Conference Session

Engineering, Ethics, and Leadership

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; John M. Feiler, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Leo McGonagle, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Eileen Milligan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Alexander Rokosz, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Schanne, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Reza S. Rahaman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Olivier Ladislas de Weck, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS), Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

-peak.Eileen Milligan, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAlexander Rokosz, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyElizabeth Schanne, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDr. Reza S. Rahaman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. Rahaman returned to MIT in 2018 after a 29 year career in the Consumer Packaged Goods, Pharmaceuticals, and Agricultural Chemical Industries to lead the four School of Engineering Technical Leadership and Communication (TLC) Programs – the Gordon-MIT Program in Engineering Leadership (GEL), the Undergraduate Practice Opportunities Program (UPOP), the Graduate Engineering Leadership Program (GradEL), and the School of Engineering Communication Lab. Immediately prior to MIT, Reza was the Vice

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dayoung Kim, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

. Through real-world engineering applications, Dr. Bairaktarovaˆa C™s experiential learning research spans from engineering to psychology to learning ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Assessment Instruments for Engineering Ethics Education: A Review and Opportunities AbstractAssessment plays an important role in education, and there is no exception in engineering ethicseducation. However, although there have been efforts to evaluate students’ learning inengineering ethics classrooms, relatively limited efforts have been made to utilize valid andreliable assessment instruments to evaluate students’ achievement of learning objectives inengineering ethics

Conference Session

Using technology in engineering ethics education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University; Pauline Wade, Texas A&M University; Shawna Thomas, Texas A&M University; Hillary E. Merzdorf, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

(Instructor 1: M = 4.79, SD = 1.64; Instructor2: M = 6.12, SD = 1.30). On average for both sections, students’ lowest ratings were for thebenefits that videos would have had during their sophomore year (M = 5.22, SD = 1.77).Figure 1 shows the distribution of student ratings for each question in the survey. Distributionsfor Questions 1, 2, and 4 were negatively skewed as students rated these aspects highly. For bothsections, distributions were similar for Question 1, “Helped in being knowledgeable aboutcurrent ethical issues in computing” and Question 4, “Picking your own ethics topics.” Instructor2’s section gave higher ratings to the importance of analyzing ethical implications of capstoneprojects. The two sections were somewhat opposite in rating

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Qin Zhu, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Andrea Gammon, Delft University of Technology; Xianghong WU; Ryan Thorpe

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

Technol. Soc. Mag., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 31–38, 2001, doi: 10.1109/44.952763.[11] H. Han, “Virtue Ethics, Positive Psychology, and a New Model of Science and Engineering Ethics Education,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 441–460, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9539-7.[12] T. Iseda, “How should we foster the professional integrity of engineers in Japan? A pride- based approach,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 165–176, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11948- 007-9039-0.[13] G. Frigo, F. Marthaler, A. Albers, S. Ott, and R. Hillerbrand, “Training responsible engineers. Phronesis and the role of virtues in teaching engineering ethics,” Australas. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 25–37, Jan. 2021, doi

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Frank A. Mazzola, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Siddhartha Roy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Marc Edwards, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

gratefullyacknowledged.References[1] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, D. W. Knight, N. Canney, and C. Swan, “Educatingengineers to work ethically with global marginalized communities,” EnvironmentalEngineering Science, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 320–330, 2021.[2] L. Roldan-Hernandez, A. B. Boehm, and J. R. Mihelcic, “Parachute Environmental Scienceand Engineering,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 54, no. 23, pp. 14773–14774,2020.[3] D. Sedlak, “Crossing the imaginary line,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 50,no. 18, pp. 9803–9804, Sep. 2016.[4] M. A. Edwards, A. Pruden, S. Roy, and W. J. Rhoads, “Engineers shall hold Paramount thesafety, health and welfare of the public - but not if it threatens our research funding?,” FlintWater Study , 10-Oct-2016

Conference Session

The Global and Cultural Dimensions of Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Darius Grandvil Carter, San Francisco State University; Stephanie Claussen, San Francisco State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

Grant Nos.2024301 and 2130924. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] D. MacMillan and M. Laris, “After midair failure, critics ask: Did Boeing learn from Max crashes?,” Washington Post, Jan. 12, 2024. Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/01/12/boeing-max-safety-crashes/[2] N. Kallioinen et al., “Moral Judgements on the Actions of Self-Driving Cars and Human Drivers in Dilemma Situations From Different Perspectives,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, p. 2415, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02415.[3] W. T. Lynch and R

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Youna Jung, Northeastern University; Jacob Ray Johnston, Virginia Military Institute; Aidan Noonan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

. Figure 11. Color-indexed Hierarchy of Ethics Topics (Green: Top 1-8, Yellow: Top 9-17, Orange: Top 22-36, Red: Uncovered Topics)AcknowledgementProject sponsored by the National Security Agency under Grant/Cooperative Agreement NumberH98230-21-l-0167. The United States Government is authorized to reproduce and distributereprints notwithstanding any copyright notation herein. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Security Agency. This manuscript is submitted for publicationwith the understanding that the United States Government is authorized to reproduce anddistribute reprints.References[1] S. Deb

Conference Session

The Global and Cultural Dimensions of Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Qin Zhu, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Andrea Gammon, Delft University of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

: 10.1007/s11948- 017-9910-6.[10] J. Haidt, The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage Press, 2012.[11] J. D. Greene, Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Books, 2014.[12] M. H. Bazerman and A. Tenbrunsel, Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do about It. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.[13] R. F. Clancy, “The Ethical Education and Perspectives of Chinese Engineering Students: A Preliminary Investigation and Recommendations,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1935–1965, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00108-0.[14] B. Keysar, S. L. Hayakawa, and S. G. An, “The Foreign-Language Effect,” Psychol. Sci., 2012, doi: 10.1177

Conference Session

Professional Development and Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bailey Kathryn McOwen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Dayoung Kim, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

andsocial identity development is Turner et al.’s [14] Self-Categorization Theory. This theoryexplicitly notes that, depending on a situation’s relative value to a person, one or both identitytypes will influence the person’s behavior. This is also the reigning difference between Tajfel’s[14] Social Identity Theory and Turner’s [18] Self-Categorization Theory; where the former“suggests a continuum of interpersonal versus intergroup behavior,” the latter “pronounces thatboth—social and personal identity processes—may be at work simultaneously” [15]. Self-Categorization notes that personal identity is the self-descriptions pertaining to one’s personalattributes and social identity is the self-descriptions pertaining to one’s membership of a

Conference Session

Using technology in engineering ethics education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald P. Uhlig, National University; Shatha Jawad, National University; Phillip Zamora, National University; Elizabeth Niven, National University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

discussed. textbook is thinking. ideas are discussed discussed. discussed. discussed. introduce and their d and impact is their explored. relevance is discussed in depthUnder- Extensive Extensive Some Good Some Minimum No evidencestanding analysis analysis analysis is understandi ability to understandi of backed demonstrate provided, ng of the apply ng of the understandiof subject up by s demonstrati subject is understandi subject is ng

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeff R. Brown, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Chad Rohrbacher, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Taylor Joy Mitchell, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University ; Leroy Long III, Sinclair Community College - Dayton; Jenna Korentsides, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Joseph Roland Keebler, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

, from https://www.gutenberg.org/files/37423/37423-h/37423-h.htm7. Bellaera, L., Weinstein-Jones, Y., Ilie, S., & Baker, S. T. (2021). Critical thinking in practice: The priorities and practices of instructors teaching in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100856.8. Burton, E., Goldsmith, J., & Mattei, N. (2015, January). Teaching AI Ethics Using Science Fiction. In Aaai workshop: Ai and ethics.9. Skirpan, M., Beard, N., Bhaduri, S., Fiesler, C., & Yeh, T. (2018, February). Ethics education in context: A case study of novel ethics activities for the CS classroom. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 940-945).10. Bielefeldt, A. (2022

Conference Session

Virtues in Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chloe Adams, Wake Forest University; Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University and National Science Foundation ; Lasya Agasthya

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

Ethics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 83–96, 2022.[6] M. Davis, “Integrating ethics across the engineering curriculum.,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 556–565, 2020.[7] O. Pierrakos, M. Prentice, C. Silverglate, M. Lamb, A. Demaske, and R. Smout, “Reimagining Engineering Ethics: From Ethics Education to Character Education,” IEEE, pp. 1–9, 2019.[8] C. Fleddermann, Engineering ethics, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: New York: Prentice Hall, 2011.[9] C. E. Harris Jr., M. S. Pritchard, M. J. Rabins, R. James, and E. Englehardt, Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 6th ed. Cengage Learning, 2018.[10] J. Lee, “Incorporating service learning into engineering ethics education,” Technology

Conference Session

Professional Development and Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amir Hedayati Mehdiabadi, University of New Mexico; Chika Winnifred Agha, Colorado State University; Rebecca A Atadero, Colorado State University; Pinar Omur-Ozbek, Colorado State University; Carlotta Duenninger

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

widely used approach in qualitative research, was used in this study toidentify, analyze, and report patterns within data [26]. As described by Braun and Clarke [26],“[a] theme captures something important about the data in relation to the research question andrepresents some level of patterned response or meaning within the data set” (p. 82).Data coding: ATLAS.ti was the platform used for this study to generate, and organize the codes.After verbatim transcription, the data was systematically coded. In particular, we identified partsof the texts where participants referred to particular events and stories related to ethics andequity. Then, we developed codes for each identified story to capture the main issue(s) that wereraised. This was done by

Conference Session

Using technology in engineering ethics education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hortense Gerardo, University of California, San Diego; Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University; B. Lallian Ngura, Centre for Thinking Language and Communication (CTLC), Plaksha University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 91, 104186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104186[3] Padhan S, Mohapatra A, Ramasamy SK, Agrawal S. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Robotics in Elderly Healthcare: Enabling Independence and Quality of Life. Cureus. 2023 Aug 3;15(8):e42905. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42905. PMID: 37664381; PMCID: PMC10474924.[4] Hasan, D. S., Pant, B., Kumar, Y., Rao, A., Singh, Y., & Srivastava, A. (2023b). Microrobot for elderly care using advance AI technology. 2023 IEEE World Conference on Applied Intelligence and Computing (AIC). https://doi.org/10.1109/aic57670.2023.10263815[5] https://www.coursera.org/articles/types-of-ai[6] Hintze, A. (2016)Understanding the

Conference Session

Decision-Making in Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tori N. Wagner, University of Connecticut; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Richard Tyler Cimino, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

: 10.59198/8259gnir7.[4] L. Kohlberg, The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row, 1984.[5] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2022-2023”. ABET. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-policy-and-proced ure-manual-appm-2023-2024/ (accessed Feb. 7, 2024).[6] Rest, James; Narvaez, D.; Bebeau, M.; Thoma, S. (1999). “DIT-2: Devising and testing a new instrument of moral judgment,” Journal of Educational Psychology. vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 644-659. 1999.[7] L. G. Kisselburgh, J. L. Hess, C. B. Zoltowski, J. Beever, and A. O. Brightman, “Assessing a

Conference Session

Broader Approaches to Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyle Payne, Collins Engineers

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

skewing interview data.Participants Twenty-five participants were selected who are currently-practicing or recently-practicing professional engineers in the United States. Twenty of the participants were men(80%), whereas five participants were women (20%), which is consistent with gender diversityin the engineering profession (Pew Research Center, 2021). The study included eighteen Whiteparticipants (72%), three Asian participants (12%), two Hispanic participants (8%), and twoBlack participants (8%), which is consistent with racial diversity in the engineering profession(Pew Research Center, 2021). The sample included age groups from participants in their 20’sthrough participants in their 80’s. However, the average age of participants was

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _ Monday June 26, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Umair Shakir, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Justin L. Hess, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Matthew James P.E., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

Engineering Ethics Interventions,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 551–583, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6.[2] D. A. Martin, E. Conlon, and B. Bowe, “Using case studies in engineering ethics education: the case for immersive scenarios through stakeholder engagement and real life data,” Australas. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 47–63, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2021.1914297.[3] K. S. Kalyan, A. Rajasekharan, and S. Sangeetha, “AMMUS : A Survey of Transformer- based Pretrained Models in Natural Language Processing.” arXiv, Aug. 28, 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2108.05542.[4] T. Mikolov, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean, “Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space.” arXiv, Sep. 06

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Monday June 26, 3:15 - 4:45

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald P. Uhlig, National University; Shatha Jawad Jawad, National University; Bhaskar Sinha, National University; Pradip Peter Dey; Mohammad N. Amin, National University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

experience. As AI tools become more sophisticated, instructors mayhave to share their teaching loads with AI tools and in some cases, AI tools may perform betterthan human teachers. Future AI tools may use effective innovations in teaching that are hard forhumans to replicate. Humans adapted to changes adequately in the past; rapid changes in AI willcontinue to pose challenges that can be serious.References[1]. S. D’Agostino, “Machines Can Craft Essays. How Should Writing Be Taught Now?” Inside Higher Ed, Oct 26, 2022 [Online] Available: Inside Higher Ed, https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2022/10/26/machines-can-craft-essays-how-should- writing-be-taught-now. [Accessed Dec 6. 2022].[2]. S. Marche “The College Essay is Dead,” The

Conference Session

Decision-Making in Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles; Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan; Megan Ennis, University of Michigan; Andrew Benham; Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

survey. However, existing researchsuggests that demographics items should be placed at the end of surveys due to their potential tocause stereotype threat for marginalized students [28]. For this reason, the demographics itemswere moved to be placed at the end of the survey.Survey AdministrationIn Spring 2023, the survey was administered to aerospace engineering undergraduate students atthe University of Colorado Boulder and the University of Michigan. Students were surveyed intwo classes where we were implementing macroethics lessons–a sophomore aerospace vehicledesign course at the University of Colorado Boulder and a senior space system design course atthe University of Michigan. Prior to the planned macroethics lesson(s), students enrolled

Conference Session

Increasing Engagement in Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Wolf, University of British Columbia; Gayatri Gopalan, University of British Columbia; Christoph Johannes Sielmann P.Eng., University of British Columbia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth McDonald, United States Military Academy, Department of Systems Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

, [Accessed 7 January 2023].[2] C. Mitcham, "A historico-ethical perspective on engineering education: from use andconvenience to policy engagement," Engineering Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35-53, 2009.[3] T. K. Jewell, F. E. Griggs, Jr and S. J. Ressler, "Early Engineering Education in the UnitedStates Prior to 1850," Houston, 2001.[4] E. Layton, The Revolt of the Engineers: Social Responsibility and the AmericanEngineering Profession, 1st ed., Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.[5] U.S. News and World Report, "Best Global Universities," 2022. [Online]. Available:https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/engineering. [Accessed 7 January2023].[6] C. o. P. Australian, "What is a Profession?," Australian Council of

Conference Session

Broader Approaches to Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Markus D. Ong, Whitworth University; Kamesh Sankaran, Whitworth University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

should improve student outcomesrelative to the expected student default behavior with the original assignment of taking the firstlink(s) from a generic internet search of an ethical theory. This priming may also benefit studentsin subsequent FRCI courses or Core 350 if they have not yet reached those courses.ResultsAn assessment rubric for evaluating the student learning outcomes was previously developed bythe department as part of the launching of the engineering degree for ABET accreditation. Twoperformance indicators re assessed for this assignment, and the corresponding rating descriptionsare shown in Table 2. Performance Aggregate Rating Indicators Weak Developing

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Koehler, Wake Forest University; Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University; Adetoun Yeaman, Wake Forest University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

the virtue(s) in the context of the course or specific course activities. The degreeof exposure for each virtue and in each course varied. It is beyond the scope of this paper todescribe in detail the modules of each course. Relevant publications are cited for the modulesthat have been published [37] – [40]. Please note that the terms character virtues and characterstrengths are used interchangeably in this paper.Table 2: WFU Engineering Required Courses and targeted character virtues/strengths.Course Name Virtues TargetedEGR 111 - Intro to Engineering Design Overview of virtuesEGR 112 – Intro to Engineering TeamworkExperimentationEGR 211 – Materials and Mechanics N/AEGR

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _ Monday June 26, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

. Corporate lawyer Bernard Reillyemailed his colleagues, “The s**t is about to hit the fan in WV. The lawyer for the farmer finallyrealizes the surfactant [C8] issue…. F**k him” [20].Bilott doggedly worked his way through the boxes, sorting, organizing, and generally trying tobring order to the chaos. In addition to routine office correspondence, the stash included sensitivedata relating to the secret testing of employees for PFOA presence, as well as private internalcommuniqués. Bilott found the documents to be extremely disturbing and provided him with awealth of evidence to support not only the Tennant case but potential suits to follow.Two examples illustrate how DuPont collected its data. In 1962, DuPont gave volunteer workersPFOA-laced

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Colorado School of Mines; Qin Zhu, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Ryan Thorpe

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

Access.Hafferty, F.W., & Gaufberg, E.H. (2017) The hidden curriculum. In A Practical Guide forMedical Teachers, 5th ed., Elsevier Health Sciences, 35-41.Johnson, S. M., & Birkeland, S. E. (2003). Pursuing a “sense of success”: New teachersexplain their career decisions. American educational research journal, 40(3), 581-617.Lucas, K. B., & Roth, W. M. (1996). The nature of scientific knowledge and student learning:Two longitudinal case studies. Research in Science Education, 26, 103-127.Polmear, M., Bielefeldt, A., Knight, D., Swan, C., & Canney, N. (2019, June 1). HiddenCurriculum Perspective on the Importance of Ethics and Societal Impacts in EngineeringEducation. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32887Martin, A. M., & Hand, B. (2009

Conference Session

The Global and Cultural Dimensions of Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kerrie Danielle Hooper, Florida International University; Ivan Oyege, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

emphasis on community well-being, support ethical and comprehensiveapproaches to the development of AI. AI ethics initiatives can guarantee that technological 110advancements benefit all members of society by incorporating indigenous standpoint theory,which prioritizes the protection and inclusion of indigenous communities. Acknowledgingindigenous viewpoints enhances the conversation about AI ethics and promotes a more just andaccountable method of technological advancement.References[1] D. O. Eke, K. Wakunuma, and S. Akintoye, "Responsible AI in Africa: challenges and opportunities," 2023.[2] O. R. Olaopa and O. A. Ayodele, "Building on the strengths of African indigenous knowledge

Conference Session

Broader Approaches to Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qin Zhu, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Lisa M. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

stakeholders, (b) rigorous inclusion of moral philosophy to avoid anti-regulationtactics such as “ethics washing,” (c) standardized reporting to maintain quality control andaccountability, (d) standardized curricula for accreditation and quality assurance, and (e) theinternalization of institutional self-governance. Mitcham and Engelhardt (2019) mention severalof these factors, and additionally suggest evaluating the relation between RCR and engineeringethics education and EAC programs.While the holistic ethics intervention framework centers on engineering ethics education at thecourse level, Martin et al.'s (2021) multi-level framework delves into how faculty, serving asdecision-makers in engineering education, perceive and establish connections

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Monday June 26, 3:15 - 4:45

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laurie A. Pinkert, University of Central Florida; Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida; Steven Kuebler; Lakelyn E. Taylor, University of Central Florida; Eve Vazquez, University of Central Florida; Victor Milanes, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

their own senses ofresponsibility but also by their institutional or programmatic mechanisms for accountability. 13References[1] Sin, C. (2013). Student-centered learning and disciplinary enculturation: An explorationthrough physics. Educational Studies, 41(4), 351-368.https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2015.1007925[2] Hoang, T. V. Y., Ma, L. P. F., & Moore, S. (2020). Academic socialisation into scholarlypublishing: Perceptions and experiences of Vietnamese doctoral students in Australia.[Dissertation][3] Ahmadi, P., Samad, A. A., Baki, R., & Noordin, N. (2011). Disciplinary enculturation ofdoctoral students through non-formal education

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alice Fox, Stanford; Benjamin C. Beiter, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

think aboutethical decision-making. To connect these important approaches from the Philosophy of Tech-nology to Engineering, we propose embracing a playful approach to engineering education,specifically the queer art of failure, to expand the strategies and tools available for engineeringeducators in conveying complicated practice of teaching ethics to engineering students.III. T EACHING E NGINEERING E THICS : T HE S TATE OF THE C RAFTPresently, the incentives that American engineering programs currently have to teach ethicsis to meet hard requirements, such as those set out by ABET Accreditation [3], which areaccreditation bodies within the educational system that judge engineering curricula across allinstitutions and verify that they are

Conference Session

Engineering, Ethics, and Leadership

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farnoosh B. Brock, Prolific Living Inc.; Jessica Koehler, Wake Forest University; Andy Brock, Prolific Living; Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University and National Science Foundation

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS), Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)