ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 331 - 360 of 553 in total

← Previous
1
2
…
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Next →

Extracurricular Fieldtrips to Theme Parks to Teach Creativity and Innovation

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Entrepreneurship Education in New Contexts
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mark M. Budnik, Valparaiso University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. Merrill, "CEDA: A research instrument for creative engineering design assessment," Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, vol. 2, no. 3, 2008.3. C. Charyton, and J. Merrill, "Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering students." Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 2, 2009.4. M. Perl, "Developing creativity and innovation in engineering and science," Inter. Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 23, no. 27, 2008.5. H. S. Fogler, S. E. LeBlanc, B. Rizzo, Strategies for Creative Problem Solving, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, 2013.6. T. Simpson, R. Barton, and D. Celento, "Interdisciplinary by design," Mechanical Engineering, vol. 130, no. 9, 2008.7

Relevance Score: 0.029546527

How the Entrepreneurial Mindset Supported the COVID-19 Transition in Engineering Unleashed Faculty Development

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Douglas E. Melton, Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network; Heather Dillon, University of Washington Tacoma; Mark L. Nagurka, Marquette University; Mary Murphy
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Proceedings, 2002, pp. 7.528.1-7.528.14, doi: 10.18260/1-2--10558.[5] B. Mertz, H. Zhu, A. Trowbridge, and A. Baumann, “Development and Implementation of a MOOC Introduction to Engineering Course,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Jun. 2018, vol. 2018-June, doi: 10.18260/1-2--30317.[6] C. Brozina and D. Knight, “Credentialing MOOCs: A Case Study,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2014, pp. 24.340.1-24.340.9, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 20231.[7] J. Green and A. Cohen Sherman, “Leveraging MOOCs to Bring Entrepreneurship and Innovation to Everyone on Campus,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2014, pp. 24.864.1-24.864.12, doi: 10.18260/1

Relevance Score: 0.029422702

Entrepreneurial Leadership, Gender And Teams In The Engineering And Science Context

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship Division Poster Sessions
Collection: 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Barbara Karanian, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Gül Okudan, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

2006-2121: ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP, GENDER AND TEAMS IN THEENGINEERING AND SCIENCE CONTEXTBarbara Karanian, Wentworth Institute of Technology Barbara A. Karanian is a Professor of Social Sciences and Management at Wentworth Institute of Technology. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Studies in Organizational Psychology from Lesley University in Cambridge, Massachusetts and was a Leadership Teaching Fellow at Harvard University. Her research interests include collaborative and cross-functional teams, transitions in the career path, gender/influence/and persuasion, and entrepreneurial leadership. Her consulting work is with changing organizations.Gül Okudan, Pennsylvania State University

Relevance Score: 0.029410332

Food for Thought: Predicting Entrepreneurial Behavior

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Craig G. Downing, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Diane Evans, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #21541Food for Thought: Predicting Entrepreneurial BehaviorDr. Craig G. Downing, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Craig G. Downing is Department Head and Associate Professor of Engineering Management at Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology. His teaching responsibilities are focused on delivering graduate-level instruction related to Operations and Quality Systems. His interests are rooted in Academic-Industrial partnerships, Process Improvement, and Action Research in Engineering Management. Further, serves as one of the champions for leading the campus entrepreneurial initiatives. He is a certified Lean

Relevance Score: 0.029398978

The Product Archaeology Canvas

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Innovative Course Offerings
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

://www.myconsultinglife.com/how-to-create-a-solid-consulting-presentation-even-[43] URL http://www.24point0.com/planning-for-presentations/10-tips-for-consultants-to-make-[44] URL http://wiseeconomy.com/small-business-ecosystems-why-what-and-how-annotated-slides/[45] William A Kline, Cory A Hixson, Thomas W Mason, M Patricia Brackin, Robert M Bunch, KC Dee, and Glen A Livesay. The innovation canvas–a tool to develop integrated product designs and business models. In Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta, GA, 2013.[46] Tim Clark and Alexander Osterwalder. Business Model You: A One-Page Method for Reinventing Your Career. Wiley, 2012.[47] Jeffrey H Dyer, Hal B Gregersen, and Clayton M Christensen. The innovator’s dna

Relevance Score: 0.029378986

The UT TRANSFORM Project

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division New Ideas Session 1
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: David G. Novick, University of Texas, El Paso; Cory Hallam, University of Texas, San Antonio; Dorie Jewel Gilbert; Olivier Wenker MD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Gary L. Frankwick, University of Texas at El Paso
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. 4. Todorovic, Z.W., McNaughton, R. B., & Guild, P. (2011). ENTRE-U: An entrepreneurial orientation scale for universities. Technovation, 31, 128-137. 5. Fogel, K., Hawk, A., Morck, R., & Bernard, Y. (2006). Institutional obstacles to entrepreneurship. In M. Casson, B. Yeung, A. Basu & N. Wadeson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship. New York: Oxford University Press. 6. Samsom, K.J., Gurdon, M.A., 1993. University scientists as entrepreneurs: a special case of technology transfer and high-tech venturing. Technovation 13 (2), 63–71. 7. Damsgaard, E.F., & Thursby, M. (2012). University Entrepreneurship and Professor Privilege, IFN Working Paper No. 909

Relevance Score: 0.029320013

Early Stage Technology Development And Commercialization: An Investment In Innovation That Yields An Economic And Educational Impact

Conference Session: Product Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Collection: 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Bradley Kramer, Kansas State University; Jeffrey Tucker, Kansas State University; Bret Lanz, Kansas State University; Dale Wunderlich, Kansas State University; Jeffrey Katz, Kansas State University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

this paper are partially funded by NSF grant EEC-0438691,a U.S. Economic Development Administration University Center grant and matching supportfrom the Kansas Technology Enterprise Corporation and the Kansas Department of Commerce.References[1] Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.[2] Hauptman, O. 1992. MBAs meet industrial design: Integrating design with technology operations management. Design Management Journal. 3(3): 55-60. Page 12.566.11[3] Neck, H., Meyer, G., Cohen, B. and A. Corbett 2004. An

Relevance Score: 0.029260892

An Automated Entrepreneurial Team Selection Tool

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 10
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Rolfe J. Sassenfeld, New Mexico State University; Luke Nogales, New Mexico State University; Barbara Andrea Gamillo, New Mexico State University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

at NMSU, Luke worked as an innovator at Procter & Gamble. He helped develop new products and businesses for a variety of markets, ranging from eco-conscious North Americans to bottom-of-the-pyramid consumers in the developing world. Luke has a BS in Mechanical Engineering Technology from NMSU and an MS in Product Design and Development from Northwestern University.Ms. Barbara Andrea Gamillo, New Mexico State University B´arbara Gamillo began her appointment as an Assistant Professor at New Mexico State University (NMSU) in 2014 and became the Information Engineering Technology Program Coordinator in 2015. She teaches computer networking, programming, hardware, and operating systems for the Information Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.02917956

Analyzing the Expected Learning Outcomes of Entrepreneurship Business Plan Development Activities Using Bloom’s Taxonomy

Conference Session: Assessment
Collection: 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jacob Dean Wheadon, Purdue University; Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Economics, 18(1/3), 13–40.Barringer, B. R. (2009). Preparing Effective Business Plans: An Entrepreneurial Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Barringer, B. R., & Ireland, R. D. (2010). Entrepreneurship: Successfully Launching New Ventures. Boston: Prentice Hall.Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company. K & S Ranch.Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: Longman and Green.Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT

Relevance Score: 0.029152952

Integrating an Innovation Concentration into the Engineering Curriculum

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Karl D. Schubert, University of Arkansas; Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas; Clint E Johnson, University of Arkansas
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=mGY_9sFg2qM.[10] A. Maurya, Why Lean Canvas vs Business Model Canvas? February 27, 2012. [Blog post] Available: https://leanstack.com/is-one-page-business-model.[11] N. Althuizen, B. Wierenga, and J. Rossiter, “The Validity of Two Brief Measures of Creative Ability,” Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), pp. 53-61, 2010.[12] S. Bjorklund and N. Fortenberry, Measuring Student and Faculty Engagement in Engineering Education, Washington, DC: The National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies, 2005. [E-Report] Available: https://www.nae.edu/File.aspx?id=11463&v=451a62ea.[13] NR Anderson and MA West, “Measuring climate for work group

Relevance Score: 0.029022597

Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions of Engineering Graduates: What Contributes to Increased Intentions and Continued Entrepreneurial Skill Development?

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Christian Schnell, Stanford University; Johann Elmar Nordhus gen Westarp, Technical University of Munich (TUM); Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #27804Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions of Engineering Graduates: WhatContributes to Increased Intentions and Continued Entrepreneurial Skill De-velopment?Mr. Christian Schnell, Stanford University Christian is currently pursuing a Master in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Technical Uni- versity of Munich (TUM). Within his studies he focuses on power engineering as well as automation and robotics. He is also a participant in the Entrepreneurial Qualification Program ”Manage&More”. This is an additional education at the Center for Innovation and Business Creation at the TU Munich (”UnternehmerTUM

Relevance Score: 0.029021744

Dedicated Curriculum, Space and Faculty: M.Eng. in Technical Entrepreneurship

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 11
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Michael S. Lehman, Lehigh University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #15257Dedicated Curriculum, Space and Faculty: M.Eng. in Technical Entrepreneur-shipDr. Michael S. Lehman, Lehigh University One will find Michael S. Lehman at the intersection of entrepreneurship, science, and higher education. Dr. Lehman is a Professor of Practice at Lehigh University, co-developing and teaching in the Master’s of Engineering in Technical Entrepreneurship, which received national recognition for its role in talent de- velopment by the University Economic Development Association. The faculty appointment also includes roles with Lehigh’s Baker Institute for Creativity, Innovation and

Relevance Score: 0.02895712

Geographically Distributed Teams in Engineering Design: Best Practices and Issues in Cases of International Teams Working from Different Continents

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Poster Session
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Constanza Miranda, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile; David Leal Martinez, Aalto University; Maurice Forget, Aalto University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

assert that, as in the field of medicine, it is critical to discuss the issues and complications sothat the intervention can contribute to the educational experience. Future work may involve thestudy of more cases with engagement of the community at ASEE.References 1. ABET, General Criteria 3. Student Outcomes, www.abet.org, 2017. 2. Bergiel, B., Bergiel, E. and Balsmeier, P. (2008) ”Nature of virtual teams: a summary of their advantages and disadvantages.” Management Research News, 31/2: 99-110. 3. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. F., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 34(1), 103–120. 4. Dörnyei, Z. (2005) The

Relevance Score: 0.028922584

Wrmt Case Study: Gis With Rule Based Expert System

Conference Session: New Methods and Tools
Collection: 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Andrew Ernest, Western Kentucky University; Jana Fattic, Western Kentucky University; Ni-Bin Chang, University of Central Florida; Shalini Chitrapu, Western Kentucky University; Paige Davenport, Western Kentucky University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

outcome of the commercialization plan development being a Page 15.1386.8primary driver. Of critical importance is the ability to engage students in businessactivities beyond the traditional professional service role (i.e. entrepreneurialactivities).AcknowledgementsThe work presented herein is funded in part through a grant from the KentuckyScience and Engineering Foundation, project number KSTC-144-401-07-016,COMMFUND-713-RFP-006.Bibliography 1. Ernest, A. N. S., N-B. Chang, R. Fowler, J. R. Fattic, K. Andrew, and J. Ballweber, "Water Resource Management Capacity Development: A Small Systems Technology Transfer Model", 2009 ASEE Annual

Relevance Score: 0.028922584

Employer Perceptions of Undergraduate Student Entrepreneurial Experience

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Elizabeth Rose Morehouse, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology ; Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #26849Employer Perceptions of Undergraduate Student Entrepreneurial Experi-enceMrs. Elizabeth Rose Morehouse, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Liz Morehouse is an assistant director in Career Services & Employer Relations at Rose-Hulman Insti- tute of Technology. She received a B.A. in Spanish and M.S. in Community Counseling from Northern Kentucky University in 2007 and 2009, respectively. She is an award-winning curriculum designer with significant experience providing leadership and career development opportunities for college students.Dr. Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Tom

Relevance Score: 0.028905295

Fostering Intra- and Entrepreneurship in Engineering Students

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division New Ideas Session 1
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Erin Jablonski, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

related to the topics of student motivation, student riskaversion, strategic learning, fostering creativity and design thinking, and the role that instructorsplay in nurturing or quashing desirable traits in students. Efforts to continuously inform mypedagogical technique are based on documented best practices and new information about howstudents and academia are changing.Costa, A. & Kallick, B. (2008). Learning and Leading with Habits of Mind: 16 EssentialCharacteristics for Success. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. Print.“Risk averse students characterized by high abilities tend to prefer Engineering.” quoted from:De Paola, M. & Gioia, F. Risk Aversion and Field of Study Choice: the Role of IndividualAbility

Relevance Score: 0.028905295

Discovery to Market: Preparing Faculty and Graduate Students for Technology Commercialization and Entrepreneurship

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Michael R. Ladisch, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Soohyun Yi, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

National Conference. www.nacua.orgBlank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The startup owner's manual: K&S; Ranch.Boh, W. F., De-Haan, U., & Strom, R. (2012). University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: faculty and students in spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-9.Carney, S. (2001). Faculty Start-Ups: The Tangled Web. Paper presented at the National Association of College and University Attorneys. www.nacua.orgCreed, C. J., Suuberg, E. M., & Crawford, G. P. (2002). Engineering Entrepreneurship: An Example of A Paradigm Shift in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(2), 185-195.Duderstadt, J. J. (2001). Preparing Future Faculty For Future Universities. Paper

Relevance Score: 0.028898584

Taking the Role of Others to Increase the Success Rates of Innovations

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Bernd Steffensen, University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

for granted and do not come to auser’s mind when market researchers attempt to identify opportunities for future productimprovements and innovations. Companies, i.e., their employees, need empathy to understand thissituation and why certain experiences and performances with products are meaningful to theuser12.McDonagh13 defines empathy as “the intuitive ability to identify with other people’s thoughts andfeelings – their motivations, emotional and mental models, values, priorities, preferences, andinner conflicts”. In an engineering class the theoretical concept of empathy is probably perplexingand will be rated by the students as a very soft skill or as a psychological approach beyond (a) theboundaries of the engineering disciplines and (b

Relevance Score: 0.028892316

Work in Progress: Entrepreneurship and Senior Design Program Collaboration Towards Multidisciplinary Design

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Rachana Ashok Gupta, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Marshall Brain, North Carolina State University at Raleigh
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. A., & Dunko, G., (2021, March), Team formation in the ECE Capstone course and studying impact, paper presented at Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE-SE Section Conference, Virtual Online.[2] Hosein, N., & Martin, L. M., & Knoesen, A. (2020, April), Fostering Entrepreneurship Through Targeted Adversity: A Senior Design Case Study Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE PSW Section Conference, canceled, Davis, California. 10.18260/1-2—35719[3] Crawley, E. F., & Bathe, M., & Lavi, R., & Mitra, A. B. (2020, June), Implementing the NEET Ways of Thinking at MIT, Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. 10.18260/1-2—34785[4] Dahm, K. D., &

Relevance Score: 0.028861547

Innovation Sandbox: Examining the Impact of Interdisciplinary Innovation Spaces on Diverse Disciplines

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Thomas M. Katona, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo; Jonathan L. York, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo; Robert S. Crockett, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

ABET Outcomes and Sandbox Outcome Sandbox Outcomes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, (a) science, and engineering X X Ability to design and conduct experiments, as (b) well as to analyze and interpret data X X Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic (c) constraints such as economic, environmental, X X social, political, ethical, health and safety

Relevance Score: 0.028810885

Mapping the Behaviors, Motives, and Professional Competencies of Entrepreneurially Minded Engineers in Theory and Practice: An Empirical Investigation

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship Teaming and Collaboration
Collection: 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: David Pistrui, Acumen Dynamics, LLC; John K. Layer, University of Evansville; Sandra L. Dietrich, Eastern Michigan University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

AC 2012-4615: MAPPING THE BEHAVIORS, MOTIVES, AND PROFES-SIONAL COMPETENCIES OF ENTREPRENEURIALLY MINDED EN-GINEERS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGA-TIONDr. David Pistrui, Acumen Dynamics, LLC David Pistrui serves as the Managing Director of Acumen Dynamics, LLC, a strategy-based education, training, and research firm that focuses on practical knowledge and skills that help organizations align vi- sion and strategy with execution and performance. Working as an independent scholar, thought leader and advisor to corporations, family foundations, academic institutions, government agencies and global think tanks, Pistrui’s activities include strategy development, business succession, assessment modeling, tech

Relevance Score: 0.028793525

The "T-Shaped" Engineer

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Tactical Approaches to Entrepreneurship Education
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Peter Rogers, The Ohio State University; Richard J. Freuler, Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

requirements: (a) measureindividual achievement within team environments; (b) provide measures authentic to engineeringpractice; (c) apply to diverse project, student, and course settings; and (d) find acceptance by thebroad engineering education community and profession.One of the prevalent course opportunities that often provide realistic project assignments is themultidisciplinary capstone course—especially those that create open-ended problems bysponsoring clients. Currently, many capstone assessments are based on team results leaving onlypeer assessments as a way to infer individual performance outcomes. The author has created ateam that has begun research to develop authentic assessment tools to measure professional skilloutcomes for senior

Relevance Score: 0.028541632

Redesigning Engineering Education in Chile: How Selective Institutions Respond to an Ambitious National Reform

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sergio Celis, Universidad de Chile; Isabel Hilliger, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

., Froyd, J., Merton, P., & Richardson, J. (2004). The Evolution of Curricular Change Models within the Foundation Coalition. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(1), 37–47. 4. Fournier-Bonilla, S. D. B., Watson, K. ., Malavé, C. ., & Froyd, J. (2001). Managing Curricula Change in Engineering at Texas A&M University. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(3), 222–235. 5. Borrego, M. (Virginia T. (2007). Development of engineering education as a rigorous discipline: A study of the publication patterns of four coalitions. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 5–18. 6. Bjorklund, S. a., & Colbeck, C. L. (2001). The View from the Top: Leaders’ Perspectives on a Decade of Change in

Relevance Score: 0.02851865

What Do Students Learn about Innovation?

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

that would form the basis of the typology presented in this study. Each theme was comprised of multiple codes or elements that added nuance or clarity to the overarching theme.4. Checking themes – We cross-compared themes and their underlying elements to ensure (a) similar aspects were grouped together and (b) themes conveyed different types of student learning related to innovation. Thus, themes were checked intrinsically by asking, “Is this an accurate depiction of the comprising elements and critical incidents?” Themes were also checked holistically by asking, “Does this comprehensively describe the learning apparent across the elements and critical incidents?”5. Building narratives – This step further described the themes in

Relevance Score: 0.028466899

Expanding and Evolving an Innovation Concentration

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Karl D. Schubert FIET, University of Arkansas; Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas; Alan E. Ellstrand, University of Arkansas
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

would do the upgrade) or a new from-the-factory model.Additional challenges in projects such as these include: 1. The students are from different disciplines and on different project calendars for milestones and assignments: a. Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Business, Social Innovation b. The final products (PoC / Prototype, paper, presentation, poster session) dates do not all coincide. 2. Being the senior year, while this is a major focus it is not their only focus. 3. Most, if not all, of the students have never managed a project with their own classmates, let alone a project that involves others outside their discipline. 4. Each student team is organized differently

Relevance Score: 0.0284261

The M.S. M.B.A. Program: Integrating Engineering, Entrepreneurship, And New Product Development

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship Education: Crossdisciplinary Programs
Collection: 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: sasikumar naidu, University of Tennessee; Prasanna Venkateswara Rao, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Paul Frymier, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Spivey Douglas, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Gary Smith, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Masood Parang, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Rapinder Sawhney, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

operational and managerial nature. Theyincluded the following: a) Developing a curriculum that could cover both engineering principles and business concepts within the tight schedule of an MBA program. b) Marketing the program to industries to help them service their new-product development and commercialization needs. c) Fostering cooperation among the various departments of the School of Engineering, College of Business Administration, School of Law, and ORNL regarding commitment of resources toward the success of this program. d) Advising student teams along with asking “hard questions” about the products, both on their technological feasibility and their market potential. This project can serve as

Relevance Score: 0.028423239

WORK IN PROGRESS: K8—The Future of Engineering Entrepreneurship

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 10
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mike Thomas Pitcher, University of Texas - El Paso; Pedro Arturo Espinoza, University of Texas - El Paso; Hugo Gomez, University of Texas - El Paso; Randy Hazael Anaya, University of Texas - El Paso; Hector Erick Lugo Nevarez, University of Texas - El Paso; Herminia Hemmitt, University of Texas - El Paso; Peter Golding, University of Texas - El Paso; Oscar Antonio Perez, University of Texas - El Paso
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. (2012). Education for Life and Work:Developing Transferrable Knowledge and Skill in the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.:The National Academies Press.9 Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning: Areview of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning (PDF). Powerful Learning:What We Know About Teaching for Understanding. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass10 Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning (PDF).11 Huhta, Ari (2010). "Diagnostic and Formative Assessment". In Spolsky, Bernard andHult, Francis M. The Handbook of Educational Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.pp. 469–482.12 Nicol, David; Macfarlane-Dick, Debra (2005). Rethinking Formative Assessment inHE: a theoretical model