Scale (SSDS), was designed to measure four sustainability-related outcomes: (a) confidence in responding to wicked problems and awareness of (b) global,(c) social, and (d) environmental responsibilities as a designer. The SSDS was implementedpre-post within a course context as part of a multi-university initiative called the WickedProblems in Sustainability Initiative (WPSI) during the Fall of 2014.The primary objective of this paper was to provide an overview of the reliability of the SSDSand to consider where the SSDS may still be improved for optimal alignment with WPSIobjectives and outcomes. Our secondary goal was to consider where WPSI may be improved inthe future in light of the survey results, which included the survey items and written
grading, and Taylor shows that theyare typically ill-trained and supervised.20 However, Smith points out that technical faculty areconsistently more effective than communication instructors at identifying technical errors instudent reports.21 Further complicating the authority problem, Cho explores the way peopledeliver communication feedback and the ways that students respond to it.22 Cho finds thatstudents respond best to feedback that is (A) positive and (B) directive—so long as the directivesare non-trivial. In order to deliver non-trivial directive feedback, communication instructors Page 22.1687.7must either be well-versed in the technical
Paper ID #19705A Maker-in-Residence Program to Build a Community of MakersMs. Jewell Amanda Brey, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Undergraduate biomedical engineering student at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, graduating May 2017. Heavily involved with the BeAM University Maker Spaces and president of MakNet, the student maker organization on campus.Ms. Danianne Mizzy, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillDr. Richard Goldberg, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Richard Goldberg is a Research Associate Professor and Associate Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of
formulate it”, (b) “solutions to wicked problems are not computable throughoptimization calculations”, (c) problems are non-repeatable, and (d) wicked problems areaddressed in an open-ended temporal space (p. 133).2 Because wicked problems are by definitionnever solved, we discuss ‘responses’ rather than ‘solutions’ in this paper.Traditional examples of wicked problems include social issues such as homelessness or K-12education in the U.S. Most people would agree that a problem exists in these areas, but theappropriate response to that problem shows a large variation depending on individual values (e.g.charter schools, merit pay, increased public funding). Many challenges within the engineering
Replication. Archives of general psychiatry, 62(6), 593-602.Ludwig, D. S., & Kabat-Zinn, J. (2008). Mindfulness in medicine. Jama, 300(11), 1350-1352.Lutz, A., Brefczynski-Lewis, J., Johnstone, T., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Regulation of the Neural circuitry of emotion by compassion meditation: effects of meditative expertise. PloS one, 3(3), e1897.Mackenzie, E. (2015). Mindfulness Training: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Assessing Efficacy in Education.Mrazek, M. D., Franklin, M. S., Phillips, D. T., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Mindfulness training improves working memory capacity and GRE performance while reducing mind wandering. Psychological science, 24(5), 776-781.Newberg, A. B., Wintering, N
. • Student’s expressions of business, finance, and other economic concepts were captured with the code Economics [E], e.g. profit. • Actors and Stakeholders was relabeled as Social Groups and Users [SU], e.g. green movement and Steve Jobs.We acknowledge that, as with all coding schema, it does not represent of all possible categories.The difference in this coding scheme from Segalás et al.22 is due to their work focused on a well-structured course on sustainability compared to the less-structured, open-ended courses underevaluation.2.4 Data AnalysisAll student-participants were assigned a random number and concept maps were renderedanonymous by removing names and adding the designated number and a letter (A, B, or C) thatcorresponded
society. He also places thisunderstanding in the context of ABET criterion (b), “an ability to design and conductexperiments, analyze and interpret data” [6, p. 2], in that such ability is part of the scientificmethod, which has its foundations in the philosophy of science, and which together alsoconstitute one of the primary components of the course design for IDM and SMR.Splitt [7] interprets the demand on engineers as the “solution of problems involving humanvalues, attitudes, and behavior, as well as the interrelationships and dynamics of social, political,environmental, and economic systems on a global basis” [7, p. 182], restated in the conclusion interms of “problems involving … world cultures, religions, ethics, and economics” and
contexts as asynonym for “ambient culture”—that is, the tacit but pervasive structures of meaning andpatterns of behavior that are difficult if not impossible to control or adjust directly. Such ambientculture could refer to either a) engineering educational or professional communities specificallyor b) society at large. However, in the (3) publications that did incorporate HC as part of theprimary analytic focus, the authors located HC within specific institutional structures, includingboth engineering schools and engineering professional societies. In these cases, the authorstreated HC as localized cultural influences on engineering educational experiences andprofessional identity development.Of the 26 publications, 7 addressed ethics as well as
wider audience than withonly interviews and give more flexibility to students who may have difficult schedules due to courseworkand other commitments. The survey data allowed us to see response trends for some of our key researchquestions. When creating the survey, a mix of multiple selection style and short answer questions were usedto see trends and gain a deeper understanding of responses (see Appendix B for specific survey questions).Coding In order to synthesize and evaluate data that was collected in the surveys and interviews, a codingmethod was used to identify key patterns and themes in the research data. An approach based on GroundedTheory was used to aid data analysis [26]. The coding method involved color coding interview
Chinese faculty will be able to teach courses that will accommodatemost American students who are more comfortable with active learning.Interestingly, within the Chinese culture, students, parents, educators, and policymakers are allchallenged by the dominant image of Chinese education that is focused on “rote learning,memorization, examination, constant testing, large classes, competitive motivation, examination,authoritarian and didactic teaching and learning methods, passivity, and compliance” [19, p. 6].Unfortunately, the positive aspects of Confucian learning (e.g., focusing on deeper-level, self-reflective learning) mainly conceptualized by Western scholars such as David A. Watkins andJohn B. Biggs [20] are not very much appreciated by the
of graduate engineering student attrition," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 125-147, 2020.[17] J. Cruz and N. Kellam, "Beginning an Engineer's Journey: A Narrative Examination of How, When, and Why Students Choose the Engineering Major," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 556-582, 2018.[18] S. M. Lord, M. M. Camacho, C. Mobley, C. E. Brawner, and J. B. Main, "Exploring Narratives of LGBTQ Student Veterans in Engineering," in CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity, Crystal City, Virginia, 2019.[19] S. Lord and M. Camacho, "Why pedagogy matters: Faculty narratives," in Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference
completed based on student reflectionessays and the course reflection survey and will be disseminated as a conference paper.References[1] Q. Zhu and B. Jesiek, “Engineering Ethics in Global Context: Four Fundamental Approaches,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017.[2] M. F. Willicks, F. Willicks, V. Stehling, M. Haberstroh, and F. Hees, “Sustainable Development Goals Meet ‘Third Mission’: The Engineers Without Borders Challenge in Germany Sustainable Development Goals Meet ‘Third Mission’: The Engineers Without Borders Challenge in Germany,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018.[3] M. David Zelinka and B. Amadei, “A Methodology to Model the
, technology, engineering, andmath (STEM) professionals is vital to strengthening the growing demand for engineers. Previousstudies about raising interest in STEM majors focused on (a) the number of undergraduatestudents who decide on a major prior to attending college, (b) common misconceptions regardingthe STEM field, and (c) the effectiveness of pedagogical techniques to increase curiosity.However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, pedagogical techniques to introduce K-12 students tothe STEM fields must be adjusted. This paper investigates the effectiveness of variousmethods to engage and interact with K-12 students interested in STEM during the COVID-19 learning environment and discusses key conclusions from a pilot 90-minute virtual modulefor K-12
determining biologicalsolutions for technological advancement, they provide the following helpful “Steps for ReverseEngineering Biological Systems.” 1. Identify and detail sub-function of interest 2. Identify candidate biological systems 3. Decompose architecture of biological system of interest a. Decompose physical architecture b. Decompose functional architecture 4. Identify state and function cycles 5. Develop behavioral model and truth table for functionality Page 23.693.7 6. Extract biological strategy in abstract form 7. Idea generation (for engineering technologies to mimic this strategy)An illustrative example of
knowledge to that of the facilitator who provides a context for self-discovery. Asfacilitators, teachers deepen student knowledge through: a) framing how a specific set of behav-iors leads to problem solving and b) bridging how certain processes look across contexts and dis-ciplines [18]. However, the empirical work on Logo calls into question the possibility of enactingeither camps’ goals. In spite of the rapid acceptance of the constructionist technology by educators and par-ents, early critiques of Logo stem from the lack of conclusive empirical results to support tradi-tional school expectations [19], [20], [21]. This made Logo’s place in traditional schoolingsomewhat contentious and made the revolutionaries double down on their
appear in search results and keyword analyses of the abstracts and complete texts of relevant articles. These could be applied not only within ASEE but in the wide range of scholarly publications that treat topics that are relevant to engineering communication and its teaching. • Organize a National Science Foundation workshop that would allow the participants to extend and deepen the analysis presented in this paper by (a) identifying issues of common concern and (b) planning research to advance knowledge and understanding. In addition to establishing direction for research that would meet the needs of teachers and practitioners of engineering communication, such a workshop would also assist the
Paper ID #26372Mandatory but not Required: Examining Change in the Year Two Imple-mentation of a Novel Engineering Mathematics CourseDr. Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher and instructor in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering
action research brings together multiple disciplines and stakeholders whocollaboratively aim to simultaneously investigate and ameliorate real-world problems, to act incommunity and institutional settings, and actively monitor whether that action is achievingdesired goals, is sustainable, and is not producing new problems. Pohl and Hadron [16] definetransdisciplinary research as research that “deals with problem fields … in such a way that it can:(a) grasp the complexity... of problems, (b) take into account the diversity … of life-world …and scientific perceptions of problems, (c) link abstract and case-specific knowledge, and (d)develop knowledge and practices that promote what is perceived to be the common good” [pp.431-32]. Perrin [17] notes
Paper ID #19483The Inequality of LGBTQ Students in U.S. Engineering Education: Reporton a Study of Eight Engineering ProgramsDr. Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan Dr. Erin Cech is an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Michigan. Before coming to Michigan in 2016, she was a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Clayman Institute for Gender Research at Stan- ford University and was on faculty at Rice University. She earned her Ph.D. in Sociology in 2011 from the University of California, San Diego and undergraduate degrees in Electrical Engineering and So- ciology from Montana State University. Cech’s research
also beused in the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) Career Readiness programoffered on our campus as part of career preparation education for engineering students [21].References 1. Ledbetter, S. (October 13, 2015). America’s Top Fears. Retrieved from https://blogs.chapman.edu/wilkinson/2015/10/13/americas-top-fears-2015/2. Nixon, S., Brooman, S., Murphy, B., & Fearon, D. (2016). Clarity, consistency and communication: using enhanced dialogue to create a course-based feedback strategy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-11.3. Boyce, J. S., Alber-Morgan, S. R., & Riley, J. G. (2007). Fearless public speaking: Oral presentation activities for the elementary classroom. Childhood
well as interrelated assessment cycles used for understanding engineeringeducation, but we focus on assessment cycles as defined by Lattuca and Stark’s model, shown asPaths A, B, and C in Figure 1. It is important to understand that, in this framework, whileassessment may be used to evaluate performance of faculty and students, it is primarily for thepurpose of continuous improvement of the academic plan. The following paragraphs describethe three pathways represented by Paths A, B, and C as “educational control loops” that adjustacademic plans to effectively satisfy stakeholders’ needs. Path A is the path of adjusting the academic plan within the educational environment.This may be instigated by self-study, perceptions of faculty, or
Paper ID #27210”I Wish I Could Do More”: A Qualitative Meta-analysis of Early Career En-gineers’ Perceptions of Agency in their WorkplacesDr. Benjamin David Lutz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Ben Lutz is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Design at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. His research interests include innovative pedagogies in engineering design, conceptual change and develop- ment, school-to-work transitions for new engineers, and efforts for inclusion and diversity within engi- neering. His current work explores how students describe their own learning in engineering design and
tointegrate liberal content into engineering curricula. The underlying aims of this talk are several-fold. They are to document and demonstrate: a) The long history of attempts to bring liberal education to engineers, b) How these efforts fit within, and contributed to the distinct professional configuration of engineering, c) That engineering educators possess a body of practice for adapting their knowledge to Page 22.1015.2 “changing times and needs,” and d) How this body of educational reform practice evolved from the early, voluntary traditions of this society to the more centralized, administrative traditions marked by
” Engineering Studies vol. 2, no. 1, 2010.[11] C. Zoltowski, W. Oakes, and M. Cardella, “Students’ Ways of Experiencing Human-Centered Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 28–59, 2012.[12] C. J. Atman, R. S. Adams, M. E. Cardella, J. Turns, S. Mosborg, and J. J. Saleem.“Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners.” Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 96, no. 4, 359 –379, 2007.[13] W. A. Sugar, “What is So Good About User-Centered Design? Documenting the Effect ofUsability Sessions on Novice Software Designers,” Journal of Research on Computing inEducation, vol. 33 no. 3, 2001.[14 ] J. B. Scott, “The Practice of Usability: Teaching User Engagement Through Service-Learning,” Technical
(a is to b, as x is to y). Most often, we encounter analogy as a form of reasoning (“analogical reasoning”) aimed at persuading an audience. For example, a common refrain in U.S. political campaigns involves variations of the following analogy: “My opponent is a Democrat, and Democrats raise taxes. I’m a Republican, and Republicans don’t raise taxes. So vote for me and I won’t raise your taxes!” In engineering, analogical reasoning is a common strategy during the design and iteration process. Analogical reasoning, “a form of inference that allows us to derive implications from single cases even when we do not know all the factors involved,” enables engineers to make comparison-based predictions [33]. For example
Courses,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2018.[10] T. Odumosu et al., “Dimensions of diversity in engineering: What we can learn from STS,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2018.[11] R. F. Clancy, J. R. Sessford, L. An, and Y. Ge, “Which Factors are Correlated with Engineering Students’ Expectations of Ethical Issues?,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.[12] J. A. Leydens, K. Johnson, S. Claussen, J. Blacklock, B. M. Moskal, and O. Cordova, “Measuring Change over Time in Sociotechnical Thinking: A Survey/validation Model for Sociotechnical Habits of Mind,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering
group’s teamwork. Throughout the entirety of the process, wewere able to efficiently work as a team. A key part of this was good communication (i.e. groupchat, zoom, group facetime).” As another group stated: “One piece of advice that we would givea future MMW lab group early in the process is to get to know the members of your group. Byunderstanding the strengths and weaknesses of those you are working with, your group will beable to divide work amongst members in a manner that ensures great quality and collaborationthroughout all parts of the design process.”(b) The importance of the prototyping and testing phase of the design project. Groupscommented on how valuable rounds of feedback were from potential users and how exciting anddifficult it
of American Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC, 2010.3. Derek Bok, “Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More,” Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2006.4. Arum, R., and Roksa, J. “Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses,” University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2011.5. Valenzuela, M., Allen, J. and Swenty, B., “Liberal Education: A Survey of Goals,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE National Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, Paper AC 2008-973.6. Commission on the Future of Higher Education, “A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education,” U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC
. Furthermore, they found thatbetween 2008 and 2014, written reflection was the most commonly described means of“operationalizing” the reflection discussed in the ASEE papers. These written reflectionsincluded essays, surveys, journals, portfolios, and short answer questions. Group or in-classdiscussions and other activities were also mentioned.While a comprehensive literature review on reflection in engineering education is beyond thescope of this paper, the authors conducted an abbreviated review in order to give context to theuse of critical reflection in the present case study. Of particular interest to the authors were thefollowing questions: a) Are critical reflections in engineering education effective in achievinglearning outcomes? and b) Are
with a clear and thorough presentation of the theory and application of the principles of engineering mechanics. Emphasis is placed on developing the student’s ability to analyze problems – a most important skill for any engineer. [9, p. v, emphasis added]Our goal here is not to debunk the ES nor to call for their exclusion from the engineeringcurriculum. The ES are crucial in engineers’ toolboxes and professional formation. Our goal hereis to make visible that they a) play important normative roles and have been amazingly durableyet can be contested, b) reinforce ideologies and mindsets, and c) can blind engineers to socialinjustices and the need for engaging in SJ by addressing the SJ dimensions already inherent