AC 2009-1044: MINDING THE BIG PICTURE: USING DISCRETE EVENTPROCESS SIMULATION AS A PROBLEM SOLVING TOOL FOR STUDENTSSusan Scachitti, Purdue University, Calumet Susan Scachitti is a Professor of Industrial Engineering Technology at Purdue University Calumet. Professor Scachitti consults and teaches in traditional areas of Industrial Engineering including Quality Management and organizational change, Six Sigma methodologies, methods engineering, Lean thinking, facility layout, process improvement, and ergonomics. Prior to working in education, she spent ten years in various engineering and supervisory roles in the telecommunications industry which focused on high volume electronics
perceptions of the two programs, as well aslistening to industry representatives speak about the job opportunities available after graduation.Keep in mind that a student does not have to actually declare the E or ET path that they want topursue until they begin their junior year of courses. Page 24.1296.5 Fig. 2 Engineering Student Enrollment as a Function of Class, Aug. 2013 180 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 157
Paper ID #28678A Low Cost Kiosk for Student Learning of Human Machine Interface (HMI)Dr. Larry Himes Jr, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Larry Himes, Jr. Dr. Larry Himes, Jr. is a recent Ph.D. graduate from Purdue University. Working on a startup, Didactic- tron, Inc., manufacturing STEM education devices and kits for students. Has taught ECET undergraduate courses at Purdue University North Central in Westville, Indiana and EECT undergraduate courses at Ivy Tech Community College in South Bend, Indiana over the past six years. A couple of my STEM educa- tion kits, patented by
Paper ID #17767Examining Engineering Technology Students: How They Perceive and OrderTheir ThoughtsDr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Lucietto has focused her research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engineering technology students. She teaches in an active learning style which engages and develops practical skills in the students. Currently she is exploring the performance and attributes of engineering technology students and using that knowledge to engage them in their studies.Dr. Jennifer Drapinski Moss, Purdue University Dr. Jennifer Moss is
kept in mind inthe design and manufacturing of the AIR MOTOR: Envelope dimensions shall not exceed 3x4x5 in inches. Either horizontal or vertical piston movement. Single piston - no impeller - no rotary valves. Maximum air pressure allowed is 60 psi. Inlet port to be threaded to accept tubing compatible with available lab sizes. Single acting. Drive shaft to be supported by a bushing. Bushing must be capable of delivering oil to drive shaft. Do reverse engineering of Air Motor. Come up with your own and improved design. Exchange your product drawings with another group. (So the other group can manufacture the product) Do literature searches to identify
Paper ID #32975Assessing Intuition Used Among Undergraduate Engineering Technology andEngineering StudentsMelissa Cai Shi, Purdue University at West Lafayette Melissa Cai Shi is an Undergraduate Researcher working under Dr. Lucietto. She is a student at Pur- due University, pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Actuarial Science and Applied Statistics with minors in Management and Chinese. She began working under Dr. Lucietto in the Summer of 2019 as an un- dergraduate researcher and has thus far continued her work. She is currently working on her Honors Scholarly Project. In addition to her Actuarial coursework, Melissa
Branding of Engineering Technology Programs Arizona State University at the Polytechnic campus Mesa, ArizonaAbstract The paper focuses on pros and cons related to the branding of EngineeringTechnology (ET) Programs. Two frequent topics among leaders of ET programsare how to educate others (prospective students, prospective employers of ETgraduates, and the community) about what engineering technology is all aboutand how to differentiate between engineering technology programs and traditionalengineering programs. Engineering Technology faculty and students face thesechallenges on a regular basis. This paper seeks to address the question can thispaper initiate a dialogue among the
., Ross, D. A. and Weber, W. J., "Environmental Sustainability Education at the University of Michigan: Collaboration with Industry to Provide Experiential Learning Opportunities", Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, paper AC2003-156. 6. Bhamra, T. and Lofthouse, V., Design for Sustainability, 1st edition, Ashgate Publishers, Inc., 2007. 7. Grasso, D., "Engineering, the Environment and Sustainability - Mind Expanding and Necessary", Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, paper AC2003-251. 8. Rosentrater, K., and Kongar, E., "Not Just Informative, But Necessary: Infusing Green and Sustainable Topics Into Engineering and Technology Curricula
Paper ID #11275Accrediting a program in Engineering TechnologyProf. Richard Cliver, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Richard C. Cliver is an Associate Professor in the department of Electrical, Computer and Telecommu- nications Engineering Technology at RIT where he teaches a wide variety of courses both analog and digital, from the freshman to senior level. Richard also works for the Eastman Kodak Company as a Senior Design Engineer. Richard has received two teaching awards while at RIT. He was the recipient of the 1998 Adjunct Excellence in Teaching Award and the recipient of the 2002 Provost’s Excellence in
Page 11.1292.3introduced at the freshman level.Dr. Baum invited an alumnus, Dr. Clive Dym of Harvey Mudd College, to discuss ‘TheEvolution of Engineering Curricula’.(5) Dr. Dym noted that his college has a common corein their curriculum that emphasizes engineering design and practice, and that “…designshould be the backbone of engineering education and should be highly present in thecurricula.” Dr. G. Wayne Clough, President of Georgia Tech, was invited to discuss ‘TheEngineer of 2020’.(6) Dr. Clough noted that China graduates more engineers than anycountry in the world (about four-times as many as the U.S.) and that it is no longer truethat the U.S. can attract the brightest minds from other countries into our engineeringschools. He stated
simply because of the different majors, it was so interesting seeing how all our minds worked together to accomplish.• This program was awesome. I was able to truly see the real problems the world as a whole is facing now. I also understand now that there must be so much more involvement in the sustainable background to get things moving the way they are supposed to in order to have a safe and healthy environment for the future.Capstone Project for Engineering Technology StudentsThe work described in this paper was meant to be the capstone project for EngineeringTechnology students. Currently, the capstone course is being offered as a three credit hour courseand thus the project must be completed in a full semester’s timeframe
Paper ID #13177Preparing Students for Industry by Integrating Commercial Software intoCourseworkProf. Joseph A. Untener, University of Dayton Joe is a professor of Engineering Technology at the University of Dayton. With degrees from General Motors Institute and Purdue University, and experience with General Motors and other engineering and manufacturing companies, he teaches courses in Mechanical Engineering Technology, and co-authors text with Robert L. Mott.Prof. Robert L. Mott, University of Dayton Robert L. Mott, P.E. is professor emeritus of engineering technology at the University of Dayton. He is a member of ASEE
members. And so in thepromotion evaluation process without excruciating and unlikely effort unless the ETapplicant looks just like science faculty, engineers and liberal artists regarding research, Page 11.1030.3the promotion application can be snubbed.Observe Figure 2.9Nearly all observers see either a young or an old woman. And seeing either makes itdifficult to see the other. “The human mind has difficulty coping with complicatedprobabilistic relationships, so people tend to employ simple rules of thumb that reducethe burden of processing such information.”10 Clearly, the mind-set of traditional liberalarts promotion criteria cannot be easily amended
Paper ID #32807The Development of Techie TimesMr. Brian D. Tedeschi, Purdue University, West Lafayette Brian Tedeschi is a current Graduate Student at Purdue University with research interests in STEM Educa- tion and informal learning environments. Brian received his Bachelor’s Degree from Purdue University in Mechanical Engineering Technology and is currently working towards a Master’s degree in Engineering Technology.Ms. Julia K. Miller, Purdue University, West Lafayette Julia Miller is a Grad Student pursuing a masters in Engineering Technology with a specialization in engi- neering/STEM education research at Purdue
recently the topics of globalization3 of science, technology, and engineering have beendelineated in such popular works such as “The World is Flat4,” by Thomas Friedman, “A WholeNew Mind Moving from the Information Age to the Conceptual Age5,” by Donald Pink. Theformer work in particular has been the focus of considerable attention in academia as well as theASEE organization where the Keynote discussion in the 2005 Annual Conference noted thetrends on engineering graduation rates.The full-time as well as any adjunct faculty teaching in an engineering technology curriculumshould be focused on administrating course lectures, homework assignments, course termprojects and classroom instruction via worked examples in these areas. It is strongly
AC 2008-293: GUIDED INQUIRY IN AN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGYCLASSROOMRobert Edwards, Pennsylvania State University-Erie Robert Edwards is currently a Lecturer in Engineering at The Penn State Erie, The Behrend College where he teaches Statics, Dynamics, and Fluid and Thermal Science courses. He earned a BS degree in Mechanical Engineering from Rochester Institute of Technology and an MS degree in Mechanical Engineering from Gannon University.Gerald Recktenwald, Portland State University Gerald Recktenwald is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department at Portland State University. He is a member of ASEE, ASME, IEEE and SIAM. His research interests are in fluid
typicallyfollowed by site visits and interviews. It is a tedious process that many institutions simply avoid.Since there are few awards and few possibilities for success additional institutions arediscouraged and simply don’t apply. With this in mind the faculty of the Engineering & DesignDepartment wasn’t discouraged and actually considered their chances quite good.Once again an investigation was undertaken seeking a match between the Department’s needsand the prospect for support. The search revealed a number of potential partners meeting bothcriteria. Then the specifics of the proposal had to be established. Through planning sessions allof the details were discussed and finalized. Proposals were then drafted, revised, and lastlysubmitted. Throughout
the courses. Eight general topical areas were suggested and rated on aqualitative importance scale of high (H), medium (M), or low (L). Credits were assigned afterthe importance rankings were made. As mentioned earlier, due to the existing curriculumstructure, that the automotive concentration would be 18 credits.While there was significant debate about the number of credits in each course, Table 1 belowrecords the conclusion of the voting and discussion. Points were assigned to each priority vote,with a ‘L’ earning one point, a ‘M’ earning two points and a ‘H’ earning three points. The ratingreflects the importance of an automotive concentration topic treatment in the minds of theindustry representatives (all engineers). It is observed that
& analysis,technical writing and presentation. The Friday session of the SEE program was designated fortechnical seminars and workshops designed to enhance students’ learning outcomes related tocritical thinking, problem solving, and life-long learning. Guest speakers from the industry wereinvited to deliver lectures and host workshops current with today’s technology. Given the rapidpace of technological change, the Friday seminar series and workshops were designed to fosterin Vaughn’s engineering students a mind-set receptive to changes in technology in order toprepare them for their future professional careers.During the last two weeks of the program, students were arranged into two to three persongroups to work with a SEE faculty mentor
to support this statement. Well funded,“fat” programs will probably never again be the norm. Faculty of engineering and technologyprograms have an opportunity to steer their own destiny if administrators will create supportiveenvironments.Engineering and technology faculty should remain open-minded about the possibilities of afuture technology worker surplus in their fields. Administrators of these programs should becognizant of the job security concerns of their faculty should engineering and technologyprograms be eliminated. Additional study needs to be done of the jobs outlook in specificengineering and technology fields to provide data that will support sound decision making
promote a free and open forum forfocused discussion and thoughtful debate regarding editorial decisions.The Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission (ETAC) of ABET establishes generalcriteria for student outcomes associated with program accreditation [3]. The curriculum ofETAC programs must include “topics related to professional responsibilities, ethicalresponsibilities, respect for diversity, and quality and continuous improvement.” These curricularcomponents are further clarified with the ABET Policy on Diversity [4]. This statementencourages a commitment to “diversity and inclusion through developing and using the talents ofall persons.” With these guidelines in mind, engineering technology educators are encouraged topromote student
AC 2008-704: AN ADVANCED QUALITY ENGINEERING COURSE FORTECHNOLOGYBimal Nepal, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne (Eng)jihad albayyari, Indiana-Purdue University Page 13.170.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 An Advanced Quality Engineering Course for Technology Graduate CurriculumIntroductionDue to fierce competition and globalized marketplace, companies are forced to operate on theirlowest possible profit margin. In this context, it is argued that quality and variety are the criticalorder winning factors for any product types. However, introducing a new variety also introduceslarge variability
Engineering Students Ability to Solve Open-Ended Problems, Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exhibition2. Joan A. Ballantine, Patricia McCourt Larres and Peter Oyelere, Computer usage and the validity of self- assessed computer competence among first-year business students, Computers and Education 49 (4) (2007), pp. 976-990.3. Shu-Sheng Liaw, Hsiu-Mel Huang and Gwo-Dong Chen, Surveying instructor and learner attitudes towards e- learning, Computers and Education 49 (4) (2007), pp. 1066-1080.4. Robert W. Wendover, Understanding the Millennium Mind, The Center for Generational Studies, wendover.gentrends.com
. • Experimental Physics and Engineering Lab III : Electricity and Magnetism - The final course is designed to complement a lecture-only physics course on electromagnetism and electromechanical systems and includes laboratory assignments that uses sensing, control and actuation to demonstrate electromagnetic concepts as well as an introduction to microcontrollers. Also included is a continuation of non-technical topics such as ethics and art-in-engineering. These three courses were purposefully designed with several goals in mind includingteaching students critical think skills through the use of programming, supporting students asthey learn highly theoretical concepts in their physics courses, introducing students to
learners is evenmore challenging. Musical instrument design will remain a part of the course, but thisstrategy is only one of many exercises used to enhance the learning environment of thiscourse with the goal of creating a truly learner-centered environment for the students.Bibliography1. National Research Council Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, HowPeople Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School, Commission of Behavioral and Social Sciences andEducation, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 2000 (on-line free access,http://books.nap.edu/books/0309070368/html/).2. Ellis, Scordilis, and Cooke, “New Pedagogical Approaches in Engineering Mechanics Yield IncreasedStudent Understanding, Confidence and Commitment
Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Designing Printed Circuit Boards for Microwave Engineering Applications: a Teaching Tool for Engineering Technology StudentsAbstractThis paper will present the results stemming from an undergraduate course in MicrowaveEngineering Technology at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell. An opportunity toexperience the complete process of designing a microwave circuit with printed circuit board(PCB) technology was made possible by a grant provided by the Electrical and ComputerEngineering Technology Department Heads Association (ECETDHA). The financial support hasallowed the students to apply the theory that is part of the class syllabus to a practical
AC 2009-89: ENGINEERING DESIGN: THE MECHATRONICS APPROACH ANDCOGNITIVE EXPERIENCEJohn Mativo, The University of Georgia Page 14.550.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Engineering Design: The Mechatronics Approach and Cognitive ExperienceAbstractMechatronics is a rapidly developing, interdisciplinary field of engineering dealing with designof products whose function relies on the integration of mechanical and electronic componentscoordinated by a control architecture. A mechatronics platform has strength through its ability tooffer dynamic and flexible solutions. Engineers and educators are devising methods and
Paper ID #23201An Engineering Technology Course in Additive ManufacturingProf. Christopher David LeBlanc, University of New Hampshire Christopher D. LeBlanc is currently the Program Coordinator and Assistant Professor for the Engineering Technology program at the University of New Hampshire Manchester campus. Prior to his faculty ap- pointment he spent 16 years at International Business Machines (IBM) as an Analog Mixed Signal design engineer.Dr. Donald J. Plante, University of New Hampshire Donald J. Plante is a lecturer of Mathematics at the University of New Hampshire. His main area of research is in fractal
focused on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning rather thanmoving into rigorous engineering technology education research. The second article has anentirely different focus as it surveys second-year students in a required class using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator10,11 to further delve into potential differences of engineering technologystudents from those in engineering, showing a significant difference in these populations.12 Thesetwo articles represent some of the research done in engineering technology education research,providing an example of work found in this area. While searching current literature, the high-level review provides material for an initial conversation with like-minded researchers.Discipline based education research13
the socially responsible engineering modelas a profession [5]. Toba said engineering needed new minds that would combine science andhuman values to solve problems that technology might cause. Toba also stated that engineeringwas viewed negatively as a profession by the young people of the day and to change thisperception, engineering needed to focus on social issues. In one of her presentations at ASEEconference and ECEDHA meeting, Leah H. Jamieson, past president of IEEE, presented dataabout the public perceptions of engineering which showed that engineering is viewed as aprofession that creates economic growth but is not sensitive to social, environmental, andquality of life issues. While the data did not show a negative public perception