the student'sresponses to them, ensuring that the findings are viewed through the lens of this vital contextualinformation.Deliverables: The Academic & Career Pathway Project delivered student individual self-reflections and academic and career presentations. These deliverables offered opportunities forstudents to engage in reflective practices, communicate their pathway plans effectively, andreceive constructive feedback from peers and instructors. By completing these tasks, studentsgained valuable insights into their academic and career aspirations and developed essential skillsfor professional development and self-awareness.Self-Reflections: The individual self-reflection objective was to articulate personal insightsgained from the
agile processes. The second activity discussed below highlights principles ofsoftware engineering without requiring students to do any programming. In addition, students areintroduced to humanitarian causes that encourage them to consider how their major cancontribute to social good.Lesson 1: Agile Process ActivityTraditional design processes in engineering and computing follow a sequence of steps. The endgoal of a design process could be a product or it could be a process. The steps to develop theproduct or process using a traditional approach usually start with comprehensive planning to becompleted before proceeding to creation. In contrast, agile design and development utilizesrepeated iterations of a shorter plan-create-test-revise process
, including students, staff, faculty, and alumni • Develop a career plan, including a plan of study that will support that career plan • Develop an awareness of curricular and co-curricular opportunities • Build foundational skills for college success, including self-reflection, study skills, time management, and goal settingHistoric EffortsEngineering Orientation is a long-standing course at ONU, and has long sought to encouragestudents to engage with the college through co- and extra-curricular activities. Historically,students enrolled in engineering orientation were required to attend two professional societymeetings during the semester and report their attendance at these meetings to their faculty viaemail. However, anecdotal
, project management, process improvement, and culturally sustaining pedagogies. She serves as a co-advisor for National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) at Western New England University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 GIFTS: Transforming First-Year Engineering Curriculum with Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Entrepreneurial-Minded Learning Lisa K. Murray Western New England University, Springfield, MA 01119 First Year Program, College of EngineeringAbstractThis Great Ideas For Teaching (and Talking With) Students (GIFTS) paper presents a plan topromote diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI) and
to address poorlyventilated spaces. Guided by weekly lesson plans, students constructed and tested the 20” C-Rboxes using the "Physics Toolbox Sensor Suite" app to record g-Force data to discern vibrationvariations across different fan speeds and measured noise levels at various distances from the fanusing sound meter. Finally, students graphed the results to illustrate sound intensity overdistance. They engaged with real-world experimental data, using Excel to graph aerosolconcentrations with and without the C-R boxes to understand their efficacy in reducingparticulate matter in the air. We donated the C-R boxes from the first two years to local schoolsand community settings. During the third year of the project (Spring 2024), students
) professional development, and 4) personal well-being. Thefirst seminar area, social engagement, is important for first-year students, as belonging to acommunity is critical for developing a sense of belonging and institutional fit [15]. Intentionallybuilding community is particularly important for the persistence of first-generation andunderrepresented racial minorities in the PWI context where they have limited opportunities toengage with diverse peers [6], [16]. The second seminar theme, academic success, supportsstudents’ transition to college and the navigation of the engineering curriculum. These seminarsexpose students to time management skills, course enrollment and degree planning resources,and opportunities to engage with engineering faculty
and a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia. His research interests include geotechnical engineering, column-supported embankments, and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Work in Progress: Developing a Foundational Engineering Course to Improve Students’ Sense of Belonging and Increase DiversityAbstractThis work in progress paper addresses the national imperative to promote involvement inscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields across all ethnicities, races,genders, and economic backgrounds. The United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) developeda Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Strategic Plan in 2021, which includes an objective
program – the support of collegemanagement (dean, associate dean, etc.) and faculty is key to the success of a such a program.As you determine the best way to justify and start up an undergraduate research program, takethis into account, as it may influence your justification plan and could heavily influence whetherthe plan is viable at your institution.Financial Support of an Undergraduate Research ProgramThe financial support of any co-curricular program is very important, and as universityemployees we have an obligation to fund the programs that will best benefit our students. TheSURE Program is currently supported by a combination of funding from the Suzanne and WalterScott Foundation and the CSU Provost; the program was initially supported
leadership position provides uniquepersonal and professional job experience for engineering students interested in advancing theircareer opportunities during their undergraduate program and increasing their employmentmarketability upon graduation.TEL also provides networking opportunities for the lab assistants while developing theirteam-building, collaboration, and project management skills. Lab assistants have the opportunityto step into leadership roles when taking on personal projects within the workplace. Assistantscreate plans and procedures in order to complete a multitude of projects, such as introducing abarcode system to the resource room inventory. These personal projects also improve labassistants’ creativity, planning, and time
, startsfundamental community building, and works on a career plan. Student success is often tied togrit, which includes a growth mindset and an ability to learn from failure. Orientation courses areessential foundational experiences for first-year retention and success, but it is challenging tocultivate a classroom environment where students feel safe sharing ideas and struggles. ThisGIFTS paper will detail the research regarding the benefits of using storybooks with olderstudents, the details (and individual modifications) of the activities done in the orientationcourses and the scenarios for storytelling, plans for future assessment of the classroom exercise,and the conclusions drawn from the faculty reflections.Justification of Picture Books “Picture
, while self-learning and recognizing the need forlifelong learning tied with applying engineering design process skills, each receiving 40% ofresponses. The utilization of appropriate computational tools and coding skills, such as Excel,MATLAB, and Arduinos, received the next most important skill with 34% of responses. Asshown in Figure 1b, the least emphasized skill among first-year students was the use of propercareer planning tools, with only 8% of respondents considering it important. Additionally,presenting ideas using appropriate presentation tools, applying the engineering code of ethics,and conducting a proper literature review were equally valued, with each receivingapproximately 11% of responses.Figure 1a: The first-year top
Excelling Ph.D. Students. He has published his work in various peer-reviewed journals in science and engineering education, including IEEE Transactions on Education, Studies in Educational Evalua- tion, and Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Dr. Lavi is the inventor of the SNAP Method® for structured creative problem-solving (US & UK trademarks).Cong Cong, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDr. Yuan Lai, The Pennsylvania State University Yuan Lai, PhD, is a lecturer in urban science and planning at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His research interests include urban science, urban informatics, and future connections between computer science and cities to address urban socio-technicMr. Justin A. Lavallee
courses that first-year students most frequently identifyas being their hardest class. We suspect that the challenge of the “big three” is not unique toUofA.For this research, we specifically focus on University Chemistry I. The goal of this research is tolook at passing rates of first-semester engineering and computer science students in UniversityChemistry I and the relation between success in this course and other educational factors. Thesefactors include starting math course, incoming high school GPA, student demographics,enrollment in multiple science courses during the first semester, and future chemistryrequirements dependent upon planned engineering major. The data considered in this studyspans from 2007 to 2020.All engineering and
. technical memos h. technical reports4. Do you have any general comments about our writing for introduction to engineering project? (i.e., additional topics, ideas, etc.)Questions 1, 2, and 4 were ‘text-entry’ used to gather open-ended feedback from respondents.Question 3 was ‘rank order’ and was used to determine each respondent’s order of preference forthe list of items. 2Review of Writing AssignmentsIn EGR 110, there are four writing assignments – the Research Paper, the Project Plan, DesignReport 1, and Design Report 2. The intention is that the Research Paper and Project Plan becomethe first two major sections in Design Report 1, and
read something about microelectronics. 2. I have had one or more instructors talk about microelectronics. 3. I have watched a video about microelectronics. 4. I have participated in an activity involving microelectronics. 5. I have taken at least one university class about microelectronics.The scale yielded an alpha coefficient of .83 for the full sample. Each student's ranking acrossthe five questions was totaled (minimum 5, maximum 25).The KAM survey included six Likert scale questions (range 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = stronglyagree) to measure students' motivation to learn more about microelectronics. The questions were: 1. I plan to read about microelectronics. 2. I plan to take a class about microelectronics. 3. I
project spanned 4 weeks and had 4 associated assignments (Table 1). Alldeliverables were team assignments (i.e. 1 per team). The project was introduced in class andteams developed a project management plan. The management plan required teams to plan outtheir communication (e.g. when would they meet, how would they communicate and sharedocuments), list project tasks (breaking into subtasks), and develop a timeline. The rest of theproject was expected to be completed outside of class time. At the end of the second week, anoutline was due from the team summarizing their research findings. The project report and videowere due at the end of the fourth week.In Fall 2023, the project also spanned 4 weeks but included 5 assignments (Table 1). The
strategies for instructional teams. This paper will present a developing conceptualframework that guides these activities, describe each component, present preliminary findings,and discuss potential next steps.Literature ReviewFactors that influence academic successIndividual learning consists of cognitive, metacognitive, and affective components [1] and is asocially-embedded process [2]. Cognitive learning refers to acquiring knowledge at increasinglevels of complexity, as in Bloom’s Taxonomy [3], and is measured through course assessments(e.g., exams). Metacognition refers to awareness and self-assessment of one’s own thinking andabilities [3], and regulation refers to the ability to plan and adjust behaviors accordingly based onthat knowledge [4
within the workload expectations of the course, and balancing the workload ofcommunity partners, the instructional team, and the ability of students to connect with theirproject sponsors are all factors that come into play when evaluating whether such projects areappropriate for a course.This study focuses on describing the planning and development process of implementingcommunity-based service-learning projects into the Foundations of Engineering course at thestudy institution and outlines a plan for evaluating the impact of the projects on students’perceptions of the usefulness of course material, specifically related to those learning outcomesthat instructors have identified as historically difficult for students to appreciate. These
within the major and the university. Students buildskills for success by creating a time management plan, learning how to access universityresources, meeting with their faculty advisor regularly, and developing a plan for success in anupcoming assignment and reflecting on its effectiveness afterwards. Two design projects fosterteamwork and problem-solving skills. Students collaborate in teams to accomplish a predefinedtask, honing their ability to work effectively to deliver a project and communicate results.The purpose of this paper is to describe the course and assignments in detail, present analyses ofstudent retention and engagement, and present faculty and student reflections on the coursecontent and management. We use this information to
, value, andengineering identity. These constructs have been identified as critical to predicting success andcareer plans in engineering fields [5], thus were chosen as the constructs to investigate. Initialdata was gathered using the Engineering Design Expectancy Value Scale (EDVES) [6], and theresults of that survey will be used to inform the development of a focus group protocol.Together, it is hoped that these data will allow for a better understanding of the impact ofauthentic engineering experiences on novice engineers.ContextOhio Northern University (ONU) is a small, private, primarily undergraduate institution. Thereare approximately 700 students enrolled in the college of engineering and approximately 200first-year engineering students
conjunction with other teammembers’ strengths; therefore, students also hypothesize how their own strengths may help andhinder teamwork and how their team members’ strengths may help and hinder teamwork.Project teams are required to complete two projects during the semester, and Phase 2 is assignedbetween those two projects. At this point, teams have a team debrief for roughly 45 minutesduring class time where they systematically give and receive teamwork-related feedback to eachteam member. Students come to class prepared with discussion points and in the proper mindsetto have difficult and respectful discussions. Afterward, students complete an action plan wherethey identify team skills they want to improve and how to work towards that goal
’ assessment of the climatewithin the first-year engineering experience. In this paper, findings from the second year ofpiloting our workshops are described. In this second iteration of training, new teaching assistantsparticipated in our foundational training in GIDBEA, and returning ones built on theirintroductory knowledge to learn about social justice and principles of inclusive leadership. Thedata shows that most of the teaching assistants found the workshop content and activitiesrelevant to them as peer educators. Several teaching assistants shared inclusive leadershipstrategies that they planned to implement in the coming semester. The goal of this study is toinform plans for implementing solutions into training that address deficiencies
the first-year experience.Backward Design and the CAP modelThe backward design of curricular development starts with the basic idea of starting from the end, wherewe envision our students to be after the learning experience we are designing [4]. Its central premise isthat once the educational purposes (i.e., the learning outcomes) of a learning experience areconscientiously selected, the rest of the elements of the experience (i.e., the pedagogical activities, andcorresponding assessments) should be designed toward the achievement of those identified outcomes [5].Therefore, the three main stages of backward design are: (1) identifying desired results, (2) determiningacceptable evidence, and (3) planning learning experiences and instruction
created an introductory journal to support incoming first-year students. The journal incorporated organizational tools, information about the university,and available student resources. The journal’s intention was not only to help students hone theirorganizational skills but also to improve learning, prioritize responsibilities, and assist studentsin allocating time to connect with each other.Project ApproachThroughout the planning stages of the journal, the research team, comprising a faculty member,a staff member, and three undergraduate researchers, considered three main features: ● Provide organizational tools such as weekly calendars to help students track their assignment deadlines and other important dates ● Inspire healthy habits
Fellow at Harvard Medical School at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Dr. Feldman developed informatics metrics to quantify performance of clinicians when using digital diagnostic tools. He has published in Radiology, Academic Radiology, IS&T, SPIE, and RESNA. As a Latino and native Span- ish speaker, born in Peru, Dr. Feldman has created markets and commercialized innovative telemedicine products in Latin America for medical device companies, including Orex Computed Radiography, Kodak Health Group, and ICRco. Dr. Feldman also served as Chief Information Officer (CIO) of Boston Health- care for the Homeless Program where he led the strategic planning and migration to EPIC Electronic Health Records system and
understand the value that this training provides the teaching assistants, a survey wasconducted of participants before and after participation in the workshops. The goal of this studyis to inform plans for implementing solutions into training that address deficiencies identifiedthrough the survey and provide a set of inclusion best practices and learning objectives forinclusivity training for undergraduate teaching assistants. In this paper, findings from the thirdyear of piloting our workshops are described. The data shows that all teaching assistants overallfound that the workshop content and activities were relevant to them as peer educators. Severalteaching assistants shared inclusive leadership strategies that they planned to implement in
ties). Thesecond subsystem is a Costume Shell, which also is made up of a PVC-pipe frame that getscovered with PVC sheeting or cardboard and decorated with paint and other materials to meetthe child’s costume request; e.g., Super Mario Cart, Toy Story 3 Claw Machine, Disney Princess.Tools and materials for planning and fabricating prototype frames and decorating costumes wereavailable for students to use during and after module sessions. Teams were given the Design Brief (see Figure 1) in Week 1, and learned that eachcostume needed at least one electrical and/or mechanical “action component,” which the childhad to be able to manipulate easily and safely. The costume design needed to incorporate safetyfeatures, including alerting passers
fit knownopenings in SSP students’ schedules to ensure availability. Content for SI was planned in weeklymeetings between the peer mentors and the SSP students’ engineering and math instructors. SIsessions lasted two hours and were typically offered four days a week in the fall quarter andthree days a week for the winter and spring quarters. Common session types included: ● Homework/Free Study - Informal open-ended sessions where students met on one floor at the University Library designed for study groups or a classroom in the Engineering building. Peer mentors were in the room to answer questions and guide the SS students when needed but did not actively lead content sessions. This session type was offered once a week
several that integrate the technical andhuman-centered aspects. Human-centered engineering is emerging as a field; for example,Boston College launched a human-centered engineering program and major in the fall of 2021(Hayward, 2020). At most campuses, however, human-centered design and technical knowledgeare taught in independent courses whereas at our school, human-centered design and technicalaspects are holistically interwoven and integrated. We plan to use that same transdisciplinaryapproach for our new HCE pathway courses. What is Human-Centered Engineering (HCE)? People and societal needs are at the heart of HCE, which is a collection of habits, abilities, frameworks, and processes that enable systematic consideration of human needs and
., psychic assumptions reassessment of values and self- 4 Recognition that one’s discontent and the process of reflection transformation are shared and that others have negotiated a similar change 5 Exploration of options for new roles, relationships, and actions 6 Planning of a course of action Affirming & Connecting, i.e., shifted 7 Acquisition of knowledge and skills for perspective that allows one to cope implementing one’s plan with those situations more easily in 8 Provisional trying new roles the future 9 Building competence and self-confidence in new roles