, other students reported “It was a good course, and the robotswere pretty fun. The simulation of a part being cut and watching it in real time was awesome.”Another student said, “The concept of this course was very interesting and can be applied toplenty of real-life applications.”Final course grade data indicate that all students enrolled in the IRAM courses earned passinggrades. Final average grades were in the B range, approximately 79.5%. Three students earnedA’s in IEGR 488; two students earned A’s in IEGR 470; and one student earned an A in IEGR468. Figure 3 displays the distribution of final grades for each course.Goal 3 - Assessing educational impact with mini-module laboratory projects for problemsolving.The review of course syllabi
9design we w used the Bernd B Bruegg ge and Allenn H. Dutoit Design Lifee Cycle Moddel. Later in 22005we used an incremen ntal design an nd developm ment processs, which allow ws for moree flexibility wwhenneeded as well as forr parallel dev velopment frrom various sub-groups which was eessential to ttheteam. Ou ur incrementaal design floow followed many sequeential ‘Validaation V’ dessigns which tthengave it a ‘W’ formatiion which reepresents thee synchronizaation of mulltiple teams w workingtogether. The team fo ound that thee ‘W’ paradiigm works e xceedingly w well for the level ofmodulariity they weree using. Desiign paradigm ms are generrally taught iin systems enngineeringcourses however
referenced assessments 17, 23. Authors Wiggins and McTighe24, asone example, recommend a “backward design” framework for designing assessment methodsand learning experiences based on the desired learning outcomes. For interdisciplinaryteamwork, in this case, sub-outcomes could be utilized. One IGERT proposal, for instance,subdivided the teamwork and professionalism learning outcome into “(a) an understanding ofgroup dynamics associated with leadership, membership, and peer to peer interactions, (b) theability to listen, give, and receive feedback, (c) ability to set appropriate goals, milestones, anddivision of labor”3. By considering these learning objectives during the course design phase,faculty can avoid utilizing methods that do not provide a
engineering, the workdoes provide insight into what is important in the discipline and can serve as a guide toundergraduate curriculum developersBackgroundGRCSE is built on an holistic interpretation of curriculum as concerning the total context inwhich education is provided, and as such the recommendations address five primary areas of asystems engineering program:5 1) student entrance expectations; 2) a curriculum architecture comprised of: a. preparatory material, b. a core body of systems engineering knowledge (the CorBoK), c. domain or program-specific knowledge, and d. a capstone experience; 3) outcomes every graduate should achieve; 4) objectives every graduate should achieve three to five years
the IE EE class A. The instructor knowing student names in the Class B. Starting Every Class with Announcements/Questions C. Knowing all upcoming events from ANGEL Calendar D. Knowing the Topics to Study for all Exams and Quizzes E. Knowing Your Grades at all times on ANGEL F. Having a 1 class Quiz or Case Study Grade Return Policy and 1 Week Exam Grade Return PolicyThe average results for the three semesters of the IE EE class are shown in Figure 1 below: Importance for your Course Satisfaction (IE EE) The instructor knowing your Name Starting Every Class with Announcements/Questions Knowing all upcoming events from Angel Calendar Knowing the Topics to Study for all Exams and
partnershipwith academic associates in India and abroad. We believe that this approach will providesustainable competitive advantage in a VUCA world.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the sponsor, and core team members of the basic and advancedprogram for their commitment and contribution to evolve the CoP, and the reviewers for theirmany helpful comments toward improving this paper.References[1] E. Wenger and B. Wenger-Trayner, “Communities of practice: a brief introduction,” Scholar's bank, University of Oregon, 15 April 2015. [Online]. Available: https://wenger- trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/. [Accessed 14th January 2020].[2] E. C. Wenger and W. M. Snyder, “Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier
)] Criterion 3. (b) Criterion 3. (d) Criterion 3. (h) Criterion 3. (k) Criterion 3. (a
industrial engineering. b An ability to select and apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to problems that require the application of principles and applied procedures or methodologies. c An ability to conduct standard tests and measurements; to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments, and to apply experimental results to improve processes. d An ability to apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes appropriate to the program objectives. e An ability to function effectively as a member or leader on a
categorized into three categories with four to seven specifictypes of technology included for each category:(1) Seating and Room Layout a. Lecture style seating arrangement b. Group tables arrangement c. Pods or node chairs d. Web-based learning – partial face-to-face e. Web-based learning – completely online(2) Boards & Projection Page 23.541.2 a. Chalkboards b. White boards c. Computer projection w/ instructor notes d. Document Camera(3) Video and Lecture Capture. a. Mobile computing: handhelds, Smartphones, tablet PCs, laptops, + b. Fixed Lab Computing c. Video capture
capability analysis, measurement systemanalysis, specification and tolerances, and acceptance sampling plans. Students typically take thiscourse in the second year of their masters program. The course learning outcomes are (a) Defineconcepts in quality and quality management; (b) Apply statistical tools in analysis andapplication of Statistical Process Control; (c) Produce and employ control charts; (d) Explainsampling process; and (e) Design acceptance sampling procedures for quality control.The course work and activities typically include a term paper, a term project, homework, in classexercises and discussions, quizzes and two exams (midterm and final). During the study periodthe author added the library training and a factory visit to the class
students enrolled in the following two existingundergraduate manufacturing courses: (1) Industrial Robotics and Automation and (2) AdvancedMaterial Handling Systems. An array of assignments and projects will be assigned andfacilitated to allow a framework of design that can be researched and presented in these subjectareas.In the Industrial Robotics and Automation course, students are exposed to topics including (a)robot geometry; (b) robot motion and drive systems; (c) motion control, performancespecifications, and precision of movement; (d) robot tooling, sensors and sensing capability; (e)designing for automation process stabilization; and (f) control systems and industrial logic.These topics deal with the study, programmability, and general
, Engineering, and Technology (SME&T)”, NSF 96-139.11. Jamieson, L.H., “At Purdue, Engineering Looks to Future,” The Indianapolis Star, (March 16), 2009.12. Christakis, D. A., Ebel, B. E., Rivara, F.P., and Zimmerman, F. J., “Television, Video, and Computer Game Usage in Children Under 11 Years of Age,” The Journal of Pediatrics 145(5), pp. 652-656, 2005.13. Hunley, S. A., Evans, J. H., Delgado-Hachey, M., Krise, J., Rich, T., and Schell, C., “Adolescent computer Use and Academic Achievement,” Adolescence, vol. 40, Issue 158, pp. 307-318, 2005.14. Pence, H. E., “Preparing for the Real Web Generation,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 347-356, 2007.15. Freitas, S., and Oliver, M., “How Can
Fellowshipprogram and the John Deere Foundation for providing the funding necessary to implement andassess this new pedagogy in an industrial engineering curriculum.References[1] http://strategicplan.iastate.edu/, [Accessed 04JAN17].[2] L. Potter and D. Popejoy-Sheriff, “Comparing Assistantship vs. Course-Based ResearchOpportunities,” Proceedings of the 2017 ISERC, 2017, Pittsburgh, PA.[3] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering By The Numbers,” https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles, [Accessed 05FEB18].[4] S. R. Daly, C. Finelli, A. B. Al-Khafaji, and M. J. Neubauer, “Student Perspectives ofFaculty Classroom Practices,” 2012 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2012, San Antonio,TX.[5] D. Lopatto, “Science in Solution: The Impact of
the next section was conducted on this dataset of 32 complete responses.Findings and DiscussionTable 1 summarizes the data we obtained from the BFI. Tables 2.a and 2.b present the summaryof the data we obtained from the SSCS and the CMS. Recall that creative self-efficacy (CSE) is ameasure of one’s belief that they can be creative, whereas creative personal identity (CPI) is ameasure of one’s belief that they are creative. Also recall that fixed mindset represents a view thatcreativity is innate whereas growth mindset represents a view that creativity is something that cangrow and develop overtime. These four constructs together are used to assess the impact of DTSDtraining. Summer 2019 Summer 2019
water tower apparatus must be easily drainable 7 Power input must be typical 110 V 8 Device must be fully automatedEach team was allocated a role and a set of responsibilities, viz: 1) Integrating Contractor Team a. Acts as the Project Manager for the project b. Acts as budget officer c. Assures an adequate amount of energy available and characterizes flow d. Determines timeline, tracks progress e. Assembles integration specifications from each team f. Writes final report 2) Sensor Design Team a. Responsible for sensor, pump, & shut-off system specification and design b. Computer interface and readout, coding and formatting c
). Nurturing affinity spaces and game-based learning. In C. Steinkuehler, K. Squire & S. Barab (Eds.), Games, Learning, and Society: Learning and Meaning in the Digital Age (pp. 123-153). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Grohs, J. R., Maczka, D. K., Soledad, M., & Bagalkotkar, K. K. (2016). Exploring the Feasibility of an Educational Computer Game as a Novel Means of Assessing Problem Solving Competencies. Paper presented at the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Now Orleans, LA.Hazelrigg, G. A. (1998). A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(4), 653-658. doi: 10.1115/1.2829328Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011). Situated Engineering
. and L. Sharp (Ed.), User-Friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations, NSF Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Division of Research, Evaluation, and Communication, 1997.(6) Hayes, R. and D. Upton, “Operations-Based Strategy”, California Management Review, 40(4), 1998, 8-25.(7) Hackett, G., N. E. Getz, J. M. Casas, I.A. Rocha-Singh, “Gender, Ethnicity, and Social Cognitive Factors Predicting the Academic Achievement of Students in Engineering”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(4), 527-538, 1992.(8) Krathwohl, D. R., “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview”, Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218, 2002.(9) Leydens, J. A., B. M. Moskal, and M. J. Pavelich, “Qualitative Methods Used in the Assessment of Engineering
toquality control from a prerequisite structure (i.e., a terminating course in a student’s curriculumplan that is routinely taken by sophomores, juniors, and seniors).Acknowledgement:The authors would like to acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions of the reviewers.Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Department of Defense, orthe U.S. Government.Bibliography 1. Klingbeil, N. W., Mercer, R. E., Rattan, K. S., Raymer, M. L., & Reynolds, D. B. (2006, April). The WSU model for engineering mathematics education: Student performance, perception and retention in year one. In Proceedings 2006 ASEE
: http://dx.doi.org/10.12753/2066-026X-20-160.[14] D. Penkauskienė, A. Railienė, and G. Cruz, “How is critical thinking valued by the labour market? Employer perspectives from different European countries,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 804–815, 2019, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1586323.[15] A. Ahern, C. Dominguez, C. McNally, J. J. O’Sullivan, and D. Pedrosa, “A literature review of critical thinking in engineering education,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 816–828, 2019, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1586325.[16] B. G. Davis, Tools for teaching. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
., “Efficacy of Using a Single, Non-Technical Variable to Predict the Academic Success of Freshmen Engineering Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2003, Vol. 92, pp. 41-48.4. French, B., Immekus, J., and Oakes, W., “An Examination Of Indicators Of Engineering Students’ Success And Persistence,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2005, pp.419-422.5. Zhang, G., Anderson, T.J. , Ohland, M.W., and Thorndyke, B.R., “Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation: A Longitudinal and Cross-Institutional Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, 2004, pp. 313–320.6. Lam, P., Doverspike, D., Mawasha, R., “Predicting Success In A Minority Engineering Program,” Journal Of Engineering Education, Vol
2006-2632: A MATHEMATICAL MODEL TO IDENTIFY PRE-TURNOVERMINDSET IN SOPHOMORE STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITYErick Jones, University of Nebraska-LincolnAnn Koopman, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Page 11.66.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 “Measuring STEM Attrition in an Engineering College” Erick C. Jones, Ph.D. Ann Koopman Industrial and Management Systems Engineering Department University of Nebraska LincolnABSTRACT Academic institutions seek to understand why Science, Technology, Engineering and Math(STEM) students are leaving
Pre-Phase A Phase A Phase B Phase C Phase D Design Problem System Level Parameter Level Optimized Fabrication, Assembly, Analysis
responded to the survey call and those who participated in focus groups;your thoughts were invaluable, and your openness appreciated. Thank you to the MontanaEngineering Education Research Center and NACOE Offices for help with dissemination of thesurvey. References[1] B. Boquet and N. Lerner, "Introduction to ATD Special Issue on WAC and high-impact practices," Across the Disciplines, vol. 13, no. 4, 2016.[2] "Writing Across the Curriculum: An Introduction," in Purdue Online Writing Lab, ed, 2017.[3] M. Eodice, A. E. Geller, and N. Lerner, The Meaningful Writing Project. Boulder: Utah State University Press, 2016.[4] "NSF Statistics," Bachelor's degrees awarded, by citizenship, ethnicity, race, sex, and field
, and 3) Assessment of specific learningoutcomes. 1) Demographic information (First & Last Name, Email, Student ID, Term Course Taken) 2) Assessment of Learning Experience a. The simulation project overall positively impacted my practical simulation modeling knowledge and understanding. b. The simulation project overall positively impacted my practical simulation modeling skills. 6 c. The simulation project positively contributed to my engagement with simualtion course. d. I find the simulation project positively contributing to my career objectives. 3) How
: 0.01 b. Calculate the probability that a wax block will either crumble away OR melt too fast when it is put to use. c. You have been told that a particular wax block was not Usable, but not the reason that it was unusable. Calculate the (conditional) probability that the wax block melted too fast (given that it was unusable). d. Calculate the following three probabilities: the probability that a wax block will Page 23.93.6 crumble away given that it was made by shift one, the probability that a wax block will melt too fast given that it was made by
AC 2007-691: A DEPARTMENTAL REFORM STRATEGY AND THE RESULTANTNATIONAL MODEL FOR AN UNDERGRADUATE INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMSandra Furterer, East Carolina University Sandra L. Furterer, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial Distribution and Logistics Program, in the College of Technology and Computer Science at East Carolina University. Dr. Furterer has extensive industry experience in Quality, Six Sigma, and Information Systems Analysis. Dr. Furterer's research and teaching interests are Six Sigma, Quality Management, Lean Enterprise, and Engineering Education.Sandra Furterer, University of Central FloridaAbeer Sharawi, University of Central Florida Abeer Sharawi is a Ph.D
, 1978.2. A. Skene and S. Fedkox, “Assignment Scaffolding”. Available: https://ctl.utsc.utoronto.ca/technology/sites/default/files/scaffolding.pdf [Accessed Mar 15, 2019]3. B. D. Jones, “Motivating Students to Engage in Learning: The MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation,” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 272-285, 2009.4. N.O. Erdil, “Influencing Student Motivation Through Scaffolded Assignments in a Quality Analysis Course and Its Impact on Learning,” in Proceedings, American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Columbus, OH, June 2017.
(2credit hours), Financial Engineering (3 credit hours), Project Engineering and Work TeamDesign (3 credit hours), and Engineering Administration (3 credit hours). Additionally, studentswill complete the Engineering Leadership & Management Experimental Laboratory courses I-II/Capstone (7 credit hours total). It is anticipated that students will complete this program inthree semesters, earning a total of 18 hours.Administration: a. This program will be administered under the auspices of the Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Department in accordance with applicable policy and regulation. b. To avoid excess hour issues, students will be able to dual count student credit hours of
the processincluding the hospital, its employees, and the physicians.Bibliography1. Snee, R. (2003). Leading Six Sigma: A Step by Step Guide Based on Experience with GE and Other Six Sigma Companies. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.2. Pande P.., Neuman R., Cavanagh R. (2002). The Six Sigma Way Team Fieldbook: An Implementation Guide for Process Improvement Teams . McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.3. George M., Rowlands D., Kastle B. (2004). What is Lean Six Sigma?. George Group (McGraw-Hill), New York, NY.4. George M., (2003). Lean Six Sigma for Service: How to Use Lean Speed and Six Sigma Quality to Improve Services and Transactions, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.5. George M., Maxey J., Rowlands D., Upton M., (2005). The
Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design. Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Louisville, KY.[5] Stern H. P. E., Marcus, A. B. (2002). Short, Instructional Modules for Teaching Ethical and Societal. Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Southeastern Section Annual Meeting, Gainesville, FL.[6] Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Evaluations during the 2010-2011 Accreditation Cycle, Retrieved Dec. 24, 2010 from: http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2010-11%2 0EAC%20Criteria%201-27-10.pdf[7] Learning Outcomes for the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at Iowa State University. Retrieved Dec. 24, 2010 from: http