AC 2009-2438: INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABILITY:DECIPHERING CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIESJoseph Delfino, University of Florida Joseph J. Delfino is Professor of Environmental Engineering Sciences at the University of Florida where he has been on the faculty for 27 years. During that period, he served for 11 years as Department Chairman. He has supervised the theses and projects of 80 PhD and masters students and is the author/co-author of 100 papers in scientific journals. He currently serves as an Associate Editor of the Journal of the American Water Resources Association. Prior to joining the faculty at Florida, he was a tenured Full Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison
thesustainability of the project goals.7The components of this particular project are to: a) Develop a prototype of a simple ventilation system that improves indoor air quality by using thermoelectric (TE) cells, driven by waste heat from the cooking fire, to energize a 12-volt battery charging system and power a small fan in a duct. Energy produced that is not required for ventilation can be stored in a battery for lighting, charging a mobile phone, or other needs. b) Develop and test an improved ceramic filter geometry based on the Filtron filter. The improved filter requires less fuel per filter to fire the kiln, reduces production breakage, and simplifies shipping on local roadways. c) Examine the
University of Wisconsin-Platteville are required to complete a large number of diverse writing assignments. Theycomplete ten laboratory courses, many of which require weekly lab reports. Senior-level coursesare focused on design, and students prepare many technical design reports in these courses; alarge design paper is the final deliverable for the capstone Senior Design course. Moreover,given the undergraduate-only nature of the university, all student writing is assessed by facultymembers. The traditional model for grading student writing is to mark up the writing withcorrections and suggestions for improvements and assign a grade between 0 and 100%.Despite the extensive practice students carry out and despite the frequent, thorough, and well
2006-1111: RICE UNIVERSITY ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS: ANEXERCISE IN INTERNATIONAL SERVICE LEARNINGRoss Gordon, Rice University Ross Gordon has just completed his B.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rice University and will be pursuing a graduate degree in Environmental Engineering at Rice University. His research interests include surface water hydrology, floodplain modeling, and early warning flood prediction systems. He is one of the leaders of the Rice University chapter of Engineers Without Borders and has worked on engineering projects in El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Mexico.Alex Gordon, Rice University Alex Gordon has just completed his B.S. in Bioengineering at Rice
’, and ‘Lymphomas’.Assessment techniques include student-based surveys (included in Appendix B) conducted at theend of each class (both cohorts) when a game was played in the experimental cohort, pre- andpost-quizzes, intervention vs. comparison group statistical analysis, and course evaluations. Inthis way, technical knowledge as well as students experience with games in the past and theirperception of their effectiveness was evaluated.The focus of this study was utilizing concurrent cohorts comprised of two (2) sections of anundergraduate, Introduction to Environmental Engineering course. One section of the class wastaught utilizing traditional active learning techniques (think-pair-share, group discussion) as wellas the direct transmission
must accompany each entry. Final reports are due in a single PDF format file submitted via CourseWeb/Blackboard by Midnight, December 9, 2016. b. Oral: Each team’s presentation will be 20 minutes followed by up to a 10 minute question and answer period. Team presentations will be held to the 20 minute time limitation and will be not be permitted to continue beyond the limit. The presentation files shall be saved in PowerPoint format. Presentations will occur in class on Thursday, December 8, 2016. c. Both written and oral presentations are subject to questioning during the question and answer period. Students in the audience are expected to participate in the
; Bird B-KER2 Laboratory Jars and Masterflex Tygon lab tubing toconnect both, one student holds the reservoir at a fixed location simulating a water source suchas a natural spring, lake, or river, and another student adjusts the elevation of the tap stand usinga simulated gate valve from the sampling port of the laboratory jar. As the tap stand locationremains lower than the location of the reservoir, students can notice water continuing to flow asthe third student is responsible for turning the tap stand valve on and off. However, as soon asthe location of the tap stand is higher than the location of the reservoir, water flow stops. Thus,students realize that the location of the outflow must be lower than the location of the inflowassuming
, Appendix 1-A), an electronic dice (brings the randomness to the game; free fromInternet, Appendix 1-B) and an engine (Excel spreadsheet created specifically for this game,Appendix 2). The engine has all the formulae for each of the game board landings in terms ofwater usage, energy consumption and emissions (per EPA and southern California standards).On the very first class, the game was deployed on several laptops. After a brief introduction bythe instructor, students actually got to play the game and see the results. This put the students in amore comfortable position that game design and play is doable to demonstrate practical aspectsof Sustainability in line with the course learning outcomesGiven were the three home owners with their current
is applied in other cultural contexts.With respect to environmental engineering, students became more aware of the water reuse andsanitation challenges faced in another country and how science and engineering skills can beused to address these challenges.ReferencesAnaniadou, K., Claro, M. 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners inOECD countries (2009). Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.EDUWorking paper no. 41.Adedokun, O. A., Bessenbacher, A. B., Parker, L. C., Kirkham, L. L., & Burgess, W. D. (2013).Research skills and STEM undergraduate research students' aspirations for research careers:Mediating effects of research self efficacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8),940-951.Bell
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/14953[4] B. Read-Daily, “Using backpacking water purification systems as a means of introducing water treatment concepts to an introduction to environmental engineering course,” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.27132[5] N. Mladenov, T. Kulkarni, and M. London, “Use of In-Class Demonstrations and Activities to Convey Fundamentals of Environmental Engineering to Undergraduate Students” 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. https://peer.asee.org/23242[6] A. Hill, and Z. Mitchell, “Competitive problem-based learning in an environmental engineering laboratory course” 2014
special issues for under-represented student populations including women andminorities.PartnershipsThe extensive research team assembled for this project has a number of positive characteristicsthat were considered requisite for ultimate success of the effort, including: (a) an experienced PIwith a track record of working with each faculty-instructor; (b) energetic faculty-instructors withlocal Department support to develop a novel laboratory course; (c) an advisory boardrepresenting 2yr, 4yr, and HBCU (historically black colleges and universities) colleges providingindependent critical feedback to make the development of educational materials broadlyaccessible to diverse student audiences; (d) two members of the National Academy ofEngineering as
. 13References1. Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Part I, Cognitive Domain; McKay: New York, 1956.2. Willingham, D. T. (2008). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach?. Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4), 21-32.3. Jacquez, R., Gude, V. G., Auzenne, M., Burnham, C., Hanson, A. T., & Garland, J. (2006). 2006-2175: integrating writing to provide context for teaching the engineering design process. 113rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago.4. Jacquez, R., Gude, V. G., Hanson, A., Auzenne, M., & Williamson, S. (2007, June). Enhancing critical thinking skills of civil engineering students through supplemental
teaching: an investigation at one U.S. medical school. Academic Medicine. 78(11):1191–200.10. Downey, G.L., J.C. Lucena, B.M. Moskal, R. Parkhurst, T. Bigley, C. Hays, B. K. Jesiek, L.Kelly, J. Miller, S. Ruff, J. L. Lehr, and A. Nichols-Belo. 2006. The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently. Journal of Engineering Education. 95(2): 107-122.11. Durocher, D.O. 2007. Teaching sensitivity to cultural difference in the first-year foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals 40 (1): 143-160.12. Fuertes, J.N, M.L. Miville, J.J. Mohr, W.E. Sedlacek, D. Gretchen. 2000. Factor structure and short form of the Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale. Measurement
exercises and the Beancritical thinking tasks ABET Criterion 3 Outcomes Writing Exercise Bean critical thinking task (a) an ability to apply knowledge of 3, 5, 7 mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct 3 experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, 3, 4, 6 or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and
Rank Teaching Experience as of Spring 2008 In Special Topics Course A PhD student Never taught before Yes B MSCE student Never taught before Yes C PhD student Yes; one semester CE 3171 Yes D PhD student Yes; two semesters CE 3171 Yes E Post-Doc Yes; three semesters of CE 3171 No F PhD student Yes; previously taught CE 3171 and CE 3354 No
toaddress these challenges? What will be the potential impact(s) of your recommendations? Whatare the foreseeable consequences of implementing your ideas?Question B: A friend of yours (who is not an engineer) has recently returned from the PeaceCorp work she was doing in a small village in Tanzania. She discussed the challenges the peoplethere were facing and asked what you would do as an engineer to improve the quality of life.What major technical issues would impact your recommendations? What major nontechnicalissues would impact your recommendations? What are some examples of products or servicesthat might you design for the community? What would be the potential impacts of thesechanges? What are the foreseeable challenges?Appendix BFigure 2
learning outcomes shown as %Post/%Pre for responses at each level of Bloom’sTaxonomy (Anderson and Krathwohl 2001) 2 P P A. Recognize B. Understand C. Apply D. Analyze E. Evaluate F. Create Demonstrate Examine and break Present and defend Compile information Exhibit memory of understanding of facts
online learning environments; and b) core threshold concepts within education for sustainability literature, focusing on project management in the built environment in the 21st Century. Consultation was undertaken with the Masters Program Convenor to confirm learning expectations (i.e. with regard to graduate attributes and program aims), two other convenors whose courses are compulsory regarding their experiences, and two teaching and learning experts within the university’s engineering Faculty.– Curriculum Renewal: This comprised updating the Course Outline, creating a Study Guide, suitable criterion-referenced assessment items, and a supporting Blackboard student interface. Concurrently questionnaires were developed
aware of the policy making process in regards to climate change, and how difficult it is, compared to my previous perspective that countries need to/can easily stop polluting the environment.” B “This course showed me the complexities in addressing climate change. Before the course, I thought solving climate change was a simple matter of reducing emissions. However, now I understand addressing climate change involves not only mitigation but adaptation and loss and damage as well. I also learned about equitable climate policy, the differences in the opinions of developed and developing countries, economics, rhetoric, etc. All of this showed me that climate
., B. Allenby, M. Bridges, J. Crittenden, C. Davidson, C. Hendrickson, S. Matthews, C. Murphy, & D. Pijawka. (2008). “Benchmarking Sustainable Engineering Education: Final Report.” EPA Grant X3- 83235101-0, December, 2008. 13. Barke, R. (2000). “Sustainable Technology: Development and Challenges to Engineering Education.” Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. 14. Vest, Charles M. (2008). “Context and Challenge for Twenty-First Century Engineering Education”. Journal of Engineering Education, July, 2008. p 235-240. 15. Eyler, J. & Giles, D. E., Jr. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 16. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2000
Projects. International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEE 2007), Coimbra, Portugal, Sept. 307. paper 204. http://icee2007.dei.uc.pt/proceedings/papers/204.pdf12. Munoz, D.R. 2006. Building a Humanitarian Engineering Program. 5th Annual American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Global Colloquium on Engineering Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Oct. 9-12, Page 14.873.13 23 pp.13. Parkhurst, R., B. Moskal, G. Downey, J. Lucena, T. Bigley, and S. Elber. 2008. Engineering cultures: Comparing student learning in on-line and classroom based implementations. International Journal of Engineering Education. 24 (5), 955
Environmental Resources, University of Texas, 10100 Burnet Road, M/CR7100, Austin, Texas 787582 Department of Civil, Environmental and Sustainable Engineering, Arizona State University,P.O. Box 875306 Tempe, Arizona 85287-53063School Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 AtlanticDr., Atlanta, Georgia 30332-03554Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 ForbesAvenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213*Corresponding Author: Email – cfmurphy@mail.utexas.eduSustainability, broadly defined, is the ability to maintain a particular system. Within the last twodecades, it has become increasingly recognized that one of the most critical systems that needs tobe maintained from a human perspective is
coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation-filtration experiments (A)and sludge volume observations (B) by the students in the laboratory during a laboratory session.For this experiment, the students were asked to prepare the experimental plan, collect the actualenvironmental samples from two different ponds on the campus, followed by experimental setupand execution. The students were asked to collect the samples from the ponds on the campus.But they were not provided any other information on the water quality or turbidity. This wasdetermined as part of the laboratory experiment. The student experiences and opinions from theevaluation survey are presented below. The students were asked to respond to the followingsimple questions and reflect over their
Outreach, Recruiting, and Retention Programs. IEEE Transactions On Education, 55(2), 157-163. 3. Montfort, D., Brown, S., & Whritenour, V. (2013). Secondary Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Engineering as a Field. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education, 3(2), 1-12. 4. Bogue, B., Shanahan, B., Marra, R. M., & Cady, E. T. (2013). Outcomes-Based Assessment: Driving Outreach Program Effectiveness. Leadership & Management In Engineering, 13(1), 27-34. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000209. 5. Nilson, L. B. (2010). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors, Third Edition. San Francisco, CA US: Jossey-Bass. 6. Milgram, D (2011). How
transformative sustainable education, presented at AASHE 2010 (Pittsburgh PA) (accessed 5/22/12)4 Rhodes, F.H.T., Sustainability: the Ultimate Liberal Art. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53 (9): B24, 2006.5 Minsker, B. A Framework for Integrating Sustainability Education, Research, Engagement, and Operations through Experiential Learning, presented at AASHE 2011 (Pittsburgh PA) (accessed 5/22/12).6 Hauser, J.R., D. Clausing (1988) The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 63-73.7 Hacker, M., Barden B., Living with Technology, 2nd edition. Delmar Publishers, Albany NY, 1993.8 Crismond, D.P., R.S. Adams (2012). The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix. Journal of Engineering Education 101(4): 738-797
Young-Green (14:34-15:00 min and 46:06-53:50 min) Concluding remarks by moderator Darshan Karwat (53:50-56:52 min). Assignment (a) Discuss two or three ethics canons (including specific sub-parts) that relate to the situation (300 to 500 described with the interstate highway system and local community in Tampa Florida. words in Summarize each canon, how it relates, and in what ways the situation appears ethical or length) unethical in relation to the codes. (b) It what ways does the code of ethics appear to fall short of considering the benefits/harms to the local community of the speaker? What did you find most compelling from Lean Young- Green
Page 14.165.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 AFRICOM and the Corps of Engineers Helmets .vs. HardhatsAbstractService learning projects in developing communities, offer an opportunity for students togain a full appreciation for the cultural and political limitations that engineers face whenproviding technical support to developing nations. To satisfy the project requirement forthe Civil and Infrastructure Engineering MS program at George Mason University, onestudent took on the daunting task of developing a framework for the US Army Corps ofEngineers to provide civil works expertise to desperately needy areas of rural Africa.Africa is a vast continent with over 900 million people
Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 14(1), pp. 119-131, 2012.[17] K.L. Meyers, Engineering Identity as a Developmental Process, PhD Dissertation, Purdue University, 2009, 248 pp.[18] N.E. Canney and A.R. Bielefeldt, “Differences in engineering students’ views of social responsibility between disciplines,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 141(4), 10 pp, 2015.[19] N.E. Canney and A.R. Bielefeldt, “Gender differences in the social responsibility attitudes of engineering students and how they change over time,” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 21(3), pp. 215-237, 2015.[20] K. Meyers and B. Mertz, “A large scale analysis of first-year engineering student
the SDG; the lecturer casuallyincluded the SDG in the class discussions.RESULTS AND ANALYSISThe data available to measure the impact of the intervention for the experimental and controlgroup are a) results from the pre-and post-intervention survey; b) results from the final individualexamination.Results of the survey applied before and after the interventionThe analysis of survey results considers three constituent parts: Degree of prejudice,commitment to equality, and degree of awareness of inequality.To measure the impact per question, only students who answered the survey in the two requestedinstances were considered. The agreement range (agree and strongly agree) responses and thedisagreement range (disagree and strongly disagree) were
Needy, Robert Ries, Laura Schaefer, Larry Shuman School of Engineering University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USAAbstractA new challenge facing engineering educators is how to train both undergraduate and graduatestudents to routinely include sustainability topics as important design criteria. Equally importantis the need for engineering students to both broaden their perspective and learn to functioncollaboratively in cross-cultural environments. The University of Pittsburgh’s School ofEngineering is addressing these issues by educating students from the BS through PhD levels aspart of a comprehensive