engineering, statistics, and business to improve how we design and construct our built environment while sustaining our natural environment. Recently, Dr. Ibrahim has been passionately interested in education research.Dr. Gustavo B. Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Cal State LA. His specialization is in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering. Since becoming part of the faculty in 2009, Menezes has also focused on improving student success and has led a number of ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Measurement of Systemic STEM Educational Wellness at a Minority- Serving Institution using the Eco-STEM Educational
Paper ID #40243Why Students Choose STEM: A Study of High School Factors That InfluenceCollege STEM Major ChoiceDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. degree in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy.Tram Dang, Purdue University Tram Dang is a PhD student of Engineering Education at Purdue University as well as a tenured professor of physics and engineering at Santa Monica College (SMC), a two-year transfer-focused
Paper ID #44171Evaluation of the Effect of Anonymous Grading on Student Performance onHigh-Stakes AssessmentsDr. Neha B. Raikar, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Raikar is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, in the Chemical, Biochemical, and Environmental Engineering department. She has taught both undergraduate and graduate-level courses. Dr. Raikar also has 3 years of industry experience from working at Unilever Research in the Netherlands.Dr. Nilanjan Banerjee Nilanjan Banerjee is an Associate Professor at University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He is an expert in mobile and
Ramirez, Purdue University Nichole Ramirez is the Assistant Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) program at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She is also an involved member of NAMI at the local and state levels. She advises NAMI on Campus Purdue and helped launch Ending the Silence, a NAMI Signature program for the state of Indiana.Dr. Douglas B. Samuel My research focuses on the development of dimensional trait models of mental health problems and their application in clinical practice.Mr. Syed Ali Kamal, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Syed Ali Kamal is a doctoral student at the Department of Engineering Education at
Paper ID #37229Work in Progress: Emotional Configurations in Undergraduate EngineeringEducationEmily Kostolansky, Tufts University Emily Kostolansky is a master’s student in mechanical engineering at Tufts University. Her research inter- ests in engineering education include undergraduate engineering education and emotions in engineering.Dr. Kristen B Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Adjunct Associate Professor of Education at Tufts University. Her research efforts at at the Center for Engineering Education and Out- reach focus on supporting discourse and design
received his PhD degree in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University in 2001. He is the Director of the NSF NRT-LEAD program and a Professor in the School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Washington State University.David B. Thiessen, Washington State University David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in 1992 and has been at Washington State University since 1994. His research interests include fluid physics, acoustics, and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Enhancing Engineering EducationEnhancing Engineering Education: A Comparative Analysis of Low-Cost Desktop Learning Module
design techniques enhances engineers understanding of users’ needs. 2. Bairaktarova, D. (2022). Caring for the future: Empathy in engineering education to empower learning. 3. Bernárdez, B., Durán, A., Parejo, J. A., Juristo, N., & Ruiz–Cortés, A. (2022). Effects of Mindfulness on Conceptual Modeling Performance: A Series of Experiments. 4. Carbonetto, T., & Grodziak, E. M. (2019, July 28). Mindfulness in Engineering v2. 5. Estrada, T., & Dalton, E. (2019). Impact of Student Mindfulness Facets on Engineering Education Outcomes: An Initial Exploration. 6. Hess, J. L., Beever, J., Strobel, J., & Brightman, A. O. (2017). Empathic Perspective- Taking and Ethical Decision-Making in
Experiences of Non-traditional Students: A perspective from higher education. Studies in Continuing Education, 57-75.Bohl, A. J., Haak, B., & Shrestha, S. (2017). The Experiences of Nontraditional Students: A Qualitative Inquiry. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 166-174.Carpenter, N. E., & Pappenfus, T. M. (2009). Teaching Research: A Curriculum Model That Works. Journal of Chemistry Education, 940-945.Carpi, A., Ronan, D. M., Falconer, H. M., & Lents, N. H. (2016). Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 169-194.Ditta, A. S., Strickland-Hughes, C. M., Cheung, C
Paper ID #37892Examining Engineering Students’ Shift in Mindsets Over the Course of aSemester: A Longitudinal StudyDr. Dina Verdin, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Dina Verd´ın, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She graduated from San Jos´e State University with a BS in Industrial Systems Engineering and from Purdue University with an MS in Industrial Engineering and PhD in Engineering Education. Her research interest focuses on changing the deficit base perspective of first-generation col- lege students by providing asset
generates compare estimates than the Bayesian method for some modeling parameters,the Bayesian approach produces substantially improved results for the standard deviationestimates of the relationship effect (𝜎𝑟 ), the autoregressive coefficient of the relationship effect(𝛽𝑟 ), the correlation between target and perceiver effects (𝜌𝑝𝑡 ), and the correlation betweenreciprocal ratings (𝜌𝑟 ). All our qualitative conclusions from Panel A holds for Panel B as well.Nevertheless, when the overall sample size has increased, the differences between the Bayesianand SR-SEM methods become smaller, due to the impact of the prior distribution beingweakened with a larger sample.Table 3Simulation Results Panel A: 15
Paper ID #44003Latino/a/x Engineering Students and Nepantla: A Multi-Case Study withinthe US SouthwestDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an Associate Professor with joint appointment in the Department of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering and the Department of Bicultural-Bilingual Studies at The University of Texas at San Antonio. His research has contributed to the integration of critical theoretical frameworks in engineering education to investigate deficit ideologies and their impact on minoritized communities, particularly Mexican Americans
. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education,” Nat Biotechnol, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 282–284, 2018, doi: 10.1038/nbt.4089.[2] J. Cornwall, E. C. Mayland, J. Van Der Meer, R. A. Spronken-Smith, C. Tustin, and P. Blyth, “Stressors in early-stage doctoral students,” Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 363–380, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2018.1534821.[3] T. John and P. Denicolo, “Doctoral Education: A Review of the Literature Monitoring the Doctoral Student Experience in Selected OECD Countries (Mainly UK),” Springer Science Reviews, vol. 1, no. 1–2, pp. 41–49, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s40362-013-0011-x.[4] F. A. Huppert, “Challenges
Paper ID #43631Teaching Online Engineering: A Systematic Literature ReviewYoula Ali, University of Oklahoma Youla Ali, a Junior majoring in Computer Science at the University of Oklahoma, currently serves as a Research Assistant in the Engineering Pathways program under the mentorship of Dr. Javeed Kittur for the academic years 2023-2024. Her research focuses on online engineering education, driven by her desire to understand the challenges that instructors face when transitioning course components, such as experiments and labs, to remote formats. As an engineering student herself, Youla aims to offer valuable insights
] K.J. Chapman, M. Meuter, D. Toy, and L. Wright, "Can’t we pick our own groups? Theinfluence of group selection method on group dynamics and outcomes," Journal of ManagementEducation, vol. 30, pp. 557-569, 2006.[12] S.A. Myers, "Students’ perceptions of classroom group work as a function of group memberselection," Communication Teacher, vol. 26, pp. 50-64, 2012.[13] S.A. Rusticus and B.J. Justus, "Comparing student- and teacher-formed teams on groupdynamics, satisfaction, and performance," Small Group Research, vol. 50, pp. 443-457, 2019.[14] B. Rienties, P. Alcott, and D. Jindal-Snape, "To let students self-select or not: That is thequestion for teachers of culturally diverse groups," Journal of Studies in International Education,vol. 18, pp
NS 0.404 a Chemer, et al. 0.51 b 0.10 b NS 0.24 b NS 0.11 b Model 1 = Complete instrument (28 Items), Model 3 = Reduced instrument (12 Items) a p<0.001, bp<0.01, cp<0.05, NS = Not SignificantConclusion A shortened version of a survey instrument, based on the Mediation Model of ResearchExperiences (MMRE) theoretical framework was developed and evaluated for use in a datadriven, proactive advising process. Items for the shortened instrument were drawn from twosources, with slight differences in wording between questions on the two instruments for thesame underlying constructs. Results from this work indicate that the source instruments aremeasuring somewhat different definitions
, practitioner papers, and conference proceedings. The aim is to ensure that articles meet quality standards as determined by others in the engineering and education communities. 4. The article was focused on instruction in a formal classroom setting for grades 6 - 8. 5. The article has an explicit connection to engineering teaching or learning.A search was conducted on February 15, 2022. All resulting citations were exported toCovidence, a web-based software for systematic reviews [12]. Covidence removed anyduplicates. Articles were reviewed for relevance, and eligibility criteria were applied. Twoauthors screened the same subset of articles (n=32) for a Kappa coefficient of 0.904 [13]. Thescreening process, shown in Appendix B, resulted
study.The analyses described above were shared among the institutions at the project kick-off. Further-more, two initial research questions were posed: • How do the structural complexities of curricular pathways differ among various top engi- neering (within and between) disciplines? (a) (b)Figure 3: (a) The structural complexities of the 18 undergraduate aerospace engineering considered inthis study, with the three participating schools highlighted. (b) The structural complexities of differentundergraduate engineering programs, by discipline, were collected from 20 different universities. The dotsin the figure correspond to outliers
). Learning to Conduct “Team Science” through Interdisciplinary Engineering Research. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 3. Knight, D. B., Davis, K. A., Kinoshita, T. J., Twyman, C., & Ogilvie, A. M. (2019). The Rising Sophomore Abroad Program: Early Experiential Learning in Global Engineering. Advances in Engineering Education. 4. Jesiek, B. K., Shen, Y., & Haller, Y. (2012). Cross-cultural competence: A comparative assessment of engineeringstudents. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(1), 144. 5. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2022-2023/ 6. Miskioglu, E. (2018, June). It takes all kinds
may not be a consensus about thedefinition and measurement of student engagement [15, 16]. While some maintain that“[s]tudents always lie at the heart of conversations about student engagement” (p. 3) [17], othersbelieve that it is important to recognize the role of postsecondary institutions in student 2engagement [18-20]. Consequently, it is posited that student engagement consists of twocomponents: (a) the extent to which students participate in educationally effective activities; and(b) the institutional resources, learning opportunities and services, and students’ perceptions ofthe institutional environment that supports student learning and
—and greatefforts to fulfill this desire will be exerted [5, p. 381]. As with the other psychological theoriesand constructs, the concept of belonging is based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs [6]. Later, Baumeister and Leary [4] broadened the construct of belonging with thebelongingness hypothesis. They defined belonging as a factor in developing and maintaininglasting, positive, and meaningful interpersonal bonds. Furthermore, this hypothesis is supportedby two characteristics: (a) that individuals maintain conflict-free interaction with others and (b)that individuals retain connections with others through stable, committed, and genuine concern.By developing long-term relationships, a person can satisfy their need for SB. According to
Education, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 53–66, Jan. 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x.[2] K. Kelly and B. Bowe, “Qualitative research in engineering education,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2011.[3] R. L. Jackson, D. K. Drummond, and S. Camara, “What is qualitative research?,” Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2007, doi: 10.1080/17459430701617879.[4] A. L. Pawley, “Learning from small numbers of underrepresented students’ stories: Discussing a method to learn about institutional structure through narrative,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2013, doi: 10.18260/1-2--19030.[5] L. H
Mwangi, N. Changamire, and J. Mosselson, “An intersectional understanding of African international graduate students’ experiences in US higher education,” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 52, 2019.[2] C. Rodríguez, C. R. Chavez, and C. Klauber, “International graduate student challenges and support,” International research and review, vol. 8, no.2, pp. 49-64, 2019.[3] T. T. Tuma, J. D. Adams, B. C. Hultquist, and E. L. Dolan, “The dark side of development: A systems characterization of the negative mentoring experiences of doctoral students,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 20, no.2, pp. ar16, 2021.[4] Institute of International Education, “Fall 2022 snapshot on international
with a range of 1 to 7, signifying a moderate belief in their ability to control effort and attention intheir HyFlex class. The non-significant Pearson correlation (r = 0.019, p = 0.773) indicated that students whoopted for face-to-face or remote participation had a comparable experience in effort regulation. Students, onaverage, scored 4.58 in peer learning, indicating a moderate belief in working and learning with peers in theirHyFlex class. The non-significant Pearson correlation (r = -0.020, p = 0.716) revealed that face-to-face orremote participants had similar experiences in peer learning.Study 8: Krishna, B. (2023). Effect of Modalities on Group Performance in Hyflex Environment (30685608)[Master’s thesis, Purdue University]. ProQuest
practices in US classrooms," Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 99, p. 103273, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103273[3] M. J. Hannafin, J. R. Hill, S. M. Land, and E. Lee, "Student-centered, open learning environments: Research, theory, and practice," Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 641-651, May 2013, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614- 3185-5_51[4] B. L. McCombs and J. S. Whisler, The Learner-Centered Classroom and School: Strategies for Increasing Student Motivation and Achievement. The Jossey-Bass Education Series. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., 1997.[5] J. N. Agumba¹ and T. Haupt, "Collaboration as a strategy of student-centered learning in construction technology
Paper ID #41332WIP: Assessment of Student Retention and Satisfaction in Computer ScienceService Courses When Using Competency-Based Grading and AssignmentChoiceMr. Robert Harold Lightfoot Jr., Texas A&M University Robert Lightfoot received his master’s degree in software engineering from Southern Methodist University and his bachelor’s degree in computer science from Texas A&M. Before joining Texas A&M, he worked at Ericsson (now Sony-Ericsson), then with DSC (Motorola) deploying Cellular network infrastructure. Now, a Professor of Practice, teaching Computer Science at Texas A&M University.Dr. Tracy Anne
examinedfour cohorts of students for three semesters: (a) fall 2018 sophomore students, (b) fall 2019sophomore students, (c) fall 2018 junior students, and (d) fall 2019 junior students. Thesophomore and junior students’ persistence was tracked over a period of three semesters— thusthe pre-COVID-19 cohorts (i.e., fall 2018 cohorts) did not have their education disrupted overthis time frame (fall 2018 to fall 2019) by COVID-19 while the COVID-19 cohorts (i.e., fall2019 cohorts) did have their education disrupted in spring 2020. Next, due to our large sample,we were able to break down and examine student persistence rate by student demographic groups(i.e., gender, financial need, first generation status, and race/ethnicity).Plan of Analysis We
discrimination faced byAsian engineering students in postsecondary education. The identified relevantstudies need to be consistent with this research scope. In order to do that, we focus onboth Asian American and Asian international college students within the engineeringdiscipline, reflecting our centered research interest. Considering the scope of ourstudy and the research questions, we established relevant studies in our review asstudies that satisfy the following three conditions: a) the presence of Asian students,b) a focus on college engineering majors, and c) relevance to experiences ofdiscrimination.Selecting Studies We conducted the literature search using a variety of scholarly databases,including Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar, ERIC
. Carroll, C. J. Finelli, and S. L. DesJardins, “Academic success of college students with ADHD: the first year of college,” Network for Engineering & …, 2022.[6] A. Cuellar, B. Webster, S. Solanki, C. Spence, and M. Tsugawa, “Examination of Ableist Educational Systems and Structures that Limit Access to Engineering Education through Narratives,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[7] M. L. Sánchez-Peña, N. Ramirez, X. (rose) Xu, and D. B. Samuel, “Work in progress: Measuring stigma of mental health conditions and its impact in help-seeking behaviors among engineering students.pdf,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Conference Content Access, 2021.[8] M. Chrysochoou et al., “Redesigning engineering education for
in flipped classroom methods, the team includes a third-personeducational researcher (Andrea Medina) focusing on high-impact classroom practices. There arethree instructors in the study: Instructor A, Instructor B and Instructor C. Instructor A is the leadinstructional designer and learned FC and active learning from the Transforming STEMTeaching Faculty Learning Program (FLP) hosted virtually by the University of California,Berkley. Instructor A has publications in iterations of the flipped classroom model [20], [21].Instructor C received a grant on diversity-centric learning and project-based learning. InstructorA and C taught years of courses in the flipped classroom modality before the study. Instructor Bhas less training than Instructor
Sciences. The International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation. 24(1). 1-24.Renshaw, T. L., & Bolognino, S. J. (2016). The college student subjective wellbeing questionnaire: A brief, multidimensional measure of undergraduate's covitality. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(2), 463-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9606-4Rodríguez-Simmonds, H. E., Pearson, N. S., Jackson, B. P., Langus, T. C., Major, J. C., Kirn, A., & Godwin, A. (2018). Interpersonal interactions that foster inclusion: Building supports for diversity in engineering teams. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.Scheidt, M., Godwin, A., Berger, E., Chen, J., Self, B. P., Widmann, J. M., & Gates, A. Q. (2021). Engineering students