. As a percentage, this is computed as 0.97or 97%. Grades of A, B, C, D, or F are assigned on traditional break lines (A > 90, 90 < B < 80, 80 0.80) versus C, D, and F (< 0.80). We hopethis approach might resonate with people using assessment data to inform goals for improvedperformance. We use a two-tailed student t-Test to identify any significant gaps between PS reported byfemale and male students and between underrepresented minorities (URM) and non-underrepresented minorities (Non-URM). In each gap analysis, the null hypothesis is that themeans between the two groups are similar. We use the t-Test on the Spring 22 data because ofthe sample size. For the Fall 22 data, we use the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum method [15] to test if
American STEM Majors," J Negro Educ, vol. 88, no. 3, p. 379, 2020, doi: 10.7709/jnegroeducation.88.3.0379.[14] A. N. Griffith, N. M. Hurd, and S. B. Hussain, "‘I Didn’t Come to School for This’: A Qualitative Examination of Experiences With Race-Related Stressors and Coping Responses Among Black Students Attending a Predominantly White Institution,” J Adolesc Res, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 115–139, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0743558417742983.[15] E. O. McGee, P. K. Botchway, D. E. Naphan-Kingery, A. J. Brockman, S. Houston, and D. T. White, “Racism camouflaged as impostorism and the impact on black STEM doctoral students,” 2021, doi: 10.1080/13613324.2021.1924137.[16] K. M. Thomas, “Leading as ‘the Other,’” J Leadersh
Paper ID #36707Building a Leadership Toolkit: Underrepresented Students’ Development ofLeadership-Enabling Competencies through a Summer Research Experiencefor Undergraduates (REU) in Engineering EducationMs. Elizabeth Volpe, University of Florida Elizabeth is a doctoral student at the University of Florida. She is pursuing a Masters and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering as well as a certificate in engineering leadership. Her research interests involve leadership, the experiences of early career women in engineering and improving diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice within engineering education and the engineering workforce. She
Paper ID #38758Learning from an Omnidirectional Mentorship Program: Identifying Themesand Outcomes through a Qualitative LensMatthew Lewis CaulfieldDr. Daniel Ivan Castaneda, James Madison University Daniel I. Castaneda is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison Univer- sity. Daniel earned his PhD in 2016 and his Master’s in 2010, both in civil engineering from the Univer- sity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He previously earned his Bachelor’s in 2008 from the University of California, Berkeley. His course development includes civil engineering materials, dynamics, engineering design
engineering and solid mechanics.Dr. Gustavo B. Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Cal State LA. His specialization is in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering. Since becoming part of the faculty in 2009, Menezes has also focused on improving student success and has led a number of ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Work in Progress: Developing a Leadership Community of Practice Towards a Healthy Educational EcosystemIntroductionStudent success in educational ecosystems is a primary goal of leadership efforts. Yet, power andprivilege, especially the power held by those individuals in leadership, can have
presentations and key note lectures and serves as referee for journals, funding institutions and associations.Camila Zapata-Casabon, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile Master in Marketing and Market Research from the University of Barcelona, Spain. Industrial Civil Engineer from the Universidad del B´ıo-B´ıo. She has three diplomas in the areas of coaching, digital marketing and equality and empowerment of women. Her professional experience is linked to higher education as a project engineer and university management in the public and private area. Teacher at different universities in matters of entrepreneurship, business plans and marketing. She currently works as a teacher and academic secretary at the Faculty of Engineering
collaboration boundaries to understand how they can supportengineering students’ development of leadership competencies. This is work-in-progress, andpart of a larger project that aims at exploring students’ development of global competencies. Thecurrent paper advances our understanding of boundary crossing that occur within an engineeringdesign team, and it asks: a) what boundaries were encountered in globally situated engineeringdesign projects in a Canadian University and, b) how can these boundaries enable students tomake productive progress in their global leadership skills?Theoretical PerspectivesThe study was guided by three theoretical perspectives namely: 1) Vygotsky’s socialconstructivist perspective allowed for the study of students
%. We assigned “grades” of A, B, C, D, or F based on the traditionalbreak lines (A > 90, 90 < B < 80, 80 < C < 70, 70 < D < 60, and F < 60). With these results, wecould look at the "grade distribution" and set goals for the percentages of A & B grades (i.e. >0.80) versus C, D, and F (< 0.80) that one might desire.In addition to analyzing each survey response, we also analyzed the data resulting from eachquestion individually. We computed the average score for each question and compared the scoresacross universities, and within university programs, comparing control populations with thosewho had a teamwork intervention of some kind.Data Analysis MethodsWe make statistical comparisons using the parametric, two
,” By the Numbers, https://ira.asee.org/by-the-numbers. [3] M. Morris, R. Hensel, and J. Dygert, “Why Do Students Leave? An Investigation Into Why Well-Supported Students Leave a First-Year Engineering Program,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. doi:10.18260/1-2—33559 [4] T. L. Strayhorn, College Students’ Sense of Belonging: A Key to Educational Success for All Students. New York , New York: Routledge, 2012. [5] V. Tinto, “Through the Eyes of Students,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 254–269, Dec. 2015. doi:10.1177/1521025115621917 [6] B. E. Rincón and S. Rodriguez, “Latinx Students Charting Their Own STEM Pathways
—those that had a negative, pessimistic culture [13].B. How Does Feeling Happy at Work Impact Engineers? The literature I reviewed on happiness and productivity in general shows a correlationbetween the two. Zelenski, Murphy, and Jenkins’ research on the happy-productive workerthesis found happy workers to be more productive; and that positive affect had a strongrelationship with productivity [4]. Similarly, Oswald, Proto, and Sgroi concluded that happinessmakes people more productive [3]. This conclusion was informed by their research that showedrandomly-selected people a clip from a comedy movie, then measuring their productivity on astandardized task. Their productivity was then compared to the productivity of a control groupwho did
Paper ID #39335Identity-based Engineering Leadership Instruction: a ReflexiveInstruction Model and Its ImpactDr. Brett Tallman, University of Texas at El Paso Brett Tallman earned his doctorate in Engineering at Montana State University (MSU), with focus on engineering leadership identity. His previous degrees include a Masters degree in Education from MSU (active learning in quantum mechanics) and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Cornell University. He comes to academia with over two decades of industry experience, including quality engineering with Toyota and managing his own consulting practice in biomedical
). From a broaderperspective, experience that increases professional formation as engineers is known to be a keyfactor in student success [3]. Extra-curricular reinforcement of interest and application ofcurricular learning also tends to support the completion of engineering degrees and thusavailability of potential workforce [4]. Engineering students are more likely to find collegiateand professional successes when leadership skill development is implemented early andrepeatedly during their learning [5, 6].The authors were led to the present effort by (a) the opportunity to address DoD interest in bothleadership and innovation skills, (b) the college’s prior positive experience with peer mentoringand with undergraduate research, and (c) the
identifying and accommodating the mentees’ communication style.Although more than 50% of mentees gave a high rate, the lowest percentage of rates “6” and “7”was given to aligning expectations. a) Overall Mentoring Quality b) E-Lead Mentor Rating 60% 54.2% 60% 52.8% 50% 50% 37.5% 36.1% 40% 40% 30% 30
associated with communication assignments, informal work to develop and practice communication skills, and a formative feedback loop to help students better understand what is expected of them. 2) The Engineering Communication Studio is one of three studios on campus. Located in the engineering building, the studio contains modular seating, computer workstations, laptop docking stations with dual monitors, 3D printers and scanners, and a variety of audio-visual equipment for checkout. 3) Students who are successful in C-I courses (minimum grade of B) and take at least four C-I courses touching on all four modes are eligible for two programs celebrating their success. The LSU Communicator Certificate is the most
Education and Practice,” in Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017, pp. 45–66. doi: 10.1002/9781118757369.ch1.[7] S. Turner, P. Hancock, B. Gordon, T. Carroll, and K. Stenger, “Scaffolding Social Justice in the Engineering Classroom: Constructing a More Restorative, Inclusive, Engineering Practice,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Feb. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/scaffolding-social- justice-in-the-engineering-classroom-constructing-a-more-restorative-inclusive- engineering-practice[8] “2024-2025_EAC_Criteria.pdf.” Accessed: Feb. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https
Paper ID #48647Empathy: Developing This Core Leadership Skill in Engineering StudentsMr. Seth C. Sullivan, Texas A&M University Seth Sullivan is the Director of the Zachry Leadership Program in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the university, he worked in consulting in the private sector and as an analyst in the U.S. Government. Heˆa C™s earnedMs. Maria PolyzoiSheila RiveraRachel Elizabeth Rice, Texas A&M UniversityNicholas Aleczander Barrio, Texas A&M University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Empathy: Developing this Core
minutes sharing observations and advice, helping tocontextualize the learning by connecting it to their world of practice. Finally, as the ELL periodends, each team’s second-year student team coach conversationally delivers feedback to the first-year team leader (scaffolded by a feedback form shown in Appendix A); that first-year team leaderthen has five days to submit a personal reflection on their ELL experience and feedback (via areflection prompt shown in Appendix B).Each ELL activity is self-contained (i.e., not part of an ongoing, semester-long challenge or project),with each primarily focused on one or two Capabilities [2]. The decision to situate the ELLlearning activities into this short-duration format represents a trade-off in
engineering,even if not explicitly so.References[1] J. J. Park, M. Handley, D. Lang, and M. A. Erdman, “Engineering Leadership Development:Contribution of Professional Skills to Engineering Undergraduate Students’ LeadershipSelf-efficacy,” International Journal of Educational Methodology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69–80, Feb.2022, doi: 10.12973/ijem.8.1.69.[2] D. B. Knight and B. J. Novoselich, “Curricular and Co-curricular Influences onUndergraduate Engineering Student Leadership,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106,no. 1, pp. 44–70, 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20153.[3] M. R. Kendall and C. Rottmann, “Student leadership development in engineering,” NewDirections for Student Leadership, vol. 2022, no. 173, pp. 7–12, Mar. 2022, doi:10.1002/yd.20474.[4] Y
openness to newways of thinking and knowing.Kendall et al. [3] articulate an expansive definition of Engineering Leadership that incorporatesmany of the dimensions of complexity inherent in wicked problems: “Engineering Leaders (a) employ the full range of engineering skills and knowledge in the design of socio-technical innovations, while (b) seeking to understand, embrace, and address the current and future impact of their work in context by (c) actively fostering engaged and productive relationships with diverse stakeholders, including themselves and their team, the users of their technologies, and those impacted by their engineering work”.We argue that systems thinking is an important engineering leadership
first Executive Board of JLLA: Randi Mendes, President;Stephany Santos, Vice President; Arshia Yusuf Mirza, Secretary; Justin Fang, Treasurer; DonyeilHoy, Parliamentarian and Armin Tahmasebi Rad, Event Coordinator. Thank you for paving theway for future John Lof Scholars.References[1] A. M. Agogino, Educating the Engineer of 2020, vol. 3, no. 2005. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005.[2] Tang, X., Burris, L., Hu, N., & Brenkus, N. (n.d.). Preparing ethical leaders in engineering research and practice: Designing an ethical leadership module. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33190[3] Sullivan, S., & Koufteros, B. (n.d.). Meaning and impact: A review of Personal
Paper ID #41595AI’s Visual Representation Gap: Redefining Civil Engineering Workspacesfor Early-Career WomenMiss Elizabeth Volpe, University of Florida Elizabeth Volpe, EIT, LEED-GA, is a Ph.D. candidate in the Simmons Research Lab located in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. Her research interests include inclusive engineering, leadership, the experiences of early-career women in engineering, and improving sustainability, diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice within engineering education and the engineering workforce. Elizabeth
://www.kornferry.com/insights/featured-topics/diversity-equity- inclusion/the-benefits-of-inclusive-leadership[9] M. Adams and X. Zúñiga, “Getting Started: Core Concepts for Social Justice Education,” in Teaching for diversity and social justice, 3rd ed., M. Adams and L. A. Bell, Eds., New York, NY: Routledge, 2016.[10] J. A. Leydens and J. C. Lucena, Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice. in IEEE PCS Professional Engineering Communication Series. IEEE Press, 2018.[11] A. Johri and B. M. Olds, “Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 151–185, 2011, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x.[12] J. Saldaña, The
Paper ID #47450Enhancing Leadership Capabilities of Engineering Instructional Faculty Throughan ICVF-Based Reflection ActivityDr. Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso An Associate Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, Dr. Meagan R. Kendall is a founding member of the Department of Engineering Education and Leadership. With a background in both engineering education and design thinking, her research focuses on how Latinx students develop identities as engineers and navigate moments of identity interference, student and faculty engineering leadership development through the Contextual Engineering