Paper ID #37619The Development of Career Resilience for Early Career Engineers inChina: A Grounded Theory StudyMr. Lichao Ma, Tsinghua University Lichao MA, male, PhD. student, Division of Engineering Education Research Tsinghua University. His scholarship focuses on higher education policy and management, engineering education. He is devoted to understanding and facilitating Chinese higher engineering education reform, through which he expects to cultivate engineers who can demonstrate innovation, resilience, social competency, responsibility and ethics. His research is published with journals like The Asia-Pacific
]. Addressing systemicinequities can be challenging in any profession, but particularly so when members are socializedto think of themselves as free agents, unencumbered by social structures [2,3]. Our paperexamines the prevalence of agentic and structural explanations of career mobility among 952Canadian engineers who responded to a national engineering career path survey. We found that49.3% of racialized men, 71.6% of white women, 75.6% of racialized women and 68.0% ofLGBTQ2SI+1 engineers, compared to only 26.3% of white men, believed their social locationhad impacted their careers suggesting that individuals who are relatively under-represented in theengineering profession are more inclined to view their social location as a non-neutral feature
adapting to the impacts of climate change, including the adaptation of infrastructureand other systems to handle extreme weather events [6]. This presents opportunity for theprofession, but also demands a sense of resilience from those working in engineering, who mustdevise complex sociotechnical solutions and combat rampant politicization in the space.This paper describes the process of surveying 200 undergraduate engineering students at a large,public research institution in Canada. The CAS was adapted for this survey, with additionalqualitative questions added to understand the student experience with sustainability curriculumand their ideas about pursuing careers in sustainability. In short, we wanted to understand theincidence of climate
perspectives on post-graduation life. The study intends to investigate whetherthe videos can improve students’ understanding of the realities of early career engineering andcan promote their ability to visualize their future professional selves. The study includes a pre-survey, video viewing, a post-survey, and semi-structured interviews with some of theparticipants. This paper presents some data from the post-survey.This paper focuses on the impact of the video series as a means of communication from thealumni speakers to the student viewers. The paper presents scholarship on the use of videos ineducation and other fields. As a medium, the video series can convey representational rolemodeling as it delivers content. Preliminary data from 121
-choice decision process. This workintends to inform engineering students, educators, and administrators during the students’development and job choice process, university career center administrators guiding studentsthrough the job search process, company recruiters in their interview and selection processduring the student’s job search, and industry partners in the recruitment, hiring, and retention ofengineering graduates with similar values. The following sections will detail the literatureassociated with influences on students’ job choice decisions, especially engineering students, themethods used to collect and analyze the data, the findings, and a discussion of the implications.IntroductionDecisions about which job to take and what career
(Oxford UP 2017). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 “Moral Weirdos”: Effective Altruism and Empathy in Engineering EducationAbstractPublic attention to the effective altruism (EA) movement—in which utilitarian moral calculationsare applied to career choices, seeking to maximize the good of an individual’s work—hasexploded over the last year. Unfortunately, that attention is currently monopolized by the scandalaround FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, EA’s highest-profile champion. At first glance, EAappears broadly consonant with broad trends in engineering education dedicated to applyingengineering work toward global human problems. Indeed, “EA for Engineers” seems
identity has changedthroughout the years, based on my academic experience and societal impact. My first exposure to the engineering profession was through a close relative, who worked as anengineering technologist for a small consulting firm. My initial impression of their work was thatthey mainly worked individually, performing calculations and creating technical drawings. Iinitially did not want to be an engineer, based on my lack of interest in architectural drawingsand external pressures to choose a more “feminine” profession, like teaching or nursing. A visitto the local university for their yearly Women in Engineering Day introduced me to differentsides of engineering, which drew me to a career in electrical engineering. At the time, my
authors, but to ensure that the lead authors (who, both early in their careers asengineering educators, generally have more to gain professionally from the publication of thispaper) took on the majority of the labor. In fact, the affordance of narrative control was asurprising by-product of this decision, and one which the lead authors did not feel entirelycomfortable with, especially early in the process. Jacque and Morgan often remarked that the actof synthesizing highly personal experiences of their co-authors was challenging, as they did notwish to overinterpret or misrepresent the experiences of others in service of the narrative. Thoughthis awareness alone does not eliminate the risk that the experiences of authors (particularlystudent
(e.g., theoretical, empirical, case study, etc.), student outcomes from therespective story-driven learning approaches tended to align across articles. Most commonly,outcomes tended to involve at least one of the following areas: 1) leadership and career skills, 2)well-being, 3) empowerment among marginalized groups, 4) self-concept clarity, 5) empathy andsense of belonging, and 6) learning skills and engagement. While the results from our analysisrevealed a relative paucity of story-driven learning in higher education, the conclusions show arange of positive impacts for students—highlighting the potential utility of story-driven learning. 2
PathwaysEngineering education is typically described using a “pipeline” metaphor, wherein students are shuffledalong pre-determined pathways toward a narrow set of career outcomes. However, several decades ofresearch have shown that this pipeline model does not accurately describe engineering trajectories andmay exclude students who enter the pipeline at different times and have other career outcomes in mind.Similarly, qualitative studies have shown that normative identities in engineering feature masculinestereotypes such as “geeks” and “nerds” that reproduce technical/social dichotomies. Several studies havesuggested that broadening the expected outcomes and identities in engineering to include “alternative”pathways and identities may contribute to a shift
is an important and complex site of negotiationbetween control and care: how do lab principal investigators (PIs) create environments that nurturethe development of individual trainees at multiple career stages, while advancing their own careerand research agenda in ways that will satisfy institutional expectations? This is fraught territory,grounded in an academic reward system that prioritizes individual performance. Persistent surveysof STEM trainees struggling with mental health [1], [2] highlight a culture of control linked tomeritocratic systems that can prioritize PI career advancement over the well-being of lab members.This culture is increasingly being challenged, by both trainees and mentors. How to support lableaders invested in
easily as do morefrequently invoked technical considerations. Further demonstrating the necessity ofsociotechnical education, Riley and Sciarra’s case study demonstrates that women inengineering education can benefit from opportunities to grapple with historical legacies relevantto their own experiences and career aims.In this paper, we analyze film representations of the École massacre from the early documentaryAfter the Montréal Massacre (Rogers 1990) to Denis Villeneuve’s 2009 feature dramatizationPolytechnique. We do not find that filmmakers over time have arrived at more comprehensiveaccounts of the tragedy or keener diagnoses of its causes. Instead, each telling becomes furtherremoved from the initial feminist understanding of the events
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Learning the impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion modules in an undergraduate electrical engineering classroomAbstract:In this paper, we present the design and implementation of a set of diversity, equity, andinclusion (DEI) based modules, created to be deployed in an introductory computing courseoffered to first year students in our program. Our objective is to ensure that engineeringundergraduate students, who are not historically exposed to DEI content within the engineeringcurriculum, are introduced to these important topics in the context of their technical courseworkand that they understand the relevance of DEI to their careers. We created 6 modules that cover awide range of topics
the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering culture, engineering careers in the public sector, and ethics and equity in STEM. Dimpho has several years of experience in thDr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto. Emily spent 20 years as a professional engineer, first as an R&D engineer in a Fortune 500 company, and then leadingDr. Andrea Chan, University of Toronto Andrea Chan is a Senior Research Associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering | University of TorontoMs. Emily Macdonald-Roach, University of Toronto
that many students’ passions (humanitarian work, justice, andenvironmental topics) directly relate to engineering and that their institutions can improve bymaking those connections. Our project differs slightly in that our effort is not to integrate theirpassions into their engineering coursework but to find ways of igniting their curiosity and passionin their liberal arts general education.Education is an endeavor in instrumentalism at the individual level (career attainment) and liberationat the societal level (ideological exploration). Liberty, freedom, and intellectual agility are commongoods requiring sound judgment; sound judgment requires breadth of understanding and curiosity.This work attempts to understand curiosity among first-year
, speaking, listening; managing process; adapting approach to circumstances; persuading and influencing others) 3. Teams and Groups a. Coordination, cooperation, collaboration b. Multidisciplinary teams, knowledge integration c. Negotiation and conflict management d. Relationship between individual capabilities and group functioning 4. Identity and Culture a. Duality/sociotechnical differentiation (technical/nontechnical; either/both; simplistic/complex; deterministic/contingency) b. Stage of career/role in organization c. “Typical/average engineer” as leader/entrepreneur (norm vs. exceptional)4.3 Topic Models Tables 2-4 display the
governance practices in higher education. His research interests include renewable energy, females in engineering, and quality assurance and governance. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Female engineering academics in the Global North and South: An exploration oflanguage of instruction, using Story Circles and Focus GroupsAbstractSustainable and inclusive development would benefit from an increase in female visibilityand leadership in the field of engineering. Particularly in the Global South, engineering iscrucial to development, and increasingly attractive to female students, but intersectionalbarriers restrict employment / career advancement. Our earlier research, published by ASEEin 2016 [1
into the expert-like practicesengineers might engage in to address challenges, but how and where engineers develop the abilityto engage in sociotechnical thinking throughout their careers is currently unclear. Sociotechnicalthinking is inherently complex, and while many engineering educators regard it as a critical skill,relatively little is understood about the learning experiences and processes needed to promotesociotechnical thinking. The purpose of this paper is to synthesize the literature on cognitivedevelopment and sociotechnical design theories and to envision a research area related to studentsand professional development of sociotechnical thinking in engineering design. In cognitivedevelopment, I highlight literature related to
improvement-basedstrategies are an essential part needed to ensure that the student populations feel supported and toretain students throughout their degree.Mental wellness is important to be discussed in the classroom at an early stage within students’professional careers to not only give them resources but to also improve the climate of the field.Engineering is a high-stress major where the goal is for students to be able to directly translate toa career-based environment after college. Studies recommend the engineering classroom shouldbe designed to teach students about skills beyond what the normal content is included within thesyllabus including problem recognition and solving, time management, and to collaborate withpeers on different hands-on
research interests related to technology and society, gender diversity and engineering education.Dr. Susanna Maria Bairoh, Academic Engineers & Architects in Finland TEK Susanna Bairoh holds a Doctor of Science (Economics) degree from Hanken School of Business and a Master of Social Science degree from University of Helsinki. She works as Research Manager at TEK (Academic Engineers & Architects in Finland) and is responsible for leading and managing TEK’s research activities and the research team. Through her research, she aims at improving gender equality, diversity and inclusion in technology workplaces and careers. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Perceived
student experiences, computing education, fostering mastery-based learning mindsets, and assessments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 (Re)visions: Approaches to Teaching Technical Communications and Professional Development in a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Course1. IntroductionIntegrating writing pedagogy-based practices and instruction into capstone curriculumdemonstrates the interconnectedness of the disciplines. While engineering programs and alumniof those programs report a need for technical and professional communication skills as part oftheir career success [1]. Success in their careers will depend on their ability to
engineers who worked on the SE3 committee, I heard similar reports about how theirfirms viewed this committee work relative to work on technical committees (like the SeismologyCommittee or the Existing Building Committee), which work to develop codes, standards, ormitigation strategies using the latest developments in research. While those involved in SE3noted the benefits that their involvement had to the career, they were not necessarily recognizedin terms of advancement in their firms for this work.Various interlocutors let me know that their work heading SE3 was valuable in terms of makingconnections with others and the work was well-regarded among others in the professionalorganization that shared the values of diversity, equity, and inclusion
complex sociotechnical and global contexts, as well as designing one’s ownengineering pathway and designing for real-world clients as required in our Capstone Designsequence. For assessing and growing this programmatic spine, we have carefully integrated theassessable performance indicators into our course delivery to expand what it means to be adesign engineer in a socially, and technologically, complex world.Problem Solving Five Years OutAs we develop our students for their post-graduate careers, we consider not only the mission andvalues of our department, but projections for student development and growth five years aftertheir learning experience in our courses. Program educational objectives (PEOs) help us to framestudent success as related
profession. As engineering educationfaculty, students, and support practitioners, we are engaging in a collaborative inquirymethodology to examine engineering education programs, recruitment, and curricula, andengineering career pathways to identify key practices that hinder learning about and workingtowards Solidarity Engineering. This work-in-progress presents a broad outline of work we areundertaking to explore what we call the “re-engineering” of both engineering education and ofpotential career pathways. Through our work, we hope to identify a broad set ofsolidarity-focused examples and methods. Further, we hope this paper inspires a largerconversation about how the engineering profession can reframe its ways of engaging within theworld to
to tell a story, write a reflection, follow provided prompts, or write a commentary.Contributors were given a series of prompts, that they could use formally, informally, or choosenot to use. They were told to write in a way that was meaningful to them, reflected who theywere, and how they wanted to communicate to other people. There are five reflections includedin this paper, but we had a total of 11 conversations with potential participants. Each of theseindividuals was enthusiastic about the vision and goal for the paper. However, six were unable tocommit to contributing to this paper. The reasons given for not participating included funding,discomfort being this transparent, concerns regarding career stability, and other reasons
Communication is widely misunderstood, and while this is perhaps especially truein STEM disciplines, STEM is not alone in their misconceptions. Outside of CommunicationStudies, Interpersonal Communication (IPC) tends to be treated as a personality trait (Okoro,Washington, & Thomas, 2017; Pert, 2019), and on popular career websites and in professionalcontexts alike, is most often defined in terms of “people skills,” “personal skills” (Doyle, 2021),or even “friendliness” (Indeed, 2021). IPC is also frequently discussed as a set of traits that areinherent to a person.However, the role of IPC in everyday professional communication is much deeper and morecomplex than cordiality; it is essential to functionality and effectiveness across disciplines
academic success and optimal emotional development of their students. Unfortunately,engineering students often do not have access to such relationships. Were engineering educatorsto better recognize the importance of these relationships and contribute to creating such acommunity, they could help to ensure engineering students were able to thrive academically andemotionally.C. Absence of Harassment and Expression without FearIn the United States, harassment is a growing problem in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) fields [14]. Harassment can be verbal, physical, or sexual and include anyunwelcome or unfavorable behavior due to one’s identity (e.g., gender, race, age, religion).Harassment has adverse impacts on career outcomes
computerengineering portion. Typical course topics in the materials and mechanical engineering portionof the course included: metals and atoms, hardness testing, microstructures and properties,Hooke’s Law, and the design of trusses. Typical course topics in the electrical and computerengineering portion included Ohm’s Law, the resistor color code, equivalent resistance, power,digital logic, ASCII, and concepts regarding computer programming like basic variables andconditional statements. In addition to these technical topics, professional orientation toengineering was addressed with lectures on career opportunities, resume development, etc.Centered on preliminary topics in computer, electrical, materials, and mechanical engineering,past versions of EG 101
about requiring engineering students to complete graded writing Q5 assignments in an engineering class? How helpful do you feel the graded writing assignments were in helping you to Q6 learn engineering statics? Explain your response. How helpful do you feel more extensive writing assignments would be to learning Q7 engineering statics? How helpful do you feel more extensive writing assignments would be to preparing Q8 you for an engineering career? As may be seen in Figure 4, a majority of the students have taken a writing class withinthe previous two years, but at the start of the semester a vast majority did not identify as a writer.Over
Paper ID #39634Mediation and Maintenance in Engineering Professional Work Practices:Findings from a Utility CompanyRussell Korte, The George Washington University Russell Korte, PhD. studies the social, cultural, and professional systems in organizations and higher education, along with their effects on learning and performance. This work focuses on the professional education and socialization of engineering students, the work of practicing engineers, as well as the prepa- ration of professionals for their future careers. Dr. Korte is an Associate Professor of Human and Organizational Learning at The George Washington