Paper ID #38749Transforming Engineering Economy into a Two-Credit CourseDr. Kate D. Abel, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) Kate Abel is the Director of the Undergraduate Engineering Management (EM) and the Industrial and Systems Engineering (ISE) Programs at the School of Systems and Enterprises. She holds a Ph.D. in Technology Management and Applied Psychology. She is a Fellow in ASEM. She has held several pro- fessional service positions including President (2006) and Program Chair (2005) of the Engineering Man- agement Division of the American Society for Engineering Education and
Paper ID #38133Course Strategy: Threading Triple Bottom-Line Sustainability AcrossMultiple CoursesDr. Daniel B. Oerther, Missouri University of Science and Technology Professor Daniel B. Oerther, PhD, PE joined the faculty of the Missouri University of Science and Tech- nology in 2010 as the John A. and Susan Mathes Chair of Civil Engineering after serving ten years on the faculty of the University of Cincinnati where he was the head of the Department of Civil and Environ- mental Engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Course Strategy: Threading Triple Bottom Line
Paper ID #47699Game-Based Supplementary Learning Activities to Increase Student Engagementin an Engineering CourseDr. Hartanto Wibowo, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Dr. Hartanto Wibowo is a faculty member in the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been teaching multiple courses ranging from the foundational engineering mechanics course to graduate-level design course.Jon Matthews Rouse ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Game-Based Supplementary Learning Activities to Increase Student
one component in attractingstudents to the profession, and has been identified as important in increasing the representationof women [16]. Engineering Economics provides an excellent venue for students to learn aboutthe social and economic benefits of technology. Internet enabled microfinance is one example.The concept of a class making microenterprise loans was inspired by university finance classesthe author heard about in which students invested $1000 (many years ago) in the stock marketand managed a portfolio.The initial goal for this project was for the students to gain a good understanding ofmicrofinance, especially as an example of a business activity that alleviates poverty. Ultimately Iwant them to think about how they can use their
reporting of fields of study andprogram completions. “Engineering/Industrial Management” was moved in 2000 from CIP 14(Engineering) to CIP 15 (Engineering-related Technologies/Technicians). In so doing, the federalgovernment changed engineering management from an Engineering field of study to anEngineering Technology field.The fact that this change occurred in 2000 is well documented. What is not available is why thechange was made. There are several important reasons that the engineering managementcommunity should attempt to reverse this change. This paper explores a strategy for how torequest and influence a return to CIP 14. Making the change will not be easy.We recommend the return of most engineering management programs to CIP 14.3001, the pre
Paper ID #47087The Engineering Ethics Coach: Integrating AI Chatbots to Strengthen EthicalDecision-Making in Engineering EconomyDr. Raymond L. Smith III, East Carolina University Emily Sondergard is a graduate from the College of Engineering and Technology at East Carolina University and a Chancellor’s Fellow graduate from the Honors College at East Carolina University. She earned her Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering with an Industrial and Systems Engineering concentration. Her academic and professional interests include systems optimization, ethical integration of artificial intelligence in engineering practice
economy is not a requiredcourse for any engineering major at this university, but a junior level engineering economy courseis offered as an elective by a graduate program in the engineering management and systemsengineering department. This project is a part of a two credit-hour course in exploration ofengineering and technology, and it, through this project, provides the only exposure to engineeringeconomy for most of the graduates. Students used an imaginary sum of $10,000 in making short-term investments in a mixture of stocks and a savings account. They learned how to calculateeffective annual return using three methods: manual calculation, programing with MS Excel, andan on-line rate of return calculator.IntroductionTime value of money (TVM
implications of technological advancements. Diversescenarios are analyzed, requiring students to identify key issues, evaluate solutions, and considerconsequences, while structured discussions promote debate and challenge assumptions. In thiscourse, students analyze scenarios and explore the intersection between product development,project management, and the lifecycle and societal impact of technology. Real-world case studiesdemand in-depth analysis of technology-related dilemmas, challenging students to considerethical dimensions and balance economic, social, and technological factors.To reinforce engineering economic concepts, weekly activities in project management topicsallow the students to analyze engineering economics and integrate answers
of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET), the stakeholders of the quality assurance in engineering education have beendiversified. Especially, different stakeholders involve the quality assurance inengineering education with different attitudes and behaviors. Engineering educationstakeholders have formed different groups representing different powers. It will helpto optimize internal quality assurance mechanisms by exploring stakeholders. Thus,this research takes Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) as a case to study the powerof quality assurance in engineering education from the perspective of StakeholderTheory. The findings indicate that engineering education stakeholders have formedthree main bodies representing
-Source EngineeringEconomics Textbook Replacement Materials (include practice problems)” 2024. Available DOI:10.14288/1.0443965[2] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), 2021. Available:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/[Accessed April 25, 2025].[3] Engineers Canada. Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board, 2023. Accreditation Criteriaand Procedures. [online]. Available: https://engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/2023-12/Accreditation_Criteria_Procedures_2023.pdf[4] J. Hilton, “Open Educational Resources and College Textbook Choices: A Review ofResearch on Efficacy and Perceptions,” Educational Technology Research and Development,64(4), 573–590, 2016.[5] N. B. Colvard, C. E. Watson, & H. Park, “The Impact of Open
Paper ID #49501The effect on student performance and course perception given an interactivemodule in online learningDr. Katie Leanne Basinger, University of Florida Instructional Assistant Professor and Undergraduate Program Coordinator at The University of Florida, in Industrial and Systems Engineering. My research is focused on practical applications of active and supplemental learning techniques for Generation Z students.Andrew Benjamin McGrath, University of FloridaHenry Maxwell Gonzalez, University of Florida ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Title: The effect on student
Paper ID #47327Comparing Feedback from AI and Human Instructor in an Engineering EconomicsCourseDr. Billy Gray, Tarleton State University Billy Gray is an Associate Professor at Tarleton State University in the Department of Engineering Technology. He holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Texas at Arlington, a MS degree from Texas Tech University in Systems and Engineering Management, and a BS from Tarleton State University in Manufacturing Engineering Technology.Dr. Gloria Margarita Fragoso-Diaz, Dr. Fragoso-Diaz is an Associate Professor of Engineering Technology at Tarleton State University. She
highlight AI's role in providing real-timefeedback, simulating real-world scenarios, and solving complex problems, thus preparingstudents for industry challenges. Additionally, Harris and Kittur [2]emphasize the need forundergraduate engineering students to leverage generative AI, such as large language models, tostay competitive in the rapidly evolving technological landscape. However, concerns about theethical use and accuracy of AI-generated content persist, suggesting that AI's integration intocurricula must be carefully managed to avoid undermining academic integrity [3], [4]. Forexample, Peuker [4] investigates the utilization of generative AI among first-year mechanicalengineering students, showing that while students recognize the potential
education, accreditationbodies like the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) encourage theintegration of economic considerations throughout the engineering curriculum, suggesting thateconomic principles and analysis may be incorporated into various courses and projects forengineering students. Programs such as civil engineering include an explanation of concepts andprinciples in project management and engineering economics in student outcomes [1]. Thecurriculum must explain some, but not necessarily all, of the key concepts and principles, andthere is no obligation to assess students’ ability to explain the key concepts and principles.Most undergraduate engineering programs introduce economics through a complete course