Paper ID #9063Developing engineers who lead: Are student, faculty and administrator per-spectives aligned?Lt. Col. Brian J Novoselich P.E., Virginia Tech Brian Novoselich is an active duty Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army and currently a Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His is a former assistant professor at the United States Military Academy. His dissertation research interest is undergraduate student leadership development in capstone design teams.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education David Knight is an Assistant Professor in the
Paper ID #10257Problem Framing as a Teachable Skill: A Practical Approach to TeachingLeadership CommunicationDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn A. Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Department of En- gineering and Society in the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She holds B.A., M.A., and PhD degrees in English from the University of Virginia and is a past chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society Division of ASEE. In addition to undergraduate and graduate teaching of written and oral communication. Dr. Neeley has conducted research and
Paper ID #9937Leadership in Multidisciplinary Project Teams: Investigating the emergentnature of leadership in an engineering education contextMegan Kenny Feister, Purdue University Megan K. Feister is a doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue Uni- versity. Her research focuses on organizational identity and socialization, team communication, ethical reasoning development and assessment, and innovation and design. Megan holds a B.A. in communica- tion from Saint Louis University and a M.A. in Organizational Communication from the University of Cincinnati.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue
mathematics, (a) science and engineering science and engineering An ability to design and conduct experiments, An ability to design and conduct experiments, as (b) as well as to analyze and interpret data well as to analyze and interpret data An ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic
bridge between worlds: Understanding network structure to understand change strategy. Journal of Educational Change 11(2): 111-138.4 Quinn, R.E. 2010. Deep Change: Discovering the Leader Within. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Page 24.630.115 Henderson, C., A. Beach, & N. Finkelstein. 2011. Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practic- es: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48(8): 952-984.6 Stone, D., B. Patton, & S. Heen. 2010. Difficult Conversations. Penguin Books, New York, NY.7 Kotter, J.P. & L.A. Whitehead. Buy-In. Harvard Business Review
Paper ID #10415Utilizing a Student Organization to Create a Self-Sustaining Mentorship Pro-gram in EngineeringSean Lauderdale King, STEM Talent Expansion Program at LSU I am currently a senior in mechanical engineering at LSU. I am the President of the Society of Peer Mentors at LSU, a subset of the STEM Talent Expansion Program. I also serve as the Corresponding Secretary for the LAA chapter of Tau Beta Pi. Next year, I plan on pursuing graduate studies in mechanical engineering with a specialization in system dynamics and control systems engineering.Samantha Noelle FadrigalanAdrienne Steele, Louisiana State UniversityMs
• Provide a way for students to distinguish themselves (e.g., a certificate) Be a Good Engineer • (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering • (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data • (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability • (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
a collaborative educational pathway for the technology leadersof tomorrow.IntroductionOver the last few years, there have been several reports documenting the need for improvingSTEM education and advancing a national innovation strategy. In 2009, the National EconomicCouncil published a report entitled A Strategy for American Innovation: Driving TowardsSustainable Growth and Quality Report that outlined three broad-based strategies: (a) investmentin the building blocks of American innovation; (b) promotion of competitive markets that spurproductive entrepreneurship; and (c) catalyzing breakthroughs for national priorities. One of thebuilding blocks specified in the report is educating the next generation with 21st centuryknowledge and
(specific program information)since 2008. This information, shown in Table 1 along with the Z value calculated based ondifference from a neutral score, provides baseline data for a longitudinal study of engineeringleadership education, as well as a snapshot of program effectiveness relative to the student’soverall leadership development at that time.The assessment survey for the data in Table 1 asked students to rate their development inleadership skills compared to when they entered the program. A rating of 1 was a negativeresponse and a rating of 5 was a maximum positive response. The survey asked the following: 1 a. You are more aware of the actions you take in leading others 1 b. You employ critical thinking in your leadership actions 1 c
, "Leadership Education for Engineers: Engineering Schools Interest and Practice,"in ASEE Annual Conference, 2012.3 A. Osagiede, M. F. Cox and B. Ahn, "Purdue University's Engineering Leaderhsip Program: Addressing the Short-fall of Engineering Leadership Education," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, 2013.4 A. Ferreras and L. Crumpton-Young, "The Development of a Curriculum to Instill Engineering Leadership &Management Skills in Undergraduate Students," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006.5 S. Kumar and J. K. Hsiao, "Engineers Learn "Soft Skills the Hard Way": Planting a Seed of Leadership inEngineering Classes," Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18-23, 2007.6 J. M. Williams, J. Ahmed
- 4), 25-36.6. Barnes, L. B., Christensen, C. R., & Hansen, A. J. (1994). Teaching and the case method: Text, cases, and readings, Harvard Business Press.7. Hoag, K., Lillie, J., & Hoppe, R. (2005). Piloting case-based instruction in a didactic clinical immunology course, Clinical Laboratory Science 18(4), 2005, 213-220.8. Richard, L. G., Gorman, M. E., Scherer, W. T., & Landel, R. D. (1995). Promoting active learning with cases and instructional modules, Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 375-381.9. Raju, P. K., & Sankar, C. S. (1999). Teaching Real‐World Issues through Case Studies, Journal of Engineering Education, 88(4), 501-508.10. MIT Engineering Leadership Program. What is Engineering Leadership
. and Ahn, B., "Purdue University's Engineering Leadership Program: Addressing theShort-fall of Engineering Leadership Education," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013. Page 24.157.1316 Scarborough, J.D., "Project Management: A Critical Area of Study for Engineering & Engineering TechnologyStudents," in ASEE Annual Conference, 1998
. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.2 Gordon, B. (2012). Toward a new engineering education consensus: Ideas from industry and academia forinculcating and fostering leadership skills. Danvers, MA: The Gordon Foundation. ISBN 97809825485543 Akao, Y. (1991). Hoshin Kanri, policy deployment for successful TQM. New York: Productivity Press. ISBN 1-56327-311-X.4 Doran, G. T. (1981). There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives. Management Review,70(11), 35–36. Page 24.672.11AppendixComplete Strategic X-Matrix for the Leadership Development ProgramStrategic X-Matrix: Leadership Development Program
360-degree feedback create behavior change? And how would we know it when it does?” Journal of Business Psychology, 26, 183-192.15 Peterson, D. B., Hicks, M. D., and Stoner, J. D. (2001). “Tools and resources for helping people move forward Page 24.543.14 following multisource feedback.” The handbook of multisource feedback: The comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes, D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck, A. H. Church, eds., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 221-238.16 Murphy, K. R., and Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based