, Team Based, First-Year Design Projects‖ Proceedings, International Conference on EngineeringEducation Research (ICREE), Honolulu, HI, June 2007.[3] Zarske, M.S., Sullivan, J.F., Knight, D., Yowell, J.L. and Wiant, D. (2007) ―The TEAMS Program: A Study of aGrades 3-12 Engineering Continuum,‖ Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conf., Honolulu, HI.[4] Sullivan, J.F. and Zarske, M.S. (2005) ―The K-12 Engineering Outreach Corps: A Service-Learning TechnicalElective,‖ Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference, Portland, OR.[5]Lima, Marybeth, and Oakes, William, Service Learning: Engineering in Your Community, Great Lakes Press,2006.[6] Jacoby, B., and Associates, (Eds.), Service Learning in Higher Education: Concepts and Practices, Jossey-Bass,San Francisco, CA
. Dowling and J. Zhou, "The Power of an Idea: The International Impacts of theGrand Challenges for Engineering," Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 4-7, 2016.[3] National Academy of Engineering, "NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering," vol. 2016,2008.[4] D. Kilgore, B. Sattler and J. Turns, "From fragmentation to continuity: engineering studentsmaking sense of experience through the development of a professional portfolio," Studies inHigher Education, vol. 38, pp. 807-826, 2013.[5] M. Eliot and J. Turns, "Constructing professional portfolios: Sense-making and professionalidentity development for engineering undergraduates," J Eng Educ, vol. 100, pp. 630, 2011.[6] J. Turns, B. Sattler and D. Kilgore, "Disciplinary knowledge, identity, and navigation
dimension, where k = the number of team members. Sliders allow the rater toadjust the point allocation for each member and encourage comparisons across team members. Aself rating slider is also provided although it does not take into account the fixed total points thatcan be allocated to other members. As such, the self rating is not included in the calculation ofothers’ ratings. Rather, on the output the self rating appears as a comparison between thestudent’s perceptions of his or her own performance and how he or she is perceived on averageby team members for each dimension (Appendix B). A third indicator on the output is the Page
Paper ID #18877Are Students Overworked? Understanding the Workload Expectations andRealities of First-Year EngineeringMs. Darlee Gerrard, University of Toronto Darlee Gerrard is a Coordinator for pre-university science and engineering outreach programs in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto. She is also a Ph.D. student in the department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning at OISE (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education) in the collaborative Engineering Education program. She received her Hon. B.Sc. from the University of Toronto, B. Ed. from Brock University, and Masters degree
Introduction to Biomechanics Course", Biomedical Engineering Education, 1(1) pp. 61-66, 2021.[23] B. David, F. Masood and K. Jensen, "Development and Implementation of a Virtual Cell Culture Lab Practical for an Introductory BME Lab Course", Biomedical Engineering Education, 1(1) pp. 109-114, 2021.[24] J.A. Gerstenhaber and Y. Har-el, Y., "Virtual Biomaterials Lab during COVID-19 Pandemic," Biomedical Engineering Education, 1(1) pp. 1-6, 2021.[25] Working Model 2005, Design Simulation Technologies, Inc., https://www.design- simulation.com/wm2d/, last accessed 02/23/2021.[26] R. M. Greenwald, J.T. Gwin, J.J. Chu, and J. J. Criscob, “Head Impact Severity Measures for Evaluating Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Risk Exposure
Perspective- Taking in an Engineering Ethics Course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, pp. 534-563, 2017.[19] A. Coplan, "Will the real empathy please stand up? A case for a narrow conceptualization," The Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 49, pp. 40-65, 2011.[20] M. Kouprie and F. S. Visser, "A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user's life," Journal of Engineering Design, vol. 20, pp. 437-448, 2009.[21] T. Brown and J. Wyatt, "Design thinking for social innovation IDEO," Development Outreach, vol. 12, pp. 29-31, 2010.[22] J. Kolko, "Design thinking comes of age," Harvard Business Review, vol. 93, pp. 66-71, 2015.[23] W. B. Rouse, Design for success: A human
Paper ID #25171Engineering Skills and not People through the First-year Design Experienceand Service LearningDr. Jonathan Elliot Gaines, University of South Florida Jonathan E. Gaines is faculty in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of South Florida. He is the Director of First Year Experiential Education and Learning. Through this position, he develops and implements the curriculum for USF’s Foundations of Engineering Lab course. He is also the Principle Investigator for Bulls Engineering Youth Experience (Bulls-EYE Mentoring) a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math based outreach program that uses
students enrolled in Nanotechnology-TLC (TLC) andNon-TLC classes. A B C D F W GPA (avg) TLC 2013 17 7 1 0 0 0 3.64 TLC 2012 18 2 2 1 0 1 3.6 Non-TLC 1 9 5 4 0 3 3 2.9 Non-TLC 2 11 5 1 1 5 2 2.7 Non-TLC 3 6 8 4 1 6 0 2.3In summary, the students in the Nanotechnology-TLC performed better, as evidenced byattending class more regularly, submitting more of the assignments, and attaining higher coursegrades. The highlights on
: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h)the broad education necessary to understand the
calculus, from single variable to multivariable vector-valued functions, introductory physics, introductory programming, introductory chemistry). Each session is staffed with 2-3 upper-class students (termed teaching assistants or TAs in what follows) who provide academic as well as emotional support. During nights with high numbers of visitors, TAs group incoming students by subject and encourage them to discuss their questions amongst each other while TAs are otherwise occupied. Often this practice helps students (a) see that they are not the only ones struggling, (b) clarify their thinking by explaining what they are confused about, (c) learn to use available resources in order to make some
Paper ID #31333Work in Progress: Project and Design-Based Introductory EngineeringCourse using Arduino KitsDr. Demetris Geddis, Hampton University Demetris L. Geddis is an associate professor and Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Hamp- ton University. He has extensive research experience in the areas of Integrated optoelectronics, Optics, Microelectronics, and Electromagnetics. He has worked as a Research and Design Engineer at Motorola and Bell laboratories. Also, he worked at NASA Langley Research Center as a NASA faculty fellow for the Nondestructive Evaluation Sciences Branch where he performed research
Paper ID #6061Getting Engineering Students to Stay the CourseMr. Robert Silverstein, University of California, Los Angeles Robert Silverstein is president of management consulting firm The Brentwood Kensington Group, Inc. Mr. Silverstein founded BKG after a long and successful career as an executive leader in defense, aerospace, technology and the U.S. Government. Mr. Silverstein served as the vice president of Ad- vanced Design and Business Development for the highly classified Northrop Grumman B-2 Bomber Pro- gram and later as the vice president and general manager of the corporation’s electronics divisions in
the control and experimental sections who were at least 18 years of ageat the beginning of the term were invited to participate in this study. Data used were obtainedfrom three online surveys: a personal information questionnaire developed by course instructors,and pre/post-course surveys developed by the authors. For the Fall 2019 quarter, a total ofapproximately 140 students were invited to complete the surveys (described below).Researchers obtained 119 responses for the personal information questionnaire (Appendix A), 57responses for the pre-course survey (Appendix B), and 56 responses for the post-course survey(Appendix C). Researchers collected demographic information only on the post-course survey.Those respondents identified as white
andTechnology in Computer Science Education. ACM, New York, NY, USA.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1345443.1345441K. Robinson, and A. M. Azzam. (2009). Why creativity now? (interview). EducationalLeadership, 67(1):22-26.UC San Diego. (2018). Data structures and algorithms specialization. Coursera Inc.https://www.coursera.org/specializations/data-structures-algorithms#coursesS. B. Velegol, S. E. Zappe, and E. Mahoney. (2015). The evolution of a flipped classroom:evidence-based recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education, Winter 2015.
point, it is essential tointegrate this content into both curricular and co-curricular efforts. It is not enough to spend asingle hour engaged in this work. It is important to find ways to encourage students to explorethese topics in more depth and to allow them to continue to engage in meaningful discussions asthey develop their personal and professional identities.References[1] B. O. Barefoot, C. L. Warnock, M. P. Dickinson, S. E. Richardson and M. R. Roberts, "Exploring the Evidence: Reporting Outcomes of First-Year Seminars. The First-Year Experience. Volume II. Monograph Series, Number 25.," National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 1998.[2] C. Boudreau and J. Kromrey, "A longitudinal
programs in the otherdepartments in the College. It is anticipated that the experiences and results of the peer mentorprogram in Mechanical Engineering will be used to inspire and improve similar programsthroughout the College.Bibliography1. Chen, X, “STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEM Fields.” National Center for Educational Statistics, Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved 01/2016 from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2014001rev.2. Marra, R. M., Shen, D., Rodgers, K., and Bogue, B., “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), pp. 6-27, 2012. Retrieved 01/2016 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi
? © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference (a) (b)Q1. Working on discipline-specific project helped me to make an informed decisionQ2. Project-based learning enabled me to discover my choice for discipline? (c) (d)Q3. Project-based learning helped me narrow down my choices of disciplineQ4. I discover new friends and enjoyed working with them (e) (f)Q5. Learning using hands-on projects is interesting to meQ6. Do you think hands-on learning would be better off
after completing the introductory course. We applied random surveys to5,083 students enrolled at all campuses in the School of Engineering and Sciences' four avenueprograms. One thousand four hundred ninety-nine students participated voluntarily in the study(~30%). The survey was applied nationwide using the Qualtrics survey tool.The survey consisted of 9 Likert-scale questions with five choices ranging from StronglyDisagree to Strongly Agree for each module and one question with three choices describing thecourse's effect on their selection of the avenue (total: 43 items). The survey was divided intothree dimensions: a) achievement of objectives and real-life experience, b) perceived demand,and c) effect on the avenue choice. To identify these
generally begin with undervaluedideas.6-8 Figure 1. A confluence model of creativity (created out of Sternberg and Lubart8). Page 24.922.3 Creativity involves the application of these six resources to specific tasks:1. Intellectual skills. Three intellectual skills are particularly important: (a) the synthetic skill to see problems in new ways and to escape the bounds of conventional thinking, (b) the analytic skill to recognize which of one’s ideas are worth pursuing and which are not, and (c) the practical–contextual skill to know how to persuade others of (to sell other people on) the value of one’s ideas. The confluence
. Data collection requires access to the university reporting tool(Cognos) to retrieve information on students in the administrative software (Banner) applicationused at Texas Tech University. The 2012 fall catalog year and the “pure” GPA is essentialinformation for the analysis. Students can replace the grade of D or F with a higher grade of A,B or C when the exact course is taken again. The student’s transcript will show the previouslower grade and eliminate the course hours and grade points from the new calculation of GPAfor the semester. This change in GPA can offer the appearance of a GPA greater to or greaterthan 2.5 in the previous semester. With assistance from programmers, a Cognos report wasmodified to include catalog year and pure GPA
, several active learning strategies and support tools were implemented to improvestudent success. The breakdown of sections of the course that were included in the study can befound in Table 1. We will look at the student results across all sections for this paper.Table 1. Course summary for the semesters included in the study Students Study Semester Section Instructor Enrolled Participants % A - 001 Instructor 1 96 41 42.71% Fall 2017 B - 004 Instructor 2 63 23 36.51% C - 001 Instructor 2 43
computer science and engineeringmajor intents found the Engineering Programming course more useful, while civil engineeringintents found the Engineering Projects course more useful.Future work includes deeper analysis into retention, certainty and satisfaction with the courseofferings in the FYE Program at the conclusion of the 2020-21 academic year.REFERENCES[1] C. E. Brawner, M.M. Camacho, R.A. Long, S.M. Lord, M.W. Ohland, and M.H. Wasburn.Work in progress-the effect of engineering matriculation status on major selection. Paperpresented at the 39th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA (2009).[2] B. Olds and R. Miller. The Effect of a First-Year Integrated Engineering Curriculum onGraduation Rates and Student
Education,” Journalof Engineering Education, 94, pp. 121-130.3. Valveny, E., Benavente, R., Lapedriza, A., Ferrer, M., Garcia-Barnes, J., Sanchez, G., 2012, “Adaptation of acomputer programming course to the ESHE requirements: evaluations five years later,” European Journal ofEngineering Education, 37, pp. 243-254.4. Anagnos, T., Furman, B. J., Hsu, P., Backer, P. R., 2013, “How Important is the WOW Factor in First YearEngineering Courses?” AC2013-6417, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA. Page 24.854.135. Bender, W. N., 2012, “Project-Based Learning: Differentiating Instruction for the 21 st
AC 2008-654: TINKERING INTERACTIONS ON FRESHMAN ENGINEERINGDESIGN TEAMSArlisa Labrie Richardson, Arizona State University Arlisa Labrie Richardson graduated from Grambling State University with a BS in Physics. After ten years of engineering experience in the semiconductor industry, she returned to graduate school to earn a MS in Engineering of Materials from Arizona State University. In May 2008 she completed her PhD in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in Science Education at Arizona State University. Her research interest includes freshman engineering and retention efforts for female engineering students. In her current position as the Coordinator of Instructional
., Moreno, M., Shuman, L. J., and Atman, C. J., Gender and Ethnicity Differences in Freshmen Engineering Student Attitudes: A cross-Institutional Study. Journal of Engineering Education, 2001: p. 477-488.7. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Atman, C. J., and Shuman, L. J., Characteristics of Freshman Engineering Students: Models for Determining Student Attrition in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 1997: p. 139- 148.8. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., and Tarule, J. M., Women's Ways of Knowing The Development of Self, voice, and Mind. 1986: Basic Books, Inc. 256.9. Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N. M., Talking About Leaving Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. 1997, Boulder: Westview
the first-year Engineering Program at Northeastern University. The focus of this team is on providing a consistent, comprehensive, and constructive educational experience that endorses the student-centered, professional and practice-oriented mission of Northeastern University.Dr. Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University Dr. Kathryn Schulte Grahame is an Assistant Academic Specialist at Northeastern University. As part of her Gateway Faculty appointment she teaches freshman engineering courses as well as undergraduate civil engineering courses.Dr. B. Kris Jaeger, Northeastern University Beverly Kris Jaeger, PhD has been a member of Northeastern University’s Gateway Team, a select group of full-time faculty
and Students in Transition 11(1): 25–38[6] Anna Zajacova, Scott M. Lynch, and Thomas J. Espenshade. (2005) “Self-Efficacy, Stress, and Academic Success in College.” Research in Higher Education. 46(6).[7] Symonds, W. C., Schwartz, R. B., & Ferguson, R. (2011). “Pathways to Prosperity: Meeting the Challenges of Preparing Young Americans for the 21st Century.” Harvard Graduate School of Education. Boston, MA. http://www.gse.harvard.edu/news_events/features/2011/Pathways_to_Prosperity_Feb2011.pdf[8] L.R.M. Hausmann, J.W. Schofield and R.L. Woods. (2009). “Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and white first-year college students.” Research in Higher Education. 50(7).[9] R.A. Darling
able to: • Define sustainability. • Describe (a) the concept of a life cycle and (b) the various stages of a life cycle as related to assessment of product. • Describe, using examples, the complexity of life cycles even for simple products. • Describe what outcomes might be anticipated if a life cycle approach is not integrated into product design. • Describe the four major phases of a life cycle analysis.The work presented in this paper evaluates the LCA approach in introductory courses that aretaught in two very dissimilar educational environments that use different course structures andlogistics of delivery. The focus of this paper is to evaluate the success of implementing the LCAmodule within these different learning
, 2000.[4] E. Seat, J. R. Parsons, and W. A. Poppen, “Enabling Engineering Performance Skills: A Program to Teach Communication, Leadership, and Teamwork*,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2001.[5] C. D. Grant and B. R. Dickson, “Personal Skills in Chemical Engineering Graduates: The Development of Skills Within Degree Programmes to Meet the Needs of Employers,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–29, Jan. 2006.[6] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Cooperative Learning,” in Active Learning, vol. 970, 0 vols., American Chemical Society, 2007, pp. 34–53.[7] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, 2003.[8] P. M. Boynton and T. Greenhalgh, “Selecting
Students,” Journal of Vocational. Behavior, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 119–33, 1979.2 J. Eccles, T. F. Adler, R. Futterman, S. B. Goff, C. M. Kaczala, J. Meece, and C. Midgley, Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman, 1983.3 C. M. Lewis, K. Yasuhara, & R. E. Anderson, “Deciding to major in computer science: a grounded theory of students' self-assessment of ability,” Seventh international workshop on Computing education research ACM, pp. 3-10, Aug. 2011.4 Martin, J. P., Simmons, D. R., & Yu, S. L. “The role of social capital in the experiences of Hispanic women engineering majors,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol.102, no. 2, pp. 227–243, 20135 N. Al‐Holou, N. M. Bilgutay, C