducted inEnvironmental Engineering lab course. A pH value
Professors, June 24, 2001 - June 27, 2001 2001;4155-4160. 11. Gustafson RJ. Determining impact of a course on teaching in engineering, inASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. 118th ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 26, 2011 - June 29, 2011 2011. 12. Simon B, Bales E, Griswold WG, et al. Case study: Faculty professionaldevelopment workshops for innovation diffusion, in SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACMTechnical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 42nd ACM Technical Symposium onComputer Science Education, SIGCSE 2011, March 9, 2011 - March 12, 2011 2011;673-678. 13. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations (5th edition). New York: Free Press, 2003. 14. Bandura A. Social
Stakeholder Metrics Since the students were not beholden to the instructors for a grade, no formal evaluationof the students was undertaken. However, a short evaluation form for the course and instructorswas given to the students at the end of the course, including five questions: (1) What do you feel were the strengths and weaknesses of these instructors? (2) How do you feel the instructors could improve their teaching of this course? (3) Please rank the instructors from 1 (low) to 5 (high) on the following aspects: a. Instructors well prepared b. Encouraged independent thinking c. Learned greatly from instructor d. Interested in helping participants e. Overall rating (4) How do you
% 71% Government 4-year organization academic Commercial 5% organization institution, Other 11% 2% 22% (a) Community Colleges (b) Industry Figure 1: Organization Types, Number of Participants and Survey ParticipantsThe survey included questions about preferred professional development program type, preferredlength
faculty learning communities: Considering socialdimensions of participant choice. Learning Communities Journal 2, 5–26.24 Sirium & Madigan (2010). Ibid.25 Cox (2004). Ibid.26 Haviland, Alleman, & Allen (2015). Ibid.27 Sorcinelli & Aiken (1995). Ibid.28 Allwright, R. (2003). Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. LanguageTeaching Research 7(2), 113-141.29 Wenger, E., Trayner, B., and de Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities andnetworks: a conceptual framework. Rapport 18, Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open University of theNetherlands. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/documents/Wenger_Trayner_DeLaat_Value_creation.pdf.
Engineering Institute,Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1997.7 Humphrey, Watts S., PSP – A Self-Improvement Process for Software Engineers, Software Engineering Institute,Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2005.8 Humphrey, Watts S., Managing the Software Process, Software Engineering Institute, Addison Wesley, Reading,MA, 1989.9 Humphrey, Watts S., TSP Leading a Development Team, Software Engineering Institute, Addison Wesley,Reading, MA, 2006.10 Humphrey, Watts S., A Discipline for Software Engineering, Software Engineering Institute, Addison Wesley,Reading, MA, 1995.11 Chrissis, Mary B., Mike Konrad, and Sandy Shrum, CMMI Guidelines for Process Integration and ProductImprovement, Software Engineering Institute, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 2003.12
). Digital Omnivores, Social Media and Social Capital: Expatriatesinteractions using Smartphones in Stockholm (Doctoral dissertation, Södertörn University).Li, D., & Segal, B. (2012). The Changing Landscape of The Canadian Mobile Audience.International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 7(1).Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the course. Babson Survey Research Group: TheSloan Consortium.Balaji, M. S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student interactions in online discussion forum:Empirical research from ‘media richness theory’perspective. Journal of Interactive OnlineLearning, 9(1), 1-22.Beck, R. J. (2010). Teaching international law as a partially online course: The hybrid/blendedapproach to pedagogy. International Studies Perspectives, 11
thatchange is needed is when the company is in dire straits. There appears to be great satisfactionamong (E&T) academicians that the status quo of teaching, research and service is achieving allrequired purposes7 while simultaneously lamenting indicators that STEM education in Americais in decline, enrollment of females and minorities is lagging and other nations are creatingengineering professionals at rates this country experienced prior to the availabilities of federalgrant monies. Kerr7 labeled this phenomena “…the folly of rewarding A while hoping for B”.There is a call for changes in P&T processes among some members of the engineeringprofession. Part of that call recognizes involving communities with scholarship in the form
results ofthe study were somewhat limited by its pure quantitative methodology which couldn’t providein-depth responses regarding students’ experiences of the course.A question that arose in the present study was the appropriateness of an online learning formatfor teaching technical content, such as the use of a sophisticated 3D solid modeling package likeCATIA, in a corporate/university program. Additionally, what were students’ and instructors’opinions of offering a course on technical content in an online environment?Distance LearningThe evolution of distance education occurred through four generations: (a) printed instruction,(b) early technology in broadcasting systems, (c) online instruction, and (d) web-basedteleconferencing.7 Online
technology into teaching and learning. M. Ed. - Education and Human Development - The George Washington UniversityDr. Michelle E. Jarvie-Eggart, Michigan Technological University Dr. Jarvie-Eggart is a registered professional engineer with over a decade of experience as an environ- mental engineer. She lectures in the Engineering Fundamentals department at Michigan Technological University. Her research interests include online learning, active and collaborative learning, sustainability and diversity in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Best Practices for Promoting Faculty-Student Interactions in Online STEM CoursesIntroductionIn
competitiveness. Educated residents with specialized skills and knowledge fuel the performance of existing firms and serve to attract new employers in our target industries. b. A comprehensive 2014 Talent Demand Study shows that many of the region’s technical and high-wage jobs are being filled by highly-educated workers moving in from out-of-state. The study also identified key gaps in the region’s education system (high school through higher education) that need to be filled in order for local students to be prepared for careers in the highest demand occupations. c. The Innovative Activity Index is below average (City Name to be provided = 61
engineering education community,” he said, “but moreimportantly in the employer community.” [1]In reviewing the Personal Skills in Chemical Engineering Graduates, B R Dickson and CD Grant from the University of Strathclyde, Department of Chemical and ProcessEngineering, Glasgow, Scotland- suggest that the development of skills within degreeprogrammes can meet the needs of employers, yet there is still further work to be donethat a relevant post graduate qualification could provide.In this paper, transferable’ (or ‘personal’) skills are defined as the five key skills of:communications; team-working; problem solving; numeracy and IT skills; self-learning.It shows, with some specific examples, that there are ample and varied opportunities todevelop
AC 2009-1127: EMBEDDING FACULTY INTO INDUSTRY: UNDERSTANDINGTHE REAL WORLD EXPECTATIONS OF OUR GRADUATESDan Baldwin, Indiana University-Purdue University, IndianapolisJohn Ludwick, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis John earned his Master of Fine Arts Degree in Sequential Art (the art of visual storytelling) from the Savannah College of Art and Design; the first such master's degree given in the United States. John B. Ludwick has directed 2-D and 3-D animation television spots for Cartoon Network, PBS Kids, Toon Disney, and many others at the Broadcast Design firm Primal Screen in Atlanta, Georgia. John earned the Gold Broadcast Design Award (BDA) for Best Television Website
universal design. Burgstahler’s UniversalDesign of Instruction (UDI) model provides eight guiding principles intended to beapplied to the design of instruction, the physical environment of the class, deliverymethods, feedback, assessment, and technology. Burgstahler defines UDI as “the design”of instruction of products and environments to be usable by all students, to the greatestextend possible, without the need for adaption or specialized design” (Burgstahler, 2012,p.2). Universal Design Educational Models a. Creating welcoming classrooms b. Determining essential components of a course c. Communicating clear
of instruction and stu- dent support. Prior to joining UW-Madison, Wayne directed the Midwest solid waste consulting services of Camp Dresser McKee and led energy conservation research projects for Argonne National Laboratory. He has a BS in engineering from Carnegie-Mellon University, an MS in civil engineering with an emphasis in regional planning from Northwestern University, and is a licensed professional engineer. For more information about UW-Madison’s online graduate engineering degree programs see http://distancedegrees.engr.wisc.edu Page 23.1224.1 c American
practical application in theuniversity classroom.8 Since that time, the Seven Principles have evolved into standards forundergraduate education and have been used by instructors in face-to-face classrooms to enhancethe quality of instruction.9, 26 These principles have also set the stage for a large number ofresearch studies3, 4, 13, 25 in support of both face-to-face and online course quality.Chickering and Gamson’s Seven Principles assert that good practice in undergraduate education(a) encourages student-faculty contact, (b) encourages cooperation among students, (c)encourages active learning, (d) gives prompt feedback, (e) emphasizes time on task, (f)communicates high expectations, and (g) respects diverse talents and ways of learning.7
• Alternative paths to system realizationThe advantage of having a smoothly-operating consortium pays off in delivering such abroad-based plan. Processes are already in place to identify the required expertise andmanage the balance between the different thrusts and measure their effectiveness. Thereis also an important ‘trickle down’ effect. Topics that appear first in high-levelleadership courses steadily diffuse out to a wider range of participants to mimic the waytechnology is spread throughout the industry. The trends are also seen in detail by theacademic collaborators and the relevant sections are quickly incorporated into academiccourses.Bibliography 1. D McNabb, L Gibson & B Finnie, The case of the vanishing workforce”, Public
Annual Conference and Exposition. American Society of Engineering Education.12 Mohammadi M, Hosseini Firouz M, Alefy B, Nafar M. (2014) Utilizing MATLAB-Simulink based technique forteaching advantages of reactive power compensation using shunt capacitors to undergraduate students. InternationalJournal Of Electrical Engineering Education. July 2014;51(3):261-27713 Nathans-Kelly, T., & Nicometo, C (2014). Slide rules: Design, build, and archive presentations in the engineeringand technical fields. New York, NY, USA: Wiley-IEEE Press.14 Hoag, K. (2005). Vehicular Engine Design. Vienna: Springer-Verlag.15 Ceaglske, A., Graf, M., & Stoll, N. (2013). Engine Design 2 Final Report, SWIrC Turbo Diesel.: InternalPublication.16 Thomason, A
them from other prior generations [p. 11]. Millennials are 28% more likely to focus on business impact. Millennials are 71% more likely to focus on teamwork Millennials are 22% more likely to focus on a culture of connection.Non-Millennial definitions of inclusion are centered on traditional Part A to Part B precedentsand initiatives: Non-Millennials are 28% more likely to focus on fairness of opportunity. Non-Millennials are 31% more likely to focus on equity. Non-Millennials are 26% more likely to focus on integration. Non-Millennials are 28% more likely to focus on acceptance and tolerance.Moving beyond previous definitions of diversity and inclusion recognizes that most diversity andinclusion
component of Illinois StateUniversity's NCETE TTE spring professional development workshops. Using a quasi-experimental, pre-test post-test design, the project will design and implement assessmentprocedures to explore the extent to which students understand the core engineering concepts. Thestudy will consist of three phases including (a) designing the unit of instruction to deliver thecore engineering concepts; (b) delivering the unit of instruction to secondary level students(grades 10-12); and (c) refining the unit for a second round of delivery and assessment. The unitwill be designed during the NCETE TTE professional development workshop at Illinois StateUniversity and will involve technology education teachers from cohorts 1 and 2. In
university as theknowledge deliverer and enabler for the knowledge application needs to be a full partner in thisvalue chain, not just a degree supplier.One key team member added to the GM TEP model is the inclusion of HR as a primary teammember to: a) integrate the TCEP into the organization’s performance evaluation process; b) provide real career path opportunities for the staff who operates the CTEP on a daily basis; Page 23.4.8 c) free the technical community from the time necessary to operate the CTEP and allocate this responsibility to the staff better equipped to execute the associated functions in a much more efficient