conduct sampling pointsapproximately every 6 hours and can focus on proper execution of the lab. This laboratory isideally suited for a class size of 12-15 students. However, the lab could be scaled up with anadditional GC, more shaker table space, and the assistance of teaching assistants.The laboratory class in which this experimental procedure was designed is a 3.0-credit, lab-basedcourse that takes place at Stanford University once every two years and focuses on current topicsin applied microbiology. Each class is unique; therefore no student assessment data is currentlyavailable. The laboratory will best support ABET Engineering Criteria Program EducationalOutcome B, “an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and
University Press.2. Ewell, P. T. (1997). Organizing for Learning: A New Imperative. American Association for Higher Education, 50(4), 3-6. Retrieved December 3, 2009. Online.3. Hmelo-Silver, C., & Barrows, H. (2008). Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge Building. Cognition and Instruction, 26 (1), 48-94. doi:10.1080/073700007017984954. Major, C. H., & Palmer, B. (2001). Assessing the Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education: Lessons from the Literature. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(1), 4-9. Retrieved December 03, 2009. Online.5. Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J., & Pass, F. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review, 10 (3), 251-296. doi: 10.1023
Paper ID #17203Insights Gained from the First Teaching of a Multidisciplinary AppropriateTechnology CourseProf. Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Michelle Marincel Payne is an assistant professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She will earn her Ph.D. this year in environmental engineering from the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She completed her M.S. in environmental engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in nuclear engineering from the Univer- sity of Missouri-Rolla. Michelle is interested in
parameters to an A, B, C, D or F school grade for three categories: pollution,habitat, and fisheries.Instructors and participants are then able to explore the concepts of sustainability in relationshipto these categories. The fisheries category is used to relate the concepts of population, resourcesand consumption to rockfish, oysters, crab and shad populations in the watershed and Bay. Thehabitat is used to discuss land use, and development and the relationship between land use andenvironmental impacts, which leads into the pollutants in the watershed. Instructors help byproviding definitions of the pollutant categories shown in the report card, which include:nitrogen/phosphorus, dissolved oxygen, water clarity, and toxics.Participants work with
studentshave completed this in-class project, they must each complete an additional drawing as ahomework assignment (see Figure 1(b) and Figure 2). Students are given the option to replicateselected drawings in their texts and other objects that are authorized by the instructor. Thesedimentation basin in Figure 1(b) is an example of the drawing homework that was produced bya student with previous CAD experience from high school (not the SolidWorks program). In thiscase, the student’s drawing more closely replicated an example from the textbook by adding asecond baffle plate to the entrance, a sloped-floor with chain and flight sludge removal system,and a more advanced weir system for the effluent. This figure illustrates that skills developedfrom
deviation that your data set has identified.Worksheet: “MC Simulations” (2) Create a new worksheet to develop your simulation (one has been started for you). Research the current population of Woburn, MA. You will model this population using the Mean and Standard Deviation for exposure duration (time lived in Woburn) [Column B] and body weight [Column C] found in Step (1). Use the Excel Function: NORMINV(RAND(), Mean, Standard Deviation). Hint: this should generate X random entries which is equal to the number for population. You may have manually copy the equation into the X number of cells. (3) Calculate the CDI for each resident [Column D] that you are modeling. In this scenario, you are modeling the
Paper ID #6254Interdisciplinary, real-world, client-based term projects in an introductoryenvironmental engineering and science courseMajor Andrew Ross Pfluger, P.E., United States Military Academy Major Andrew Pfluger is an officer in the United States Army and an Assistant Professor at the United States Military Academy (USMA) in the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering. He holds two graduate degrees from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Stanford University and is a Professional Engineer in the State of Delaware. He current teaches Environmental Science, Environmental
). References 1 Ma, X. C., Xue, X., Gonzlez‐Mejia, A., Garland, J., and Cashdollar, J. (2015) Sustainable water systems for the city of tomorrow ‐ a conceptual framework. Sustainability, 7: 12071‐12105. 2 Ashoori, N., Dzombak, D. A., and Small, M. J. (2015) Sustainability review of water‐supply options in the Los Angeles region. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943‐5452.0000541, A4015005 3 Ait‐Kadi, M. (2016) Water for development and development for water: realizing the sustainable development foals (SDGs) vision. World Water Week 2015, Aquatic Procedia, 6: 106‐110. 4 Sapkota, M., Aora, M., Malano, H., Moglia, M., Sharma, A., George, B., and Pamminger, F. (2015) An overview of
+ + 11 2011 + +++ 12 2009 + + 12 2011 ++++ 13 2009 + 13 2011 + 14 2009 ++ ++ 14 2011 +++Results and DiscussionThe 2009 and 2011 CLOSE data were summarized and are illustrated below (Figure 1 A and B)for 57 students in 2009 and 53 students in 2011. In 2009, for the majority of CLOs a clearincrease can be seen between the
have tofabricate the voussoirs yourself. 4 The thick semicircular arch does not require abutments on most surfaces because its weight creates enough frictionto resist the thrust.Figure 3. Top: students constructing the thin parabolic arch (left) and the completed thin parabolic arch(right); Middle: students constructing the thin semicircular arch (left) and the completed thinsemicircular arch (right); Bottom: students constructing the thick semicircular arch (left) and thecompleted thick semicircular arch (right)References [1] D. Billington, The Tower and the Bridge, New York: Basic Books, 1983.[2] R. Hooke, A description of helioscopes, and some other instruments, London, 1676.[3] B
lecture, we covered common misconceptionsuncovered using student concept maps and addressed student-submitted muddiest points. Thestudents were also assigned a problem set that required application of chemistry to solveproblems related to the Flint Water Crisis (Appendix A). Problem sets were completed in pre-assigned groups. In addition, a writing assignment developed with input from the UW WritingCenter (Appendix B) was completed by all students. A timeline of all of the activitiesimplemented for the Flint Water Crisis case study and related assessments is provided (Fig 1).Table 2: Additional proposed learning outcomes, assessments, and activities. (G) indicates a group assignmentor activity. Learning Outcomes
Spring 2017, only4.4 % of students had a perfect score on the AP, in Fall 2017 the number was 2.2 %, in Spring2018 it was 5.1 %, and in the Fall 2018, the number went up to 20.3 %. Perhaps the reason whysuch a small number of students get a perfect score on this AP is that the statements provided bythe AP are broad and some may be misunderstood.Table 3 – Percentage of students that marked statements as related to the greenhouse effect.Correct statements are indicated with an asterisk. Statement Fall 2018 Spring 2018 Fall 2017 Spring 2017 Average (n = 59) (n = 59) (n = 51) (n = 68) (n = 237) A* 96.6 98.3 92.2 100.0 96.8 B 0.0
Lundeberg, M. A., B. B. Levin and H. L. Harrington, eds., Who Learns What From Cases and How? The Research Base for Teaching and Learning with Cases, 1999, pp. 3-23.6. Chinowsky, P. S. and J. Robinson, “Enhancing Civil Engineering Education Through Case Studies”, Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 1, 1997, 45-49.7. Russell, J. S. and B. G. McCullouch, “Civil Engineering Education: Case Study Approach”, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 116, 2, 1990, pp. 164-174.8. Raju, P. K. and C. S. Sankar, “Teaching Real-World Issues through Case Studies”, Journal of Engineering Education, 88, 4, 1999, pp. 501-508.9. Richards, L. G., M. Gorman, W. T. Scherer and R. D. Landel, “Promoting Active Learning with
-1981.9. Reese, T., Stevenson, T., “Planning for Diversity at all Levels.” 2006 American Society for Engineering Education National Conference Proceedings, Paper number: 2006-564.10. Pong, C., Shahnasser, H., “Case Study: Steps to Reach Out to Hidden Underrepresented Student Candidates in Engineering.” 2006 American Society for Engineering Education National Conference Proceedings, Paper number: 2006-779.11. Hagenberger M., Engerer B., Tougaw, D., “Revision of a First-Semester Course to Focus on Fundamentals of Engineering.” 2006 American Society for Engineering Education National Conference Proceedings, Paper number: 2006-1360.12. Crossman G., Dean, A., “Intriducing the Engineering Technology Programs to all Incoming Freshman
Paper ID #14738Making the Case: Adding Case Studies to an Environmental EngineeringLaboratory to Increase Student Engagement, Learning, and Data AnalysisDr. Stephanie Luster-Teasley, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Stephanie Luster-Teasley is an Associate Professor with a joint appointment in the Departments of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, and Chemical, Biological, and Bioengineering. Over the last ten years, Dr. Luster-Teasley has demonstrated excellence in teaching by using a variety of research-based, student-centered, pedagogical methods to increase diversity in STEM. Her teaching and
survey, a response rate of approximately 9%.Table 1. Questions from online survey of ASEE environmental engineering division. # Question Responses 1 Co-locating environmental engineering with the following programs enhances student (each program a-o education and faculty development: rated as one of the a. Architecture following): b. Biological Science/Engineering c. Chemical Engineering Strongly Disagree d. Chemistry
2006-644: A COMPREHENSIVE COURSE IN ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGYDavid Vaccari, Stevens Institute of Technology Page 11.31.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A COMPREHENSIVE COURSE IN ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGYIntroductionA new course was developed to introduce environmental engineers and scientists to biology. Theprimary novelty of this course was its division of the subject into three core areas of relevance toenvironmental professionals: microbiology, ecology, and toxicology.This paper will further describe the need that exists for this course, and will introduce a textbookand other materials that were developed for the
Paper ID #16227Sustainability Education in a Global EraMiss Paula Alvarez Pino, UAB Sustainable Smart Cities Research Center Paula Alvarez Pino is the Center Coordinator and Research Assistant of the Sustainable Smart Cities Research Center at University of Alabama Birmingham (UAB). Paula coordinates and communicates work effort and development within the center. She obtains, evaluates and processes materials related to different research projects, as well as, assists in publication of papers and grant proposals. Paula constantly collaborates with the City of Birmingham as liaison in several projects related to the
apply mathematics, science and engineering principles. b. Ability to design and conduct experiments, analyze and interpret data. c. Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. d. Ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. e. Ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems. f. Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. g. Ability to communicate effectively. h. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. i. Recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning. j. Knowledge of contemporary issues. k. Ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools
AC 2012-5212: USING A P3 FUNDED PROJECT AS PART OF A CAP-STONE DESIGN CLASS IN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERINGProf. Stefan J. Grimberg, Clarkson University Stefan J. Grimberg completed his PhD in 1995 from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Since that time he has been a faculty member of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Clarkson University. He received his Diplom in Chemical Engineering from the Technical University of Munich, Germany (1987) and his Masters in Environmental Engineering from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1989). Dr. Grimberg’s research focuses on delineating the role of microorganisms on contaminant transport in atmospheric and aqueous systems. Most
AC 2008-175: DEVELOPING A BODY OF KNOWLEDGE FORENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERINGDebra Reinhart, University of Central Florida Page 13.383.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Developing a Body of Knowledge for Environmental EngineeringIntroductionAt the American Academy of Environmental Engineers (AAEE) Board of Trusteesannual meeting in November 2005, a Body of Knowledge Development Working Group(BOKDWG) was created with the following charge: “The Body of Knowledge Development Working Group is charged with defining the BOK needed to enter the practice of environmental engineering at the professional level in the 21st century taking into account other
2006-1606: A PRODUCTIVE INNER CITY - ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGYCOLLABORATIONJosh Goldowitz, Rochester Institute of Technology Mr. Goldowitz is a graduate of University of Arizona. His current research interests include heavy metal phytoremediation in the urban environment and aquifer testing technology. He teaches introductory geology, hydrology classes and labs in RIT's Civil Engineering Technology Environmental Management & Safety department.Karl Korfmacher, Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Korkmacher is a graduate of Duke University. His current research interests include aquatic environment mapping and monitoring, and urban environmental analysis. He Teaches GIS classes and
AC 2012-4371: PRACTITIONER PANELDr. Sharon A. Jones, University of Portland Page 25.1052.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Environmental Engineering Practitioner Panel ASEE 2012 Annual Conference Environmental Engineering Division San Antonio, TX June, 2012Panel Name: Educational Preparation of Environmental Engineering Students forProfessional LifeThe panel consists of four highly-placed environmental engineers representing theconsulting and regulatory communities. They
Paper ID #8578Ms. Hines and the Sick 5th Graders -– Making hands-on outreach and learn-ing about the Environment engaging through the use of Case Stories!Mrs. Janie Gina Locklear, NC A&T I am a Senior Civil Engineering major with 5 years experience teaching elementary science. I returned to school to obtain a second degree in engineering after learning that I have a stronger passion for design and problem solving. As a teacher, I emphasized to my students daily the importance of science and en- gineering and promoted love and passion for the related work by using hands-on experience with EVERY lesson taught. My
affective outcomes related tosustainable engineering. This project was aimed at beginning to fill this gap.Research QuestionsThis research explored the following questions: (1) At the beginning of the courses, to what extent did students vary in their motivation toward sustainable engineering, appreciation for interdisciplinary skills, consideration of others in the context of engineering, and interest in global work? a. Were there differences between institutions? b. Were there differences between the students enrolled in different courses at the same institution? (2) Did student attitudes on these issues change over the course of a semester when taking courses that included
of fermentation after submission of the final laboratory report. We hope toevaluate the overall impacts of classroom instruction compared to the experiential learningexercise itself. A key focus of this critical assessment is to determine how well this fermentationlaboratory supports ABET accreditation, namely the newly refined Student Outcomes andProgram Criteria.Supporting ABET AccreditationEV396 directly supports ABET Student Outcomes (SO). Prior to the recent change in ABET SOto 1 through 7, EV396 directly supported ABET SO a (apply knowledge of mathematics,science, and engineering), b (design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpretdata), g (communicate effectively), and i (recognition of the need for, and ability to
’, or ‘ancillary’. Definitions of each classification arefound in Table 1.B. After classification, each activity is examined considering COVID-19impacts, i.e., was the activity modified during the pandemic? If so, was the change positive ornegative? Further, does the change represent an opportunity to ‘bounce forward’ and enhance 5resilience (Step 5)? The individual responsible for the activity is likely in the best position toanswer these questions. The last step (6) is implementation, which can include making changespermanent, synergizing like efforts, and creating timelines for execution.Figure 2. Six-step process for assessing activities at a program-level.Table 1. Key Categories and
Environment: Are They Related to Environmental Affect and Behavior?,” The Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 23-40, 2014.[11] E. Martinez, C. Ouellette, L. Plante, B. Wallen, and J. Starke, “An Environmental Engineering Sequence: Deliberately Addressing and Evaluating Attitudes and Knowledge,” Proceedings of the 2017 Mid-Atlantic Section Fall Conference, American Society for Engineering Education, Penn State University – Berks, Reading, PA, 2017.[12] P. Tikka, M. Kuitunen and S. Tynys, “Effects of Educational Background on Students' Attitudes, Activity Levels, and Knowledge Concerning the Environment,” The Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 12-19, 2000.[13] H. Müderrisoğlu, and Altanlar A. 2011
subsequent sections. Students were not required, but highly encouraged, toparticipate in the actual design competition and participation did not impact final student gradesof the capstone design course.During the first semester, EnvE 5305, students were provided a real-world problem of providingupgrades for the municipal WWTP adapted from the WEAT student design prompt. The studentswere required to address enhanced nutrient removal to meet future stringent regulations,enhanced solids treatment for production of biosolids A versus biosolids B and provide 1 milliongallon per day (MGD) type 1 reclaimed water. Students were tasked with performing a capacityanalysis, performance evaluation, develop a design process selection criterion for selection
Paper ID #29242Working toward tenure in a teaching focused branch campusDr. Shannon L. Isovitsch Parks P.E., University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown Dr. Shannon Parks is a registered Professional Engineer with 20 years of broad-based experience in the water resources and environmental engineering fields. She holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Civil Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University and a Masters of Science and doctoral degree in Civil & Environmental Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. She is currently teaching water resources and environmental engineering at University of Pittsburgh at