software, further optimization is required by doing a series of testruns.Even for small-manufacturing runs, this approach can be applied. The performance baselinesmake a very good starting point to help use the machine’s capabilities fully. A well-plannedapplication of HPM can see a 50% or better cycle time reduction, increasing the manufacturingthroughput by a factor of two. The time expended in applying HSM methodologies pays offalmost immediately, since the performance gains can be applied to manufacturing processes forboth existing and new parts.Bibliography1. Woody, B. A. & Smith, S. K. (2006). High Speed Machining Technology Basics, SME Technical Report.2. Arone, M. (1998). High Performance Machining. Hanser Gardner Publications.3. Oberg
, October 2007, pp. 283-294.16. Davis, B. G., Tools for Teaching, Jossey-Bass Publishers, p.100, 1993.17. Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., and Allen, D.E., “Chapter 1: Why Problem-based learning? A Case Study of Institutional Change in Undergraduate Education,” The Power of Problem-Based Learning, A Practical “How to” for Teaching Undergraduate Courses in Any Disciplinary, edited by Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., and Allen, D.E., Stylus Publishing, LLC, Sterling, Virginia, 2001, pp. 3-12.18. Daems, W., Smedt, B.D., Vanassche, P., Gielen, G., Sansen, W., and Man, H.D., “PeopleMover: An Example of Interdisciplinary Project-Based Education in Electrical Engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 46, No. 1, February 2003, pp. 157-167.19. Presley
experts who do not have adequate exposure to other industries to allow them to cross pollinate ideas from other fields.With all these rules of thumb too, “many of today’s layouts are the product of evolution ratherthan careful design3”. This stems from the size and the nature of the problem itself. Unless aperson like Charles Sorensen5, Vice-President of Production for the Ford Motor Company, isinvolved in creating a plant layout using experience and rules of thumb, you have to repeat theexercise several times before getting it correct.Sorensen’s story of how he created the production facility to assemble the B-24 Liberatorbomber during World War II is worth revisiting to learn what can be described closest to amethod for creating a plant
AC 2008-2236: OUTCOME ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN A MANUFACTURINGENGINEERING PROGRAMJahangir Ansari, Virginia State University Jahangir Ansari is an Associate Professor of Manufacturing Engineering in the Department of Engineering and Technology at Virginia State University. He received his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering in 1979 and Ph. D. degree in Mechanical Design and Production Engineering in 1983 both from Seoul National University. He joined the faculty at VSU in 2002. He has over 18 years of industrial experience in different areas including shipbuilding and cement plant industries. His research interests include Structural Vibration, FEM, CAD/CAM/CNC, and Computer Integrated
AC 2008-2101: DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW CURRICULUM FOR ROBOTICSINTERFACING ENGINEERINGYuqiu You, Morehead State University Page 13.408.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Development of a New Curriculum for Robotics Interfacing EngineeringI. IntroductionThis paper describes a course and laboratory of Robotics Interfacing Engineering for students ofmanufacturing technology program (ITMT) in the Department of Industrial and EngineeringTechnology (IET).There are four Robotics courses offered in the IET Department spanning from 100 level to 400level to teach concepts, operation, programming, maintenance, interfacing, and
AC 2008-1546: ANALYSIS OF VERBAL DATA FROM AUTOMATED SYSTEMDESIGN PROBLEM-SOLVINGSheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (“Tony”) Hsieh is an Associate Professor in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the Department of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in
AC 2008-1446: GREENING THE SUPPLY CHAIN: DEVELOPMENT OF ACOMPUTER GAME TO TEACH ENVIRONMENTALLY BENIGNMANUFACTURINGJacqueline Isaacs, Northeastern University JACQUELINE A. ISAACS is an Associate Director of the Center for High-rate Nanomanufacturing and an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Northeastern University in Boston, MA. Her research focuses on economic and environmental assessment of manufacturing. Initial development of Shortfall resulted from her CAREER grant funded by the National Science Foundation (DMI-9734054), and subsequent NSF funding (DMI-0537056) to continue its development.Jay Laird, Metaversal Studios JAY LAIRD is
AC 2008-1651: A PROCESS MAP FOR STATE-WIDE ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY /MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY CURRICULUM REFORMEric Roe, Hillsborough Community CollegeRichard Gilbert, University of South FloridaMarilyn Barger, University of South FloridaBradley Jenkins, St. Petersburg College Page 13.85.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 A Process Map for Statewide Engineering Technology /Manufacturing Technology Curriculum ReformAbstractOver the period of three years, FLATE, the National Science Foundation-funded FloridaAdvanced Technological Education Center for Manufacturing, has undertaken reform ofFlorida’s Associate in Science (A.S.) and Associate of
airplanes. The production goal was to make 108paper airplanes in a half-hour period – a takt time of 16.7 seconds. Three styles of airplaneswere manufactured in each session: 60 of model “A”; 30 of “B”, and; 18 of “C” (Figure 1).These designs were selected for aesthetics; none were very good flyers. Four airplanes of anymodel fit on a single sheet of 8-½”×11” paper. Each airplane followed the same basicmanufacturing process: 1. TRACE. A three-axis CNC knee mill marked the outlines and fold lines for four airplanes of one type on a sheet of paper taped to the bed. A marker was held in the machine’s tool holder. 2. CUT. The outline was cut with scissors. 3. FOLD. The airplane was folded along the marked lines. 4. TAPE. A short
AC 2008-1978: MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISE SIMULATION AS THEFOUNDATION COURSE AND SYNERGISTIC FOCUS OF ADVANCED COURSEHANDS-ON APPLICATIONPhil Waldrop, Georgia Southern University Dr. Phil Waldrop earned his Ph.D. from the Purdue University School of Technology. His industrial experiences range from turret lathe operator to Director of Advanced Process Development. His 11 years of aerospace R&D work included metal matrix composites and high speed machining, and responsibilities as Manager of Manufacturing Technology and Industrial Modernization technology development projects management for the B-2 aircraft program. He has performed invited service in an endowed chair as Stocker Visiting
scans. Its main advantage over the comparably priced scanners Page 13.991.5 (NextEngine and Roland) is that the accuracy is better and there is no set object size limitation that can be scanned, though 8” to 10” in length may be ideal. Educational price for the E-Scan with SLIM software is $ 5000.b) Reverse Engineering Software: i) Rhinoceros10 This software connects with digitizers for capturing existing model geometry. Editing and aligning imported data is possible though most users choose a different program to do so. Manual interface is required for these operations. Third party vendor plug-in is
engineering study, using local media to your advantage, on-campus recruitingtechniques, and ideas to improve student retention in engineering have all been discussed. Weinvite all manufacturing engineering programs to enter a national dialogue on manufacturingengineering education. All parties involved must be active participants in promotingmanufacturing engineering, manufacturing technology, and engineering education for our Page 13.276.9continued success in manufacturing.References1. Bee, D. and Meyer, B., 2007, Opportunities and Challenges for Manufacturing Engineering, 2007 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, American Society for Engineering
distortion is produced due to the nature of the stick-slip friction at speedsequal or close to zero. Page 13.1115.7REFERENCESFeeny, B. F., and Moon, F. C. (1989), “Autocorrelation on Symbol Dynamics for aChaotic Dry Friction Oscillator,” Physics Letters, Vol. A141, Nos.8, 9, pp. 397-400.Knapp, W. (1983), “Circular Test for Three-Coordinate Measuring Machines andMachine Tools,” Precision Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 115-124.Popp, K., and Stelter, P. (1990), “Nonlinear Oscillations of Structures Induced by DryFriction,” Nonlinear Dynamics in Engineering Systems, (W. Schiehlen, Ed.), SpringerVerlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, GermanyTobias, S. A. (1965), Machine
andevaluations assessing the efficacy of the proposed approach on student conceptual understandingand learning motivation.2. MethodsThe objective of this paper is to incorporate LEGO 3D design programs and systems inundergraduate industrial engineering courses to provide students with hands-on team labactivities that will help them better understand the challenging principles of micromanufacturingand industrial automation. These hands-on team activities were designed to achieve thefollowing pedagogical objectives: a) Increase student conceptual understanding by integrating theory with practice using LEGO 3D programs and systems b) Development of personal skills such as communications, technical writing and team working skills c
AC 2008-100: MANUFACTURING CENTRIC UNDERGRADUATE CAPSTONEEXPERIENCETodd Myers, Ohio University Todd D. Myers Ph.D, M.B.A. is a researcher in Center for Automatic Identification and an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial Technology at Ohio University. Dr. Myers has ten years of manufacturing experience in the supply side of the automotive industry. His responsibilities have included multi-plant materials management, ERP implementation, project management, and engineering management. His funded research has included RFID OEM capability studies, Barcode robustness studies, and Manufacturing Operations Studies. Dr. Myers is a certified GlobeRanger trainer and three-time recipient of the
, 40 cm) P = design load (400 lb., 182 kg)) E = Young’s Modulus σ = Yield Strength b = rung width h = rung height thickness The total cost is the sum of the material cost, processing cost, and the cost penalty. Theprocessing can be approximated by the expression:Cp = (P/Ac) x (Tmp / 1800) x CWf x HTf x Rpc x L x Ac x NIWhere:P = total Perimeter of Cross-section (in)Ac = cross-sectional area (in2)Tmp = melting point of alloy (degrees K)CWf = cold work factor = 1.25 if material is cold worked, otherwise use 1.0HTf = heat treating factor = 1.35 if material is heat treated, otherwise use 1.0NI = hollow internal section factor = 0.70 if material has a hollow internal section, otherwiseuse 1.0L
AC 2008-1400: APPLICATION OF LEAN CONCEPTS TO THE TEACHING OFLEAN SYSTEMSArlie Hall, University of Kentucky Dr. Arlie Hall (B.S.E.E. and Ed.D.) is a faculty with the University of Kentucky Center for Manufacturing, and former manager of the Lean Systems Program at the university. After working at IBM for 26 years, Dr. Hall joined the University of Kentucky in 1994 and partnered with Toyota as the primary architect of the university’s lean manufacturing curriculum. He has taught lean manufacturing to undergraduate and graduate students, and to industry participants from around the world.Lawrence Holloway, University of Kentucky Dr. Larry Holloway is the TVA Endowed Professor of
AC 2008-1815: ANALYSIS OF THE CURRICULUM OF MANUFACTURINGENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMSSean Falkowski, University of Dayton Sean Falkowski is an assistant professor of Manufacturing Engineering Technology at the University of Dayton. He recently worked for Delphi Automotive as a manufacturing engineering supervisor and project engineer. He earned a MS in Engineering Management from the University of Dayton and a BSME from Kettering University. Of interest are the topics of recruiting and retention of manufacturing engineering students. Also he is interested in various manufacturing technical subjects such as machining and tooling design, design for producibility, and automotive
nation. The traditional recruitment approach of static websites and brochures fail to attractthe interest of potential students. This approach must be adjusted to include the evolving interestsof each new incoming generation of students; if it’s not animated, colorful, virtual, “cool” andmost importantly part of their current world, capturing student interest is difficult at best. This paper will address a planned summer workshop for high school students that will usethe guitar to introduce the “fun” side of engineering and specifically manufacturing. Theworkshops build on experience from semester classes in stringed instrument manufacturing andfrom an adult summer workshop on guitar making. Additionally, details of the guitar workshop
AC 2008-1460: SIX SIGMA: DOES IT BELONG IN THE MANUFACTURINGCURRICULUM?Alan Leduc, Ball State University Alan Leduc is an Associate Professor, in the Manufacturing Engineering Technology program at Ball State University and the creator and advisor for the Minor in Process Improvement which focuses on Six Sigma training and will provide students and opportunity to earn a Six Sigma Black Belt certification prior to graduation. In addition to 19 years of teaching experience Alan has 25 years of experience prior experience in industry in the areas of manufacturing, quality, and engineering, ending his industrial career as a Vice President and General Manager. Alan has an M.B.A., M.S
AC 2008-2740: THE VALUE OF VALUE STREAM MAPPING TO STUDENTSMichael Lobaugh, Pennsylvania State University-Erie Page 13.1281.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 The value of Value Stream Mapping to studentsAbstractThis paper provides a discussion of the value of teaching the lean manufacturing topic ofValue Stream Mapping to senior students in engineering. Value Stream Mapping is a techniquethat is used to view, on a broad level, a company’s manufacturing of a part family. The techniqueis used to identify possible improvement areas within the manufacturing plant. Once identified,the appropriate Lean Manufacturing technique is used to meet specific
AC 2008-439: ASEE ABSTRACT 08 CHEN & COX - MANUFACTURING DIVISIONJoseph Chen, Iowa State University Joseph C. Chen, Ph.D., PE, is a Professor in the Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering at Iowa State University. He received both his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Industrial Engineering at Auburn University in 1990 and 1994, respectively. His teaching interests include: Lean manufacturing system design, automated manufacturing processes, facility design, Taguchi design in quality, etc. His research interests include: manufacturing system control, manufacturing system design, design for manufacturing education, smart CNC machining, simulation as a design tool, simulation
, SMTA, IEEE and ABET. Prior to joining NDSU, he held manufacturing engineering and management positions in aerospace, commercial sheet metal and automotive industries for 25 years. He also held a faculty position at University of Cincinnati for 15 years. He is a certified manufacturing engineer and earned the BS and MS in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University and the PhD in Engineering Management from University of Missouri-Rolla.Daniel Ewert, North Dakota State University Daniel L. Ewert has been Professor and Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University since January 2001. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in biomedical
Laboratory for Computer Integrated Manufacturing CoursesI. IntroductionThis paper describes the development of an online laboratory for students in Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) courses. Computer-Integrated Manufacturing is acomprehensive topic taught in a 400 level course to senior undergraduate students, and in a 600level online course to graduate students. Teaching computer-integrated manufacturing coursescan be a challenge because of the breadth of topics spanning from manufacturing technology toelectronic technology and computer technology which encompasses concepts frommanufacturing processes such as modeling and milling, to manufacturing automation systemsand manufacturing information management
). Page 13.437.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Digital Manufacturing and Simulation CurriculumIntroductionOhio Northern University is in the tenth year of a curriculum utilizing advanced industrialcomputer simulation software. The virtual simulation classes are offered in a sequence of threequarters, earning four credits per quarter. Students learn specific simulation applications fromtutorials and online course materials. Teams of students then work with local companies to createsimulation models of actual manufacturing operations. Each student team prepares PowerPointmaterials which are presented to representatives of the company. Recent projects included workwith major automotive original equipment
modeling, visualization and fabrication a“common knowledge” for middle school, high school and community college students.What is nanotechnology?According to the Encyclopædia Britannica¹ (2008), nanotechnology is defined as “themanipulation and manufacture of materials and devices on the scale of atoms or small groups ofatoms.” Nanotechnology is the creation of materials, components, devices and systems at theatomic or nanometer level. Given this structural modification, products designed and createdwith materials at this scale will perform exceptionally. Nanotechnology as a buzz word iscurrently viewed from two major perspectives, science and technology. From the scientificperspective, it concerns a basic understanding of physical, chemical, and
AC 2008-400: MODERN TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES FOR TEACHINGMANUFACTURING ENGINEERING IN THE DIGITAL AGEPriya Manohar, Robert Morris University Dr. Priya Manohar is working currently an Assistant Professor of Manufacturing Engineering at Robert Morris University, Pittsburgh, PA. He has a Ph. D. in Materials Engineering (1998) and Graduate Diploma in Computer Science (1999) from University of Wollongong, Australia and holds Bachelor of Engineering (Metallurgical Engineering) degree from Pune University, India (1985). He has worked as a post-doctoral fellow at Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (2001 – 2003) and BHP Institute for Steel Processing and Products, Australia (1998 – 2001). Dr. Manohar
responsibility for both clearinghouses wasassigned to the Sinclair Community College team.In addition to integrating the two websites into a comprehensive resource for all of engineeringtechnology education, the newly formed Manufacturing and Engineering Resource Center(MERC) will also focus on attracting students at the pre-college level into the STEM (Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) pipeline, and also will research trends and bestpractices in engineering technology and manufacturing education programs. The goal is toincrease the national impact of engineering and manufacturing technology education reformthrough the dissemination of model instructional resources via the web-based clearinghouse, aswell as by offering faculty