Conference Session

Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Junaid A. Siddiqui, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #7574The Challenge of Change in Engineering Education: Is it the Diffusion of In-novations or Transformative Learning?Mr. Junaid A. Siddiqui, Purdue University, West Lafayette Junaid A. Siddiqui is a doctoral candidate at the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. In his graduate work he is exploring the systems of conceptual and social challenges associated with educa- tional change for the development of undergraduate engineering education. Before joining the doctoral program he worked for nine years in a faculty development role at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Saudi

Conference Session

Assessment and Research Tools

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nancy E. Study, Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College); Steven Nozaki, Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College); Sheryl A. Sorby, University of Cincinnati ; Mary A. Sadowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (Polytechnic Institute); Heidi M. Steinhauer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach; Ronald L. Miller, Colorado School of Mines; Kaloki Nabutola, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #22470Creating a Concept Inventory - Lessons LearnedDr. Nancy E. Study, Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College) Dr. Nancy E. Study is on the faculty of the School of Engineering at Penn State Behrend where she teaches courses in engineering graphics and rapid prototyping, and is the coordinator of the rapid prototyping lab. Her research interests include visualization, standardization of CAD practices, and haptics. Nancy is a former chair of the ASEE Engineering Design Graphics Division and is currently the Circulation Manager and Treasurer of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal. She received

Conference Session

Concept Inventories and Assessment of Knowledge

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natalie Jorion, University of Illinois, Chicago; Brian Douglas Gane, University of Illinois at Chicago; Louis V DiBello; James W Pellegrino, University of Illinois, Chicago

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #13108Developing and Validating a Concept InventoryMiss Natalie Jorion, University of Illinois, Chicago Natalie Jorion is a research assistant and Ph.D. student of learning sciences specializing in psychometrics at the University of Illinois in Chicago, 1240 W. Harrison St, Chicago, IL 60607; njorio2@uic.edu.Dr. Brian Douglas Gane, University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Brian Gane is a Visiting Research Assistant Professor at the Learning Sciences Research Institute, University of Illinois at Chicago. Dr. Gane’s research focuses on psychological theories of learning and skill acquisition, assessment

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 15: Perspectives on Engineering Careers and Workplaces

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gretchen A. Dietz, University of Florida; Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida; Erica D. McCray, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, Columbus, OH., 2017.[27] E. L. Bell, “The Bicultural Life Experience of Career-Oriented Black Women,” J. Organ. Behav., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 459–477, 1990.[28] J. R. Feagin and M. P. Sikes, Living with Racism: The Black Middle-class Experience. Beacon Press, 1994.[29] T. S. Gibbs, “From retention to detention: A phenomenological study of the African - American engineer experience,” Ph.D., Walden University, United States -- Minnesota, 2008.[30] P. B. Jackson, P. A. Thots, and H. F. Taylor, “Composition of the Workplace and Psychological Well-Being: The Effects of Tokenism on America’s Black Elite,” Social Forces, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 543–557.[31] G. Ladson-Billings, “Culturally Relevant Pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a. the Remix,” Harv. Educ

Conference Session

Research Informing Teaching Practice I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University; Robert A. Linsenmeier, Northwestern University; Timothy Miller, Binghamton University ; Matthew R. Glucksberg, Northwestern University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference, Savannah, GA., 2004.5. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., and Post, T., "Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers," Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 591-645, 2000.6. Yildirim, T.P., Shuman, L., and Besterfield-Sacre, M., “Model-Eliciting Activities: Assessing Engineering Student Problem Solving and Skill Integration Processes,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 831–845, 2010. Page 25.1428.18

Conference Session

Teaching and Learning in Online Environments

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Javeed Kittur, Arizona State University; Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

students’navigations to and submissions of different course elements including quizzes, assignments,discussion forums, wiki pages, attachments, modules, syllabus, grades, and courseannouncements. Table 2. Structure of the raw data eventtime student_id course_id eventtype action object_name enrl_status 10/10/2018 A 2018Fall NavigationEvent NavigatedTo quizzes:quiz ENRL 9:21:33 B_X 10/15/2018 A 2018Fall NavigationEvent NavigatedTo attachment ENRL 9:22:18 B_X 10/11/2018 B 2018Fall NavigationEvent NavigatedTo syllabus ENRL 19:54:17 B_X 10/16/2018 B

Conference Session

Studying Engineering Education Research & Institutions

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Justin L Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

innovative behaviors. Page 26.740.2Research PurposeThis paper explores whether a specific trait or tendency may be connected to innovation:empathy. This quantitative study is guided by the following research questions:RQ1: What is the relationship between the empathy and innovation amongst engineering students?RQ2: To what extent are empathic tendencies predictive of innovative behavioral tendencies?Using a model developed out of social psychology,13 we define empathy as a multi-facetedphenomenon built upon four distinct sub-constructs: (a) fantasy, (b) perspective-taking, (c)empathic concern, and (d) personal distress. Here we explore whether

Conference Session

Studying Engineering Education Research & Institutions

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren A. Sepp, University of Washington; Mania Orand, Human Centered Design and Engineering ; Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington; Lauren D. Thomas, University of Washington; Brook Sattler, University of Washington; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. Dr. Atman is co-director of the newly-formed Consortium for Promoting Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), funded by a $4.4 million grant from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. She was director of the NSF-funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), a national research center that was funded from 2003-2010. Dr. Atman is the author or co-author on over 115 archival publications. She has been invited to give many keynote addresses, including a Distinguished Lecture at the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) 2014 Annual Conference. Dr. Atman joined the

Conference Session

Diversity and Inclusion

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen E. Rambo-Hernandez, West Virginia University ; Rebecca A. Atadero, Colorado State University; Christina Paguyo, Colorado State University; Jeremy Clinton Schwartz, West Virginia University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

capture how students valueddiversity within engineering specifically or how likely students were to enact inclusivebehaviors. Thus, we created two new scales: Valuing Diversity within Engineering and InclusiveBehaviors in Engineering.To determine what constructs needed to be addressed in the two scales, we examined literatureaddressing reasons for promoting diversity and inclusion in the workplace and school –specifically in engineering; and barriers to participation encountered by students fromunderrepresented populations in engineering For the Valuing Diversity Scale, three constructssurfaced. Specifically, engineers should value diversity to (a) address issues of social justice(e.g. Baillie, Pawley, & Riley 2012), (b) improve the bottom

Conference Session

Curricular Innovations 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Branislav M. Notaros, Colorado State University; Ryan McCullough, Colorado State University; Pranav S. Athalye, Colorado State University; Anthony A. Maciejewski, Colorado State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

-work. Namely,with the new LSM/KI pedagogical structure and substantial portions of class time being devotedto KI sessions, it has become evident that the students must engage very intensely in the assignedpre-work that, in turn, must be carefully thought out and guided, and, most importantly,meaningfully assessed.To this end, one of the faculty team members (B. M. Notaroš) has developed a unique andextremely comprehensive collection of as many as 888 Conceptual Questions inelectromagnetics6, to help students comprehend anchoring concepts in this core competency, as away of encouraging active learning through a partially flipped classroom approach and problem-based learning. These are multiple-choice questions that focus on the core concepts of

Conference Session

Examining Social Ties and Networks

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado Boulder; Daria A Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #12204Introducing Actor-Network Theory Via the Engineering Sophomore YearMs. Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a doctoral student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at CU Boulder. Her research investigates sociocultural environments of engineering undergraduate, particularly within the environments of impactful required mathematics courses. Adapting concepts from the Learning Sciences, Janet hopes to bring new ideas to engineering education that will illuminate previously overlooked social phenomena and improve the engineering experience for all students.Dr. Daria A Kotys

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Potpourri I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raghavi Merugureddy, Purdue University ; Amani Salim, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

correlation analysis in SAS resulted in a significant coefficient or strong positiverelation between several subparts of items 11 and 12. Viewing the analysis results, it becameapparent that these relations can be grouped into six clusters: A = [3, 4]; B = [6, 7, 8]; C = [7, 8,9, 10]; D = [10, 17]; E = [12, 13, 14]; and F = [16, 17, 18, 19] as shown in Figure 1. Theserelations have a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7 or above, which according to the criteria inTable 2 represents a strong or significant relation. Pearson correlation coefficients greater than0.9 where found for item pairs in cluster F (16&17), F (17&19), and F (18&19). Pearsoncorrelation coefficients greater than 0.8 were found for item pairs in cluster A (3&4), B

Conference Session

Understanding Our Students

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert M. Bielby, University of Michigan; Trevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University; Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Janel A. Sutkus, Carnegie Mellon University; Brian A. Burt, University of Michigan; Eunjong Ra, University of Michigan ; Matthew Holsapple, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Magazine, IEEE, 16 (4), 27-36.6. Rabins, M.J. (1998). Teaching engineering ethics to undergraduates: Why? What? How? Science and Engineering Ethics, 4 (3), 291-302.7. ABET. (2011). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: Efective for evaluations during the 2010-2011 accreditation cycle. ABET, Inc: Baltimore, MD.8. Newberry, B. (2004). The dilemma of ethics in engineering education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10 (2), 343-351.9. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.10. Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college? Four Critical Years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.11. Terenzini, P. T., & Reason, R. D. (2005,). Parsing the first year

Conference Session

Open-Ended Problems and Student Learning

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark T. Carnes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

assigning quality Levels (scores) to each of the dimensions, while the I-MAP (Appendix B)provides guidance specific to the JIT MEA. The quality Levels possible vary from one(sub)dimension to another, but the values of the Levels are the same. Specifically, a qualityLevel 4 corresponds to a letter grade of “A”, Level 3 = “B”, Level 2 = “C”, and Level 1 = “D”.Mathematical ModelMathematical Model Complexity. In Carnes, et al.6, the Mathematical Model Complexity wasassessed based on the progression of the number of statistical measures used. For example, ateam that began by using Mean alone to rank the shipping companies in DRAFT 1 was judged tohave made progress if they used both Mean and Standard Deviation in DRAFT 2. Similarly, theaddition of a

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Potpourri II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael A. Collura, University of New Haven; Shannon Ciston, University of New Haven; Nancy Ortins Savage, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

and the gpa is quite large.The differential between EAS211 grade and gpa is negative, meaning that the EAS211 grade islower than the previous term gpa. Thus a smaller negative number for this metric indicatesperformance closer to the student’s previous level. Students in the middle gpa group showessentially no difference in this metric (0.1). Students in the lowest and highest gpa group whohave had two chemistry course show better performance by this metric with differences of 0.4and 0.3, respectively. Note that a value of 0.3 for this metric would be approximately thedifference between a B and a B+.To further examine the effect of chemistry courses on engineering course grades, correlationcoefficients were determined for several paired

Conference Session

Research Informing Teaching Practice I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George D. Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Noah Salzman, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Russell Andrew Long, Purdue University; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

 Education. 37.  Lawanto, O. and S. Johnson. Students' cognitive self‐appraisal, self‐management, and the level  of difficulty of an engineering design project: Are they related? in 2009 ASEE Annual Conference  and Exposition, June 14, 2009 ‐ June 17, 2009. 2009. Austin, TX, United states: American Society  for Engineering Education. 38.  Harper, B. and P. Terenzini. The effects of instructors' time in industry on students' co‐curricular  experiences. in 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22, 2008 ‐ June 24, 2008.  2008. Pittsburg, PA, United states: American Society for Engineering Education. 39.  Strayhorn, T. Measuring the educational benefits of diversity in STEM education: A multi

Conference Session

Understanding Our Students

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Holsapple, Univeristy of Michigan; Janel A. Sutkus, Carnegie Mellon University; Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Brian A. Burt, University of Michigan; Eunjong Ra, University of Michigan ; Trevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University; Robert M. Bielby, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2011-1585: WE CAN’T GET NO SATISFACTION!: THE RELATION-SHIP BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ETHICAL REASONING AND THEIR SAT-ISFACTION WITH ENGINEERING ETHICS EDUCATIONMatthew Holsapple, Univeristy of Michigan Matthew Holsapple is a doctoral candidate at the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Ed- ucation at the University of Michigan. His research interests include moral development and character education in higher students, professional ethics education, and research design and quasi-experimental methods in research on college student outcomes.Janel Sutkus, Carnegie Mellon UniversityDonald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Donald Carpenter is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering and the

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 19: Thinking about the Engineering Curriculum

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Darby Rose Riley, Rowan University; Joshua Bourne Reed, Rowan University; Richard T. Cimino, Rowan University; Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

during the datacollection and analysis process were kept in an audit trail ( process reliability).Results and DiscussionAnalysis of the student responses yielded the following set of themes. In parentheses are thenumber of student responses (N = 11 total) that were coded as the corresponding theme.A. Acknowledging Complexity (1): ​Subjects discuss details of the situation, oftentimes using thefact that the situation is complicated to support their point. Their decision is typically that whichis the least invasive (can be any of the three depending upon scenario), and use phrases such as“there’s a lot to consider.”B. Broader Scope (2): ​Subject is focused on the diversity/inclusivity issue highlighted in thescenario. The subject applies the

Conference Session

Problem Solving, Adaptive Expertise, and Social Engagement

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

research, 74(1), 59-109.Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. (2006). Commissioned report for thenational symposium on postsecondary student success: Spearheading a dialog on student success.National Postsecondary Educational Cooperative.Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade ofresearch (Vol. 2): San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Tavakol, M & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal ofMedical Education, 2, 53-55.Rigdon E. E. (1996). CFI vs RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equationmodelling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(4), 369-379.Voelkl, K. E. (2012). School Identification, A. L

Conference Session

Knowing Our Students, Part 2

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ozgur Eris, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Debbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Helen Chen, Stanford University; Camelia Rosca, Boston College; Larry Ludlow, Boston College; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Krista Donaldson, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2007-2392: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF CORRELATES OFENGINEERING PERSISTENCE: RESULTS FROM A LONGITUDINAL STUDYOzgur Eris, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering OZGUR ERIS is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Design at Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering. His interests include engineering design theory, design cognition, and design informatics. He received a B.S. from the University of Washington, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University. He has published on the role of inquiry in design, design knowledge and capture, and interdisciplinary aspects of creativity. He is the author of Effective Inquiry for Engineering Design, Kluwer, 2004

Conference Session

Using Technology to Enhance Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Parthum, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2009-826: TEACHING WITH A TABLET PC, A NEW TECHNOLOGY FORTHE CLASSROOM AND ACADEMIC USAGEMichael Parthum, Rochester Institute of Technology Michael J. Parthum Sr. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology and the Program Chair of the Electrical/Mechanical Engineering Technology program at the Rochester Institute of Technology (Rochester, NY). He teaches undergraduate courses and conducts research in the field of MEMS (micro electro-mechanical systems) and has been working in the areas of thin films / composite materials and glassy metals with patients filed. He also has strong interests in the design for life philosophy, and renewable power sources

Conference Session

New Learning Paradigms II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gymama Slaughter, Virginia State University; Toni Harris, Virginia State University; Kabongo Ngandu, Virginia State University; Keith Williamson, Virginia State University; Kwame Adom, Virginia State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2009-321: UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH EXPERIENCE: A TOOL FORSTUDENTS PURSUING A GRADUATE DEGREE IN ENGINEERINGGymama Slaughter, Virginia State UniversityToni Harris, Virginia State UniversityKabongo Ngandu, Virginia State UniversityKeith Williamson, Virginia State UniversityKwame Adom, Virginia State University Page 14.1290.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Undergraduate Research Experience: A Tool for Student Pursuing a Graduate Degree in EngineeringKey Words: Undergraduate Research Experience, Mentoring, Graduate Degree inEngineeringAbstractMany engineering programs across the country have witnessed large numbers of students leavingtheir

Conference Session

Research Methods I: Developing Research Tools and Methods

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rosa Cabedo, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid; Tovar Caro Edmundo, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid; Manuel Castro, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #16718A Benchmarking Study of Clustering Techniques Applied to a Set of Charac-teristics of MOOC ParticipantsMs. Rosa Cabedo, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid Rosa Cabedo is Engineer in Computer Science and currently Ph.D. Student at Technical University of Madrid (Spain) in the field of Open Education. The final purpose of her research is the identification and analysis of the profiles of language MOOC participants and the features of language learning (interaction, feedback, evaluation, certification) in order to adequate the design to MOOC format to facilitate the linguistic and communicativa competences

Conference Session

Qualitative Methodologies

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie P Martin, Clemson University; Aubrie Lynn Pfirman, Clemson University; Rachel K. Anderson, Clemson University; Shannon K Stefl, Clemson University; Frederick Paige, Clemson University ; Lindsey Whitfield Cain, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #11535A Series of Singular Testimonies: A New Way to Explore Unearned Advan-tages and Unearned DisadvantagesDr. Julie P Martin, Clemson University Julie P. Martin is an assistant professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research interests focus on social factors affecting the recruitment, retention, and career development of underrepresented students in engineering. Dr. Martin is a 2009 NSF CAREER awardee for her research entitled, ”Influence of Social Capital on Under-Represented Engineering Students Academic and Career Decisions.” She held an American Association for the

Conference Session

Graduate Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba; Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto; Liz A. Kuley, University of Saskatchewan; Robyn Paul, University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

comments in the excel files: a. What are the topics of your comments? b. What is the tone of your comments? c. What in your history/identity has defined these topics/your attitudes towards these topics and made them important/unimportant? d. What are the topics of the survey that you responded to most strongly? Least strongly? 3. What did you discover about yourself from the holistic process of building the survey? 4. Look at all your answers and thematically code them using examples and thick descriptions.Once we completed our reflections, we met virtually to discuss the protocol and to collectivelyshare our data, while three of us kept field notes. At the conclusion of our two-hour

Conference Session

Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Denise Rutledge Simmons PE, Virginia Tech; Chosang Tendhar, Virginia Tech; Rongrong Yu, Virginia Tech; Eric A. Vance, Virginia Tech; Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #11794Developing the Postsecondary Student Engagement Survey (PosSES) to Mea-sure Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Out of Class InvolvementDr. Denise Rutledge Simmons PE, Virginia Tech Dr. Denise R. Simmons, PE, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction and in Civil & Environmental Engineering Department, and an affiliate faculty of the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She holds a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in civil engineering and a graduate certificate in engineering education – all from Clemson University. Until 2012

Conference Session

They're Not "Soft" Skills!

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brook Sattler, University of Washington; Ashley Ann Thompson, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Deborah Kilgore, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

-207.11. Barrett, H.C., Balancing the Two Faces of ePortfolios. Educaçã Formaçã & Tecnologias 2010. 3(1): p. 6- 14.12. Turns, J., B. Sattler, and D. Kilgore. Disciplinary knowledge, identity, and navigation: the contributions of portfolio construction. in International Conference of the Learning Sciences. 2010. Chicago, IL.13. Sattler, B., D. Kilgore, and J. Turns. "I Have Never Spent Time to Think About What I Have Gained From My Projects": Linking Portfolio Development and Life-Long Learning. 2010. Washington, D.C.14. Zimmerman, B.J., A. Bandura, and M. Martinez-Pons, Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting. American Education Research Journal, 1992. 29

Conference Session

Measurement and Instrumentation

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian M Frank, Queen's University; James A. Kaupp, Queen's University; Natalie Simper, Queen's University; Jill Scott, Queen's University, Kingston (Canada)

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

B, Humphreys J, Lenton R, Madsen K, Omri A, Turner R. Tuning: identifying and measuringsector-based learning outcomes in postsecondary education. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario;2014.6. International Engineering Alliance. Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies.; 2013.http://www.washingtonaccord.org/IEA-Grad-Attr-Prof-Competencies.pdf7. ABET, Inc. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs.; 2014.8. Engineers Canada. Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board Accreditation Criteria and Procedures.; 2013.9. Stuckey J, Munro D. Skills for Success: Developing Skills for a Prosperous B.C.. ottawa: The Conference Board ofCanada, 2014. Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada; 2014.10. Arum R, Roksa J, Cho E

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Curricula and Pathways

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nebil Buyurgan, Missouri State University; Martin P. Jones, Missouri State University; Kevin M. Hubbard Ph.D., Missouri State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

@MissouriState.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Systematic Weighted Factor Approach for Curriculum DesignAbstractCurriculum revision and course design efforts are typically started partly as a result ofconstituent input, such as that from industrial advisory boards, potential employers of graduates,recent employers of graduates, and alumni. This process is often performed on an ad-hoc basiswith various constituents who express conflicting opinions. This study offers a more formalizedapproach to the decision making process applied to curriculum revision by using a weightedfactor index method to remove much of the subjectivity. Starting with an existing program, anew program is developed and the

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Innovation Through Propagation

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #16389Innovation through Propagation: A Roadmap for Engineering EducationDr. Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Mary Besterfield-Sacre is an Associate Professor and Fulton C. Noss Faculty Fellow in Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She is the Director for the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering, and serves as a Center Associate for the Learning Research and Development Center. Her principal research is in engineering education assessment, which has been funded by the NSF, Department of Ed, Sloan, EIF, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s