Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer L. Herman, Ohio State University; Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University; Lynn Hall, Ohio State University; David A. Delaine, Ohio State University; William Cohen, Ohio State University; James Edward Toney, Ohio State University; Lisa Abrams, Ohio State University; Alan Kalish, Ohio State University; Melinda Rhodes-DiSalvo, Ohio State University; Toni M. Calbert, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

conversation withtheir supervisor or mentors to ensure that choices are made based on reflection about teachingpractice as well as timelines for submitting dossiers for promotion and tenure.We determined that incorporating meaningful, but intermittently administered summativeoptions as part of faculty annual reviews would ensure that the focus remained on teachingdevelopment, rather than strictly measured performance. To meet the needs of faculty whowould require summative evaluations for their promotion and tenure dossiers, our review optionson classroom teaching, syllabus and course materials include instructions and forms to helpobservers produce written reports documenting their observations that could be incorporated intoformal summative letters

Conference Session

Faculty Development 2: COVID-19 Impact on Faculty

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Susannah C. Davis, University of New Mexico; Yan Chen, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Pil Kang, University of New Mexico; Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico; Eva Chi, University of New Mexico; Sang M. Han, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

sustained faculty changes, including their awareness and carerelated to students’ success, their readiness and implementation of online teaching pedagogy, andtheir initiatives in creating inclusive learning environments for diverse student needs. Resultssuggest the importance of fostering and sustaining change by creating collaborative spaces forfaculty to reflect on and support each other’s teaching practice. A departmental Community ofPractice (COP) related to teaching provided faculty with existing space, norms, and practicesupporting each other in reflecting on, adapting, and improving their teaching to support theneeds of diverse learners. We share our findings and implications in a traditional lecture.IntroductionThe emergence of COVID-19

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Richard J. Aleong, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

learning pedagogy, and assessment through collaborativelearning sessions and 3) scaffolding learning moments to build up to a culminating courseexperience. In the following sections, each of these strategies corresponding to the course designconsiderations are described, as well as my instructor reflection on student feedback.Table 1Translation and Reframing of Course Design Considerations for Implementation in an Open-ended Course Design Context Course Design Core Idea and Reframed Approach Strategy for Considerations Approach to Expand Thinking Implementation Focus on learning Focus on being and Journey mapping for objectives to address

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amy B. Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

, service, and career advancement) and provideholistic faculty support in areas such as time management, work-life topics, and well-being [1].From the context of the CTL, the intentional alignment of programs, in which the relationshipsbetween goals and activities of different faculty development programs are considered, helps toidentify strategic approaches to advancing the CTL’s goals. At the same time, from the contextof faculty members, participating in exercises that encourage the consideration of an issue fromboth big picture and granular perspectives and the connections between the factors that impactthe issue can help foster reflection and make visible the role of faculty members in the issue.The objectives of this paper are to 1) present a

Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, Rice University; Samuel Garcia Jr., NASA EPDC

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

parenthesesThe survey also included an open-ended question for both cohorts: Share your thoughts and reflections about your experiences collaborating with the faculty advisor (e.g., mentorship experience), and your overall experience conducting researchIV. RESULTSCohort 1 ResultsThe questions administered on the survey (Table 2) were intended to inquire about developingrelationships, commitment to mentorship, genuine desire for mentee to succeed, and willingnessof the faculty member to disseminate personal and academic wisdom.Table 2. Student Response Percentages: Cohort 1 Question N Yes No Prior to joining the group, did you engage in research

Conference Session

Faculty Development 1: Social Justice Research

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Katie Johanson, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Richard Carroll Sinclair, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Comas Lamar Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute; Rosario A. Gerhardt, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kinnis Gosha, Morehouse College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

transcribed by a third-party service and permanently deletedonce reviewed and cleaned.Reflexivity and Positionality. Prior to data analysis, the researchers engaged in the process ofreflexivity, in which experiences, beliefs, values, and assumptions on the ways in whichmentoring is used in academe to support the career development of faculty were reflected uponindividually and discussed collectively (Watt, 2007). Reflexivity is integral in qualitativeresearch because it forces the consideration and exposure of researcher bias through analyticalreflection and dialogue. The theoretical underpinnings of the pragmatic lens were revisitedduring the reflexivity process to ensure practical implications were foundational to the way inwhich the transcripts

Conference Session

Faculty Development 4: COVID-19's Impact on Students

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sreyoshi Bhaduri, McGraw Hill ; Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida; Debarati Basu, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Michelle Soledad, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

, ME) from the Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU) in Davao City, Philippines, and in Engineering Education (PhD) from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include learning experiences in fundamental engineering courses and data-informed reflective practice. Michelle’s professional experience includes roles in industry and academia, having worked as a software engineer, project lead and manager before becoming Assistant Professor and Department Chair for Elec- trical Engineering at the Ateneo de Davao University in the Philippines. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Grounded Theory Analysis of COVID-19 Information and Resources Relayed

Conference Session

Faculty Development 1: Social Justice Research

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Henry Salgado, University of Texas at El Paso; Yamile A. Urquidi Cerros, University of Texas at El Paso; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso; Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

. Therefore, this paper seeks to answer the following research question: Whateducational supports do engineering faculty at HSIs propose to embed in their curricula toincrease their students’ intrinsic motivation?To answer this question, thirty-six engineering educators from thirteen two- and four-year HSIsfrom across the continental United States were introduced to the SDT and approaches forsupporting students’ intrinsic motivation during a multi-institutional faculty developmentworkshop series. Participants were asked to reflect on and prototype learning experiences thatwould promote intrinsic motivation and fulfill students’ needs for competence, relatedness, andautonomy to learn engineering [1]. Data were collected through a series of reflection

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Evan Ko, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Joseph Francis Mirabelli, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Allyson Jo Barlow, University of Nevada, Reno; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Kelly J. Cross, University of Nevada, Reno

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

researchers.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2016753. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. The authors would also like to thank the participants for their insights and theadvisory board members Cynthia Finelli and James Pembridge for mentorship in guiding thisstudy.References[1] E.A. Walker, J.M. Pettit, and G.A. Hawkins, Goals of Engineering Educaiton: Final Report of the Goals Committee, in Engineering Education 1968. p. 367-446.[2] E. de Graaff, “Ten years in engineering education research: looking back ahead,” Taylor & Francis

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Adithya Jayakumar, Ohio State University; Lisa Abrams, Ohio State University; Lucille Sheppard, Ohio State University; Shadia Siliman, Ohio State University; Toni M. Calbert, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

manner, andencouraging faculty to use the document. The intent of the workshop was not to dictate to facultywhat exactly to do in their respective classrooms but rather to spur discussion and encourageself-reflection on class structure, logistics, and teaching philosophy.After introducing the concept of inclusive teaching through an interactive dialogue, the benefitsof an inclusive classroom were discussed. Following this, demographic information comparingthe percentage of women and URMs in the department to the COE as a whole was included.Whether or not the specific department had higher or lower than average female/URM studentenrollment, the importance of creating a welcoming climate in the department, and the role itplays in attracting and

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Dick Apronti, Angelo State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

discipline. These scores were generated from theclose-ended questions requiring students to choose from a scale of 1 to 5. A snapshot of somesummaries of the quantitative assessments using the 5-point rating is presented in Table 1.Table 1: SET assessment on a 5-point scale Parameter Average Standard Score Deviation Found ways to help students answer their questions 2.38 0.99 Helped students to interpret subject matter from diverse perspectives 2.00 0.94 (e.g., different cultures, religions, genders, political views) Encouraged students to reflect on and evaluate what they

Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Li Tan, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

nationally representative surveyon postsecondary faculty, and thus results from our study reflect data from more contemporarycohorts of faculty. In addition, the ECDS has comprehensive data, including demographic andindividual-level factors, PhD institution and program characteristics, and measures regardinghow well PhD programs prepare students for their faculty position in terms of skill sets. Theseaforementioned variables are aligned with our adapted theoretical framework (Fig. 1). We restricted our analytical sample to individuals with a science, engineering, or socialscience PhD, and to those who hold a teaching position within the U.S. Thus, our sampleincludes tenure-track faculty, lecturers and other non-tenure track teaching personnel

Conference Session

Faculty Development 2: COVID-19 Impact on Faculty

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Maria Chierichetti, San Jose State University; Patricia R. Backer, San Jose State University; Laura E. Sullivan-Green, San Jose State University; Liat Rosenfeld, San Jose State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

of professional valuesand attitudes). According to Eaton et al. [1], some teaching activities in the online environmenthave “the potentials to cultivate deeper learning experiences, but they can fail to do so ifactivities are not designed and implemented properly.” The rapid switch to online instruction inMarch 2020 did not allow faculty members to train, plan and reflect upon the best teachingmodes for online instruction, unless they had previously taught an online class. Therefore, aswith many other researchers, we consider the Spring semester to be an example of remotelearning rather than planned online learning [3].In October 2020, the Chronicle of Higher Education conducted a survey among faculty membersin US institutions to gain

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sarah A. Wilson, University of Kentucky; Joseph H. Hammer, University of Kentucky; Ellen L. Usher, University of Kentucky

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

priority in their position, which could misrepresent how thegeneral population of engineering faculty feel about student mental health. Finally, this surveyfocused on faculty self-reported confidence levels about communicating with students aboutdifferent mental health concerns rather than quantifiable skill levels. Literature shows that evenwith trained therapists, there is little relationship between confidence and competence when itcomes to treatment efficacy. In fact, it has been found that therapists who have higher levels ofself-doubt can help facilitate better patient outcomes [25]. This is possibly due to positive self-reflections that result in improved therapeutic interventions. As a result, lack of confidence doesnot necessarily mean

Conference Session

Faculty Development 4: COVID-19's Impact on Students

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Celeste Chavis P.E., Morgan State University; Steve U. Efe, Morgan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

skills,knowledge, and attitudes of a faculty can be a roadblock to training and determining facultyreadiness [13]. Teaching behaviors by faculty that reflect knowledge, skills, and attitudes must beidentified prior to a faculty training program, and training content must be developed to meet theirneeds at the appropriate level [14].Instructor and Learner’s InteractionBolliger & Halupa [15] stated the need to place a high value on communication between theinstructor and students, and the instructor’s timely responsiveness. Interaction facilitates dialogueand promotes active and collaborative learning. Unlike synchronous or face-to-facecommunication, online courses may lack interaction due to the physical separation of students andinstructor

Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven; Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven; Goli Nossoni, University of New Haven; Emese Hadnagy, University of New Haven; Joseph A. Levert, University of New Haven; Junhui Zhao, University of New Haven

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

years compared to earlier years as reflected in the sample data shownin Table 3, and we believe this is largely due to increased faculty engagement and positivityrelated to EML. Table 3 Average Student Ratings Related to E-learning Modules Question 2015* (n = 98) Fall 2020* (n = 133) The instructor reinforced what you learned in the e-learning 3.58 3.95 module through an assignment or a project The assignment or the project was effective in reinforcing 3.44 3.91 what you learned

Conference Session

Faculty Development 4: COVID-19's Impact on Students

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Patricia R. Backer, San Jose State University; Maria Chierichetti, San Jose State University; Laura E. Sullivan-Green, San Jose State University; Liat Rosenfeld, San Jose State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

instructors adopted digital technologies “as a replacement forthe missing physical learning environments, with the learning process remaining the same. Thisresulted in ineffective learning when compared to traditional face-to-face learning environments”(p. 294). 82 students in the Qatar study participated in written reflections about their experiencesand eight students were interviewed. The students felt that the emergency remote learningenvironment needed to “be supported by teaching activities that involve more participationthrough interactive activities and teamwork” [15, p. 13]. Overall, the surveys and interviewsshowed that the quality of instruction suffered after the move to remote teaching in Spring 2020.MethodologyThe results in this paper

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo; Syed Ali Kamal, Independent Researcher

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

level contributes to this vision. Despite some gains in recent decades, women faculty inengineering are still underrepresented. Between 2006 and 2016, the proportion of women facultyin engineering grew from 16% to 23% at the assistant level, from 11.9% to 18.3% at theassociate level, and from 3.8% to 10.6% at the full professor level [2], [3]. While the proportionof women faculty at the lower ranks has increased significantly, the limited representation ofwomen at higher faculty ranks limits their potential for reaching leadership roles andcontribution with significant decision-making to influence engineering education [4]. Althoughthe presented gains are of value, and may already reflect the effect of multiple initiativesimplemented to support