institutional approach,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2011, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2010.518231.[5] J. Cowan, “Quality Assurance in European Engineering Education: Present and Future Challenges,” in Engineering Education Quality Assurance: A Global Perspective, A. S. Patil and P. J. Gray, Eds. Springer, 2009, pp. 29–40.[6] G. Augusti, “EUR-ACE: the European Accreditation system of engineering education and its global context,” in Engineering Education Quality Assurance: A Global Perspective, A. Patil and P. J. Gray, Eds. Springer, 2009, pp. 41–49.[7] H. V Le and K. D. Nguyen, “Quality assurance in vietnam’s engineering education,” in Engineering education quality assurance: A global
to have the support of an organization orcompany that fulfills the role of Training Partner (TP).One of the big challenges for universities is to put different teaching-learning models intopractice to allow students to transfer their learning from “mental knowledge” to a “practi-cal application” of knowledge [5]. The role of both student and professor will be more ac-tive; professors will become mentors and evaluators along with staff from the organizationthat serves as TP. In summary, the main contributions of the study are: • a model of how to successfully teach Lean Thinking through CBL for Industrial and Systems Engineering students; • a teaching-learning model of Lean Thinking in collaboration with organizations; • best