ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 1 - 30 of 134 in total

← Previous
1
2
3
4
5
Next →

Board 124: Work in Progress: A Framework to Develop Project-based Platforms to Support Engineering and Technology Education: Project Development Canvas

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Casey Daniel Kidd, Louisiana Tech University; Krystal Corbett Cruse, Louisiana Tech University; Kelly B Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

2004 and Spring of 2023, respectively.Dr. Krystal Corbett Cruse, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Krystal Corbett is the First-Year Engineering Programs Coordinator and Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Louisiana Tech University. She is also the Co-Director of the Office for Women in Science and Engineering at Louisiana Tech.Dr. Kelly B Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University Dr Kelly Crittenden is a member of Louisiana Tech University’s Integrated STEM Education Center (ISERC), and is the Harrelson Family Professor of engineering. He is also the Program Chair of Mechanical engineering and the coordinator for Tech’s PhD in Eng ©American Society for Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.6479917

Work in Progress: Development of an Innovative Undergraduate Engineering Academic Advising Model

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 8
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Margaret Ruth Hammond, Pennsylvania State University; Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

advising capacity for over 12 years, Margaret is the current Director of Advising Innovation and Assessment in Penn State’s College of Engineering where she works to provide support and guidance on academic advising best practices for professional and faculty academic advisers, oversees assessment efforts, and the development and implementation of advising innovation.Dr. Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University Christine Masters is the Assistant Dean for Academic Support and Global Programs and a Teaching Professor in the Engineering Science and Mechanics Department at the Pennsylvania State University. In between raising 4 great kids with her husband of 35 years, she taught large enrollment statics and

Relevance Score: 0.54618156

Improving student outcomes in math through online faculty professional development

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 9
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Chris S. Hulleman, University of Virginia; Dustin B. Thoman, San Diego State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

social and personality psychology from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 2007. Prior to his career in psychology, he spent six years as a teacher, coach, and social worker. Chris is a second generation educator whose grandparents were tenant farmers in Iowa and Nebraska. He tries to emulate their hard work and persistence in the pursuit of social justice. One of his favorite childhood memories is eating his paternal grandmother’s homemade fruit pies with plenty of ice cream.Dr. Dustin B. Thoman, San Diego State University Dr. Dustin Thoman is a Professor in the Department of Psychology and the Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education at San Diego State University. He also serves as California

Relevance Score: 0.4385697

Faculty Transformation: a Study of Professional Transition

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lori Houghtalen, University of Texas at El Paso; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

. Siddiqui, C. Allendoerfer, R. Adams, and B. Williams, “Integration of Scholarship: Interconnections among Three Studies on Becoming an Engineering Education Researcher*,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, pp. 2352–2377, Dec. 2020.[6] S. Cutler and A. Coso Strong, “The Overlooked Impact of Faculty on Engineering Education,” in International Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Routledge, 2023.[7] L. Earle Reybold and J. J. Alamia, “Academic Transitions in Education: A Developmental Perspective of Women Faculty Experiences,” J. Career Dev., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 107–128, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0894845308325644.[8] D. Oyserman, “Identity-Based Motivation,” in Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, John Wiley &

Relevance Score: 0.4070872

A Mind Map for Active Learning Techniques

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

. Traditional Methods: A Six-thousand Student Surveyof Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses,” American Journal of Physics, vol.66, no. 1, 1998.[13] P. Terrenzini, A. Cabrera, C. Colbeck, J. Parente, and S. Bjorklund, “Collaborative Learningvs. Lecture/discussion: Students’ Reported Learning Gains,” Journal of Engineering Education,vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 123-130, 2001.[14] D. Boud, “PBL in perspective,” Problem-based Learning in Education for the Professions,D. Boud, Ed. Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, 1985, p. 13.[15] B. Duch, S. Groh, and D. Allen, The Power of Problem-based Learning: A Practical "Howto" for Teaching Undergraduate Courses in any Discipline. Sterling, VA: Stylus, 2001.[16] N. Bradbury

Relevance Score: 0.40610427

The CS POGIL Activity Writing Program

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Helen Hu, Westminster College of Salt Lake City; Tricia D. Shepherd; Clifton L. Kussmaul, Green Mango Associates, LLC; Patricia B. Campbell, Campbell-Kibler Associates
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

of Kerala, and Chief Technology Officer for Elegance Technologies, Inc.Dr. Patricia B. Campbell, Campbell-Kibler Associates Patricia B. Campbell, PhD, President of Campbell-Kibler Associates, Inc, has been involved in research and evaluation on science, technology, engineering and mathematics education and issues of race/ethnicity, gender and disability for over 30 years. He ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The CS POGIL Activity Writing ProgramAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper describes the CS POGIL Activity Writing Program (AWP),a faculty development program to help computing faculty create classroom activities for ProcessOriented Guided Inquiry

Relevance Score: 0.39131147

Conceptual Framework for Empathy as a Teaching Practice in Engineering Education

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kate Youmans, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

, C. R. (1958). The Characteristics of a Helping Relationship. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 37(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4918.1958.tb01147.x[5] Christe, B. (2013). The Importance of Faculty-Student Connections in STEM Disciplines: A Literature Review. Journal of STEM Education, 14(1), 22–26.[6] Baston, D. (2011). These Things Called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomenon. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.). The Social Neuroscience of Empathy (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book[7] Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2). 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045357[8] Cech, E. A

Relevance Score: 0.35549378

Creation and Delivery of a Faculty Workshop on Grading - Practical Implications

Conference Session: Faculty Development: Grading and Artificial Intelligence
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Michael J McGinnis, LeTourneau University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

resources to faculty that would allowgrading to provide meaningful and helpful feedback to students during the grading process, and(b) provide practical guidance to faculty on how to make the grading process more efficient,streamlined, and time-on-task effective. The current paper describes the creation andimplementation of this workshop. It includes a survey of the literature on grading practices andincludes the perceptions and feedback of the participants. It also provides the practical content ofthe workshop, allowing readers to use this material and these methods to create impactfulexperiences on their own campuses. Participants of this workshop rated the effectiveness highlyand indicated that the material presented had the opportunity to

Relevance Score: 0.35549378

Innovation Training and Its Impact on Faculty Approach to Curricular and Pedagogical Changes

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 5
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Arun R. Srinivasa, Texas A&M University; Rujun Gao, Texas A&M University; M. Cynthia Hipwell, Texas A&M University; Mindy Bergman, Texas A&M University; David Christopher Seets; Emma Edoga, Texas A&M University; Luis Angel Rodriguez; Guillermo Aguilar, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

change are (a) a faculty development series focused oninnovation and data-driven change, and (b) the creation of faculty driven communities of practiceor "soft wired" teams that support each other and sustain incremental change across semesters asfaculty cycle in and out of courses. Ultimately, the goal of this project is to enhance adepartmental culture in Mechanical Engineering where faculty regularly discuss currentcurricular effectiveness and are empowered to develop pedagogical innovations that enable allstudents and faculty to thrive.For the first objective, our aim is to help faculty reduce effort and risk in implementingpedagogical changes. Faculty already have investigative and experimentation-driven processes inplace for research and a

Relevance Score: 0.3530568

Facilitating Engineering Faculty Mentorship with a Focus on the Entrepreneurial Mindset

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 6
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University; Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University; Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University; Julianne L. Holloway, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

. https://doi.org/10.17226/25568.[7] Haggard, D. L., Dougherty, T. W., Turban, D. B., & Wilbanks, J. E. (2011).Who is a mentor? A review of evolving definitions and implications for research.Journal of Management, 37(1), 280-304.[8] Ragins, B. R., & Kram, K. E. (Eds.). (2007). The handbook of mentoring atwork: Theory, research, and practice. Sage.[9] van Emmerik, I. J. H. (2004). The more you can get the better: Mentoringconstellations and intrinsic career success. Career Development International,9(6/7), 578.[10] Schrodt, P., Cawyer, C. S., & Sanders, R. (2003). An examination ofacademic mentoring behaviors and new faculty members’ satisfaction withsocialization and tenure and promotion processes. Communication Education,52(1), 17-29

Relevance Score: 0.35282052

WIP: Piloting a Comprehensive Needs Assessment to Enhance Engineering Faculty Development

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Megan Patberg Morin, North Carolina State University; Joel J. Ducoste, North Carolina State University; Evelyn C. Brown, North Carolina State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

. 2, pp. 75–86, 2014.[7] M. Scarbecz, C. K. Russell, R. G. Shreve, M. M. Robinson, and C. R. Scheid, ‘Faculty development to improve teaching at a health sciences center: a needs assessment’, Journal of Dental Education, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 145–159, 2011.[8] N. S. Ali, K. Hodson-Carlton, M. Ryan, J. Flowers, M. A. Rose, and V. Wayda, ‘Online education: Needs assessment for faculty development’, The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, vol. 36, no. 1. Slack Incorporated Thorofare, NJ, pp. 32–38, 2005.[9] E. S. Oztay, S. Aydin Gunbatar, and B. Ekiz Kiran, ‘Assessing Chemistry Teachers’ Needs and Expectations from Integrated STEM Education Professional Developments’, Journal of Pedagogical

Relevance Score: 0.35185912

Board 122: Preparing to Teach a Multi-Campus (Distributed Learning) Course

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Casey James Keulen, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Christoph Johannes Sielmann P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Elly Park, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

. Hjelsvold, and B. R. Krogstie, “ICT-Based Challenges of Repurposing a Single-Campus Course to Multi-campus Settings: A Pragmatic Case Study,” in Digital Transformation for a Sustainable Society in the 21st Century, I. O. Pappas, P. Mikalef, Y. K. Dwivedi, L. Jaccheri, J. Krogstie, and M. Mäntymäki, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 641–653. doi: 10.1007/978-3- 030-29374-1_52.[7] C. Sielmann, C. Keulen, and S.-F. Hu, “Multi-Campus Teaching in a Canadian Engineering Context: Assessing Presence Using The COI Survey,” Proc. Can. Eng. Educ. Assoc. CEEA, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.24908/pceea.vi0.14878.[8] C. Sielmann, V. Chiu, and C. Keulen, “An Online Survey Tool for Multi-Cohort

Relevance Score: 0.3517856

WIP: Developing a Framework for Ethical Integration of Technology in Instruction

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Helen Choi, University of Southern California
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

responses 3 4 1 0 0Q5: Please add any comments you have about the framework. (n=4)a. "This is a good idea - a deliberate approach."b. "I liked how we could disagree about AI and still have a productive discussion."c. "The framework can have different outcomes for different people - I think that's ok since we are at least talking about it and we can see people are acting with intention. I learned a lot about LLMs such as their environmental impact."d. "The framework sparked great discussion."While not statistically relevant, these initial survey responses indicate a generally favorableresponse to the framework and related discussions about

Relevance Score: 0.35171127

A Cross-Institutional Study of Engineering Education Faculty Profiles

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 5
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Gadhaun Aslam, University of Florida; Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

education became a scientific inquiry in theU.S. between 1890 to 1910 with the goal to innovate curricular design as well as pedagogicalpractices. Engineering education as a discipline and research field aims to assist students by a)providing evidence-based practices to instructors on engineering practices [2], b) ways toenhance students’ learning experiences [3]; [4], c) incorporating effective teachingmethodologies for students [5]; [6], d) integrating technology in the classroom [7]; [8]; [9], e)refining assessment methods [10], and f) enhancing curricula to meet the needs of students andimplementing strategies to better equip the next generation of engineers [7]; [11]; [12].Understanding engineering education from a historical perspective, it

Relevance Score: 0.35075065

A Comparison of TA Training Programs Across Multiple Institutions

Conference Session: Faculty Development at Various Career Stages
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Haley Briel, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Deesha Chadha, Imperial College London; Erica Jean Hagen, University of Wisconsin - Madison
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

College of Engineering. 3The authors conducted 60-minute interviews with trainers from each institution using asemi-structured interview with a common set of questions (see Appendix A). The purpose wasto compare approaches and seek effective practices, needs, and challenges. Interviewees werealso provided with an informational sheet explaining how the interview would be conducted,what the expectations were, and how their responses would be shared (Appendix B).We are most interested in the following categories at each institution: ● Who are the key players of TA training? ● What is the primary program content? ● What are your primary

Relevance Score: 0.35075065

The Water Working Group at West Texas A&M University: A creative means for interdisciplinary research catalyzation and faculty development

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nathan Luke Howell, West Texas A&M University; Kenneth R. Leitch P.E., West Texas A&M University; Anirban Pal, West Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

received his B. Tech. from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (2010) and his Ph. D. from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (2016), both in Mechanical Engineering. He worked as Post-Doctoral Research Associate for 1.5 years and as a Lecturer for 6 months at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute prior to joining the College of Engineering at West Texas A&M in Fall 2019 as an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering. The famous American scientist Richard Feynman prophesied the huge potential for engineering at small scales (There’s plenty of room at the bottom!). In this spirit, Dr. Pal is interested in the unique nano-mechanical behavior of materials at small scales, and how they can be harnessed to produce

Relevance Score: 0.35063314

Board 128: Work in Progress: Toward a Common Sci Comm Strategy

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mark Blaine, University of Oregon; Nathan Jacobs, University of Oregon
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

toshare this approach in a Lightning Talk.References[1] A. Dudo, J. C. Besley, and S. Yuan, “Science Communication Training in North America: Preparing Whom to Do What With What Effect?,” Sci. Commun., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 33–63, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1075547020960138.[2] T. S. Ritchie, D. L. Rossiter, H. B. Opris, I. E. Akpan, S. Oliphant, and M. McCartney, “How do STEM graduate students perceive science communication? Understanding science communication perceptions of future scientists,” PLoS ONE, vol. 17, no. 10, p. e0274840, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274840.[3] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies

Relevance Score: 0.3497157

Establishing a Framework for the Effective Mentorship of Junior Engineering Faculty

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Himani Sharma; Jennifer Hadley Perkins, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University; Adam R Carberry, The Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

and mentees on a national mentoring programme for pharmacists: An examination intorelationships, personal and professional development,” Research in Social and AdministrativePharmacy, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 2495–2504, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.019.[11]. Pawson, Ray “Mentoring relationships: an explanatory review.” 2004.[12]. M. J. Karcher, G. P. Kuperminc, S. G. Portwood, C. L. Sipe, and A. S. Taylor, “Mentoringprograms: A framework to inform program development, research, and evaluation,” Journal ofCommunity Psychology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 709–725, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1002/jcop.20125.[13]. Eby, L. T. D. T., Allen, T. D., Hoffman, B. J., Baranik, L. E., Sauer, J. B., Baldwin, S., ... &Evans, S. C. (2013). An interdisciplinary

Relevance Score: 0.3496637

A Professional Development Program for Emerging STEM Education Researchers

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Shams El-Adawy, Kansas State University ; Christopher A. F. Hass; Eugene Y. Vasserman, Kansas State University; Mary Bridget Kustusch, DePaul University; Scott Franklin, Rochester Institute of Technology; Eleanor C. Sayre, Kansas State University and Rochester Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

://aspenphys.org/index.html (accessed Jan. 17, 2023).[13] American Physical Society, “APS - Meetings & Events,” 2023. http://www.aps.org/meetings/index.cfm (accessed Jan. 17, 2023).[14] S. Franklin, E. C. Sayre, and M. B. Kustusch, “PEER: Professional Development Experiences for Education Researchers,” in ASEE Proceedings, 2018, p. 14. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/peer-professional-development-experiences-for-education-research ers[15] E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, 1999.[16] A. D. Robertson, R. Scherr, and D. Hammer, Eds., Responsive Teaching in Science and Mathematics. New York: Routledge, 2015. doi: 10.4324/9781315689302.[17] S. El-Adawy, S

Relevance Score: 0.34764582

Board 123: Work in Progress: A Case Study of a Community of Practice Model Fostering Faculty Scholarship of Teaching and Learning of the Entrepreneurial Mindset

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kristen Peña, Arizona State University; Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Jean M. Andino Ph.D., P.E., Arizona State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

engineering student outcomes," Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2016.[3] B. M. Schwartz and A. Haynie, "Faculty development centers and the role of SoTL," New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 136, pp. 101-111, 2013.[4] P. C. Wankat, R. M. Felder, K. A. Smith, and F. S. Oreovicz, "The scholarship of teaching and learning in engineering. Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning," pp. 217-237, 2023.[5] D. Boden and M. Borrego, "Academic Departments and Related Organizational Barriers to Interdisciplinary Research," Higher Education in Review, vol. 8, 2011.[6] R. Felder and R. Brent, "An analysis of fifteen years of the national effective teaching

Relevance Score: 0.33069086

Work in Progress: The Antigua Forum Format: Increasing Information Flow for Increased Pedagogical Innovation

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 8
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: M Cynthia Hipwell, Texas A&M University; Luis Angel Rodriguez, Texas A&M University; Astrid Layton, Texas A&M University; Arun R Srinivasa, Texas A&M University; Guillermo Aguilar, Texas A&M University; Karan Watson P.E., Texas A&M University; Mindy Bergman; Rujun Gao, Texas A&M University; David Christopher Seets, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

the cohort 1 (a) and cohort 2 (b) sessions of the department facultyteaching retreat. Table 2 summarizes the number of individuals in each session and the Freemandegree centrality associated with each session’s Fig. 4 interaction network. The cohort 1 and cohort2 sessions were both found to be decentralized, validating the unstructured rotation phase’s goalof the Antigua Forum format. The low centrality score (close to zero) indicates that almost everyparticipant interacted with a larger number of other participants. Comparing the centrality scoresof the Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 sessions, it is evident the Cohort 2 session had more uniqueconversation interactions occurring. This trend is also somewhat visible in Fig. 4, with moreparticipants in

Relevance Score: 0.3268311

Faculty Perspectives on Undergraduate Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) Assistance: A Work-in-Progress

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 8
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Michaela Harper, Utah State University; Cassandra McCall, Utah State University
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

for Education," SSRN, 2023.[4] I. Tuomi, Y. Punie, R. Vuorikari and M. Cabrera, "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Learning, Teaching, and Education: Policies for the Future," European Commission, 2018.[5] A. Bozkurt, J. Xiao, S. Lambert, A. Pazurek, H. Crompton, S. Koseoglu, R. Farrow, M. Bond, C. Nerantzi, S. Honeychurch, M. Bali, J. Dron, K. Mir, B. Stewart, E. Costello, J. Mason, C. M. Stracke, E. Romero-Hall, A. Koutropoulos, C. M. Toquero, L. Singh, A. Tlili, K. Lee, M. Nichols, E. Ossiannilsson, M. Brown, V. Irvine, J. E. Raffaghelli, G. Santos-Hermosa, O. Farrell, T. Adam, Y. L. Thong, S. Sani-Bozkurt, R. C. Sharma, S. Hrastinski and P. Jandrić, "Speculative Futures on ChatGPT and Generative Artificial

Relevance Score: 0.29882652

Self-Reported Emotions of Engineering Instructors During and After a Sudden Change

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Katie Mowat, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

reportedthe emotions they experienced were typical during the semester went from 34% to 76%. In Fall2020, participants reported their emotions as being typical around 50% of the time with a low of41% in Week 4 and a high of 53% in Week 14. Lastly, a majority of participants reported typicalemotions throughout Spring 2021 with the percentage increasing from 60% at the start of thesemester to 78% by the end of the semester. There was, however, a drop to 51% in Week 6.The percentages of participants that selected at least one positive emotion in each positiveemotion category are displayed in Figure 2. In this figure, half of the emotion categories aredisplayed on the top (Figure 2(a)) and the other half are displayed on the bottom (Figure 2(b

Relevance Score: 0.29857218

Empowering Educators: A Pilot Study of Faculty Training on Building Decarbonization and Clean Energy Integration

Conference Session: Faculty Development Works in Progress Session 2
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mohamed Khalafalla, Florida A&M University - Florida State University; Tejal Mulay, Florida A&M University - Florida State University; Doreen Kobelo Regalado, Florida A&M University - Florida State University; Peter Rumsey, Stanford Building Decarbonization Learning Accelerator
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

BIM capabilities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 67, pp. 811-825, 2017.[3] A. Schlueter and F. Thesseling, "Building information model based energy/exergy performance assessment in early design stages," Automation in construction, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 153-163, 2009.[4] D. Jones, C. Snider, A. Nassehi, J. Yon, and B. Hicks, "Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review," CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology, vol. 29, pp. 36-52, 2020.[5] Y. Peng, A. Rysanek, Z. Nagy, and A. Schlüter, "Using machine learning techniques for occupancy-prediction-based cooling control in office buildings," Applied energy, vol. 211, pp. 1343-1358, 2018.[6] R

Relevance Score: 0.2967012

Instructional Development at a Time of Involuntary Changes: Implications for the Post-Pandemic Era

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Qin Liu; Greg Evans P.Eng.; Milad Moghaddas; Tamara Kecman
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

across all disciplines. These initiatives include digitallytransforming the faculty development program [1], rebuilding existing resources such as thelearning management system [2] and the university makerspace [3], and harnessing existingsocial networks [4]. Rather than documenting similar institutional initiatives for instructionaldevelopment, in this paper we investigated the process and the results of instructionaldevelopment among faculty members after a couple of years of involuntary changes in teachingand learning during the pandemic.Specifically, this study examined the following three aspects of instructional development amongfaculty members of a Canadian engineering school: (a) changes in teaching practices; (b) theevolving views

Relevance Score: 0.2952994

Evaluation of a Postdoctoral Early Career Fellowship Program Developing Future Faculty Members

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4
Collection: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sydni Alexa Cobb, University of Texas, Austin; Audrey Boklage, University of Texas, Austin; Maura Borrego, University of Texas, Austin; Lydia Contreras
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

way the program was structured. Thedifficulty of navigating all of the pitfalls that can present themselves when attempting to weave aprogram like this across six different colleges and schools cannot be understated, but the benefitsof it outweigh the trouble. This program is a true space for camaraderie and support and canserve as a model for other universities looking to implement a similar program.Acknowledgements We would like to thank the University of Texas at Austin’s Office of the Vice Presidentand Provost for inviting us to interview fellows in their program.References[1] Main, Joyce B., Yanbing Wang, and Li Tan. "The career outlook of engineering PhDs: Influence of postdoctoral research positions on early career salaries

Relevance Score: 0.29472274

Faculty and Administrators' Servingness in Engineering Education at Hispanic Serving Institutions: A Systematic Review

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 2
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Hyun Kyoung Ro, University of North Texas; Shirley Anderson, University of North Texas
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. References[1] Excelencia in Education (2023a). “Hispanic–serving institutions (HSIs): 2021–22,” 2023.[Online]. Available: https://www.edexcelencia.org/media/2105[2] A. M. Núñez, J. Rivera, J. Valdez, and V. B. Olivo. “Centering Hispanic-serving institutions’strategies to develop talent in computing fields,” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technologyand Society, vol., 4, no. 1, 1842582, 2021.[3] B.L. Scott, S. M. Muñoz, and S. B. Scott. “How whiteness operates at a Hispanic ServingInstitution: A qualitative case study of faculty, staff, and

Relevance Score: 0.29436207

Translational Engineering Education: A New Paradigm for Preparing Next-Generation Engineers for the 21st Century Workforce

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 9
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Phuong Truong, University of California, San Diego; Truong Nguyen, University of California, San Diego; James Friend, University of California, San Diego; Alex M. Phan, University of California, San Diego
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

. "Limited learning on college campuses." Society 48 (2011): 203-207.12. B. C. Sanyal and M. Martin, "Quality assurance and the role of accreditation: An overview," Report: Higher Education in the World 2007: Accreditation for Quality Assurance: What is at Stake?, 2007.13. J. S. Eaton, "An Overview of US Accreditation. Revised November 2015," Council for Higher Education Accreditation, 2015.14. D. G. Rodionov, I. A. Rudskaia, and O. A. Kushneva, "The importance of the university world rankings in the context of globalization," Life Science Journal, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 442-446, 2014.15. S. N. S. Sahuri et al., "Engineering Education: Program Ranking and Student Interest," ASEAN Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 1, 2015.16

Relevance Score: 0.29406008

WIP: A Knowledge Graph to Share and Discover High-Impact Practices and Support Decision-Making

Conference Session: Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 8
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Natalia Villanueva Rosales, The University of Texas at El Paso; Ann C. Gates, The University of Texas at El Paso; Lani Nicole Godenzi, The University of Texas at El Paso; Francisco Osuna, The University of Texas at El Paso; Angel U. Ortega, The University of Texas at El Paso; Veronica A. Carrillo, The University of Texas at El Paso
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

SSKG:StudentSuccess (b) Individual: SSKG:iLink_REU Annotations: dc:source < https://ilink.cybershare.utep.edu/> dc:description “The iLink group provides research and training opportunities for undergraduate and graduate students through multiple research projects funded by different agencies, organizations and industry partners.” Types: SSKG:UGResearchProgram (c) ObjectProperty: SSKG:impacts SubPropertyChain: SSKG:ReportedIn o SSKG:DescribesOutcomeFigure 3. (a) Description of the SSKG High Impact Practice class, (b) an example of anUndergraduate Research Program instance individual, and (c) an Object Property