. Schmeckpeper taught at a land-grant college, the University of Idaho, and worked as an engineer in design offices and at construction sites.Dr. Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University Dr. Ashley Ater Kranov is an adjunct associate professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University.Dr. Michael B. Kelley P.E., Norwich University B.S.C.E., 1974, Norwich University M.S.C.E., 1976, (Environmental Engineering), Purdue University P.E., Commonwealth of Virginia, 1979 to present. Ph.D., 1996, (Environmental Engineering), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Colonel, US Army (Retired) O ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Norwich
%. We assigned “grades” of A, B, C, D, or F based on the traditionalbreak lines (A > 90, 90 < B < 80, 80 < C < 70, 70 < D < 60, and F < 60). With these results, wecould look at the "grade distribution" and set goals for the percentages of A & B grades (i.e. >0.80) versus C, D, and F (< 0.80) that one might desire.In addition to analyzing each survey response, we also analyzed the data resulting from eachquestion individually. We computed the average score for each question and compared the scoresacross universities, and within university programs, comparing control populations with thosewho had a teamwork intervention of some kind.Data Analysis MethodsWe make statistical comparisons using the parametric, two
andhow the industry, the type of company, and other participants’ demographics might affect thefrequency and types of ethics and equity issues the engineers face in their practice.References 1. Chintam, K., & Prybutok, A. N., & Archuleta, C. M., & Deberghes, A., & DiBiase, B., & Li, R., & Richards, J., & Seitz, L., & Cole, J. (2023, June), Designing, codifying, and implementing social justice content in a required course on engineering and research skills for first-year graduate students. Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--43005 2. Shields, B. (2022). Justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion curriculum within
twenty-one of them having publishedyears from 2010-2023. Two coders were involved in this process. Nevertheless, the same steps inselecting textbooks were adopted for both coders. Once each coder had compiled a set of books,the lists were combined for the finalized set of twenty-six textbooks, which are cited in thereference list. The final list of engineering ethics textbooks used in this comparative analysis areshown below.1. Beyond the Code: A Philosophical Guide to Engineering Ethics (2021) by Heidi Furey, et. al2. Contemporary Ethical Issues in Engineering (2015) by Satya Sundar Sethy3. Engineering Ethics 4th Edition (2011) by Charles B. Fledderman4. Engineering Ethics and Design for Product Safety (2020) by Kenneth d'Entremont5
Paper ID #41198Making Room for Followers: A Grounded Theory Study of Ethical FollowershipAmong Professional EngineersDr. Kyle Payne, Collins Engineers Kyle is a strategic talent development leader and consultant with fifteen years of experience driving process improvement and behavior change through training, coaching, and kaizen events. He draws upon his experience managing quality in the structural steel industry – building high-quality structures that stand the test of time in any environment – to building high-performing and continually-improving teams. As a coach and facilitator, Kyle has established a strong
.[6] F. A. Akena, "Critical analysis of the production of Western knowledge and its implications for Indigenous knowledge and decolonization," Journal of Black Studies, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 599-619, 2012.[7] C. F. Oyier and B. Namande, "Tapping indigenous knowledge to power the national development agenda: the indigenous knowledge resource centre approach," 2015.[8] B. Nkhata et al., "Exploring selected theories applicable to educational disciplines and social sciences research," 2019.[9] E. E. Etta, D. D. Esowe, and O. O. Asukwo, "African communalism and globalization," African Research Review, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 302-316, 2016.[10] O. Onah, H. Ezebuilo, and T. Ojiakor, "The place of the individual
Engineering Macroethics Issues and Education,” in 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, Sweden: IEEE, Oct. 2022, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962654.[18] J. R. Herkert, “Engineering ethics education in the USA: Content, pedagogy and curriculum,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 303–313, Dec. 2000, doi: 10.1080/03043790050200340.[19] B. Jimerson, E. Park, V. Lohani, and S. Culver, “Enhancing Engineering Ethics Curriculum by Analyzing Students’ Perception,” in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2013. doi: 10.18260/1-2--19544.[20] E. A. Cech, “The (Mis)Framing of Social Justice: Why Ideologies of
not necessarily mean thatNASA or the United States government view these issues to be problematic. This was clarified inthe report and should be interpreted as part of the context about our discussion here about ethicalchallenges that emerged.5 Ibid, 11-136 W.C. Lee, "Pipelines, Pathways, and Ecosystems: An Argument for Participation Paradigms,"Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 8-12, 2019.https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.202417 Workshop report pages 15-168 While not focused on an ELSI expert to non-expert divide, a classic summary on such adivision is: B. Wynne, "May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-layknowledge divide," in Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, vol. 40, p.44, 1996.9
gratefullyacknowledged.References[1] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, D. W. Knight, N. Canney, and C. Swan, “Educatingengineers to work ethically with global marginalized communities,” EnvironmentalEngineering Science, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 320–330, 2021.[2] L. Roldan-Hernandez, A. B. Boehm, and J. R. Mihelcic, “Parachute Environmental Scienceand Engineering,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 54, no. 23, pp. 14773–14774,2020.[3] D. Sedlak, “Crossing the imaginary line,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 50,no. 18, pp. 9803–9804, Sep. 2016.[4] M. A. Edwards, A. Pruden, S. Roy, and W. J. Rhoads, “Engineers shall hold Paramount thesafety, health and welfare of the public - but not if it threatens our research funding?,” FlintWater Study , 10-Oct-2016
programs. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2016.[2] R. F. Clancy and A. Gammon, “The Ultimate Goal of Ethics Education Should Be More Ethical Behaviors,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2021.[3] P.-H. Wong, “Global Engineering Ethics,” in Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Engineering, D. Michelfelder and N. Doorn, Eds. 2021.[4] Q. Zhu and B. Jesiek, “Engineering Ethics in Global Context: Four Fundamental Approaches,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 28252.[5] R. F. Clancy and Q. Zhu, “Global Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? and When?,” J. Int. Eng. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jiee/vol4/iss1/4?utm_source
allow them toact upon their values? The newly developed Engineering Ethics course tackles this questionusing four basic approaches: a.) Ethics Theory, b.) GVV, c.) Contemporary Issues, and d.)Debates. Importantly, the new course motivates students to identify opportunities to voice theirperspectives, but it does not dictate for the students what those perspectives should be.(a) First, students learn fundamentals of deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics to providethem with frameworks for thinking about ethical action and character. This foundation in moralphilosophy is developed further in later senior-level courses as students incorporate ethicalanalysis into their undergraduate theses.(b) Once a student knows what they think is correct
Paper ID #36772Non-human Animals and a New Ethics for EngineeringDr. Rosalyn W. Berne, University of Virginia Rosalyn W. Berne, Ph.D. is the Olsson Professor of Applied Ethics in the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at the University of Virginia, and Chair of the Department of Engineering and Society. She also directs the Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science (OEC). As a scholar, Berne ex- plores the intersecting realms of emerging technologies, science, fiction, and myth, and the links between the human and non-human worlds. Published under her name are two academic books: Creating Life from Life
Paper ID #39735Using a Framework to Define Ways of Integrating Ethics across theCurriculum in EngineeringDr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University at RaleighCynthia BauerleLisette Esmeralda Torres-GeraldCarrie Hall ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Using a Framework to Define Ways of Integrating Ethics across the Curriculum in EngineeringEthics are an important part of engineering and computer science education for many reasons,ABET accreditation being only one. Historically, engineering ethics have been taught as a part ofa specific class, often outside of the engineering
. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. K. Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, and A. D. Mead, “The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decisionmaking in Project-based Design Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods.” Presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June, 2014. 10.18260/1-2--23130[2] National Society of Professional Engineers. “NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers.” NSPE.org. https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics [accessed Jan. 4, 2023].[3] C. Moos, L. Dougher, L. Bassett, M. Young, and D. D. Burkey, “Game-Based Ethical Instruction in Undergraduate Engineering,” NEAG Journal, no. 1, pp. 20–37, Mar. 2023, doi
]. Another, theSurvey of Engineering Ethical Development (SEED), measures ethical knowledge (e.g.,knowledge of the NSPE code of ethics) [17]. Other examples include the EERI, the ESIT, DIT-2,and the Survey of Ethical Reasoning (SER) which measure ethical judgment [18]–[21]. Whilethese quantitative measurement instruments can be useful, such measures can be challenging toimplement [13]. Specifically, the measurements are (a) inflexible in that they cannot be adjustedto account for one’s learning context, (b) purely quantitative and thus fail to elicit students’views in their own words, and (c) prime students to focus on certain ideas, thus activating extantschema [22] while foreclosing other possible responses. For example, if an instructor aimed
minutes sharing observations and advice, helping tocontextualize the learning by connecting it to their world of practice. Finally, as the ELL periodends, each team’s second-year student team coach conversationally delivers feedback to the first-year team leader (scaffolded by a feedback form shown in Appendix A); that first-year team leaderthen has five days to submit a personal reflection on their ELL experience and feedback (via areflection prompt shown in Appendix B).Each ELL activity is self-contained (i.e., not part of an ongoing, semester-long challenge or project),with each primarily focused on one or two Capabilities [2]. The decision to situate the ELLlearning activities into this short-duration format represents a trade-off in
foundational tothe West Point graduate. As Superintendent, MacArthur was instrumental in establishing thefirst codified honor code at West Point. He saw that all the hard work that went into making agood military officer falls short if the character of the individual is not likewise developed. Ashe describes each, his words are clear, concise, and powerful. “…[T]olerance, not to debase nordeprive those from whom one may differ by character of custom, by race or color of distinction.…[B]alance, a sense of proportion and ability to put first things first. A realization that there isa time and a place for everything but a recognition of the old maxim 'nothing too much' - whatthe Ancients meant by the 'golden mean'. …[I]ntelligence, rather than sentiment
) Micro Micro-Subject Micro-Object Identify and mitigate immediate risks Oppose unethical actions of managers or colleagues Develop and enact specific values, S character traits, and attitudes Contribute to workplace conditions for O u ethical practice b Comply with legislation and professional b standards Oppose work for unethical employers j j Uphold human rights Act as a workplace ally e e Macro-Subject Macro-Object
: 10.1007/s11948- 017-9910-6.[10] J. Haidt, The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage Press, 2012.[11] J. D. Greene, Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Books, 2014.[12] M. H. Bazerman and A. Tenbrunsel, Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do about It. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.[13] R. F. Clancy, “The Ethical Education and Perspectives of Chinese Engineering Students: A Preliminary Investigation and Recommendations,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1935–1965, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00108-0.[14] B. Keysar, S. L. Hayakawa, and S. G. An, “The Foreign-Language Effect,” Psychol. Sci., 2012, doi: 10.1177
Paper ID #43244Exploring the Influence of Identity Development on Public Policy CareerPathways for EngineersMiss Bailey Kathryn McOwen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Bailey is a student at Virginia Tech in the Engineering Education doctoral program. She has her bachelor’s in physics from Canisius University and bachelor’s in Industrial Engineering from St. Mary’s University. Her research interests are in workforce development, continued education for engineering practitioners, alternative engineering career pathways, and engineering ethics.Dr. Dayoung Kim, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
the dataset, overall the GPA and education level distributionsare equal between sexes. (b) Mosaic plot highlighting the distribution of(a) Box plot showing the equal distributions of degrees among male and female applicants. TheGPA among female and male applicants. Both education breakdown is approximately equal be-sexes have similar distributions of GPA. tween sexes. Figure 1: Sex-Agnostic FeaturesCertain features were influenced by the applicant’s sex to reflect observed trends in the workforce.For example, the mean for years of experience was lower for female applicants, reflecting trendsin the tech industry where women
points as it allowed me to compare where I think my virtues lie …Another expressed, demonstrating how engineering students appreciate quantification andmetrics: Having these assessments of virtue points was really exciting and meaningful to me, as they evaluated my behaviors and presented numbers which could be used for future guidelines. I will definitely keep track of ethical decisions I make and reflect as self development.Theme 4: Virtue Points were seen as valuable, particularly as a tool for reflection.Comments pertaining to the value of Virtue Points were primarily found in the course reflection,with value identified in how Virtue Points can help students a) learn about biases andperceptions; b) target a higher
-guidelines/ethical- practice.pdf?sfvrsn=78261e0b_14Bauschpies, W., Holbrook, J. B., Douglas, E. P., Lambrinidou, Y., & Lewis, E. Y. (2018). Reimagining Ethics Education for Peace Engineering. 2018 World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF-GEDC.2018.8629655Biesta, G. (2007). Why ‘What Works’ Won’t Work: Evidence-Based Practice And The Democratic Deficit In Educational Research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.xBradley, B. (2023, March 10). Why engineers want to retool a mysterious ring ceremony [Broadcast]. https://www.thestar.com/podcasts/this-matters/why-engineers-want-to- retool
, “Critical incident technique as a qualitative research method,” AORN Journal, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 536–540, Oct. 2001.[15] M. J. Bitner, B. H. Booms, and M. S. Tetreault, “The service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 54, pp. 71–84, Jan. 1990.[16] J. Van Doorn et al., “Customer engagement behavior: theoretical foundations and research directions,” Journal of Service Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 253–266, 2010.[17] W. R. Dunn and D. D. Hamilton, “The critical incident technique: a brief guide,” Medical Teacher, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 207–215, 1986.[18] R. C. Solomon, “Corporate roles, personal virtues: an Aristotelian approach to business ethics,” Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 3
managerial discourses woven into the public service promises of organizedprofessional engineers in both Canada and the United States, with slight disciplinary differences. Civil engineersprioritized safety, and sustainability, mining engineers prioritized industrial development and technical stewardship,and biomedical engineers prioritized health and wellness. While all eight professional organizations wove socialgood into their messaging systems, they did so in ways that characterised public impact as a product of industrialinnovation. This passive acceptance of capitalist forces as an inherent aspect of Canadian and American engineers’collective professional identity formation provides one possible explanation for persistent gap between the
ethics and the ethicalunderstanding of engineering from a Philosophy of Technology approach. We then utilizethe intersection of queer theory and video game studies to present how the understandingof failure can help us reshape how it is approached in engineering. Finally, to illustrate theuse of these ideas, we present two theoretical examples of how failure can be enacted in theclassroom for a better understanding of engineering ethics.II. FAILING AT G AMES , A B RIEF I NTRODUCTIONThe initial quote, from the 2023 Game of the Year, Elden Ring [1], serves as a call to action,a start to an adventure, the beginning of a quest that we hope will change the world (at leastthe one within the game. . . ). Video games can act as a world within a
his father that he did not want to continue because of the (a) (b) Figure 1: Two Virtue-of-the-Week stories. (a) Lu Ban and Ya Zi 21,22 , (b) Mercury and the Woodman 23 .hardship involved in farming. Lu Ban thought for a while and asked his son what his plan was forthe future. Ya Zi said he wanted to learn the skills of weaving and left home to learn weavingafterwards. One year later, Ya Zi returned home again. Lu Ban asked his son: “Why do you give up again?”Ya Zi said: “It was too difficult to do for me.”Lu Ban asked his son: “I see. Then, what is your plan for the future?”Ya Zi said: “Father, I would like to follow you and become a carpenter.”Lu Ban approved
located indisadvantaged areas.This module was designed to be accompanied by a written assignment requiring the students toexplore one of these two impacts ((a) bias and lack of inclusivity in design, and (b) colocation ofhigh risk technology in low income/minority areas) via analysis of news reports and studiesfocused on a particular engineering failure or enhanced risk of a technology or facility based onlocation near a disadvantaged or vulnerable population. Students will be asked to consider whatthis implies about the values of the designers or implementers of the technology, and how suchproblems can be avoided through Value Sensitive Design and ethical engineering principles.This includes asking students for their observations not only on
Paper ID #49159Canary in the Mine: An LLM Augmented Survey of Disciplinary Complaintsto the Ordre des ing´enieurs du Qu´ebec (OIQ)Tammy Mackenzie, The Aula Fellowship EcoTech CEO, inventor, MBA, human rights activist, philosopher, and researcher of the intersections between strategic management, institutions, and systems theories.Varsha Kesavan, University of AlbertaProf. Thomas Mekha¨el, Ecole de Technologie Superieure ´ Thomas Mekha¨el is a professor at Ecole ´ de technologie sup´erieure (ETS) in Montreal
, and how to most effectively reach out to and engage with them, b) identify specific questions we should ask stakeholders, including to capture contextualized needs, concerns, and future outlooks that will assist in guiding ethics- related learning and training goals, content, pedagogy, assessment, etc., and c) identify specific opportunities for future “ethics R&D” efforts that may be worthy of further exploration.To help prepare for the event and seed initial lines of discussion, a survey was developed by theleadership team and deployed to all invitees. More detailed information about our approach tosurvey data collection and analysis is presented below, followed by a summary of the findings.The HEEE event itself