curriculum. Proceedings of the 124th ASEE Annual Conference. Columbus, Ohio, June 25-28, 2017.7. Waldorf, D. J., & Georgeou, T. M. (June, 2016). Geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) integration throughout a manufacturing engineering curriculum. Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference. New Orleans, Louisiana, June 26-29, 2016.8. Witherell, P., Herron, J., & Ameta, G. (May, 2016). Towards annotations and product definitions for additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the 14th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Gothenburg, Sweden. May 18-19, 2016.9. Hewerdine, K. P., Leake, J. M. & Hall, W. B. (June, 2011). Linking CAD and metrology to explain, demonstrate, and teach GD&T
R. Ribe, “Engage Engineering.” [Online]. Available: https://www.engageengineering.org/.6. C. Hill, C. Corbett, and A. St. Rose, Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. American Association of University Women, 2010.7. S. A. Sorby, Developing spatial thinking. Delmar Cengage Learning, 2012.8. R. B. Guay, Purdue spatial visualization test: Rotations. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation, 1977.9. S. A. Sorby. "Assessment of a" new and improved" course for the development of 3-D spatial skills." Engineering Design Graphics Journal 69.3, 2009.10. N. Delson and L. Van Den Einde, “Tracking student engagement with a touchscreen app for Spatial Visualization Training and freehand sketching
planes. In contrast Figure 8 shows a student sketched part with chamfered corners,where the vertical edge of chamfer and the horizontal edge of the mating top surface are collinearin the drawing. When asked to describe the collinear lines, the student replied that, “Thechamfer line doesn’t look up and down, but looks like it is at an angle because of how the rest ofthe part is.” This remarkable comment indicates that the student was understanding the part in aholistic way and that the features on the isometric sketch represent edges of it in a coherentfashion.Figure 7: Coincident lines (Line A and Line B) on different planes in an isometric view.Figure 8: Student sketched chamfered corner where collinear vertical line represents two edgeson
/23796529.2011.11674687. [Accessed Jan. 10, 2018].[7] J. M. Brill and R. Maribe Branch, “Visual literacy defined – The results of a Delphi study: Can IVLA (operationally) define visual literacy?,” Journal of Visual Literacy, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 47-60, 2007. [Online] Available: Taylor & Francis Online, http://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2007.11674645. [Accessed Jan. 10, 2018].[8] B. R. Harris, “Blurring borders, visualizing connections: Aligning information and visual literacy learning outcomes,” Reference Services Review, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 523-535, 2010. Available: Emerald, https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321011090700. [Accessed Jan. 30, 2018].[9] T. Bowen, “Assessing visual literacy: A case study of developing a rubric for identifying and
multiaxis tasks including visual cue quality,” J. Aircr., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 607–614, 2001.[2] J. j. Vogel-Walcutt, J. b. Gebrim, C. Bowers, T. m. Carper, and D. Nicholson, “Cognitive load theory vs. constructivist approaches: which best leads to efficient, deep learning?,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 133–145, Apr. 2011.[3] J. X. Chen, N. D. V. Lobo, C. E. Hughes, and J. M. Moshell, “Real-time fluid simulation in a dynamic virtual environment,” IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 52–61, 1997.[4] D. M. Fraser, R. Pillay, L. Tjatindi, and J. M. Case, “Enhancing the learning of fluid mechanics using computer simulations,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 381–388, 2007.[5] S. Roweis et al., “A
SD Assessments n (hr:min:sec) (hr:min:sec) (hr:min:sec) Assignment 7. Widgets 1-6 1. Instructor A 25 0:30:07 0:24:48 0:07:32 2. Instructor B 13 0:19:28 Assignment 8. Widgets 7-15 1. Instructor A 25 0:37:50 0:33:44 0:05:49 2. Instructor B 14 0:29:37 Assignment 9. Widgets 16-18 1. Instructor A 24 0:58:25
State University. Her research focuses on (a) new literacies of online reading comprehension, particularly in complex and ill-structured learning domains, (b) teaching and learning in synchronous hy- brid learning environments, where physically present and remote participants interact in real time through such technologies as video conferencing tools and robots, and (c) the use of augmented reality in STEM education.Dr. Hannah Klautke, Michigan State University Hannah Klautke is a User Experience Research Associate with Usability/Accessibility Research and Con- sulting (Michigan State University Outreach and Engagement). She is involved in usability evaluations, focus groups, and information architecture projects for
Paper ID #22200The Engineering Design Graphics Journal and Its Selected Metrics of EffectDr. Robert A. Chin, East Carolina University Robert A. ”Bob” Chin is a faculty member, Department of Technology Systems, College of Engineering and Technology, East Carolina University, where he has taught since 1986. He is the Engineering Design Graphics Division’s chair and in 2015, he completed his second term as the director of publications for the Engineering Design Graphics Division and the Engineering Design Graphics Journal editor. Chin has also served as the Engineering Design Graphics Division’s annual and mid-year
Paper ID #23227Detection and Incidence of Plagiarism in a Solid Modeling CourseDr. Steven Joseph Kirstukas, Central Connecticut State University Steve Kirstukas is an Associate Professor at CCSU, where he teaches courses in solid modeling, MATLAB programming, and engineering mechanics. He is exploring the use of computer-aided assessment of CAD files to give consistent, accurate, and quick feedback to students. He has degrees in civil and mechanical engineering, with a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota. Steve has worked in industry as a civil engineer, software developer, biomechanics researcher, and mechanical design
Creo demo completed example (A) (B) (C) (D) Figure 2 – Lecture Creo demo step-by-step example• Prior to the lecture, a Precision LMS unit had been assigned that addressed concepts, theory, and step by step practical examples on the creation of revolved features and patterns in Creo, and it was to be completed outside of class before lecture. The tutorials include videos and step-by-step instructions with detailed explanations as shown in Figures 3 and 4. Figure 3 – Precision LMS lesson on creating revolved features [5] Figure 4 – Precision LMS lesson on creating
with real-world examplesas compared to theoretical examples traditionally employed in introductory engineering graphicscourses.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1725874. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] J. V. Ernst, T.O. Williams, A. C. Clark, and D. P. Kelly, “Psychometric properties of the PSVT:R Outcome Measure: A preliminary study of introductory engineering design graphics,” in 70th EDGD Midyear Conference Proceedings, Daytona, FL, USA, January 24-26, 2016.[2] S. A. Sorby and B. J. Baartmans
, and J.T. Allison, “Project-Based Curriculumfor Teaching Analytical Design to Freshman Engineering Students via ReconfigurableTrebuchets,” Education Sciences, vol. 6, no. 7, 2016.[14] B. N. Roszelle, “ Implementation of 3D Printing Design Project in First Year MechanicalEngineering Course to Aid in Understanding of Engineering Design Process,” 7th First YearEngineering Experience Conference, Roanoke, VA, USA, August 3-5, 2015. Available:http://fyee.asee.org/FYEE2015/papers/5027.pdf[15] E. Ford, “ Get to Know Your CNC Code: How to Read G-Code, October 24, 2016. [Online}Available: https://makezine.com/2016/10/24/get-to-know-your-cnc-how-to-read-g-code/Appendix A: Rubric for assessing design reviews Category Poor
workshop (possiblydue to an iceberg effect, which is discussed in the Findings section below). 5 4 3 2 1 0 Lesscomfortable Nochange MorecomfortableFigure 6. Phase I: Change in Rhino Comfort Level after Training in Modules 5 and 6; N = 9.Phase II testing was carried out for college-targeting high-school students who participated in aone-week-long summer design immersion workshop hosted by Rensselaer. These studentsranged in age from 15 to 18 and worked on open-ended design projects in groups of 3 to 4members. Group CAD output was analyzed according to a rubric designed by Krauss thatassessed command, strategic, and epistemic CAD knowledge as demonstrated by each team’sfinalized CAD models. (See Appendix B for the
J. Strimel is an assistant professor of engineering/technology teacher education in the Purdue Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. His prior teaching experience includes serving as a high school engineering/technology teacher and a teaching assistant professor within the College of Engineering & Mineral Resources at West Virginia University.Dr. Esteban GarciaEmily Yoshikawa, Purdue University, West LafayetteLiwei Zhang Liwei Zhang is a master student at the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation at Purdue University. In 2016, she received her Bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering from Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Her research focuses on assessment in
the area of pedagogical methodology in CAD/CAE and Mechanics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Application of Data Analytics Methodologies to Spatial Visualization Test ResultsAbstractThe field of data analytics has received substantial attention in the past years due to global trendof collecting and analyzing data. Most of the attention and applications relate to consumersbehavior, but the applicability of data analytics has extended to processes and market analysis.Data analytics can be considered a generic term used to refer to a set of quantitative andqualitative approaches that are applied to provide the basis for some decision making