wouldalso be helpful to administer the survey to a similar group of students who did not receive theintervention. Based on the lack of literature about the growth mindset in engineering curricula,this area of study has much potential.Appendix A: MINDSET SURVEYAttitudes about difficult classes and learning1. What have you heard about the difficulty of MSE 308? a. It’s really hard b. It’s kind of hard c. It’s not too hard d. It’s not hard at all2. What have you heard about the time commitment involved with MSE 308? a. It takes a ton of time b. It takes a lot of time c. It takes a moderate amount of time d. It is not too time intensive3. What else have you heard about MSE 308? (short answer)4. What are you expectations for your
graduated and gone to work – at a plastic formingcompany wanted to build a thermoforming machine and conduct material experiments onthermoformed specimens. His co-op experience clearly gave rise to interest in this project.A plan solidified with first-semester (spring) objectives for the four students to: 1. Design/build a 3D printer and thermoforming machine that could produce specimens for material testing a. Three students responsible for the 3D printer b. One student responsible for the thermoforming machine 2. Design an experimentation procedure for 3D printed and thermoformed materials 3. Produce a variety of specimens that could be tested, primarily in tensionThe option remained for a second semester (summer
to demonstrate the behavior of shape memory alloys. A nitinol asshown in Figure 1(b), an alloy of Ni and Ti, is used in the lab since it is the most well knownshape memory alloy that was developed by the U.S. Naval Ordance Laboratory. (a) (b) Figure 1. Photographs of (a) PZT specimens and (b) a nitinol wireThe first two experiments, including measurement of electric displacement vs. electric field loopof PZTs and determination of electromechanical behavior of PZTs through compressive tests, aredesigned to cover the fundamental concepts that emphasize on piezoelectric and mechanicalproperties. Figure 2 shows the needed equipment for the first experiment
group has an especially high confidencein their understanding of class topics.Table 14 shows a breakdown of final grades in the course. The highest concentration of gradesfor distance students was at the ‘C’ grade, with over 10% of distance students in the D/F/Wcategory. In contrast, no on-campus students finished in the D/F/W range and over 80% finishedin the ‘A’ or ‘B’ ranges. With the exception of the semester project, the average grade forcampus students was higher in each of the grading categories than for distance students(homework, exams, final exam). The difference was smallest on the final exam (72.9% vs.72.5%) and largest in the homework category (108.1% vs. 91.4%). The greater than 100%average on homework for campus students reflects
aredependent upon leveraging the motivation and enthusiasm of materials professionalsrepresenting regional universities, professional organizations, business, and industry. This paper will provide an overview of the West Houston Center, and the REEMS andREEMS REU programs: 1. The West Houston Science and Engineering Center 2. REEMS Program Timeline, Student Demographics, and Activities a. Recruitment b. Demographics c. Academic Year Activities d. Transfer Guidance e. Networking f. REEMS REU 3. Evaluation Methodologies & Impacts a. Discussion of Evaluation Instruments b. REU Student Focus Group Remarks c. REU Faculty Focus Group
test matrix in evaluating spatial visualizationability of students in mixed reality environment. The work will them involve the implementation of the Holo-MSE app in introductorymaterial science course to teach the selected concepts. Students will be asked to utilize theapp, interact with holograms and take built-in quizzes for each module (Crystal structures andMiller indices). Their performance will be compared with the historical student performancedata for the two concepts as well as with a control group where the mode of instruction willbe intentionally kept traditional, i.e. reliance on 2D drawings and video animations.5. References[1] G. M. Bodner and R. B. Guay, “The Purdue Visualization of Rotations Test,” Chem. Educ., vol
Paper ID #21452Exploration and Innovation in Creative Material EducationDr. Robert A Heard, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Heard holds a Teaching Professor in the Materials Science and Engineering Department at Carnegie Mellon University. Past work includes activities as an industrial consultant, entrepreneur/president of two companies, and vice president positions in several engineering companies. His experience lies largely in the development and application of specialized new technologies and business opportunities, having significant international business and project experience. He has served on the Board of
toanalyze their bins from class and state if, after seeing others’ sorting and discussing largerimpacts of trash in class, their bin sorting would change if asked to sort their contents once more.The collection of questions asked are below: - Q1: In class, our group was assigned this category type: (A) Property, (B) Use, (C) Life Cycle, (D) Cost, or (E) I was not in class. - Q2: What bins below would you use if you had a second opportunity to sort your trash using the SAME CATEGORY you were assigned in class? (A) Opacity, (B) Weight, (C) Cost, (D) Resale Value, (E) Perishability, (F) Transparency, (G) Use, (H) Rigidity, (I) Recyclable Components, (J) Biodegradable, (K) Material Type, (L) Other (add your own) - Q3
Paper ID #21339Incorporating Active Learning and Sustainable Engineering Concepts into aRequired Materials ClassDr. William M. Jordan, Baylor University William Jordan is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University. He has B.S. and M.S. degrees in metallurgical engineering from the Colorado School of Mines, an M.A. degree in theology from Denver Seminary, and a Ph.D. in mechanics and materials from Texas A & M University. He teaches materials-related courses and does research with natural fiber composite materials. He is also interested in entrepreneurship,sustainable engineering, and appropriate technology
Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as part of the Strategic In-structional Initiatives Program (SIIP), by a National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER Awardto A.L.F. (Grant No. DMR-1350008), by a NSF CAREER Award to J.A.K (Grant No. 1654182),by a NSF CAREER Award to C.L. (Grant No. 1554435), by a NSF CAREER Award to R.M.(Grant No. 1654065), and by a NSF CAREER Award to A.S. (Grant No. DMR-1555153). Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References [1] K. Thornton, S. Nola, R. E. Garcia, M. Asta, and G. B. Olson, “Computational materials science and engineer- ing education: A survey of trends and needs
. Comparison of the number of students (top number) and fraction (bottom number) in Study 1 with errors in parts 1 and 2 of the FCC (111) plane. (a) “Should touch” misconception. (b) “Missing atoms” misconception. (a) FCC (111) “Should Touch” (b) FCC (111) “Atoms Missing” Part 2 Part 2 N=46 N=46 Error No Error Error No Error Error 16 13 Error 1 10 0.35 0.28 0.02 0.22 Part 1
Outcomes Question Number 1 I am able to search materials and materials a, c Q1 identification (non-metals), testing standards, and testing method using library resources and internets. 2 I am able to understand the materials specifications a, c, d Q2 and characterize the properties of non-metals for design specifications. 3 I am able to identify and select proper materials for a, b, d Q3 product design using technical information and resources. 4 I am able to analyze the lab experimental results and a, b, c, g, h Q4 to write
Paper ID #22290New Resources for Introduction to Materials ClassMrs. Hannah Melia, Granta Design, Ltd. Hannah Melia leads the Teaching Resources Team at Granta Design and has responsibility for Materials Educational Resources. She has a degree in Materials Science and Metallurgy and a Post Graduate Cer- tificate in Design, Manufacturing and Management from the University of Cambridge. She has worked in the United States and Germany on medical device design and technology transfer. Over the last 9 years she has interacted with academics that use CES EduPack around the world. c American Society for