. This study provides implications for the importance of the PBL method to teachengineering curricula in elementary education and the importance of including engineeringcurricula in elementary schools.References[1]. L. Katehi, G. Pearson, and M. Feder, “Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects, “Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2009.[2]. J. Yuan, C. Kim, L. Vasconcelos, and M. Y. Shin, C. Gleasman, and D. Umutlu, “Preservice elementary teachers’ engineering design during a robotics project,” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 4-104, 2022.[3]. D. H. Jonassen, “Toward a design theory of problem-solving,” Educational
tangible products with some engineeringcomplexity as the learning goal of a course. Both because of more available and accessibledigital fabrication tools and a rise on maker-based pedagogy, such educational approaches areprogressing past just learning experiences that are project-based but more and more one canrealize a functional and desirable product (in addition to the underlying technology). This greateravailability of rapid prototyping and maker spaces can support these types of learningexperiences, allowing student teams more access to holistically imagine, design, and morereadily build their solutions. The more authentically these learning experiences can be curatedand staged by instructors, the more meaningful and useful such courses can
and parallel ideas. tasks. Curriculum objectives related Select an engineering project to the Washington Accord; outcome (PO) in the corresponding standard for the e.g. environment and learning outcome (CO) requiredEvaluation based on sustainability, abstract thinking by professional coursesthe matrix of and originality in analysis to Construct the CO-PO matrixcompetency criteria Isa et al.[24
(andimplementation), and assessment (Figure 1). These key elements of instructional design will bediscussed in detail in the subsequent sections.Design and Learning ObjectivesResearch suggests that it is critical to carefully consider the specific objectives and type ofproblem that best fit each topic when using PBL to execute an engineering curriculum. De Graaf& Kolmos [1] suggest considering a series of questions when determining the objectives forwork in PBL, including (but not limited to): where will the problem lead, what goals does itfulfill, and what should students learn? These questions should help the PBL designer identifykey student learning outcomes that should be highlighted in both the implementation andassessment of the project. Once
Paper ID #36958A Study Report in the Web Technologies Course: What Makes FeedbackEffective for Project-based Learning?Alaa Jaber Alaa Jaber is currently pursuing her Master’s degree in Computer Science from the University of Michigan Dearborn. She has always been passionate about technology and its potential to transform the world. She is excited about the possibility of continuing her studies by pursuing a Ph.D. in Computer Science.Dr. Kimberly Lechasseur, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kimberly LeChasseur is a researcher and evaluator with the Worcester Polytechnic Institute. She holds a dual appointment with the
, sociotechnical engineering practice. Their current projects include studying and designing classroom interventions around macroethical issues in aerospace engineering and the productive beginnings of engineering judgment as students create and use mathematical models. Aaron holds a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from U-M, and a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Prior to re-joining U-M, he was an instructor in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at the University of Colorado Boulder. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Students’ Use of Engineering Judgment on Undergraduate Student Project
Paper ID #41622Work in Progress: Project Teams’ Structure Impacting Students’ ProfessionalSkill DevelopmentEmily Buten, University of Michigan Emily (she/her) is a Ph.D. student in the Engineering Education Research program at the University of Michigan and received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Dayton. Her research focuses on individuals’ development from students to professional engineers. She is particularly interested in studying co-op/internship programs, professional skills development, and diverse student experiences in experiential learning settings.Jack Boomer Perry, University of Michigan
Paper ID #40272Undergraduate Student Experience with Research Facilitated by ProjectManagement and Self-regulated Learning ProcessesMs. Sakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University Sakhi Aggrawal is a Graduate Research Fellow in Computer and Information Technology department at Purdue University. She completed her master’s degree in Business Analytics from Imperial College Lon- don and bachelor’s degree in Computer and Information Technology and Organizational Leadership from Purdue University. She worked in industry for several years with her latest jobs being as project manager at Google and Microsoft. Her current research focuses
Paper ID #37580Relationship between Motivation and Effective Communication inEngineering Capstone Projects Design ClinicsMrs. Nourhan E. Elatky, Rowan University Nourhan El-Atky is a Graduate Assistant in Experimental Engineering Education at Rowan University. She received her BS from The Arab Academy Of Science And Technology in 2018 in Egypt. She is working on her Ph.D. in Engineering Education and MS in Mechanical Engineering at Rowan University.Dr. Juan M. Cruz, Rowan University Juan M. Cruz is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. He has a B.S. in Electronic
Paper ID #41174The Relationship between Mental Health, Professional Identity, and Perceptionsof Inclusion in Project-Based Engineering ProgramsDr. Lin Chase, Minnesota State University, Mankato Lin Chase is an experienced executive with an extensive track record in the successful application of artificial intelligence technologies in complex business environments. She has spent thirty years developing emerging software and telecommunications technologies in the commercial world. Lin earned a B.S. in Physics and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Robotics at Carnegie Mellon University. She was then awarded the NATO/NSF postdoctoral
Paper ID #41648Improving Peer Feedback in Project-Based Learning Contexts: An Investigationinto a First-Year Engineering InterventionMs. Katherine Drinkwater, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Katie Drinkwater is a first-year PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She received a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Duke University. Her research interests include engineering extracurriculars, PBL, design in informal learning environments, makerspaces, and women in engineering.Olivia Ryan, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Olivia Ryan is a Ph.D. student in
University of Nigeria, Nigeria and the University of Cape Town, South Africa. Currently, His research focus is in the field of Computing and Engineering Education where he is involved with investigating team-based computational projects using qualitative, quantitative, and artificial intelligence-based tools. He is also involved with developing and redesigning a Team-Based transdisciplinary graduate course under the Purdue University EMBRIO Innovation Hub Grant project, where He has contributed by applying computational fluid dynamics methods in the development of partial differential equation (PDE) models to implement cell cytokinesis. His ongoing Ph.D. research broadly investigates teamwork interactions and
Paper ID #41175The Effects of Length of Participation on Student Mental Health, ProfessionalIdentity, and Perceptions of Inclusion in Project-Based Engineering ProgramsDr. Lin Chase, Minnesota State University, Mankato Lin Chase is an experienced executive with an extensive track record in the successful application of artificial intelligence technologies in complex business environments. She has spent thirty years developing emerging software and telecommunications technologies in the commercial world. Lin earned a B.S. in Physics and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Robotics at Carnegie Mellon University. She was then awarded the
challengingones. Combined with the technical track advisory board, which consists of representatives fromindustry, students, and faculty of each track in the department, the overall structure hopes tobenefit the students in an unprecedented way that revolutionizes how and what skills theElectrical Engineering curriculum can teach and offer to the students.Purpose and Author TeamThe first author initiated this research as an electrical engineering undergraduate student,intending to know how PFE and the technical tracks combined support learners to prepare forindustry requirements. The study described in this article is part of a larger Participatory ActionResearch (PAR) project at the Department of Electrical Engineering that engages students
Safety, Human-robot Interaction, and Engineering Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Enhancing Teamwork Skills in STEM Education: A Behavioral Theory-Based Approach AbstractThe ability to work in a team is one of the most important skills a college graduate can acquirefrom an educational institute. However, some students do not appropriately participate in courseprojects, making teamwork more challenging than it needs to be for others. As a result, manystudents fail to develop teamwork skills, and some become frustrated with course projects. Thisstudy adopted the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to develop tools
specific, its aid in instructional and course design. The METM program curriculum offers courses that focus on Project Management,Strategic Planning and Management, Financial Resource Management, etc., that are included inthe Engineering Management Body of Knowledge (EMBOK)[3]. At the conclusion of theMETM program, students must research, design, and showcase a real-world project that requirescomprehensive application of the knowledge they have learned throughout the program, in orderto bring significant impact to the stakeholders of their chosen organizations. The Capstone course spans over two semesters, Fall (Capstone I) and Spring (CapstoneII); it was first offered in 2019, and in 2023, the fifth student cohort started their
research on the performance of students in courses using OER and more specifically inarchitecture and engineering education. The objective of this research is to assess the impact of anOER platform for teaching building information modeling (BIM) course, taught to architecture,engineering and construction (AEC) students at the University of Texas at Arlington. This studyexamined the performance of AEC students in a BIM course before and after adopting the OERplatform developed and also a combined OER and flipped classroom strategy. Hypothesis testswere performed to compare the averages of students’ project and overall grades in three semestersthat the BIM course was offered without the OER, with the OER, and with combined OER withflipped classroom
Bridgeport received funding fromthe National Science Foundation Hispanic Serving Institution program in 2022. The project, calledProject Achieve, aimed to foster, engage, and retain underserved and underrepresentedundergraduate men and women, with particular emphasis on Hispanic students in engineering andcomputer science majors. As a part of the project, a multi-disciplinary effort among faculty inmechanical, electrical, computer engineering, and computer science designed an undergraduatecourse, Introduction to Scientific Research, based on the evidence-based Affinity Research Groupmodel, one of the signature models in the Computing Alliance of Hispanic-Serving Institutions(CAHSI) Network. This 2-credit yearlong course offered undergraduate
) program, aimed at promoting undergraduate research. Theprogram offers students the opportunity to engage in voluntary research, receive stipends, andaccess paid residency dorms. It contributes to academic growth and practical experience,enhancing communication skills, presentation abilities, resilience, teamwork, and problem-solving capabilities.The program spans eight weeks from June 1st to July 27th. Students are required to dedicate 20hours per week to their respective research projects and attend weekly seminars organized by thedean's office on important topics such as responsible conduct of research training, intellectualproperty rights, regulatory aspects of research including Institutional Review Board (IRB) andInstitutional Animal Care
]. Project-based learning is one of the teachingmethodologies used in engineering education to promote teamwork [2; 3]. Cornerstone coursesare first-year engineering design courses mostly using project-based learning methodologies [4],where students work in teams to solve real-world problems [5]. During COVID-19, students hadto work remotely in teams using different platforms, such as Teams, ZOOM, and Google Drive.Today, most universities have returned to face-to-face classes. After meeting with students todiscuss their projects, the faculty team realized that despite the face-to-face classes, some teamsstill use different technologies to do their teamwork and have never met in person outside lecturetime. The faculty team has noticed a need for more
research paper synthesizes findings from two research grants studyingHyFlex instruction in a first-year design course. “HyFlex” is a method providing students with autonomy toparticipate in person or online and, in many cases, fluidly blends the two based on the instructor or students'individual needs. While HyFlex is not new, it has become more feasible since COVID, as technologies haveimproved and cultural acceptance of remote work has evolved. Our two funded projects have resulted in avariety of specific research studies that are published in papers. This research paper follows a compilationmethod to review and synthesize multiple findings, sharing each as data sources and draw conclusions acrossthe larger set of results with implications for
Paper ID #40960Effectiveness of Scrum in Enhancing Feedback Accessibility among UndergraduateResearch Students: Insights from Integrated Feedback Dynamics FrameworkSakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University Sakhi Aggrawal is a Graduate Research Fellow in Computer and Information Technology department at Purdue University. She completed her master’s degree in Business Analytics from Imperial College London and bachelor’s degree in Computer and Information Technology and Organizational Leadership from Purdue University. She worked in industry for several years with her latest jobs being as project manager at Google and Microsoft. Her
curriculum thatbest suits the graduate preparing for a career such that the industry can hire knowledgeable smartgrid employees. Multiple universities have partnered on a DOE-funded project calledGrid-Ready Energy Analytics Training with Data (GREAT with Data) to solve this shortage ofqualified workforce. These universities mentioned above that have partnered together consist ofthe University of California, Riverside (UCR), University of Texas, Austin (UT), Virginia Tech(VT), Stony Brook University (SBU), and Washington State University (WSU). To meet smartgrid requirements, these five universities have adapted courses for undergraduate and graduatestudents in different categories, including machine learning, cyber security, alternative
adaptability dimension, Dealing with Uncertain and UnpredictableSituations [15], due to the uncertainty managers described engineers feeling about the changingnature of their job role. However, each manager's recollections were associated with a differentcause (e.g., project cancellation, company merger, market change), resulted in a differentoutcome, and featured varying levels of detail. By choosing three situations from which to createa composite narrative, a complete story that succinctly touches on multiple challenges related toadaptability but is still grounded in the data could be told.Following the same methodology, I developed each composite narrative using two to fourexcerpts from the manager interviews. First, I categorized the critical
Student Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Engineering Design in Work-Integrated Learning Contexts1 IntroductionTo continue enhancing student learning, many institutions are implementing work-integratedlearning programs (WIL) to aid in the development of work-ready graduates [1]. WIL integratesacademic studies with experiences within a workplace or practice setting [2]. These experiencescan take many forms including collaborative research projects, apprenticeships, co-operativeeducation, entrepreneurship, field placements, internships, professional placements, servicelearning, or work experiences. WIL programs are very common in undergraduate engineeringprograms and have more recently expanded to graduate programs
Deformation & Failure Mechanisms, Materials Science, Fracture Mechanics, Process-Structure-Property Relationships, Finite Element Stress Analysis Modeling & Failure Analysis, ASME BPV Code Sec VIII Div. 1 & 2, API 579/ASME FFS-1 Code, Materials Testing and Engineering Education. Professionally registered engineer in the State of Texas (PE). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Teaching Effective Communication for TeamworkThis is a Work in Progress paper.IntroductionEngineering projects are often complex and require collaboration, making teamwork skillscritical for engineers. Employers want to hire students with strong professional skills, includingthe ability to work
Work In Progress: Assessing the Long-Term Impact of Maker Programs on Career Outcomes and Industry Skills DevelopmentAbstractOur project, led by the University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill and Rice University, seeks toassess the long-term impacts of Maker-focused educational programs on career outcomes andindustry skills development. While much attention has been given to the positive educationaloutcomes of these educational programs, little has been written about their effects on careerprospects and industry hiring trends. The project aims to identify relevant metrics for measuringcareer impacts and develop tools for assessing the relationship between makerspace experiencesand career readiness. We anticipate that the data
engineering knowledge and skills in real-worldcontexts [2]–[4], and lacking preparation for solving engineering workplace problems [5], [6], which hasbecome global issues for engineering education. Some higher engineering education institutions have madesteps to overcome these challenges. For example, MIT implemented the NEET initiative, concentrating onfive different learning threads and project-based learning mode, which provide students authentic contextsto address the real-world engineering challenges [7], [8]. Other engineering education institutions likeSingapore University of Technology and Design, University College London, Charles Sturt University andTU Delft (see [9]), and The Pennsylvania State University’s Learning Factory [10] have also
Heileman and colleagues in 2017, the Curricular Analytics framework enables researchersand practitioners to quantify the interconnectedness of their prerequisite structures to unveilgatekeeper courses and forecast the impact of curricular policies or changes using network-analytic metrics. These metrics can be calculated using only available data; all one needs todo is transform a plan of study into a list of courses, prerequisites, and corequisites. However,larger projects that examine institutional, disciplinary, and temporal differences will likelyface difficulties when wrangling with the details of diverse organizational contexts. Thispaper outlines the data entry processes developed by drawing from a research group’sMicrosoft Teams
[6] and fill in the gap of knowledge access during thesummer [7,8]. Hands-on projects and workshops with industry experts [9] increase students’ self-confidence, and site visits to authentic examples of engineering introduce students to the socialsectors that leverage STEM knowledge [10], helping to develop self-confidence and STEMidentity formation.The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of a three-week STEM summer campconducted on the university grounds by the engineering faculty and a undergraduate and graduatestudents mentors on middle school students of grades 6, 7 and 8. Participants were selected torepresent a broad range of both demographics and genders. The camp is designed to promoteSTEM identity development by