they were “doing”science, it is essential to provide the teachers an opportunity to discover for themselves how theteaching standards are applicable to their own teaching and classroom methods. Facultyplanning to implement a similar workshop should note that the programmatic design should startwith the appropriate teaching standards and the content should be selected to align with thestandards; not the reverse. The curriculum standards checklist used for the curriculum standardintegration portion of this workshop is given below.NSTA Content Standards, Grades 5 – 82Standard A: Science as Inquiry___Abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry___Understandings about scientific inquiryStandard B: Physical Science___Physical and chemical properties
: Royal Academy of Engineers.21. IMechE., (2009). Education for Engineering: IMECHE Policy Summary. London: Institute for Mechanical Engineering.22. DIUS.,(2008). A Vision for Science and Society. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering. Department of Innovation, Universities & Science.23. IMechE., (2010). When STEM? http://www.imeche.org/knowledge/policy/education/policy/when-stem Accessed: 12/3/2014.24. MacBride, G., Hayward, E. L., Hayward, G., Spencer, E., Ekevall, E., Magill, j., Bryce, A.C. and Stimpson, B. (2010). Engineering the Future: Embedding Engineering Permanently Across the School– University Interface. IEEE. Transactions On Education, 53, 1.25. Twyford, J., & Jarvinen, E.M., (2000). ‘The
University CAROLINE BELLER earned her B. S. in Education from Florida Atlantic University in 1967 and her M. Ed. In 1989 and Ph. D. in 1998 from Texas A&M University in College Station, TX. Dr. Beller is an Assistant Professor in the School of Teaching, Curriculum, and Learning in the College of Education at Oklahoma State University. Her main research interest are in science education and professional development. Dr. Beller has presented extensively at state, national, and international conferences in her research areas.Pamela Fry, Oklahoma State University PAMELA FRY was named Dean of the OSU College of Education in March 2005. As dean, she also serves as the Director of
and CCMSalignment project.References1. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: David McKay Company.2. Akins, L. & Burghardt, D. (2006) Work in Progress: Improving K-12 Mathematics Understanding with Engineering Design Projects. 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, M3C-14, October 28-31, 2006, San Diego, CA. Accessed 1/16/2015. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=41168693. Bottoms, G. & Anthony, K. (2005) Project Lead the Way: A Pre-Engineering Curriculum That Works: A New Design for High School Career
technologies, and a well educated,globally distributed global workforce represent significant challenges to the status quo ofU.S. engineering and engineering education. Meeting these challenges requires atransformation of how engineering is taught. Strong domain knowledge and technicalexpertise no longer make a well-rounded engineer; the rapid pace of change in scienceand engineeringalso requires high levels of ingenuity and adaptivity. Learning scientistsdescribe these dual capabilities as “adaptive expertise” (AE). Adaptive experts areinnovative: they are able to creatively leverage their experience and perform well in noveland fluid situations. They are also efficient: they apply their core taxonomic knowledgeappropriately and expeditiously. Common
Engineering Leadership Academy. She also provides oversight for student professional development curriculum and programs, including the Fundamentals of Engineering exam. She is founder and co-chair of the college’s Strategic Planning and Assessment Resource Team and is a key member of the University’s Institutional Effectiveness Oversight Committee. As a founding member of the Academic Affairs Assessment Team, she was instrumental in helping to develop campus-wide tools that enhance the efficiency of data collection and reporting. As co-PI on several projects, including four current NSF projects, Patricia contributes her expertise in the areas of the freshman-year experience
needs, we developed a water acquisition,distribution, and disposal challenge for the second team of students. We shared it with thecurrent team leader and civil engineer so that they could present the solution to the school boardof the orphanage if they believed that the solution warranted further discussion andconsideration. See Appendix B for the Water System Design Challenge.Although we had interviewed four additional students, their interests and backgroundexperiences were not comparable to the other group members’ interests and backgroundexperiences. Because it was more difficult to develop a design challenge that met criteria for‘authenticity,’ in which the participants’ interests were considered in constructing the challenge,we did not
downloaded datasets compiled from Survey Monkey were further analyzed to address theevaluation questions in the current report using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences(SPSS) version 21.Sources of criterion references used in the current evaluation are from (a) project expectationsand objectives cited in the proposal to NASA dated 2010; (b) two science teaching status reportsavailable online. These latter reports--“The Status of Secondary Earth Science Teaching” dated2002 but based on data from the 2000 National Survey conducted by Horizon Research for theNational Science Foundation (NSF) 8 and reports published by the Texas Education Agency(TEA) in May 2012 9 describing demographics and teaching experience of science teachersStatewide
throughout thesemester. The Graduate Fellow was the primary instructor with assistance from twoFellows and the teacher. We followed a similar lesson schedule as ES1. We also spentthe last 15 minutes of each lesson collecting the paper recycling for the school. As ofFebruary 2008, the Energy Club students have recycled approximately 4,500 pounds ofpaper. (a) (b)Figure 2. (a) Graduate Fellow Engaging Students in the Lightbulb Activity, (b)Students Explaining Their Windmill DesignMath ClubRAMP-UP has conducted several Math Clubs within their participating elementaryschools since its inception. The following will focus on the Math Clubs that have beenconducted in the fall 2006, spring 2007 and fall 2007 semesters
understand all of the benefits and drawbacks involved inscaffolding engineering design for mathematics learning.Bibliography 1 Burghardt, M. David, & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design: A contemporary approach to design pedagogy asthe core process in technology. The Technology Teacher, 64(1). Page 23.1375.112 Linn, M.C., & Eylon, B. –S. (2006). Science education. In P.A. Alexander & P.H. Winne (Eds
. TheNational Academies Press.6 National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education:Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.7 National Academy of Engineering (2010). Standards for K-12 Engineering Education? Washington, DC. TheNational Academies Press.8 Ibid. Pg. 289 Collins, A, J.S. Brown, & S. E. Newman (1989). Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading,writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of RobertGlaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 453 – 494.10 Barrows, H. S. (1986). How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years. NY: Springer.11 Hmelo
the Systematic Characterization of Inquiry Instruction inEarly LearNing Classroom Environments, or SCIIENCE instrument, to measure the efficacy ofour professional development and to improve pedagogical practices in PK-3 classrooms.The SCIIENCE instrument was designed to objectively capture the presence of specific bestpractices outlined in the NRC Framework as they occur within a science lesson and focuses onteacher behaviors. The goals of the SCIIENCE instrument are (a) to provide a standardized toolbased on the NRC Framework for assessing the quality of science and engineering instruction inPK-3 classrooms; (b) to capture the instructional practices that engage students in their scienceand engineering lessons, promote scientific and
includedthe engineering design center, a computer laboratory and a classroom. Participants wereinvolved in hands-on activities in the three environments that provided opportunities for them toinvestigate and explore models and conduct analyses. Page 15.1339.4Virtual Reality in Engineering Design (a) Immersive model of a sabretooth tiger (b) Three dimensional tracking interface generated from point cloud data for visualization Figure 1. Immersive Interfaces for Engineering Design.As an introduction to the application of mathematical theories in the development of engineeringsimulations
Page 23.1083.8schools. There were 14 middle schools participating in the event. Half of those schools areimplementing the STEM Apps curriculum. The STEM Apps schools accounted for 68% of themiddle school teams. Table 3 outlines the number of teams sent form the various middle schools.Note the STEM Apps middle schools are emphasized using red font. The schools sending moreteams tend to come from the STEM Apps schools with the exception of two non-STEM Appsschools. Table 3. Number of middle school teams sent by each middle school. Middle School Number of Teams STEM Apps School A 15 STEM Apps School B
goals of the Partnership for ImplementingEngineering Education were achieved and will hopefully be used to assist many educators in thefuture as technology and engineering become increasingly important throughout the world.References1. B. Mathias-Riegel, “Engineering that’s elementary.” ASEE Prism, Mar 2001.2. E. Barney Smith, R. Miller, “Education by Design: Connecting Engineering and Elementary Education.” ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI, January 2006.3. J. E. Miller, J. J. Rencis, “A University/Public School Partnership in K-6 Engineering Education.” ASEE 2004 Annual Conference & Exposition.4. K. Bush, J. Gray, M. Holmes, K. Kosinski, J. Orr, L. Razzaq, J. Rulfs, , “How do you Teach Engineering in Kindergarten and First Grade
AC 2009-717: CHILDREN'S CONCEPTIONS AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OFTECHNOLOGY BEFORE AND AFTER PARTICIPATING IN AN INFORMALENGINEERING CLUBPamela Lottero-Perdue, Towson State University Dr. Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue is an Assistant Professor of Science Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She began her career as process engineer, taught high school physics and pre-engineering, wrote curriculum and was a master teacher for Project Lead the Way, and led two Project FIRST robotics teams. As a science teacher educator, she has added engineering content and pedagogy to her science methods courses for prospective elementary teachers. She teaches engineering to
Paper ID #9463Energy Inquiry: Hands-on, Inquiry Learning Methods to Enhance STEMLearning by Engaging Students in Renewable Energy Solutions (Research toPractice)Leslie Wilkins, Maui Economic Development Board Leslie Wilkins has served as the Vice President of the Maui Economic Development Board since 1999. She was hired to design, launch and direct the Women in Technology Project with a mission to en- gage girls/women and underrepresented populations into the Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) pipeline. In its 13th year, the program serves annually more than 14,000 students, educators and industry members
program. Applicants are selectedbased on the following competitive criteria: their scholastic performance with an emphasis onengineering related courses such as mathematics and the sciences; their standardized test scoressuch as the PSAT, SAT and other achievement tests; prior exposure to pre-engineering classes oractivities; their expressed interest and motivation in a short essay; telephone interviews; andrecommendations from high-school teachers and guidance counselors.The CDE receives on average between 40 and 50 applications for the ITE program every year.Although the specific standards for admission vary year to year based on the qualifications ofthat year’s applicants, there are some general trends. Competitive applicants have a “B
, November 2002.[33] Koppel, N. B., Cano, R. M., Heyman, S. B., and Kimmel, H. (2003). “Single Gender Programs: Do they Makea Difference?” Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO, November2003.[34] Cano, R., Berliner-Heyman, S., Koppel, N., Gibbons, S., Kimmel, H. (2004). “Evaluation of SummerEnrichment Programs for Womens’ Students”, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & Exposition.[35] Hirsch, L. S., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R. and Bloom, J. (2006). “A Study of the Impact of Enrichment Programson Girls’ Attitudes Towards Engineering”. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on EngineeringEducation, San Juan, PR, July 2006
Learning Styles, P. Suarez and G. Suarez, Eds., ed Nashville, Tennessee: B&H Publishing Group, 2006, pp. 56-68.[12] N. A. Harrington, "What Is the Socratic Method?," Classical Homeschooling Magazine, 2000. Page 26.961.12Appendix A-1: Student Interview Protocol1. Icebreaker Let’s start by talking a bit about you. How many brothers and sisters do you have? What kinds of things are they interested in? NOTE: These are intended as warm up questions, just to get the interview underway, and can be followed up with a few other “small talk” questions, like “What kinds of things are your friends
potential: Science and engineering at thecrossroads,” American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Washington,DC.1991.Barrett, C. “Skilled engineers are developed, not born,” Electronic Engineering Times, October30, 1997, pp. 284-288.Culotta, E. “Scientists of the future: Jumping high hurdles,” Science. 1992, 228, pp. 1208-1213.Culotta, E. “Trying to Change the Face of Science”, Science, Nov. 12, 1993, vol. 262, pp.1089-1090.Clewell, B. C., Anderson, B., & Thorpe, M.E., Breaking the barriers: Helping female andminority students succeed in mathematics and science. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers,1992.Malcom, S., Hall, P., & Brown, J., “The Double Bind, the Price of Being a MinorityFemale in Science.” American
American Society for Engineering Education. 2007.[6]Fleer, M., The Science of Technology: Young Children Working Technologically. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1999. 9(3): p. 269-291. Page 22.1024.17[7] Kolb, D.A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. 1984, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc, 1984[8] Bloom B. S.. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc, 1956.[9] Talley, A “Understanding the Effects of Active Learning in Action: Analyzing and Improving Learning with Engineering
4. Broader global perspective Unit 2: Exploring Solutions to Energy Problems 5. Summarize the “problem,” define problem solving approach and semester project 6. Conservation a. Home energy audit activity b. Light bulb activity (heat and light from CFB vs. incandescent) 7. Alternative energy systems a. Introduce energy sources / conversions (fossil fuel demo) b. Energy forms and states (puzzle activity, household item activity) c. Energy systems (internet research, flow chart diagramming activity) d. Efficiency of Conversions (Lego motor activity, including calculations) Unit 3: Physical Models of Energy Systems 8
the classroom, who will implement throughteaching and learning, the explicit authentic articulation of engineering in 7th-12th grade math andscience classrooms. As a result, CEEMS has developed three pathways to educate in-service andpre-service teachers in engineering content and pedagogy so that they may, in turn, effectivelyprepare their students to understand engineering design and consider careers in engineeringfields: 1. Masters in Curriculum and Instruction (CI) degree with Engineering Education (MCIEE) specialization: This pathway provides opportunities for a) pre-service teachers with a degree in math, science, or engineering to obtain an initial Ohio Adolescent to Young Adult (OAYA) teaching license and for b) in
were integrated intothe curriculum and introduced at three high school sites, i.e.; two in Arizona and one in Teaching Energy Concepts using Chain Reaction Machines (Work in Progress)Trinidad and Tobago. A total of 65 students ranging from age 13 to 18 participated in theexperience.This paper presents: a) detailed account of the design of the energy and anaerobicdigestion module and b) descriptions of the ways students applied this learned knowledgein the design and development of their chain reaction machines. The paper concludeswith a discussion of how this experience can be adapted for inclusion in formal, in-classscience courses at the middle and high-school level.Overall Structure of the STEAM Machines
test at a significance level of 0.05 did not reveal any significant differencesbetween participants from private (Mean=2,36, SD=0.809) and public schools (Mean=2.4,SD=0.687) U=193.42, p=0.98 (figure 5). Page 26.244.7 Figure 5: Public vs. Private School Opinions on STEMA Mann-Whitney test was conducted to determine if significant differences were present withrespect to the level of teaching experience at a significance level of 0.05. The test did not revealany significant differences when comparing category A: 1 to 5 years of experience (Mean=2.46,SD=0.74) with category B: more than 6 years
computer literacy skills. The following quote from NCLB Title II Part D outlines thissentiment: “(1) PRIMARY GOAL- The primary goal of this part is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology in elementary schools and secondary schools. (2) ADDITIONAL GOALS- The additional goals of this part are the following: (A) To assist every student in crossing the digital divide by ensuring that every student is technologically literate by the time the student finishes the eighth grade, regardless of the student's race, ethnicity, gender, family income, geographic location, or disability. (B) To encourage the effective integration of technology resources and systems with
in the Early Years: A Strategic Report.Commissioned by the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative, John Adams Innovation Institute (May 5, 2010)Retrieved June 10, 2010 from http://www2.wheelock.edu/wheelock/x3146.xml.4 Hotaling, L., McGrath, B., McKay, M., Shields, C., Lowes, S., Cunningham, C., Lachapelle, C., Yao, S.Engineering Our Future New Jersey. 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition Proceedings, Honolulu, HI, June 2007; 2007-1349.5 McGrath, E., Hotaling, L, and McKay, M. (2007). Efforts to Promote Engineering in K-12 Schools in New Jersey:A Case Study of Recent Professional Development, Capacity-Building, Awareness-Building and Policy Initiatives.Presented at the K-12 Engineering Education
Structural Equations Modeling,” Manag. Inf. Syst. Q., vol. 22, no. 1, p. 14, Mar. 1998.[8] S. J. Finney and C. DiStefano, “Non-Normal and Categorical Data in Structural Equation Modeling,” in Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, United States of America: Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2006, pp. 269 – 314.[9] C. M. Cunningham and C. P. Lachapelle, “The impact of Engineering is Elementary (EiE) on students’ attitudes toward engineering and science,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, 2010.[10] IBM Corporation, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation, 2012.[11] L. K. Muthén and B. O. Muthen, Mplus. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén, 2012.[12] D. Hooper, J. Coughlan, and M. R
teaching awards, and is internationally recognized in his primary research field.Dr. Catherine Maltbie, University of Cincinnati Dr. Cathy Maltbie is a Research Associate at the University of Cincinnati with a joint appointment with the Evaluation Services Center and the Arlitt Child and Family Research and Education Center. She has a BS in Chemical Engineering and a Doctorate in Educational Foundations. Her research areas include evaluation, cognitive and social aspects of educational environments, and STEM education from pre-K through graduate school.Ms. Julie Steimle, University of Cincinnati Julie Steimle received her Bachelor of Arts in English and Secondary Education from Thomas More College. She served as