improve student performance in MEEN 221and lower the number of students that repeat the course. Ultimately this should improve graduationrates and retention of students in the non-MEEN engineering majors.References[1] H. Vasquez, A. A. Fuentes, R. A. Freeman. “Improving Student Retention and Engagement in Statics through Online Formative Assessment and Recitations”. Proceedings of the 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, 2012.[2] X. K. Brandon, B. M. Holloway, B. Pierson. “Engineering Education and Quantified Self: Utilizing a Student-Centered Learning Analytics Tool to Improve Student Success”. Proceedings of the 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[3] S. L. Fiore, S. P. Fagan, D
. 2016, Accessed: Mar. 17, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/blended-learning-in-a-rigid-body-dynamics-course-using-on-line- lectures-and-hands-on-experiments.[3] D. O’Connor, “Investigations into Engineering Dynamics Theory: A Student-Led Project to Utilize Smartphone Technology,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017, Accessed: Mar. 17, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/investigations-into-engineering-dynamics-theory-a-student-led-project- to-utilize-smartphone-technology.[4] C. D. Facciolo and A. Behrouzi, “Interactive Physical Experiments in an Advanced Undergraduate Structural Dynamics Course,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
.[4] M. G. Morgan, "Theory of transactional distance.," in Keegan, D. (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. , NY, Rotledge, 1993, pp. 22-38.[5] Y. Chen, "Transactional distance in World Wide Web learning environments.," in Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2001, pp. 327-338.[6] K. W. Tunks, " An introduction and guide to enhancing online instruction with web 2.0 tools.," Journal of Educators Online 9, 2012.[7] A. Purwar and C. A. Scott, " An Online Engineering Dynamics Class for College Sophomores: Design, Implementation, and Assessment," in ASEE , Tampa, FL, 2019.[8] D. Baker, "Colorado State University Online," [Online]. Available: https://www.online.colostate.edu
2012 and 2019 [5].This paper will describe the philosophical and practical questions which arose in adoptingDELTA’s gamification module for use in Engineering Statics at NC State. Each of the questionsbelow could be answered in very different ways in different situations with different instructors;Every solution has pros and cons. This paper states the philosophical questions we agonized overand describes the solutions the team adopted for this version of Statics. Any similar project mayhave different answers to these questions but will likely encounter the need to answer them oneway or the other. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Annual
Paper ID #25469Board 101: Project Based Learning for a Mechanical Engineering Major Stu-dent: The Sustainability of Internal Combustion Engines (Student Poster)Mr. Aaron Price Barnett Aaron Barnett is currently a sophomore at Salt Lake Community College studying Material Science En- gineering with a minor in Chemistry. His academic focus includes renewable energy and sustainable materials. As well as helping shape a new generation of engineers and scientists to continue improving the world.Dr. Nick M. Safai, Salt Lake Community College Dr. Nick M. Safai is an ASEE Fellow. He has been an ASEE officer and member for the past
. Davishahl, L. Singleton, and W. H. Goodridge, “Do they understand your language? Assess their fluency with vector representations,” In Proceedings of 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, June 16- 19, 2019.[7] P. Barniol and G. Zavala, “Force, velocity, and work: The effects of different contexts on students’ understanding of vector concepts using isomorphic problems,” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 020115-1-020115-15, 2014.[8] R. D. Knight, “Vector knowledge of beginning physics students,” Physics Teacher, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 74-78, 1995.[9] K. J. Shryock, A. R. Srinivasa, and J. E. Froyd, “Assessing first-year calculus
; Exposition, Seattle, Washington.16. Vitali, R., & Perkins, N. C., & Finelli, C. J., “Incorporating IMU Technology to Demonstrate Concepts in Undergraduate Dynamics Courses,” Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah.17. Shelley, J., “Assessing Learning Outcomes In A Broadcast Learning Environment: Application Of The Dynamics Concept Inventory,” Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas.18. McVey, M., & Luchies, C. W., & Giraldo, C., & Sidener, L., “Developing Problem- Solving Skills in Dynamics: Implementation of Structured Homework Assignments,” Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.19
: https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=505105. [Accessed: 02-Feb-2019].[11] D. A. Chen and G. D. Hoople, “Contextualizing a New General Engineering Curriculum in the Liberal Arts,” 2017 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., Jun. 2017.[12] E. A. Reddy, B. Przestrzelski, S. M. Lord, and I. Khalil, “Introducing Social Relevance and Global Context into the Introduction to Heat Transfer Course,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2018.[13] G. D. Hoople, J. A. Mejia, D. A. Chen, and S. M. Lord, “Reimagining Energy: Deconstructing Traditional Engineering Silos Using Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies.” 23-Jun-2018.[14] J. A. Mejia, D. A. Chen, O. O. Dalrymple, and S. M. . Lord, “Revealing the Invisible
Paper ID #26903Do They Understand Your Language? Assess Their Fluency with Vector Rep-resentationsProf. Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl is assistant professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community Col- lege. His teaching and research interests include developing, implementing and assessing active learning instructional strategies and auto-graded online homework. Eric has been a member of ASEE since 2001. He currently serves as chair of the Pacific Northwest Section and was the recipient of the 2008 Section Outstanding Teaching Award.Todd R. Haskell, Western Washington
University of Portland.References1. Newberry, B. Experimentally determining mass moment properties. 2008 Annual Conference& Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania2. Raviv, D., & Barb, D. R. A visual, intuitive, and engaging approach to explaining the center ofgravity concept in statics. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida3. Kaul, S., & Sitaram, P. Curriculum design of statics and dynamics: An integrated scaffoldingand hands-on approach. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia4. Brake, N. A., & Adam, F. A. Integrating a 3-D printer and a truss optimization project instatics. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana5. Mayar, K. Re-design of engineering mechanics
Multiple Course Delivery Modes.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Indianapolis, IN, June 2014.[21] Bart M. “Flipped Classroom Survey Highlights Benefits and Challenges.” Retrieved fromhttps://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/blended-flipped-learning/flipped-classroom-survey-highlights-benefits-and-challenges/. [Accessed Apr. 24, 2019][22] Hu Y, Montefort J, Tsang E. “An Innovative Redesign of Statics: Approach and Lessons Learned.” Proceedingsof the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, June, 2015.[23] Hu Y, Montefort J, Tsang E. “An Analysis of Factors Affecting Student Performance in a Statics Course.”Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, June, 2017.
hours that were transformed into study sessions onstudents’ homework and exam grades. At a medium sized (4000-8000 undergraduate students),public, primarily undergraduate, hispanic serving 4-year institution, hour-long study sessions wereheld once per week the evening before homework was due for both a dynamics course and athermodynamics course. The courses and study sessions were led by the same instructor. The studysessions were voluntary and did not directly influence course grades, but attendance records showthat on average 17% of students attended on any given week. Data were collected on study sessionattendance, homework grades, midterm grades on the three midterm exams, gender, ethnicity, andPell grant status, in Fall 2019 (Dynamics and
solutions, copying them and turning them in for a grade with little or nolearning occurring during the process [9]. The results of this experiment should not come as asurprise.This experiment was conducted in the fall of 2019 and is continuing in the spring of 2020, thusgiving the authors another semester of data to consider the question. If requiring gradedhomework does not improve exam performance, it may be more effective to reallocate teachingassistants to interacting with students in small group settings rather than grading homework.References1. Lura D.J., Badir A., and O'Neill R.J., “Homework Methods in Engineering Mechanics,” the 122nd American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle WA, June
Paper ID #30704Feel the force! An inquiry-based approach to teaching free-bodydiagrams for rigid body analysisEric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl holds an MS degree in mechanical engineering and serves as associate professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College. His teaching and research interests include developing, implementing and assessing active learning instructional strategies and auto-graded online homework. Eric has been a member of ASEE since 2001. He currently serves as awards chair for the Pacific Northwest Section and was the recipient of the 2008 Section
quite small.In conclusion, the study indicates that Male URM students and Female non-URM studentsperform as well as their peers in courses organized using the SMART method. Further study iswarranted to determine if targeted interventions will counter the negative effect seen amongFemale URM students, which may be impacted by their significant degree of doubleunderrepresentation (2% of course population).References 1. Ronald C. Averill, Sara Roccabianca and Geoffrey Recktenwald. “A Multi-Instructor Study of Assessment Techniques in Engineering Mechanics Courses.” Conference Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June 16-19, 2019. Tampa (FL). 2. Peter C. Brown, Henry L. Roediger III and Mark A. McDaniel, Make It
-side comparison of the traditional and blended versions of the staticscourse with regard to standard course evaluation questions that are relevant to course format.Both courses were taught by the same instructor; the traditional format had enrollments of 56 and50 (in Spring 2018 and 2019, respectively) and the blended format had an enrollment of 21. Anyeffects of class size are difficult to determine, because the two traditional sections had similarenrollment. To date we have not had the opportunity to teach a traditional course with a smallenrollment, or a blended course with large enrollment. Table 5 shows that the blended formatscored slightly higher than the traditional format with respect to “Were class meetings profitableand worth
in 2000 and the Rose-Hulman Board of Trustee’s Outstanding Scholar Award in 2001. He was one of the developers of the Rose-Hulman Sophomore Engineering Curriculum, the Dynamics Concept Inventory, and he is a co-author of Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics, by Beer, Johnston, Cornwell, and Self. In 2019 Dr. Cornwell received the Archie Higdon Distinguished Educator Award from the Mechanics Division of ASEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Interactive Videos and “In-class” Activities in a Flipped, Remote Dynamics ClassAbstractFlipped classes are relatively common in the engineering education
homework. Eric has been a member of ASEE since 2001. He currently serves as awards chair for the Pacific Northwest Section and was the recipient of the 2008 Section Outstanding Teaching Award.Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich
Purdue Mechanics Freeform Classroom: A new approach to engineering mechanics education. In Proceedings from the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Indianapolis, IN.[12] Evenhouse, D. A., Zadoks, A., de Freitas, C. C. S., Patel, N., Kandakatla, R., Stites, N., Prebel, T., Berger, E., Krousgrill, C., Rhoads, J. F., DeBoer, J. (2018). Video coding of classroom observations for research and instructional support in an innovative learning environment. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 23(2), 95-105.[13] Stites, N. A., E. Berger, J. DeBoer, and J. F. Rhoads. (2019). A cluster-based approach to understanding students’ resources-usage patterns in an active, blended, and collaborative learning environment
]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propagation_of_uncertainty#cite_note-5.[10] R. C. Hibbeler, "PowerPoints for Engineering Mechanics: Statics, 14th Edition," Pearson, 2016.[11] J. L. Newcomer, "Inconsistencies in Students’ Approaches to Solving Problems in Engineering," in Proceedings – 40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, ASEE/IEEE, 2010.AppendixTable A1 – Semesters that assessed the problems Assessed semesters Problems Summer 2018 Fall 2018 Spring 2019 Fall 2019 1 x x 2 x x 3
”. Information Analyses - ERIC Clearinghouse Products (071). pp. 3. ISBN 978-1-878380-08-1. ISSN 0884-0040.[2] J. Schultz, J. Wilson, and K. Hess, (2010), "Team-based classroom pedagogy reframed: the student perspective," American Journal of Business Education, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 17-24[3] Compeau, C.R.., Talley, A., Tran, P.Q., (2019). “Active Learning in Electrical Engineering: Measuring the Difference”. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference. Tampa, FL[4] Dutson, A., Green, M., Jensen, D., and Wood, K. L., (2003) "Active-Learning with Engineering Mechanics: A BuildingBlock for Design," Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference.[5] Jensen, D., Wood, K.L., And Wood, J., (2003) "Hands-on Activities, Interactive Multimedia and
, Chicago, IL, 2006.[5] J. C. Bruhl, J. L. Klosky and J. P. Hanus, "Let's Break Stuff! A Refit of the Mechanics Sequence of Courses to Inspire Student Inquiry," in Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017.[6] E. Davishahl, R. Pearce, T. R. Haskell and K. J. Clarks, "Statics Modeling Kit: Hands-On Learning in the Flipped Classroom," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[7] T. L. Nilsson and L. Doyle, "Pushing and Shoving: Improving Student Understanding of Support Reactions with Hands-on Demonstrations," in Proceedings of the 126th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[8] E. Davishahl, T. Haskell and L. Singleton, "Feel the Force
structural dynamics, structural health monitoring, and undergraduate engineering education. Dr. Cornwell has received an SAE Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award in 1992, and the Dean’s Outstanding Teacher award at Rose-Hulman in 2000 and the Rose-Hulman Board of Trustee’s Outstanding Scholar Award in 2001. He was one of the developers of the Rose-Hulman Sophomore Engineering Curriculum, the Dynamics Concept Inventory, and he is a co-author of Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics, by Beer, Johnston, Cornwell, and Self. In 2019 Dr. Cornwell received the Archie Higdon Distinguished Educator Award from the Mechanics Division of ASEE. American c Society for
own grading code in the server.py file, whichoverrides the built-in grading implementation described above. Figure 5 shows a vector and itscorresponding bounding box. Note the generous length of the box to allow the placing of thevector with either the head at the origin or the base at the origin. We will introduce more featuresof the built-in grader in the results section.Example questions from coursesThe drawing tool described in this paper was integrated into PrairieLearn in Summer 2019, andinstructors from two different courses (Statics and Strength of Materials) used the tool during theFall 2019 semester. Here we show examples from these courses.Find the centroidsIn the example illustrated in Figure 6, students are asked to mark the
- Your daily dose of mechanics exercises,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2002, pp. 2201–2221, doi: 10.18260/1-2--10984.[6] D. Koban, M. Fukuzawa, R. Slocum, M. Fletcher, and J. Pleuss, “Differential effects of incentivized homework on student achievement in undergraduate mathematics,” Primus, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–19, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2018.1530703.[7] R. Wieman and F. Arbaugh, “Making homework more meaningful,” Math. Teach. Middle Sch., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 160–165, 2014.[8] J. R. Grohs, T. Kinoshita, B. J. Novoselich, and D. B. Knight, “Exploring learner engagement and achievement in large undergraduate engineering mechanics courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference
to these observations.References[1] Y. Ju, J. Montefort, and M. Cavalli, “Comparing Blended and Traditional Instruction for aStatics Course,” Proceedings of the ASEE 126th Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL,2019.[2] C. Papadopoulos, A.I. Santiago-Roman M.J. Perez-Vargas, G. Portela-Gauthier, W. Phanord."Development of an Alternative Statics Concept Inventory Usable as a Pretest." Proceedings ofthe ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June, 2016.[3] P. Steif, A. Dollar, J. Dantzler. "Results from a Statics Concept Inventory and theirRelationship to Measures of Performance in Statics." Proceedings of the ASEE Frontiers inEducation Conference, Indianapolis, IN, October, 2005.[4] E. Davishahl, R. Pearce, T. Haskell
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27284 on Micro/Nanosystems and Vibration and Sound, as well as the Design, Materials, and Manufacturing (DMM) Segment Leadership Team. Dr. Rhoads is a recipient of numerous research and teaching awards, including the National Science Foundation’s Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award; the Purdue University School of Mechanical Engineering’s Harry L. Solberg Best Teacher Award (twice), Robert W. Fox Outstanding Instructor Award, and B.F.S. Schaefer Outstanding Young Faculty Scholar Award; the ASEE Mechanics Division’s Ferdinand P. Beer and E. Russell
prevalent in Physics, as Force Concept Inventories(FCI), [1]–[4] and in Statics [5]–[8]. Not many concept inventories have been created to focus on thetopic of Dynamics. Expanding on the success of the FCI, Gray et al. [9] have created and are fine tuning aDynamics Concept Inventory (DCI) test. The test examines 11 different concepts over a 29-questionmultiple choice exam and since its inception, has been analyzed to have “adequate” reliability [10]. Inaddition, there has also been some work to investigate a shortened version of the same DCI [11]. In this study, the DCI was implemented at the very beginning (pre-course) of two Fall Dynamiccourses (in 2018 and 2019) at a public university and then again at the very end of the same course(post
structural dynamics, structural health monitoring, and undergraduate engineering education. Dr. Cornwell has received an SAE Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award in 1992, and the Dean’s Outstanding Teacher award at Rose-Hulman in 2000 and the Rose-Hulman Board of Trustee’s Outstanding Scholar Award in 2001. He was one of the developers of the Rose-Hulman Sophomore Engineering Curriculum, the Dynamics Concept Inventory, and he is a co-author of Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics, by Beer, Johnston, Cornwell, and Self. In 2019 Dr. Cornwell received the Archie Higdon Distinguished Educator Award from the Mechanics Division of ASEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
are three lectures and one laboratory session per week. The classroom follows a blendedformat where the students have to come prepared for the class by watching pre-recorded videosand taking a quiz due before class. It begins with reviewing the quiz followed by interactiveproblem-solving. The entire class works as a single group while the instructor asks specificquestions and triggers guided discussion leading to problem-solving.Towards the goal of improved comprehension and retention, a zero-credit laboratory session isintroduced to this course in Fall 2019 at Angelo State University. The lab session was a “self-assessment problem solving” session where students are challenged with a random problem onthe concepts covered in the past week to