for their efficacy and ease of adoption. Ease ofadoption refers to the subjective measures of (a) ease of implementation, (b) minimaldisplacement of class time, and (c) no requirement for a change in pedagogy. The two toolspromote metacognition, which has an extensive evidence base for promoting learning in a widerange of subjects and across grade levels. The first tool tested is the exam wrapper.Examinations or tests provide a measure of student performance and offer feedback to studentsof their learning and the need to perhaps adjust their learning strategies. Many students,however, focus on the grade rather than the comments or corrections. Even when students makethe effort to look at the mistakes, they often miss the opportunity to
“extension learning.” Students can tap into their passions and seek tounderstand something of interest to them. If they want a “B” they do one “extension learning” ifthey want an “A” they do two. This increases the relevance of the material.We also give students several options for predefined projects so that they can understand theexpectations. There are students who have a very difficult time with the freedom and, therefore,appreciated a more typical predefined project. The large majority of students work on a projectof their interest. Table 2 has an example list of reports done in some of the courses.Table 2: project examples:Course Project DescriptionQuality Engineering The application of electronic signatures for FDA
control over achievement activities and outcomes and (b)the subjective values of these tasks, activities and outcomes. For example, in terms ofsubjective control, students who feel more in control of the class materials may experiencemore positive emotions in learning. Previous research has also shown that college students’beliefs about their inability to control learning or how well they do in class predicted shamereactions to test feedback. 22 In terms of subjective task value, students who place more valuein mastering a particular class may be more emotionally charged for the class activities andoutcomes. 16, 21 Future Time Perspective Theory (FTPT). In motivational research, Future TimePerspective (FTP), which is described as humans
at a higher education institution, this certainly holds true as teachers interact with students via learning activities such as courses, tutorials, assessment, and other feedback mechanisms. Beyond the teacher/student interaction, students communicate with other students or academic staff on various occasions and in a number of different ways. b) Non-Linear Interaction The interaction of elements of complex systems is generally non-linear. This means that small influences can have large effects in the system and conversely, that large influences can have small effects. In the educational context, this can be verified for example by looking at the process of formal teaching: Generally the same
. Mullainathan, E. Shafir, and J. Zhao, “Poverty impedes cognitive function,” Science, vol. 341, no. 6149, pp. 976–980, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/341/6149/976 [9] M. Lacour and L. D. Tissington, “The effects of poverty on academic achievement,” Educational Research and Reviews, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 522–527, 2011.[10] R. Likert, “A technique for the measurement of attitudes.” Archives of psychology, 1932.[11] J. Callenes-Sloan, P. Hummel, A. Danowitz, and B. Benson, “Exploring the relevance and energy usage implications of fixed computer labs in electrical engineering education,” in 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct 2018, pp. 1–7.
analyses for each sample, setting eight as the number of factorsto retain. There is no standard threshold for statistically determining the composition of factors.Based on what made sense conceptually, we used a threshold of the factor loadings greater than.40 to assess the suitability of the items. Below, we indicate the eight latent factors (CCWdimensions) we identified and the survey items and associated factor loadings that constituteeach dimension: ● All students 1. Social capital (proportion explained = 0.19) a. I draw on connections with individual faculty to be successful in college (0.62) b. I draw on connections with university staff to be successful in college (0.69) c. I draw on connections with individuals
maintain an A-levelgrade point average (GPA). B-level students put less emphasis on a good work ethic, use lesseffective study habits and do not prioritize attending class. C-level students put low priority ondoing the work assigned to them, but do make an effort to study and attend class. This study alsofound that students' priorities are not always aligned with their practices and/or values,particularly as related to work ethic, studying, and doing assigned work. Lower prioritization ofnote taking and attending class means a closer alignment between priorities, practices, andvalues, but does not contribute to overall academic success.IntroductionPost-secondary institutions take student success seriously. Learners are supported throughouttheir
determine theshortest route between two of the towns, because a sales team needed to visit a customer. Theydid this twice, using two lists of towns that had the same underlying structure of connections anddistances, but with different town names. For both the experimental and baseline conditions, participants were presented with aconstruction scheduling task for constructing a building (see Appendix B for the materials used).In this construction scheduling task, participants were given a single sheet of paper containing amatrix of tasks, which included the duration for each task as well as the tasks that needed to becompleted first (precedent tasks). Intentionally, the matrix only used about a quarter of the pageto leave room for the
overviewThe Essential Adult Skills Initiative (EASI) was a large-scale research project undertaken by theHigher Education Quality Council of Ontario (HEQCO) and 20 postsecondary partners in 2017-2018. EASI was designed to measure the numeracy, literacy, and problem-solving skills ofincoming and graduating college and university students in Ontario.The central research goals of the larger project were: a) to determine the suitability of theEducation and Skills Online (ESO) assessment to measure post-secondary students’ literacy,numeracy, and problem-solving; b) to determine observable differences between incoming andgraduating students’ skillsets, and; c) to identify practical implications of implementing such aproject in post-secondary
Grant Nos. 1762436 and1762444. The contents, opinions, and recommendations expressed are those of the authors anddo not represent the views of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesAlexander, B. B., Foertsch, J., & Daffinrud, S. (1998). The spend a summer with a scientist program: An evaluation of program outcomes and the essential elements for success. Madison, WI: Citeseer.Chaplin, S. B., Manske, J. M., & Cruise, J. L. (1998). Introducing freshmen to investigative research--a course for biology majors at Minnesota’s University of St. Thomas: How" investigative labs" change the student from passive direction-follower to analytically critical thinker. Journal of College Science Teaching.Cleary, T. J. (2011). Emergence
AC 2011-2655: ANALYZING SUBJECT-PRODUCED DRAWINGS: THEUSE OF THE DRAW AN ENGINEER ASSESSMENT IN CONTEXTTirupalavanam G. Ganesh, Arizona State University Tirupalavanam G. Ganesh is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Arizona State University’s Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering. He has bachelors and masters degrees in Computer Science and Engineering and a PhD in Curriculum and Instruction. His research interests include educational research methods, communication of research, and k-16+ engineering education. Ganesh’s research is largely focused on studying k-12 curricula, and teaching-learning processes in both the formal and informal settings. He is principal investigator of the Information Technology
Writing Enriched requirements.Assignment High- Low- Revision Disciplinary Stakes Stakes Writing Table 1. List of course assginments showing how they meet WE requirements.10. Disciplinary Writing: Programs must provide a brief explanation for what disciplinary writing tends to look like in their field. This explanation can be used in course certification application. The following questions should be considered while completing the application: a) What genres of writing are common practice in the discipline? (Examples: memos; case notes; grants; field study write-ups; etc.) b) Who generates writing in the discipline
in the Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineeringat the University of Evansville have undertaken a similar, multi-year study, in an attempt tofurther quantify and support the findings of these studies.Method and Study ParametersData from three different courses in the Mechanical and Civil Engineering curriculum werecollected for this study. Table 1 contains information regarding the study parameters and thethree instructors (listed as A, B, C) associated with each course included in this semester. Foreach of the courses in this study, there are typically 3-4 exams each semester, approximately 20-25 homework assignments and 8-10 quizzes. Average enrollment for ENGR prefix classes isapproximately 20 students per section. For CE prefix
believe that carpet and tileare at different temperatures because of differences in the rate of convective heat transferoff the two surfaces rather than considering the amount of energy transferred into tile orcarpet from a bare human foot. These results were our first indication of the “rate vs.amount” misconception in students who beta-tested the TTCI instrument. Table I – Cross-Tabulation of Student Responses to MeltIce1, MeltIce2 and Carpet Questions1 Carpet responses Total a b c (correct) d MeltIce 1 responses a
. (2006). The research agenda for the new discipline of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 259-261. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00900.x2. Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 27-38.3. Munce, R., & Fraser, E. (2013). Where are the STEM students? Retrieved October 7, 2014, from http://www.stemconnector.org4. Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411-427
this researchillustrates, there are still several nuances that need to be explored to understand howintersectionality influence the professional development experiences in organizational leadershipfor engineering students.AcknowledgementFunding for this project was provided by the National Science Foundation under grant EEC-ENG 1738132. The views expressed in this work are those of the author and do not necessarilyrepresent those of the National Science Foundation.References[1] D. B. Knight and B. J. Novoselich, "Curricular and Co-curricular Influences on Undergraduate Engineering Student Leadership," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 44-70, 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20153.[2] G. N. Powell and D. A
. 4. Mazur, E. (1992) Qualitative versus quantitative thinking: are we teaching the right thing? Optics and Photonics News, 3,pp 38-39. 5. Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, pp 64-74. 6. Strevler, R., Miller, R., Reed-Rhoads, T. & Allen, K. (2007) Best Practices in the Design and Use of Concept Inventories. Workshop presented at 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. 7. Notaros, B. M. (2002). Concept inventory assessment instruments for electromagnetics education. Proceedings of the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International
(key concepts or gate keeper concepts) of beginning engineering studentstowards the relationship between environment/ecology and engineering specifically towardschoosing: either (a) engineering as a career to make an environmental impact or (b) choosingenvironmental and ecological engineering as a specific engineering profession. The project issituated in the context of life cycle analysis and the environmental impacts of design,manufacturing, use and disposal of products. The study employs also an innovative researchdesign: The researchers investigate students’ conceptions and attitudes (and change of both) byasking students to co-design an educational game with them – through a series of workshops. Ofparticular focus will be the change of
make two important assumptions on their own about the structure of the iWalk2.0: 1. The type of connection the device makes with the ground at point A “which best describes the real scenario” (text from the assignment). 2. The type of connection at point B, either a smooth pin or a welded joint.In order to solve the OEMP, students were implicitly required to make two additionalassumptions about the weight of the 125 kg person using the iWalk2.0, and one additionalassumption about the weight of the iWalk2.0 members: 3. The amount of the person’s weight that loaded on the iWalk2.0. 4. The location where this weight acted on the iWalk2.0, and if the weight was discretized as a point force, multiple point forces, or a
concludes. Thisnot only erodes the integrity of evaluation within an academic program, but also has seriousconsequences for the team as well: experience shows that simply having to cope with a non-performing team member can actually result in more stress and effort for the team than if thatteam member were not present at all. Ultimately, nothing erodes team morale faster thanworking overtime to make up for a poorly performing teammate, only to receive exactly thesame evaluation. Thus, development of reliable mechanisms for (a) quickly detecting anddealing with internal team problems, and (b) adjusting individual credit given for team productsbased on actual effort invested by each individual is crucial in any team project context
AC 2009-2218: PREDICTING POST-SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMESWITH SURVIVAL ANALYSISGillian Nicholls, University of Pittsburgh Gillian Nicholls is a Lecturer in Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. Her research interests are in applying statistical analysis and optimization to engineering education and transportation management. She holds the B.S. in Industrial Engineering (Lehigh University), Masters in Business Administration (Penn State University), and M.S. in Industrial Engineering and Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering(University of Pittsburgh.) Address: 1048 Benedum Hall, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261; telephone 412.400.8631; fax: 412.624.9831
for Team 1 and Appendix C for Team 2. Images of the team’s configuration, gestures, andvisual elements at specific intervals during the analyzed interactions are presentedchronologically in Appendix B for Team 1, and Appendix D for Team 2. Select sections of thetranscripts and select figures are repeated in the analysis below; figures whose captions beginwith the letters C or D can be found in Appendix C or Appendix D respectively.5.1.1. Team 1 - an example of not togetheringOur analysis of Team 1 left us with the image of multiple solitudes. Although the team membersfreely raised issues, stated ideas and opinions, and individually seemed to try to be productive,their discussions rarely produced a decision or created any kind of shared
reported in Appendix B including the infit and outfit mean square(MNSQ) and standardized (ZSTD) indices indicating the fit of the data to the Rasch model. TheMNSQ is the transformed residuals representing the difference between the observed andpredicted with an expected MNSQ value of 116.Item difficulty level ranged from –1.18 to 0.96, indicating additional items at a higher difficultylevel such as the essay design problem items are needed, as one of the purposes is to assessstudent growth from lower to higher-level understanding. Item separation was 4.94, yieldingsufficient separation of more than four1 distinct groups of items along the measure. The itemseparation reliability of 0.96 indicated the ordering of items along the continuum would
, really? Why is that?” “Because you’re good at math and science, and that’s a field of study that would utilize those math and science skills”. ~StephenDiane shared some of her conversations with her grandfather about her dreams of wanting tostudy Nuclear Engineering. She stated that he had an Aeronautical Engineering degree. I sat down with my grandpa and we’re talking about what I want to be. And he graduated from [University B] with an aeronautical degree in engineering. … He actually helped work on one of the first planes to reach Mach speed. And telling me about that, how his work was secret, it was oh so interesting. ~DianeDiscussion and ConclusionWhereas the literature indicates that low-SES first
Commission (EAC). (2016). Proposed revisions to criteria for accrediting engineering programs definitions, general criterion 3 student outcomes, and general criterion 5 curriculum. Retrieved from: http://www.abet.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/11/Proposed-Revisions-to-EAC-Criteria-3-and-5.pdfAmerican Association of Engineering Societies (2015. May). Engineering competency model. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from http://www.aaes.org/sites/default/files/Engineering%20Competency%20Model_Final _May2015.pdfAsunda, P. A., & Hill, R. B. (2007). Critical features of engineering design in technology education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 44, 25-48.Atadero, R. A., Rambo
' regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224-235.[10] Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.[11] Zumbrunn, S., Tadlock, J., & Roberts, E. D. (2011). Encouraging self-regulated learning in the classroom: A review of the literature. Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium (MERC).[12] Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(3), 211-238.[13] Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal
to protect the identity of the participants. Table 2: Distribution of participants and school type for the four small colleges School Type Size Number of student participants "College A" Predominantly 2,000-2,500 8 Non-Engineering students enrolled (1 nonbinary, 3 (PNE) women, 4 men) "College B" Balanced/Religious 2,000-2,500 9
;'* 8"',*9* ! "#$%&!'()$%!*+!,!-&*.$/0)1!)$,2(2!'(,0!%*3#!,!4)$+(!-5!$.!3#(!4-3!0,2(!,3!4/$++!+(43*$&!6768! !Figure 3. Simply supported uniformly loaded beam with a cut and cross-section representation 9/$0!3#(!:/$++!"(43*$&!676!+#$%&!,'$;(!/,&#!?=!./$0!)(,+3!3$!>/(,3(+3!',+(2!$&!provided 3#(!0,>&*3-2(!$.!&$/0,)!+3/(++@!A#,3!*+!1$-/!/(,+$&*&>!.$/!1$-/!/,&+B!! !Interview MethodologyEach interview followed an overall outline of the questions shown in Table 1 that were asked of !every student, but each interview was also conducted uniquely depending on the
participants to accomplish the agents’ desired goals. In today’sfunding world, paid graduate teaching assistants are becoming less viable. Instead, faculty mustmotivate undergraduates to be the active teaching assistants that are needed to run a successfulflipped classroom [1]. By improving undergraduate TAs’ competence, supporting theirautonomy, building environments that allow for interpersonal relationships to flourish,relatedness, socialization, and positive outcomes, faculty can motivate their TAs to improve theircourses. Our long-term goal is for faculty to use this work to make their teaching assistantshipprograms more rewarding for their undergraduates serving as TAs.References[1] Van Veen, B. (2013). Flipping signal-processing instruction [sp
version of the first draft instructionsof the Nano Roughness MEA is shown in Table 2. The complete version can be found in(Zawojeski, Diefes-Dux, and Bowman, in review). Prior to the lab, students were given a pre-reading activity about Atomic Force Microscopes (AFM) and the images they produce. In thelab setting, students were given AFM images of gold samples (Sample B is shown below inFigure 2) to create and test their procedures for quantifying roughness. Table 2 – Nano Roughness MEAAbbreviated Problem StatementInteroffice Memo: Liguore LabsTo: Nanosurface Engineering TeamFrom: Kerry Prior, Vice President of ResearchRE: Surface RoughnessLiguore Labs is very