populations: results from the healthy minds study,” Journal of Mental Health, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 205-213, 2018.[3] S. Lipson, S. Zhou, B. Wagner, K. Beck, and D. Eisenberg, “Major Differences: Variations in Undergraduate and Graduate Student Mental Health and Treatment Utilization Across Academic Disciplines,” Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, vol. 30, no. 1, pp.23- 41, 2015.[4] H. Anttila, S. Lindblom-Ylänne, K. Lonka, & K. Pyhältö, “The Added Value of a PhD in Medicine--PhD Students' Perceptions of Acquired Competences,” International Journal of Higher Education, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 172-180, 2015.[5] M. Schmidt and E. Hansson “Doctoral students’ well-being: a literature review
categories:discovery, integration, application, and teaching 1. This is the well-known “Boyer’smodel of scholarship.” Since its inception in 1990, Boyer’s model has been widelydiscussed and debated, and the focus has mainly been on its impact on university faculty,especially their tenure, promotion, and reappointment (TPR) policies 2, 3.However, scholarships are not generated by faculty alone. Our students, especiallygraduate students, are an important integral part of the scholarship. They serve as abackbone of pure research (discovery), a vehicle of implementations (integration andapplication), and a bridge between faculty and the students, graduate and undergraduatesalike (teaching). Their efforts of generating and improving the quality of scholarships
they tend to bemore successful. As one of the mentoring program participants (P1) indicated when asked aboutthe influence of the program on him: [The Mentoring Program and NSBE] allowed me to set more specific goals for myself Page 12.1072.10 b/c I had a better idea of what I was after. Seeing my mentors' community [and] organizational involvement, resumes, and work ethic gave me an excellent model for what I strived to be.Beyond StratusAs mentioned previously, there are numerous programs that contribute to the development ofbonding and bridging social capital in the National Society of Black Engineers. The Table
;T State University’s initial Outstanding Educator’s Award. During his tenure at Northeastern University, he held the ALCOA Chair in Civil Engi- neering and served as professor of civil engineering. He has held positions at Westinghouse Laboratories as Senior Engineer and General Electric Research Laboratories as Research Engineer, where he conducted research into problems in dynamic plasticity and high-pressure physics, respectively. He has served as Chief Scientist for Corporate Research for B&M Technological Services and President of RMS Science and Technology, a research and development firm he owns. Amory’s government experience includes service as a Special Assistant in the U. S. Department of Energy and
T. Hodapp, "Investigating approaches to diversity in a national survey of physics doctoral degree programs: The graduate admissions landscape," Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 020142, 12/29/ 2017.[11] (1/29/2019). 2018-19 Graduate School Handbook of The Ohio State University Graduate School. Available: https://gradsch.osu.edu/handbook[12] C. S. Dweck, Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books, 2006.[13] (1/29/2018). The Ohio State University Graduate School University Fellowship. Available: https://gradsch.osu.edu/pursuing-your-degree/graduate- fellows/university-fellowship[14] CollegeXpress, D. Masciello, B. Sullivan, and H
14.666.9Bibliography 81. G. Crebert, M.Bates, B. Bell,C.J.Patrick & V. Cragnolini, “Developing generic skills at university, during work placement and in employment: graduates' perceptions”, Higher Education Research & Development. Vol. 23, No. 2, May 2004, p. 147-165.2. A. Kameoka, S.W. Collins, L. Meng & M. Hashimoto, “Emerging MOT education in Japan”, Presented at the Engineering Management Conference, 2003. IEMC '03. Managing Technologically Driven Organizations: The Human Side of Innovation and Change, 2-4 Nov. 2003, p 296-300.3. Gunasekara, Chrys S. (2004) The Third Role of Australian Universities in Human Capital Formation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(3). pp
by US college students: 10-year population-level trends (2007–2017),” Psychiatric Services, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 60-63, 2019.[3] A. Martinez & S. Nguyen, “The Impact of COVID-19 on College Student Well-Being,” 2020. Available: https://www.acha.org/documents/ncha/Healthy_Minds_NCHA_COVID_Survey_Report_ FINAL.pdf. [Accessed April 19, 2021].[4] P. LeViness, C. Bershad, K. Gorman, L. Braun, & T. Murray, “The association for university and college counseling center directors annual survey,” Director, pp. 1–146, 2018. Retrieved from http://files.cmcglobal.com/AUCCCD_2013_Monograph_Public.pdf.[5] B. Andrews & J. Wilding, “The relation of depression and anxiety to life-stress and
cognitive sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.25. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.26. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction. Cambridge: Pearson Publishing.27. Merrill, M. D., & Twitchell, D. (1994). Instructional design theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.28. Khan, B. H. (Ed.). (1997). Web-based instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.29. Cook, D. A., Garside, S., Levinson, A. J., Dupras, D. M., & Montori, V. M. (2010). What do we mean by
, “Why Do So Many People Leave Graduate School Without a Ph.D.?,”Chron. High. Educ. Wash., vol. 47, no. 38, p. A10, Jun. 2001.[5] Council of Graduate Schools, “Ph.D. Completion Project.”[6] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence for amental health crisis in graduate education,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 36, pp. 282–284, Mar. 2018.[7] D. J. Satterfield, M. Tsugawa-Nieves, and A. N. Kirn, “WIP: Factors Affecting GraduateSTEM Student Attrition Rates,” p. 4.[8] B. Miller, M. A. Tsugawa, J. N. Chestnut, H. Perkins, C. Cass, and A. Kirn, “TheInfluence of Perceived Identity Fit on Engineering Doctoral Student Motivation andPerformance,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference &
broadobjectives and specific goals previously outlined. Once the funding was secured, the secondaryfacilitator identified and hired the primary facilitator, coordinated advertising efforts andlogistics, and participated in the discussion sessions.Assessment Process and InstrumentsThe facilitators obtained approval for research with human subjects from the MSU’s InstitutionalReview Board. Appendix B includes copies of the pre- and post-experience surveys as well asthe open-ended feedback forms distributed at the end of each discussion session. The facilitatorsalso used observation as a tool to capture qualitative data; this included notes taken during eachsession, notes captured by both watching and participating in the online community forum
from the perspective ofthe graduate students who participated in the program. This exploration draws on a new theoretical framework that integrates possible-selvestheory and self-determination theory1. Using key indicators of this framework, we analyzed blogentries that the two graduate students, or the fellows, wrote while they participated in theprogram. We sought to address the following question: How did the fellowship experience influence the fellows’ conceptions of (a) their possible selves as part of the future professoriate, and (b) how they would reach their professional goals? The following paper is written from multiple perspectives and thus represents multiplevoices. The background and framework
AC 2007-2030: MENTORING OF GRADUATE STUDENTS IN STEM:PERCEPTIONS AND OUTCOMESAmy Wheeless, University of Washington AMY E. WHEELESS is a graduate student at the Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs at the University of Washington and a research assistant at the UW Center for Workforce Development. She will receive her Master’s of Public Administration in 2007.Brianna Blaser, University of Washington BRIANNA BLASER is a PhD candidate in the Women Studies Department at the University of Washington and a research assistant at the UW Center for Workforce Development. She will receive her doctorate degree in 2008.Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington ELIZABETH LITZLER is the Director
mentoring, and our research questions are as follows: 1. How does the formalized and on-the-job training benefit the EGSMs during their tenure as a mentor and beyond? 2. What learning outcomes are enhanced or developed for the mentors through the EGSM program? 3. How does the EGSM program impact the teaching practices, mentoring, and career direction of participants?The survey was adapted from Meizlish and Wright20 and included (a) questions about careerchoices, with respondents in academia providing information about their institutional context andpostsecondary teaching experiences and graduate students sharing their potential career choices;(b) items associated with the value of the GSM training and what they learned
: Economists suggest 20% return on public investment for research andinnovation,” Science Business, June 2017. Retrieved fromhttps://sciencebusiness.net/news/80354/R%26D-pays%3A-Economists-suggest-20%25-return-on-public-investment-for-research-and-innovation.[7] National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). “Doctorate Recipients fromU.S. Universities: 2019,” NSF 21-308. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation, 2020.Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21308/.[8] H. Thiry, S. L. Laursen, and A. B. Hunter, “What experiences help students becomescientists? A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gainsfor STEM undergraduates,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 82, pp. 357-388, 2011.[9
. Retrieved from http://www.geysers.com/history.aspx.4. Harding-Newman, T., J. Morrow, S. Sanyal. Success of Geothermal Wells: A Global Study. International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC, 2013.5. Monastero, F. C. Model for Success: An Overview of Industry-Military Cooperation in the Development of Power Operations at the Coso Geothermal Field in Southern California. The Geothermal Resources Council (GRC) Bulletin. September/October 2002, Pp. 188-194.6. Mateck, B. 2014 Annual U.S. & Global Geothermal Power Production Report. Geothermal Energy Association, 2014.7. Geysers by the Numbers: The Geysers Geothermal Field 2014 Statistics. Calpine Corporation, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.geysers.com
strategy statistically proved that the TAs and students’ performance significantlyimproved. The strategy can be applied to other science and engineering courses. The authors planto extend this strategy to 3 other courses over the next 3 years. The strategy presented in thisstudy may be used at other institutions with appropriate modifications in order to engage ourstudents to learn the laboratory experiments. Page 15.744.6Bibliography 1. Brooks, R., Madjar, A., Miller, W., Takkalapelli, K. “Finite Element Method - A Tool for Learning Highway Design”, 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburg, PA 2. Brooks, R., Ayranci, B., Takkalapelli, K
consistent with recent studies of “How People Learn”(2,3), Here Donovan, Bransford and Pellegrino argue that “To develop competence in anarea of inquiry, students must (a) have a deep foundation of factual knowledge, (b)understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework, and (c) organizeknowledge in ways that facilitate retrieval and application” We argue that our early introduction of literature searching and reading reviewsand original articles centered around a simple hypothesis provides opportunity to initiatefoundation knowledge construction, that the conceptual framework of writing inproposalformat provides a focus for the student to demonstrate “understanding of facts and ideasin the (research) context”, and that the
initiatives, and PhD Completion in Panama, Mexico, Ecuador, Colombia, Puerto Rico, and schools across the United States. Tull is on the board of advisors for the PNW-COSMOS Alliance to increase the number of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) students who complete STEM graduate programs, and is a speaker on ”GRADLab” tour with the National GEM Consortium, giving talks across the US each Saturday morning during the Fall. Tull researched speech technology as former member of the faculty at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She has co-authored several publications on achievement in STEM fields, and is a mentoring consultant for Purdue, Carnegie Mellon, Cornell, and MIT. She co-leads the ”ADVANCE His- panic Women in
contact information (e-mails as well as phone numbers) in case they had anyquestions about the survey itself or their role as participants.Each additional webpage of the survey contained questions on a single topic. This organizationwas adopted in recognition of past literature supporting surveys presented in manageablesections7. Providing further clarity to the respondent, a progress bar was featured on the top ofeach page indicating the percentage of the survey that had been completed.The survey was divided into five sections from A to E. Section A contained the backgroundquestions discussed above. Sections B, C, and D contained questions relating to perceivedacademic concerns in the program. Section B was designed to address the level of
M.A. in Psychological Measurement from Ewha Womans University. Her scholarly trajectory aims to improve education for underserved and un- derchallenged students with impactful research and evidence-based interventions. Longitudinal research methodology is the main area of her expertise, which has enabled her a) to investigate growth trajecto- ries of motivation and career choices; b) to identify opportunity gaps within underserved groups; and c) to evaluate and improve educational interventions in STEM. With the expertise in quantitative research methodology, she is engaged in collaborative research with entrepreneurship education and other interdis- ciplinary programs. American
and Environmental Engineering, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-6603 Page 11.268.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Benefits and Challenges of Training Teaching AssistantsAbstractGraduate teaching assistants (TAs) contribute significantly to laboratory instruction,grading, and, to a lesser extent, classroom instruction in undergraduate engineeringeducation. However, many universities/colleges do not offer formal training forengineering TAs and, instead, rely on generalized workshops and orientations offered bythe University or Graduate School. While these workshops are beneficial to
: Benchmarking quality," 2014 InternationalConference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), Dubai, 2014, pp. 1079-1086.[5] J.V. Boettcher and & R.M. Conrad, The Online Teaching Survival Guide: Simple andPractical Pedagogical Tips. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.[6] S. Krause, D. Baker, A.R. Carberry, T.L. Alford, C. Ankeny. M. Koretsky, B. Brooks, C.Waters, B. Gibbons, M. Maass, and C. Chan, “Characterizing and Addressing Student LearningIssues and Misconceptions (SLIM) with Muddiest Point Reflections and Fast FormativeFeedback,” in 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of EngineeringEducation 2014, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June15-18, 2014, pp. 24.273.1 - 24.273.18.[7] A. Chickering and Z. Gamson, Applying the
direct-pathway and returning engineering graduate students. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.11. Mosyjowski, E. A., Daly, S.R., Peters D.L., Skerlos, S.J., & Baker, A. B. (2014). The PhD advising relationship: Needs of returning and direct-pathway students. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. Page 26.859.7
all of the written comments of the students on thesustainability and ethical issues on specific problems such as High Occupancy Vehicles,Walking and Cycling Path Improvements, Speed Reductions and Traffic Calming, TrafficDemand Management Strategies, Access Management Programs, Global Society, BusinessPerspectives, People’s Nature and Values were not only positive but also demonstrated theirimprovement of the knowledge on providing solutions to the problems.Bibliography 1. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/01/24/us/politics/state-of-the-union-2012-video-transcript.html 2. Obama, B. (2011). State of the Union Address, Washington, D C. January, 25. 3. Saheen S., Wright J., Dick D., and Novick L (2000). CarLink - A Smart
; Saribas, D. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ competence to design an inquiry based lab lesson. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4255-4259.28. Hollins, E. R. (1993). Assessing teacher competence for diverse populations. Theory into Practice, 32(2), 93- 99.29. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.30. The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (2001). Reinventing undergraduate education: Three years after the Boyer Report. New York: Stony Brook University: Office of the President. Retrieved from http://dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu/bitstream/handle/1951/26013/Reinventing
faculty worked with these graduate studentsboth in Master and Ph.D. level. Several studies on the relationship between graduate student andtheir advisors have been conducted in the past. These studies are concerned with various issuesaffecting the mentoring relationship. However, there has never been a study on this mentoringrelationship specifically at Purdue University. This project is a study of the mentor relationship between mentor and mentee, or facultyand graduate students at Purdue University. Graduate students were invited to participate in thesurvey through email. The survey was conducted online anonymously. This study consists ofquantitative and qualitative analysis. The existing mentoring relationships are identified in orderto
engineeringtechnology program must demonstrate that graduates have: a. an appropriate mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills and modern tools of their disciplines, b. an ability to apply current knowledge and adapt to emerging applications of mathematics, science, engineering and technology, c. an ability to conduct, analyze and interpret experiments and apply experimental results to improve processes, d. an ability to apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes appropriate to program objectives, e. an ability to function effectively on teams, f. an ability to identify, analyze and solve technical problems, g. an ability to communicate effectively, h. a
the STEM Workforce, A Companion to Science and Engineering Indicators 2014, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB- 2015-10).[3] Wendler, C., B. Bridgeman, F. Cline, C. Millet, J. Rock, N. Bell & P. McAllister. 2010. The Path Forward: The Future of Graduate Education in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.[4] Hancock, S. & Walsh, E. 2016. Beyond knowledge and skills: Rethinking the development of professional identity during the STEM doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 37-50.[5] Litalien, D. & F. Guay. 2015. Dropout intention in Ph.D. studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources
(163), 77-87. doi:10.1002/he.200674. Merolla, D. d., & Serpe, R. T. (2013). STEM enrich ment programs and graduate sch ool matriculation: the role o fscience identity salience. Social Psychology Of Education, 16(4), 575 -597. doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9233-75. Myers, C. B., & Pavel, D. M. (2011). Underrepresented students in STEM : The transition fro m undergraduate tograduate programs. Journal Of Diversity In Higher Education, 4(2), 90 -105. doi:10.1037/a00216796. National Science Board. (2015). Revisiting the STEM workforce. A co mpanion to science and engineeringindicators 2014 (1-46). Arlington VA: National Science Foundation.http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsb201510/nsb201510.pdf7. National Science Board. 2014. Science and Engineering
and N. Hewitt, Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates leave the Sciences,13. Sant. A. Santiago and M. Einarson, The graduate experience in engineering and the physical sciences:gender and ethnic differences in initial expectations and departmental incorporation, American EducationalResearch Association Annual Meeting, New York, April 1996.14. R.M. Marra, K.A. Rodgers, C. Shen, and B. Bogue, Women engineering students and self-efficacy: a multi-year,multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy, Journal of Engineering Education 98 (1), January2009, 27-38.15. C.M. Golde and T.M. Dore, At cross purposes: what the experiences of doctoral students reveal aboutdoctoral education, A report prepared for The Pew Charitable