, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 131–146, 2005. [2] B. J. Sottile, L. E. Cruz, Y.-A. L. Burleson, and K. McLain, “It’s about time: An analysis of student activities under remote learning,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021. [3] T. H. Macan, C. Shahani, R. L. Dipboye, and A. P. Phillips, “College students’ time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress.” Journal of educational psychology, vol. 82, no. 4, p. 760, 1990. [4] E. A. Holman and E. L. Grisham, “When time falls apart: The public health implications of distorted time perception in the age of COVID-19.” Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy, vol. 12, no. S1, p. S63, 2020. [5] R. V. Adams and E. Blair, “Impact of
andgamifying formative assessment. Figure 4 shows the application pictures of the course syllabi atSt. Ambrose. b. Electronics a. Control Theory c. Heat TransferFigure 2. Course syllabus application pictures employed at St. AmbroseResults and DiscussionInstructor 1 Reflection:Background and Context:I am an assistant professor at a research-intensive university which is the largest university in USby student enrollment located in Texas, United States (about 73,000 students). I have beenemployed there since January 2020. During COVID-19, the biggest challenge I encountered wasstudent motivation and class attention. I started to evolve
organized and chaired numerous sessions, fora, symposia, and tracks for several ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) and APS (American Physical Society) conferences and served as the Chair of the ASME Micro/Nano Fluid Dynamics Technical Committee. Moreover, he served as an Associate Editor for the ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering; currently, he is an Editor for Electrophoresis. Prof. Dutta is an elected Fellow of ASME, and he is a recipient of the prestigious Fulbright Professorship sponsored by the US Department of State.David B. Thiessen, Washington State University David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in 1992 and has been at Washington State
of data. Table 1 shows the multiple streamsof data, data analysis methods, and utility of that stream of data in understanding facets of success.We started with the investigation of students in our online MSME program since that project a)had IRB approval; b) was already underway; and c) was aligned with long-term goals of ourdepartment [34]. Therefore, the parts of the study for which preliminary results are reportedcorrespond to the row outlined in boldface and shaded in Table 1.Table 1: Description of data streams, utility, analysis methods Stream of Data Purpose Analysis Methods Statistical analysis of Analyze broad patterns in student Quantitative descriptive and
mathematics background with the success of engineering students [19].More recently, Zaurin et al. investigated the impact of incorporating an Adaptive LearningModule in Statics to review the mathematical prerequisite knowledge the students need [20].Two multivariate models were estimated: (a) pass/fail outcome and (b) grade outcome (classifiedin 5 levels) using a multivariate ordered logit model. In these models, the effects of adaptivelearning methods and other factors on the student's final grade were captured. The model resultsoffer several important findings. First, the pass/fail model clearly highlights the role of themodules in increasing pass rate while controlling for all other student attributes. Also, theadaptive learning module had a
%). As theimpact of the disruption subsided, courses using the Quizzes feature declined, but not back to the2019 use-level. (a) (b) Figure 1. Percentage of courses that used Grading LMS features, (a) Mid-Spring, (b) SpringTo better understand the use of the Quizzes and Gradebook Entries features, box-and-whiskerplots were created. Figure 2 shows the distribution in the number of quizzes the coursesadministered. It is very evident that the average number of Quizzes (shown using the lineconnecting the bars) administered via the LMS for each course peaked in Spring 2020 andSpring 2021 though the median number of Quizzes (shown as the line
resistance. Testing and Validation Conduct tests Need under varying pressure conditions to verify performance.After the general prompt, a follow-up prompt was used: 'Create 2D and 3Dmodels of the hose clamp.' Figures 1.d and 1.b were generated in response.However, it is evident that these outputs merely depict basic shapes within acoordinate system and do not resemble proper engineering drawings. Figure 1illustrates a comparison between the student-created drawing and the bot-generated output Figure 1. Comparison of desired 3D
collaboration and adaptive teachingmethods in mixed-level classrooms. While engagement and confidence increased, some studentsnoted that collaboration between high school and college students was sometimes limited.Suggestions for improvement included more structured group interactions and clearerconnections between course content and real-world applications. A Engagement Levels B Collaboration Effectiveness 60 60 High School High School
implementing theengineering design process into engineering problems. The education class was a foundationsclass in education. In collaboration 1, engineering and education students collaborated to developand deliver engineering lessons to fourth or fifth graders. The original model was for theelementary students to come to campus for an engineering field trip (Figure 2a), which wasadapted starting in the spring 2020 semester due to the COVID-19 pandemic to includeasynchronous, online, and onsite engineering lessons (Figure 2b), based on the progression of thepandemic (Table 1) (a) (b)Figure 2. Collaboration 1 lessons during a field trip to campus (a) and at the elementaryschool (b
, including a combination filter and regulator, a shutoff valve, anda manifold, while the back is used for mounting power supplies for control and data acquisition.The control panel is currently sparsely utilized, allowing for future expansion and customization. (a) (b) Figure 4: Control panel (a) front and (b) back. Air prep and manifolding are mounted to the front of the control panel for easy access while 5V and 24V power supplies are mounted to the back. The remaining pegboard provides additional mounting space for future builds. The final component of the pneumatic cart is the sandbox. The sandbox consists of adrawer
individual and group work such that 41% of the total projectgrade was based on individual activities and 59% of the total project grade was based on theperformance of the team. A significant proportion of the grade was based on individual activitiesto encourage all students to be accountable to the team. It was also important to have a strongproportion of the grade be based on success of the team to promote interdependence of the team. a. Automatic Paper Plane Launcher b. Fish Feeding Rowboat c. Coin Dispenser d. Light Sensing Robotic Car Figure 1 Teams created a range of robotic systems such as those illustrated here. These systems were expected to meet the requirements for the 4-H Robotics requirements for
attributes: (a) the necessary technical knowledge, skills, and abilities to work intheir chosen field, (b) an appreciation for how all kinds of diversity strengthen engineering andcomputer science as disciplines, (c) knowledge of how to act in inclusive ways and createinclusive environments within their fields, and (d) consideration of diverse populations who areimpacted by their professional practice [4]. The thermodynamics activity focused on helpingdevelop attributes a, b, and d.Both the quick and long student reflection pieces showed that students understood the overalleffect group composition can have on the design process, helping reiterate attribute (b). In thequick reflection, 73% of students indicated that group composition mattered when
* = p-value < .05While there were no significant differences across the periods of pre-COVID, transition,COVID/online, and post-COVID/return to in-person (Figure 1), the means of all the CATMEvariables dropped from the pre-COVID semesters to Spring 2020; whereas depending on thevariable, the means either increased or decreased again. However, following the return to onlinelearning in Fall 2021 and Spring 2022, teamwork effectiveness skills seemed to have anincreasing tendency.Figure 1. Plots of Means of the Treatment and Comparison over the several semesters forteamwork effectiveness categories a. Contributing to the team’s work b. Interacting with teammates c. Keeping the team on track d. Expecting
systematic review of the literature from 2011 to 2021,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 114, pp. 1–17, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101996.[4] E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni, “Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study,” Sci. Educ., vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 493–534, 2004, doi: 10.1002/sce.10131.[5] H. Thiry, T. J. Weston, S. L. Laursen, and A.-B. Hunter, “The Benefits of Multi-Year Research Experiences: Differences in Novice and Experienced Students’ Reported Gains from Undergraduate Research,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 260–272, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-11-0098.[6] R. Taraban, E. Prensky, and C. W
ofthe provided glycol-water mixtures is the best engine coolant for cold weather?" Studentsanalyzed engine coolant performance between three fluids given as unknown propylene glycol-to-water ratios, simply labeled A, B, and C. They were asked to perform viscosity, specific heatcapacity, thermal conductivity, and density for each to predict the propylene glycol-to-waterratios. The students performed experimentation during the first three labs by following theprovided protocol modified from the relevant ASTM procedure. Except for the density lab, eachteam of three students was provided access to eye droppers, a precision pipette, graduatedcylinders, and a precision scale. Then they were asked to develop their own protocol to measurethe density
withdrawfrom the course after the first few weeks due to the high programming requirements and difficultconcepts of data science algorithms. For example, in Fall 2021, 10 undergraduate studentsenrolled in this course in the beginning but 3 of them ended up dropping the course. ii) Thequality of the course projects of undergraduate students is much lower than that of graduatestudents in general. Based on students’ feedback, this is mostly because a) the undergraduatestudents have limited research experience and b) some of the undergraduate students need tospend lots of time and effort getting familiar with programming. What’s worse, the situation isn’tgetting better in Fall 2022 compared to Fall 2021 despite the efforts being made to designsimpler
reinforcedifferent technical communications skills and that both course types may be needed to provideopportunities for student growth in the middle years.References[1] Donnell, J. A., Aller, B. M., Alley, M., & Kedrowicz, A. A. (2011, June). Why industry saysthat engineering graduates have poor communication skills: What the literature says. In 2011asee annual conference & exposition (pp. 22-1687).[2] Sageev, P., & Romanowski, C. J. (2001). A message from recent engineering graduates in theworkplace: Results of a survey on technical communication skills. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 90(4), 685-693.[3] Buckley JM, Trauth A, Burris D, De Rosa A. Implementation of a stand-alone, industry-centered technical communications course in a mechanical
programs ofdeveloping curiosity and an entrepreneurial mindset are similar to the objectives of the authors ofthis paper. However, the approach presented here is to explicitly develop curiosity before moreopen-ended real-world projects, in a “walk before you run” paradigm. Furthermore, the approachpresented in this paper, in which all students work on the same lab and design assignments, isefficient to teach to a large number of students.MethodsCourse and Project StructureThe Mechanical Engineering senior design course, MAE 156A&B, at University of California atSan Diego (UCSD) is taught in a 2-quarter sequence. During the first six weeks of the sequence,students work in pairs (with some groups of 3) on a mechatronic project that
specificconstraints such as total length, height, width, and maximum number of joints. To ensure aseamless transition between parts two and three, the third phase occurs just before the completionof the second part, involving the creation of 3D drawings and subsequent 3D printing of the trussdesigns. Finally, students present their 3D-printed bridges in class for measurement, ensuring thatprototypes conform to the specified parameters. Previous iterations of the course studentsconstructed bridges using craft sticks in one semester, while in another, they utilized laser cuttingfor constructing trusses and cross members. a b c dFigure 1
of the literature,” Improving Schools, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 267–277, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1177/1365480216659733.[11] B. W. Lilly, L. M. Abrams, M. Neal, K. Srinivasan, and D. Mendelsohn, “DEVELOPING AN EFFECTIVE PLATFORM FOR INTRODUCING MECHANICAL ENGINEERING IN A LARGE PUBLIC UNIVERSITY,” 2012. [Online]. Available: http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IMECE/proceedings- pdf/IMECE2012/45219/517/2479745/517_1.pdf[12] E. Coyle and E. J. Coyle, “2006-2565: THE VERTICALLY-INTEGRATED PROJECTS (VIP) PROGRAM IN ECE AT PURDUE: FULLY INTEGRATING UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION AND GRADUATE RESEARCH.” [Online]. Available: http://epics.ecn.purdue.edu/.[13] C. B. Zoltowski and E. J. Delp, “Vertically Integrated
engineering industry [12]. ABETemphasizes the importance of developing technical and professional skills to better preparegraduates for the current expectations of employers [13]. A variety of competencies are neededto create holistic engineers, and ABET articulates the competencies that graduates shoulddevelop through their degree programs in Student Outcomes 1-7 [14].B. Teaching variety and active learningThe development of technical and professional skills expected by employers requires acurriculum to be implemented with a variety of teaching practices and strategies. A variety ofteaching practices and strategies can be identified by observing the qualitative differencesbetween assignments, forms of assessment, and activities used within a course
Paper ID #38302Board 135: Undergraduate Projects/Research in a Liberal Arts CollegeDr. Niloofar Kamran, Cornell College ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH IN A LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGENiloofar KamranAssistant Professor of EngineeringINTRODUCTION FIRST PROJECT, GESTURE- SECOND PROJECT, SPACE DEBRIS THIRD PROJECT, WIND TUNNEL CONTROLED PIANO• Cornell College is a liberal arts college with an
Paper ID #38567Quarter to Semester Transition: Lessons Learned from a MechanicalEngineering CaseDr. Amanda C. Emberley, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Emberley is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at California Polytechnic State Uni- versity, San Luis Obispo. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Quarter to Semester Transition: Lessons Learned from a Mechanical Engineering CaseOverview During the fall of 2021, our university was mandated to make the transition from ourhistorical quarter-based system to a semester-based system, effective starting the
Paper ID #38966Work in Progress: Specifications Grading in a System Modeling CourseDr. Scott F. Kiefer, York College of Pennsylvania Scott Kiefer has spent the past twenty-one years teaching mechanical engineering at four different col- leges. He started at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez in the traditional role of teaching and administering a modest graduate research program. At Trine University, a small private school in An- gola, Indiana, he focused on undergraduate education while teaching ten different courses ranging from introductory freshman courses to senior capstone. Scott also served as an advisor to
Paper ID #47898Integrating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into a Thermal-Fluid Sciences CourseNancy J. Moore PhD, North Carolina State University The author is a Teaching Associate Professor at North Carolina State University in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department. She teaches undergraduate courses in the thermal-fluid sciences and is the course coordinator for Thermal-Fluid Sciences. Her pedagogical research supports her teaching methods and philosophy. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Integrating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into a Thermal-Fluids CourseAbstractAt
Paper ID #43380Introducing Social and Environmental Sustainability Aspects Cohesively throughoutthe Student Experience: One Course at a Time while Considering the Programas a WholeDr. Elisabeth Smela, University of Maryland, College Park Elisabeth Smela is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Maryland. She received a BS in physics from MIT and a PhD in electrical engineering from the University of Pennsylvania. Previously, Dr. Smela had worked as a research scientist in Link¨oping, Sweden and in Risø, Denmark before becoming Vice President of Research and Development at Santa Fe Science and Technology
Paper ID #38757Mini-Lab Activities to Stimulate Students’ Conceptual LearningMr. Abdelrahman Atef YoussefProf. Shadi Balawi, Texas A&M University Dr. Balawi is an Instructional Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Texas A&M. He teaches in the areas of materials, manufacturing, and design. His interests are in the areas of Engineering Design for Disciplinary STEM Educational Research, Team Formation and Team Skill Education.Matt Pharr, Texas A&M University Matt Pharr is an Associate Professor and J. Mike Walker ’66 Faculty Fellow in Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M
Paper ID #37975Work in Progress: Introducing Process Simulators to MechanicalEngineering Seniors in a Thermofluids CourseProf. Ibrahim Hassan P.E., Texas A&M University at Qatar Dr. Ibrahim Hassan has over twenty years of research experience in the field of Energy and Thermal Fluid Sciences. His research interests include Heat Transfer, Multiphase Flow, Flow Assurance, and Turbomachinery.Mr. Omar Al-Ani, Texas A&M University at Qatar ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Introducing Process Simulators to Mechanical Engineering Seniors in a Thermofluids
Paper ID #36698Board 130: Continuous Improvement of a Mechanical Engineering SeniorSeminar Using Student FeedbackDr. Yucheng Liu, South Dakota State University Dr. Yucheng Liu (PhD, PE, FASME, FSAE) currently serves as the Department Head of Mechanical Engineering (ME) Department at South Dakota State University (SDSU) and holds the Sander Professor of Entrepreneurial Engineering in the Jerome J. Lohr College of Engineering at SDSU. Prior to joining SDSU in the fall of 2021, Dr. Liu was an Associate/Full Professor in the ME Department at Mississippi State University (MSU) since the fall of 2014. In that department, he
Paper ID #43347Problem Solution Error Detection as a Means of Learning Assessment inFluid MechanicsDr. Thomas Shepard, University of St. Thomas Thomas Shepard is an Associate Professor at the University of St. Thomas in St. Paul, Minnesota. He teaches courses in the thermal/fluid sciences, aerodynamics, introduction to engineering and accompanying labs. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Problem Solution Error Detection as a Means of Learning Assessment in Fluid MechanicsIntroductionThe development of problem-solving skills can be accomplished in a