, “Engineering Identity,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, 1st ed., A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 2014. Accessed: Sep. 01, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781139013451/type/book[5] A. Godwin, G. Potvin, Z. Hazari, and R. Lock, “Identity, Critical Agency, and Engineering: An Affective Model for Predicting Engineering as a Career Choice,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 312–340, 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20118.[6] M. V. Svyantek, R. L. Kajfez, and L. D. McNair, “Teaching vs. Research: An Approach to Understanding Graduate Students’ Roles through ePortfolio Reflection.,” International Journal of ePortfolio, vol
only to fulfill theresponsibilities of early career positions, but also to navigate potential career transitions. Futureefforts can build on this success by continuously refining the program to ensure that developmentof teaching, facilitation, and sociotechnical engineering & design skills are strategically alignedwith potential future career opportunities.ReferencesAgarwal, J., Bucks, G., & Murphy, T. J. (2020). A literature synthesis of professionaldevelopment programs providing pedagogical training to STEM graduate students. In 2020 IEEEFrontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274036Amadei, B. and Wallace, W. A. (2009). Engineering for humanitarian development. IEEETechnology and
forsharing pedagogical ideas and tools to enhance student learning. A special thank you to Dr. JohnEstell for encouraging her to attend FYEE, where she met Laura who introduced her to Dr. Ureel.She is forever grateful and thankful for them for the journey.Laura Albrant also wishes to thank everyone listed above, especially Dr. Albers & Dr. Ureel. Theirguidance has been truly life-enhancing.References [1] R. M. Felder, B. A. Soloman, et al., “Learning styles and strategies,” 2000. [2] S. D. Price, J. L. Callahan, and R. J. Cox, “Psychometric investigation of competency bench- marks.,” Training and Education in Professional Psychology, vol. 11, pp. 128–139, Aug. 2017. [3] Michigan Technological University Department of Psychology &
conceptualization aboutquality in Eng Ed PhD programs [7], [8], [9],[11].A semi-structured interview protocol was constructed for the overarching research project fromwhich this study originated. Participant responses to the following excerpt of prompts were usedas data sources for this study: A) Program Leadership Tell me a little about what you do as an engineering education program director and/or developer … what does a day or month look like? B) Engineering Education – As a field of study 1) So, changing gears a little here: tell me how you define the field of engineering education? b) Possible probe: Tell me a little about the relationship between engineering and engineering education
Paper ID #47919Understanding How Skill Development During Graduate School Can PrepareStudents for Engineering Industry Career PathwaysParker Boggs, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityDr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Chief of Strategy in the College of Engineering and Special Assistant to the Provost. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, and
and PhD in STEM Education from the University of Texas at Austin.Dr. David B. Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Special Assistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation in the College of Engineering. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, and considers the intersection between policy and organizational contexts. Knight currently serves as the co-Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Engineering Education.Dr. Maura Borrego, University of Texas at Austin
develop theirpedagogical and entrepreneurial mindsets.Reference[1] H. H. Choi, Y. W. Chen, A. M. Beckman, L. Anderson, B. E. Johnson, M. D. Goodman, C. Migotsky, and N. Johnson-Glauch, “Integrative Engineering Leadership Initiative for Teaching Excellence (iELITE),” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., Salt Lake City, UT, USA, Jun. 2018. doi: 10.18260/1-2--30696.[2] Y. W. Chen, H. H. Choi, B. E. Johnson, M. A. Beckman, and L. Anderson, “Board 85: Integrated Engineering Leadership Initiative for Teaching Excellence (iELITE) Year Two: Assessment of Intermediate-Term Outcome for Graduate Teaching Assistant Training,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., Tampa, FL, USA, Jun. 2019. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32445.[3] H. H. Choi, S
engineering doctoral education: Experiences of students with minoritized sexual identities. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association; Denver, CO.[5] Ehrhart, M. G., Schneider, B., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational Climate and Culture: An Introduction to Theory, Research, and Practice. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315857664[6] Ehrhart, M., & Schneider, B. (2016). Organizational climate and culture. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.[7] Schneider, B., & Barbera, K. M. (2014). The Oxford handbook of organizational climate and culture. Cheltenham, UK: Oxford University Press.[8] Hurtado, S., Milem, J. F., Clayton-Pedersen, A. R., & Allen, W. R
Paper ID #42829Development of a Climate Survey for Engineering Doctoral Students from anIntersectional Approach: First-Round Validity EvidenceDr. So Yoon Yoon, University of Cincinnati Dr. So Yoon Yoon is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering and Computing Education in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Cincinnati, OH, USA. Dr. Yoon received her Ph.D. in Gifted Education, and an M.S.Ed. in Research Methods and Measurement with a specialization in Educational Psychology, both from Purdue University, IN, USA. She also holds an M.S. in Astronomy and Astrophysics and a B.S
] Wyatt, T. W., & Oswalt, S. B. (2013). Comparing mental health issues among undergraduate and graduate students. American Journal of Health Education, 44(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2013.764248[16] Godfrey, E., & Parker, L. (2010). Mapping the Cultural Landscape in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 5–22.[17] Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Sage.[18] Jack, O., Chase, E., & Warwick, I. (2019). Higher education as a space for promoting the psychosocial well-being of refugee students. Health Education Journal, 78(1), 51–66.[19] Reid, J. W. (2020). Biology graduate students’ perceptions
education as a distinctdiscipline and b) its range of disciplinary intersections across the engineering domains mean thatthe discipline’s knowledge systems, values, and conventions for communication warrantseparate examination and attention. Further, the corresponding move to house engineeringeducation researchers and their work in departments and centers outside of “education” (e.g.,within a College of Engineering) signals institutional shifts in how EER work is perceived andvalued in the university.Within this broader disciplinary landscape, we narrow the focus to demonstrate how the positionof technical communication pedagogy and instruction in engineering education functions in aPhD program. Though the relationship between technical
, doi: 10.1007/s40299-018-0400-7.[17] K. E. Brinkley-Etzkorn, “Learning to teach online: Measuring the influence offaculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens,” InternetHigh Educ, vol. 38, pp. 28–35, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.004.[18] B. Bos, “Professional development for elementary teachers using TPACK,”Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 167–183,2011.[19] Y. W. Chen, B. E. Johnson, M. Pool, S. Shehab, and B. Johnson, “Engagement inPractice: Toward Building University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign’s Multi-Disciplinary Service-Learning Ecosystem,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, 2022.[20] G. E. Gardner and M. G. Jones, “Pedagogical
. 2217640 through a wider initiative and acenter for transforming graduate engineering education. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.REFERENCESArtiles, M. S., Knight, D. B., & Matusovich, H. M. (2023). Doctoral advisor selection processes in science, math, and engineering programs in the United States. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 1-16.Boyce, A. S. (2021). Strategies for mentoring and advising evaluation graduate students of color. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 35(3), 350-362.Bryson, T., Kowalske, M., Wilkins-Yel, K., & Housh, K. (2023). The
Paper ID #38229Engineering graduate students’ perceptions of challenges and stressors:A comparison of master’s vs. doctoral students and domestic vs.international studentsDr. Eunsil Lee, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Eunsil Lee is an assistant professor at University at Buffalo in the Department of Engineering Education. She received a B.S. and M.S. in Clothing and Textiles from Yonsei University (South Korea) with the concentration area of Nanomaterials and Biomaterials in Textiles. She began her Ph.D. study in Textile Engineering but shifted her path toward Engineering Education, earning her Ph.D
Paper ID #43481”How You Got Me Messed Up”: A Critical Analysis of Doctoral EngineeringEducation through the Lens of Black PhD CandidatesMrs. Crystal Alicia Nattoo, Stanford University Crystal Nattoo (she/her) is a first-generation college student from South Florida. She graduated with her bachelors from the University of Miami in 2019 as an Electrical Engineering (EE) major and Graphic Design minor. She then received her EE M.S. degree at Stanford University in 2021, and is currently continuing in the EE Ph.D program. Her current research focuses on the fabrication and characterization of flexible sensors and circuits using
students. He is an advocate for DEI&B as well as graduate student well-being.Dr. Grace Gowdy Dr. Gowdy is an Assistant Professor at North Carolina A&Tˆa C™s Department of Social Work & Soci- ology. Dr. Gowdy currently works on multiple studies examining how formal and informal mentoring relationships can support educational outcomes for histoShea Bigsby, Dr. Shea Bigsby is the Coordinator of Graduate Writing Services in the Graduate College at North Car- olina A&T State University. In this position, he develops resources and conducts workshops to help graduate students improve their writing skills and complete thesis/dissertation formatting and submission requirements. He also develops programming
/participation, b) weekly auto-gradedhomework, c) team cases, d) take-at-home midterm exam (also referred to as exam 1), and e)proctored final exam (also referred to as exam 2). These assignments are explained below.Attendance/ParticipationThe in-person sections of the course are offered weekly in the evenings. Students’ attendance inclass is monitored and recorded by faculty but class discussion/participation is not tracked norgraded. Online sections have a graded discussion requirement. Faculty of online sections track,and grade student participation based on quality and quantity of their interaction in coursediscussion area. The online discussion grade is subject to variation in instructor’s assessment andexpectations across faculty; hence it will be
the success of this project.References 1. V. L. Baker and K. A. Griffin, “Beyond mentoring and advising: Toward understanding the role of faculty ‘developers’ in student success.,” About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 2–8, 2010. 2. K. M. Thomas, L. A. Willis, and J. Davis, “Mentoring minority graduate students: Issues and strategies for institutions, faculty, and students,” Equal Opportunities International, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 178–192, 2007. 3. L. F. Alcocer and A. Martinez, “Mentoring hispanic students: A literature review,” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 393–401, 2017. 4. I. Villanueva, L. Gelles, M. Di Stefano, B. Smith, R. Tull, S. Lord, L
Paper ID #39105Future GR.A.D.S. (Graduate & Advanced Degree Students); A MentoringProgram to Support Undergraduate Hispanic Seniors through the GraduateSchool Application Process.Susan Arnold Christian Susan Arnold Christian currently serves the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers as a Manager for the Research & Innovation office. She helps lead the MentorSHPE and InternSHPE programs in this role. In her former roles she has served as the Assistant Director for the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED) at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, VA from 2010-2020. Prior to joining Virginia Tech in
their development offive skills, where a grade of ‘F’ is 1 point, and a grade of ‘A’ is 5 points. These five skills areCommunication with audiences from different academic disciplines and the public,Understanding FEW stakeholders, Identify potential research partnerships, Interdisciplinaryteamwork, Understand potential career pathways: government, academia, industry. Then wecalculated mean student rating for each skill. Figure 1 offers a summative depiction of studentratings for how well the NRT program supported development of the five skills. All cohorts ratedthe NRT program similarly for each skill, with a grade at or near 4.0, which is a ‘B.'Figure 1: Students gave the NRT a grade for how well the NRT program supported trainees’development
Paper ID #46058Forward Fellows: An extended onboarding program to foster a sense of belongingand research self-efficacy in incoming graduate studentsDr. Anne Lynn Gillian-Daniel, University of Wisconsin - Madison Anne Lynn Gillian-Daniel has been the Education Director for the Wisconsin Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) since 2012 and the Wisconsin Education lead for the Wisconsin-Puerto Rico Partnership in Research and Education and Materials (WiPR2EM) since 2017. In these roles, Anne Lynn collaborates with researchers to broaden participation of historically underrepresented groups in materials
[1] G. A. Garcia, A.-M. Núñez, and V. A. Sansone, “Toward a Multidimensional ConceptualFramework for Understanding ‘Servingness’ in Hispanic-Serving Institutions: A Synthesis of theResearch,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 745–784, Oct. 2019, doi:10.3102/0034654319864591.[2] J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. M. Nicholls, and R. Ormston, Eds., Qualitative research practice:a guide for social science students and researchers, 2. ed. Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage, 2013.[3] A. Srivastava and S. B. Thomson, “Framework Analysis: A Qualitative Methodology forApplied Policy Research,” Journal of Administration & Governance, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 72–79,2009.[4] N. K. Gale, G. Heath, E. Cameron, S. Rashid, and S. Redwood, “Using
Paper ID #39783What If They Choose: Surfacing Insights Associated with a Pedagogy forDoctoral EducationDr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co-director of the
/docview/2522431819.[5] M. Caskey, D. Stevens, and M. Yeo. “Examining doctoral student development of a researcher identity: Using the draw a researcher test,” Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, 2020. Available: http://impactinged.pitt.edu/ojs/ImpactingEd/article/view/92.[6] L. Hall and L. Burns. “Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education,” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 49-70, 2009. Available: https://meridian.allenpress.com/her/article-abstract/79/1/49/31955/Identity-Development- and-Mentoring-in-Doctoral.[7] C. Cass, A. Kirn, M. A. Tsugawa-Nieves, H. L. Perkins, M. Bahnson, R. Mills, and A. B. Parker. “Board 18: Engineering Doctoral Students
] B. E. Lovitts, “Who Is Responsible for Graduate Student Attrition--The Individual or the Institution? Toward an Explanation of the High and Persistent Rate of Attrition,” Apr. 1996. Accessed: Mar. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED399878[2] National Science Foundation, “Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering (GSS) 2022,” Fall 2022. Accessed: Mar. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/surveys/graduate-students-postdoctorates-s-e/2022[3] N. Sellami, B. Toven-Lindsey, M. Levis-Fitzgerald, P. H. Barber, and T. Hasson, “A Unique and Scalable Model for Increasing Research Engagement, STEM Persistence, and Entry into Doctoral Programs,” CBE—Life Sci
Paper ID #48603Utilizing Project Management Principles to Administer a Graduate EngineeringRecruitment InitiativeDr. Colleen L. Coulter, Purdue University College of Engineering Dr. Colleen Coulter serves as the Assistant Director of Graduate Recruitment for Purdue University’s College of Engineering. She previously spent nearly 15 years at Purdue University West Lafayette leading innovations in recruitment, admissions, retention, and curricular design for interdisciplinary graduate programs. As a national expert in graduate recruitment, Dr. Coulter served as the inaugural president and founder of the Midwestern Association
Paper ID #38569Developing Engineer Systems Competencies with a Nexus of Engineering,Law, and PolicyMrs. Sandra Allain, Pennsylvania State University Professor of Practice in the School of Engineering Design and Innovation in the College of Engineering at Penn State, Lecturer in Law at Penn State Law, and an affiliate of the School of International Affairs and the Sustainability Institute at Penn State. Inaugural Director of the Law, Policy, and Engineering initiative - LPE, and the Design, Justice, and Sustainable Development Lab - DJSD. Over 15 years experience as a practicing attorney in intellectual property and
Paper ID #37227Why a PhD? An exercise with LEGO®. Using novel communication tools toexpress multilevel complex messagesProf. Carmen Torres-Sanchez CEng MEng PhD PGCert FHEA MIMechE, Loughborough University Carmen Torres-Sanchez is a Professor of Multifunctional Materials Manufacturing at Loughborough Uni- versity, England, United Kingdom, and the Executive Director of the Centre of Doctoral Training in Em- bedded Intelligence (CDT-EI). She is the architect of the novel Doctoral Transition Zone(TM) Training ethos. She has been working in industry-informed, academically-led education for more than 15 years. Her research
Paper ID #39418Engineering doctoral student retention and persistence from anorganizational climate and intersectional perspective: A targeted reviewof engineering education literatureDr. Julie Aldridge, The Ohio State University My background and research interests are in organizational change, innovation, and leadership. My cur- rent work focuses on organizational climate to better support the retention of engineering doctoral students from diverse groups to degree completion.Dr. Nicole M. Else-Quest, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Nicole M. Else-Quest is Associate Professor and Associate Chair of Women’s and
Paper ID #38901Student-led program to improve equity in Ph.D. oral qualifying examsMeredith Leigh Hooper, California Institute of Technology This author was an equal first author contributor to this work. Meredith Hooper is an Aeronautics PhD student studying under Professor Mory Gharib in the Graduate Aerospace Laboratories of the California Institute of Technology (GALCIT). Meredith is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, leader within the GALCIT Graduate Student Council, and Co-Director of the Caltech Project for Effective Teaching (CPET). Her PhD research uses a combination of machine learning and