Conference Session

Engineering as the STEM Glue

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ben Pelleg, Drexel University; David Urias, Drexel University; Adam K. Fontecchio, Drexel University; Eli Fromm, Ph.D., Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

250engineering based modules that are available for public access. To assess the effectiveness of theprogram, the fellows, teachers, and students were monitored throughout the school year. Thefellows completed multiple surveys and wrote weekly reflection journals. The students weresurveyed at the beginning and end of the year, while the teachers completed mid and end of yearsurveys. Evaluations of all three populations showed positive outcomes. The fellows developedtheir communication skills in the classroom and gained experience communicating their researchto a non-specialized audience; the teachers reported their partner fellow as being a valuable assetto the classroom in a number of ways; and the students showed an increase in their knowledge

Conference Session

Focus on Elementary

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ming-Chien Hsu, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

researchresults suggest that the design process that students use might be indicative of the kinds ofdesign thinking that they use or do not use, such as reflective practice 11. Also, designlanguage shapes the knowledge that students have about design 17. We believed that designlanguage also reflects the knowledge that students have about design. Thus students with abetter understanding of the design process will give not only a more comprehensive view ofthe process but also exhibit deeper reasoning abilities. Observation refers to the task orsituation that will prompt students to demonstrate the knowledge or skills 14. We used adesign scenario to prompt students’ thinking and answering. Interpretation refers to a methodof interpreting the performance to

Conference Session

Out-of-School and Informal Activities

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brittany L. Luken, Georgia Institute of Technology; Susan L. Hotle, Georgia Institute of Technology; Laurie Anne Garrow, Georgia Institute of Technology; Christopher Cappelli, Georgia Institute of Technology; Lauren Alise Jones; Margaret-Avis Anyeley Akofio-Sowah, Georgia Institute of Technology; Stefanie Brodie, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

career in industrial engineeringNote: Student responses may not add up to 100 percent. Missing data is not included in this representation of studentresponses. Reported mean scores reflect the following values for each response category:1: Not at all 2: Slightly 3: Somewhat 4: Quite a Bit 5: Very Much* Mean change = Mean Post – Mean PreGoal 2: The impact of the program experience on student self-efficacyThe summer program was also very successful in increasing student confidence for the programobjectives listed in Table 2. The results showed that students were less confident in achievingeach program objective prior to the summer program (mean scores from 1.9 to 2.9) thanfollowing the summer program (mean scores 3.0 to 4.33). This yielded a

Conference Session

Addressing the NGSS, Part 2 of 3: Supporting K-12 Science Teachers in Engineering Pedagogy and Engineering-Science Connections, Part 2 of 3

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremy V. Ernst, Virginia Tech; Laura J. Segedin, Virginia Tech; Aaron C. Clark, North Carolina State University; Vincent William DeLuca, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

teachers to improve their classroom practices, participate in professional activities,and increase student learning in STEM while practicing self-reflection. As educators engage inreflection about teaching and learning, they tend to improve their practice and increase studentperformance.3,4 These improvements are significant when educators pursue high qualityprofessional development such as National Board Certification, even if they do not ultimately Page 24.1180.2achieve certification.5 T2I2 capitalizes on this finding by creating a program that challengesteachers to reflect on and improve instruction without the cost or arduous journey

Conference Session

K-12 Professional Development I

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bradley Bowen Ed.D, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

completes the new employee training, gains access to appropriate email and server files, and participates in any other activities deemed critical to a fully immersive experience. Once the work experience is complete, the teachers receive a $2,000 stipend, half of which is paid by the company and the other half is paid for by the local regional education association (REA).  Each week, the teacher participants must submit a weekly written reflection. This assignment gives the teachers an opportunity to reflect on what they learned during the week and how it will help them become a more effective teacher. It also provides documentation of their experience that can be included in their final

Conference Session

Engineering in Middle Schools

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reid Bailey, University of Virginia; Susan Donohue, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

2:30 Robotics 2:30 Day 2 - Line Final Presos Following and Demos 3:00 3:00 3:30 3:30 Reflection Reflection Reflection Reflection Recognition Pick-up Pick-up Pick-up Pick-up Pick-up 4:00 4:00

Conference Session

Engineering in the Elementary School

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine Cunningham, Museum of Science, Boston

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

has worked, what has not, and ongoing challenges. Constructive, critical team andindividual reflection and critique have helped us to distill some successful strategies. The paperbelow captures some of what we have begun to understand. It outlines some of the organizingprinciples and structures that guide our professional development programs, challenges that weencounter, opportunities that arise, and differences that we have observed between elementaryand secondary professional development. However, we still have much more to learn! The EiEteam is continually tweaking our existing programs or experimenting with new professionaldevelopment offerings as we seek to improve and expand our knowledge, programs, andresources

Conference Session

Curriculum Exchange

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jean M. Trusedell, EPICS

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

solution to the scenario using materials provided and discuss the prototype with a partner andteam to determine how effectively the prototype meets the needs of the stakeholder. The teacherparticipants will then explain the solution to the scenario to the group and how this prototype will meet theneeds of the stakeholders.Reflection- Reflection is an essential part of the educational process not only with students but withinstruction. The teachers will reflect using the following questions. • How would this process help identify potential projects and the critical thinking associated with delivering a possible engineering solution in your community? • How are the discussions that the prototype facilitates helpful for understanding

Conference Session

New and Innovative Ideas

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer S. Atchison, Drexel University; Danielle Tadros, Drexel University; Yury Gogotsi, Drexel University; Paul Holt; William Andrew Stoy, North Carolina State University; Joy A. Kots, Father Judge High School; Caroline Louise Schauer, Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

presence ofpolymer. Each foil collection plate was carefully placed into a plastic sandwich bag fortransport to a local University and inspected under Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM).A Ziess VP 5 Supra scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to image the fibrousmats. The SEM samples were prepared by sputter coating, Denton Vacuum, with Pttarget at 40 milli amps for 35 s resulting in a 7-8 nm conductive film. The SEM was runat 3.5 KV at a 11mm working distance in high vacuum. Image results were sent via emailto students for fiber diameter analysis with Image J.Methods: The schools that participated in this project were from three different regionsin the Greater Philadelphia Region and reflect three different learning environments

Conference Session

Core Concepts, Standards, and Policy in K-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenny L. Daugherty, Purdue University; Rodney L. Custer, Illinois State University; Raymond A. Dixon, Illinois State University, CeMaST

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

                                                                                                                       1  This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0426421. Any Page 22.1508.3opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.   The focus of secondary level engineering education, however, has largely been onprocess. The Standards for Technological Literacy (STL),9 for example, include design-orientedstandards that

Conference Session

Addressing the NGSS, Part 1 of 3: Supporting K-8 Science Teachers in Engineering Pedagogy and Engineering-Science Connections

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary McCormick, Tufts University; Kristen B. Wendell, University of Massachusetts Boston; Brian Patrick O'Connell, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

recognize a need to plan before begin building, others may create and reviseplans as they begin working with building materials. Throughout this process, students mayrealize and test their design ideas, identifying and applying evaluation criteria, often implicitly,to determine the effectiveness, functionality, or viability of their solution. Students’ evaluationsmay include conducting physical tests, collecting and analyzing information from tests or otherforms of feedback (e.g., peer review, class discussions), and using results and feedback to refinetheir designs. In these ways, students’ engineering design decisions are not based on anyprescribed way of engineering, but instead reflect their reasoning, evaluations, and logic inachieving design

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicole D. Berge, University of South Carolina; Charles E. Pierce, University of South Carolina

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

are EFFECTs?The Environments for Fostering Effective Critical Thinking, or EFFECTs, are modular inquirybased tools designed to stimulate critical thinking and collaborative teamwork while improvingthe transfer of core knowledge in engineering.1 The pedagogical framework for EFFECTs linkstwo critical elements, active learning and reflective writing, within the context of a realisticengineering design problem. Lipman2 defines critical thinking as “skillful, responsible thinkingthat facilitates good engineering judgment because it relies upon criteria, is self-correcting, andis sensitive to content.” The EFFECT framework is designed on the basis of this definition.EFFECTs begin with a driving question that is embedded in a decision worksheet

Conference Session

K-12 Teacher Professional Development

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith A. Schimmel, North Carolina A&T State University; Muktha Jost, North Carolina A&T State University; Tyrette Sherlone Carter, North Carolina A&T State University; Shawn Raquel Watlington, North Carolina A&T State University; Terrie Ruth McManus, Ragsdale High School, Guilford County Schools; Solomon Bililign, North Carolina A&T State University; Terry White Worrell, Guilford County Schools; Yuh-Lang Lin, North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

participants had the opportunity to reflect on their work by attendingquarterly teaching and learning seminars.In Phase Three, Cohort B middle school teachers mirrored most of the activities of high schoolteachers in Cohort A. The only exception was that each Cohort B participant was paired with aCohort A teacher. This allowed middle and high school teachers to vertically integrate theirmodules so that they adequately prepare middle school students for high school math and sciencecontent.Summer Research InstituteThe three-week Summer Research Institute was designed to provide teachers with theexperiences outlined above. Lead teachers from the region who had participated in the firstSummer Research Institute were interviewed, and provided significant

Conference Session

Think Outside the Box! K-12 Engineering Curriculum

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen Wendell, Tufts University; Kathleen Connolly, Tufts University; Christopher Wright, Tufts University; Linda Jarvin, Tufts University; Mike Barnett, Boston College; Chris Rogers, Tufts University; Ismail Marulcu, Boston College

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

work in groups, and interaction among students and Page 15.958.4improvement of communication skills are key goals of the teacher. As they work on solving thedesign problem, students are always expected to engage in written or pictorial record-keeping. Atsome point, students are given the option to revise their designs. In addition to their individualrecord-keeping and reflection, students reflect on their designing through participation in whole-class discussions. Importantly, throughout design-based science units, teachers provide guidanceon how students should incorporate science ideas and careful reasoning into their

Conference Session

...by Design

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amber Kendall, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Merredith D Portsmore, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

, attention-dependent knowledge includes a “repertoire ofattentional skills for attending to cognitive and affective aspects of pupil activity which may notbe apparent to those without this experience” and contains knowledge which “cannot be writtendown….[but] becomes available during the complexity of the progress of a lesson, often inresponse to instances of pupil activity that could not be predicted on the basis of the teacher’ssubject or pedagogical knowledge” (p 4). Thus the framework they used to identify thisknowledge and the data presented in this present study rely on both classroom observation dataas well as later teacher reflections on their practice. Additionally, the emphasis Ainley andLuntley place on teacher attention to student

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre- College Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tameshia Ballard Baldwin, North Carolina State University; Vincent William DeLuca, North Carolina State University; Aaron C. Clark, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

engaging science teachers in projects with substantive focus on reflection ontheir own teaching is important in helping to change their thinking about science teaching andlearning and to initiate the development of PCK. Furthermore, Nilsson16 found that teamteaching and videotaped lessons were two useful ways of promoting reflection of their teaching,and subsequently developing their PCK. Similarly, in a study investigating two components ofPCK: (i) knowledge of students’ understanding, conceptions and misconceptions of topics, and Page 26.16.3(ii) knowledge of strategies and representations for teaching particular topics, it was concludedthat

Conference Session

Curriculum Exchange

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Greg Bartus, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

  (1)​Astronauts go on spacewalks to make repairs, do experiments and test new equipment ​ .  Two big challenges in spacewalks are, first, that space can feel very cold (­250 degrees F) to an  (2)​astronaut in the shade and, second, space can feel very warm (250 degrees F) in the Sun ​ .  The reason for this is that an astronaut will be exposed to about ​ 7 times​  the amount of radiation that we, on the Earth’s surface, experience due in part to the reflectivity of the surface and  (3)​atmosphere

Conference Session

Curriculum Exchange

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Mitchell, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; John M. Keller, California Polytechnic State University; Victor M Castillo Jr, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

stream table, very similar to the actual stream tablesstudents used in the first activity. Students can adjust parameters for the model such as table slope, soilproperties, and water flow rate. They then make observations of the resulting erosion patterns, and discusssimilarities and differences to the real stream table. Students also reflect on the utility of a computationalmodel.Activity #3: RivertownThe second computer-based activity introduces students to Rivertown, a fictional town within the NetLogosimulation, in a flood plain next to a river. The river can overflow its banks, which will flood the town’s Page 26.1355.2fields

Conference Session

High School Students Thinking and Performance

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew D. Lammi, North Carolina State University; Theodore J. Branoff, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

, the reflective interview, and the studentgenerated physical traces, e.g. sketches and notes.High school student designers Both criterion and convenience sampling approaches were employed to recruit studentdesigners for this study. There were two criteria: high school students who had an interest inengineering and were upperclassmen. We assumed that student designers with awareness andinterest in engineering would be motivated to work through the engineering design challenge.We found this indeed to be the case with all of the student designers; they were completelyengaged in the design challenge from start to finish. Upperclassmen were chosen as we assumedthey would have more ability and development to help them perform engineering

Conference Session

Engineering Design

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Taryn Melkus Bayles, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Joshua A. Enszer, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Julia M. Ross, University of Maryland, Baltimore County

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

experimentation;  Intensive and sustained support;  Engaging teachers in concrete teaching tasks that integrate teachers’ experiences;  Focusing on subject-matter knowledge and deepening teacher content knowledge;  Providing explicit connections between the Professional Development (PD) activities and the student outcome goals; and  Providing connections to larger issues of education/school reforms.The PD institute threads the use of the INSPIRES curriculum throughout all components –which include a content course, practice instruction, reflection, and post institute enactment.Engineering faculty model various pedagogical best practices and then teachers use these samestrategies and materials as they

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brianna L. Dorie, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Gina Navoa Svarovsky, Science Museum of Minnesota

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

threemain reasons: (1) the sheer prevalence of that code due to the nature of the tasks, (2) the“modeling” activity we observed very closely resembled typical children’s play (thus it is harder toargue that children were engaging in engineering during those times), and (3) previous researchsuggests that there are no significant differences between novices, post-novices, and experts inhow they engage in modeling.5 Beyond the four main behaviors that we focus our discussion on,we also looked at testing, reflection, prediction, and material property codes. Page 24.256.4Table 1. Main codes for Playdates and Engineering Studio engineering behaviors

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division Curriculum Exchange

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine Schnittka, Auburn University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

concepts, and attitudes and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF. Studio STEM Engineering After toward engineering have demonstrated the efficacy of the (www.studiostem.org) includes School the author, faculty from the Studio STEM model.Schnittka, C.G., Evans, M.A., Drape, University of Virginia, Virginia Tech, and Temple University, and a

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division Curriculum Exchange

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anne Marie Bergen, Cal Poly State University; Katherine C. Chen, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

design. A debrief of the activity is done withthe entire class. In addition, each team is asked to reflect on their process of the design activity and to Page 24.377.2construct their own representation of the engineering design process to share it with the rest of theclass.

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Crystal Jean DeJaegher, University of Virginia; Jennifer L. Chiu, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

similar benefit to engineeringeducation20. For example, students working on a CAD program can share and critiqueother students’ designs within an environment that prompts them to reflect upon andrefine their designs based on evaluations. Online environments also have uniqueopportunities for research, such as logging and tracking student progress that can giveinsight into processes that may contribute to learning outcomes21.This work-in-progress paper aims to understand how explicitly supporting engineeringdesign in an online environment can help precollege students engage in design processes Page 24.820.3through novel use of log data.WISEngineering: Using

Conference Session

Exemplary Outreach Programs

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen Davis, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

, and (3)manufacturing of plastic pellets using the creation of pixel cookies as a hands-on classroom activity.The undergraduate mentors leverage their industrial and academic experiences to create the lessons andact as role models for college and professional success. Evaluation of the activities includes a mappingto academic content standards, student interest surveys, and mentors’ reflections on their experiences.1. IntroductionThe Computer Science Investigations (CSI: Cincinnati) project brings undergraduates in engineeringand computing-related fields into urban STEM classrooms to interact with and teach high schoolstudents. CSI: Cincinnati is funded under the National Science Foundation’s Broadening Participation inComputing program and

Conference Session

Assessment of K-12 Engineering Programs & Issues

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Emily Medders, Southern Wesleyan University; Cheryl Cass, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

towards their doctorate, and one with a Ph. D. Eight participants were placed inengineering labs, and one each in math and chemistry labs.Our data included weekly journal entries and exit interviews (Table 1). Journal entries werecontemporaneous observations during the course of the program, in contrast to Exit interviews,conducted by the RET program director, which were retrospective reflections at the end of the Page 15.1165.3program. All data were self reported, which may be skewed by false reports of what wasactually taking place; however this limitation is offset by having two sources of data.The data were coded using a qualitative analysis

Conference Session

K-12 Teachers: PD, Implementation, and Beyond

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily Dringenberg, Purdue University; Ruth E. H. Wertz, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

encouraged students (Lawrenz et al., Information, scale 1 (not at all) to to seek and value alternative 2001) Classroom 5 (to a great extent) modes of investigation or of Demographics, + observation table problem solving.” Classroom and 1 open ended “Students were reflective about Context question their learning” RTOP Lesson design and 25 (5-point scale) “The instructional strategies and (Sawanda, implementation, activities respected students’ prior Piburn, Judson, Content

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James F. Groves, University of Virginia; Leigh R. Abts, University of Maryland, College Park; Gail Lynn Goldberg

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

design process (Figure 1) individuals should be able to: 1. Identify a significant challenge and specify a set of requirements that a successful engineering response to the challenge (i.e., a solution) should achieve, 2. Imagine a diverse set of possible solutions to the challenge and use systematic processes to select the most promising solution, 3. Define the solution using scientific knowledge, mathematical techniques, and technology tools and evaluate it via one or more prototypes, 4. Report the findings of the evaluation and conclude whether the prototyped solution can be expected to achieve the previously specified requirements, and 5. Reflect upon the process and recommend iteration or

Conference Session

K-12 Professional Development II

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremy V Ernst, Virginia Tech; Aaron C. Clark, North Carolina State University; Vincent William DeLuca, North Carolina State University; Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

teacherswho meet these standards, and advocating related educational reforms to integrateNational Board Certification in American education and to capitalize on the expertise ofNational Board Certified Teachers.” The NBPTS “seeks to identify and recognizeteachers (primarily Pre K – 12) who effectively enhance student learning and demonstratethe high level of knowledge, skills, abilities and commitments reflected in the followingfive core propositions”5. First, teachers are committed to students and their learning.Second, teachers know the subjects they teach and how to teach those subjects tostudents. Third, teachers are responsible for managing and monitoring student learning.Fourth, teachers think systematically about their practice and learn from

Conference Session

Exemplary Teacher and Counselor Professional Development

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kurt Becker, Utah State University; Jim Barta, Utah State University; Rebecca Monhardt, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

cultural knowledge reflecting their specific community into mathand science curricula.The findings presented are based on surveys, phone interviews and observationsconducted with teachers and CAP members representing each elementary school. Thefindings indicate that it is critical to have fully functioning CAPs, as their input andsupport is tantamount to the success of the professional development, and in turn, haseffects class-wide and school-wide. Page 14.1314.2 1IntroductionThe American Indian population of the United States was estimated at 1.86 million in2000, with a total of about 4 million reported