outcomes. Open ended responses were coded based on the learning outcomespreviously identified in the literature [1]. The survey was distributed via snowball sampling, withinitial distribution at the American Institute of Chemical Engineers’ annual meeting in 2022 andvia social media. Faculty response data was analyzed to identify trends across the three differentresponse types. Across the survey responses, there was agreement on the high level ofimportance of four learning outcomes: design experiment, compare to theory, analyze data, andcommunication. While the learning outcome of ethics was rated as significantly important for alaboratory course, many faculty did not include this in their ranking of the top five learningoutcomes or their open
. The results provide insight intothe prioritization of laboratory learning outcomes and allow the redesign of laboratory courses tobetter align with the skills and attributes desired from all three stakeholder groups.IntroductionOver the last decade, many surveys and studies have considered the future of chemicalengineering and its alignment with industry expectations [4], resulting in changes to ABETrequirements [5] (specifically towards process safety education [6] and ethics and socialresponsibility [7]). A larger picture of chemical engineering modernization was the focus of arecent National Academies report entitled “New Directions for Chemical Engineering”, whichexplored research and undergraduate educational program updates [8
challenges of using this AI-based model are discussed, as well asthe ethical and social issues that arise from its implementation. Suggestions andrecommendations for future research and practice in this emerging and interdisciplinary field arerequested as this study will contribute to advancing knowledge and innovation in STEMeducation and inspire more researchers and educators to explore the potential of AI and CV inenhancing teaching and learning.Literature ReviewAs Lombardi et al [8] described, active learning is a broad term among educators. They assertedthat the existing comprehension from the literature on active learning is excessively broad andlacks precise particulars, impeding the ability to conduct effective research and enhance
, production processes, concurrent engineeringdesign, and detailed system description. Further it is essential to include a variety of realisticconstraints, such as economic factors, safety, reliability, aesthetics, ethics and social impact."1. Share which of the following labs, according to you, was related to engineering design (limit: one choice) Launcher BeetleBot Hydraulic Robotic Arm Product Dissection Engine Dissection Lego Car Race2. Share to what extent engineering design was integrated into each lab” Scale: not at all, somewhat, a little bit, mostly, a lot Launcher BeetleBot Hydraulic Robotic Arm Product
with a specific audience, both Communication orally and in writing, at levels ranging from executive summaries to comprehensive technical reports 4 Objective 11: Work effectively in teams, including individual and joint accountability; Teamwork assign roles, responsibilities, and tasks; monitor progress; meet deadlines; and integrate individual contributions into a final deliverable Objective 12: Behave with the highest ethical standards, including reporting information Ethics in the objectively and interacting with integrity Laboratory Objective 13: Use the human senses to gather information
Use the propagation of uncertainty equation IKD HW8 Identify different distribution shapes, including normal, HW 1, 3-9, 11, P3, EU skewed, uniform, and bimodal Q Distributions Explain and utilize the Central Limit Theorem IKD HW4, HW11, P3 Recognize natural limits in a dataset WF Critique the ethics of a particular statistical analysis that Statistical may or may not support the analyst's conclusions (e.g
ofuncertainty in the physical world. Once the activity results have been fully analyzed and asolution is obtained, the students must both verify and validate the solution. These concepts arememorable due to the engaging nature of the activity and produce an appreciation for historicalengineering methods as a resource. The analogue nature of the tool appears to improve theunderstanding and synthesis of the lesson, as opposed to memorizing a procedure.This paper provides a valuable and customizable lab activity for educators and curriculumdevelopers seeking to improve Freshman/Sophomore mechanical engineering lab courses. TheQuadrant Activity supports ABET learning outcomes 1 (solve complex engineering problems), 4(recognize ethical responsibility/make
xmodification, & operation ofengineering tools…Safety. Identify health, safety,and environmental issuesrelated to technological x xprocesses and activities, anddeal with them responsibly.Communication.Communicate effectively x xabout laboratory work with aspecific audience…Teamwork. Work effectively x x xin teams…Ethics in the Laboratory.Behave with highest ethical x xstandards…Sensory Awareness. Use thehuman senses to
[1] listed in italics: • Keep careful, complete and systematic records of laboratory work (experiment) • Understand the importance of, and appropriate methods for, the calculation of errors and uncertainties. (experiment, data analysis) • Carry out experiments, using key equipment to make appropriate calculations and solve realistic, open engineering problems. (experiment) • Analyse data collected, apply theory to one’s own experimental measurements, evaluate results and draw conclusions. (data analysis) • Write technical reports to justify experimental study, record procedures in the laboratory, communicate results and make concise robust conclusions. (communication,ethics)The activity
]. However, thechallenges of transitioning laboratory experiments to these environments are still not wellunderstood. This is particularly true in chemical engineering, where replicating hands-onexperiences and ensuring safety and ethical considerations are especially critical [10]. Researchstudies in different contexts also suggest that these learning environments present severalchallenges, including replicating hands-on experiences [11], dealing with equipment limitations[12], [13], effectively assessing learning outcomes [14], adapting pedagogy to suit the onlineenvironment and ensuring safety and ethical considerations [15].Graphical characterization of pumps is critical to ensure optimal performance and compliance withtechnical and safety
Biology classes. Our focus was on three Biology courses (BIO 103, BIO 201, and BIO202), and we utilized various assessment tools to measure student performance and engagement.By doing that, we aim to reveal the nuanced effects of hands-on learning on students learningand interest in Biology.The study is a quantitative descriptive study that focuses on a particular group in a pre-test andpost-test design. This study adopted purposeful sampling in selecting the classes where ECPwould be implemented. The inclusion criteria for participants are full-time students enrolled infoundational courses in Biology and willingness to allow classroom observation of activities aswell as recording these activities. Ethical clearance was issued by the Morgan State
: 8.74. The Optimized Elbow project helped me to identify, formulate and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science and mathematics: 8.35. The Optimized Elbow project helped me to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgements, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental and societal contexts: 7.06. The Optimized Elbow project helped me to communicate effectively with a range of audiences: 6.57. The Optimized Elbow project helped me to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies: 8.5Student RecommendationsThe completion of this project was hampered by
practices and the profession of engineering through immersion in an engineering project environment of moderate complexity; 2. Demonstrate an ability to work effectively in a multidisciplinary team; 3. Demonstrate acquisition of new technology skills through use or development of appropriate computer hardware, software, and/or instrumentation; 4. Demonstrate understanding of business and entrepreneurial mindset; 5. Demonstrate effective use of project- and personnel-management techniques; 6. Integrate engineering professionalism and ethics in their work; 7. Demonstrate improved communication skills, including written, and presentation.Although the project's results were not evaluated against specific criteria, several
modules with more checklists/worksheets, additional AI-related materials, andstudent perspectives, and improving the workshop’s effectiveness by offering more time,encouraging attendees to bring their assignments to work with, and coordinating followup virtualmeetings. The high demand for AI integration and ethical guidance, the versatile application ofthe modules, the need for continuous professional development, varying levels of initial studentpreparedness, and feedback on assignment load all highlight areas where this professionaldevelopment workshop, and engineering writing professional development more broadly, can befurther enhanced.5. AcknowledgmentThe authors appreciate the support of NSF #1915644, #1915318, and #1914593.6. References[1
to the following guiding reflection questions: • “What challenges did you face related to your role?” • “What surprised you during development?” • “What advice would you give someone else in a similar position?”3.4 Ethical ConsiderationsAll team members provided informed consent for their reflections to be used in this study. Sincethis was an internally focused project, anonymity was not a primary concern; however, weagreed to keep specific organizational details (e.g., location, aircraft registration) confidential.We sought to ensure the authenticity of personal reflections by encouraging open dialogue andproviding opportunities for members to review their narratives before publication.4. Results and Reflections
Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative – CITIResearch students are required to take the Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI).They learn the ethic of conducting research that involves human subjects. After completing therequired modules, they are required to take and pass a test to become eligible to participate in theresearch study. Research students are recruited through the office of undergraduate research, in-class announcements and word of mouth. Students are encouraged to get involved in research 7starting in their freshman year. CITI training is required for Institutional Review Board (IRB)approval.2.3 Institutional Review
instructor’s guide to update their labassignments to include descriptions of the audience and their expectations. Some participantsdeveloped lab report assessment rubrics using the instructor’s guide. Although there was avariation among the materials after instructors had access to the guides, all the participating labinstructors updated their lab instructional materials to use the terms and concepts introduced inthe guides and adjusted their instructional content to consider students’ prior knowledge.1. IntroductionEngineering labs offer unique engineering experiences to students, ranging from hands-onexperiments to safety and ethics [1]. Teaching engineering labs provides unique pedagogicalopportunities for lab instructors; however, it is
Tibbs is a Bioengineering PhD candidate at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. He is interested in pursuing a passion for education by becoming a teaching faculty and exploring topics of ethics education, engineer identity formation, and bioengineering curriculum development.Kaitlyn Tuvilleja, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Kaitlyn Tuvillea is a Bioengineering Undergraduate with a Statistics Minor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her interests in the therapeutics, cell and tissue engineering, and bioengineering curriculum development are complemented by her involvement in Society of Women Engineers (SWE), Women in Engineering (WIE), Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES), and Brain
Experiences for Interdisciplinarity in Biomedical Engineering Education’, in ASEE, 2023.[13] H. Golecki and J. Bradley, ‘Experiential Learning: Exploring Nuances When Making Ethical Decisions in a Capstone Design Course’, Biomed Eng Educ, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s43683-023-00126-2.[14] C. Cvetkovic, S. Lindley, H. Golecki, and R. Krencik, ‘Biofabrication of Neural Organoids: An Experiential Learning Approach for Instructional Laboratories’, Biomed Eng Educ (In Press), 2024.[15] ‘BIOPAC: Data Acquisition, Loggers, Amplifiers, Transducers, Electrodes’, https://www.biopac.com/.[16] S. H. Kim and M. Y. Chang, ‘Application of Human Brain Organoids—Opportunities and Challenges in Modeling Human
Social 3. Communicate with a larger audience. 4. Address ethical and professional responsibili es 5. Grow as a Team192193 3. PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION194 In retrospect, the evolu on of the first year experience for our students has developed along the195 precepts outlined in the Framework for High Quality Project Based Learning [29]. As such the remaining196 discussion will track six criteria presented by the HQPBL Organiza on. 6197 3.1. Intellectual Challenge and Accomplishment198 The first criterion for PBL established in the HQPBL framework is Intellectual Challenge &199
ethical concerns related to biomedical research, and be able to read,comprehend, and critically evaluate research papers, publications, etc., pertaining to tissueengineering.Selected VR LaboratoriesThis study administered commercially available desktop VR laboratory modules selectedfrom the suite of simulations produced by Labster. The selected labs were as follows: 1) CellCulture Basics: Plate, Split and Freeze Human Cells, 2) Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorting(FACS), and 3) CRISPR-Cas Applied to TGF-beta Induced EMT (CRISPR). We presentsample images and descriptions from these VR labs in Figure 1. The virtual labs selected forimplementation in the course and evaluated for this work were chosen based on theirapplicability and alignment with the
our students, we must work closely withIR to implement sensitive, ethical, effective approaches for how to report and how to act on data.Adopting prior education-research findings can help guide some redesign changes. Consultingwith our professional network on how their institutions address this challenge can also benefitour practice.Case Study: The Need for New Reporting and AnalysisIn preparing this Work in Progress, we requested data from our IR team. Their follow up taughtus areas in which we need to better understand what we track and how we use evidence tosupport students. Figure 4. This figure illustrates completion patterns for community college transfers and the differences between students who take a first
Institute of Technology Jill Fennell, the Frank K. Webb Chair in Communication Skills at the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech, focuses on advancing written, visual, and verbal communication skills. Her research centers on affect theory and its application to technical communication, specifically information design. Jill studies how to enhance the effectiveness of pedagogical documents by incorporating principles from affect theory. Through her work, she aims to empower students, fostering an environment where they actively shape their communication interactions, including teamwork and ethical discussions. By integrating these principles, she goes beyond traditional methods