Paper ID #11800The Influence of Racial and Mathematical Identities on African AmericanMale Engineering Transfer StudentsMrs. Olgha B Davis, North Carolina State University Olgha B. Davis is currently a doctoral candidate at the department of Leadership, Policy, and Adult and Higher Education at North Carolina State University. She obtained her Bachelor’s degree in Biomedical Engineering from Boston University and worked in industry for 7 years prior to returning to graduate school. She earned her Master’s degree in Biomedical Engineering from North Carolina State University and the University of Chapel Hill. Ms. Davis
retaining underrepresented minorities and women in STEM. Prior to Purdue, she spent time in industry holding technical and operations-based roles and has experience with informal STEM community and outreach projects. She holds a BS degree in Industrial Technology and a MS degree in Engineering Management.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education
Appendix 2 - 2014 FGCU/NAACP S.T.E.M. Summer Camp SurveyPart A. DemographyGender: ☐ Female ☐ Male Current Grade: ☐ 9 ☐ 10 ☐ 11 County: ☐ Lee ☐ CollierRace: ☐ American Indian/Alaskan Native ☐American Indian/Alaskan Native ☐ Asian or other Pacific Islander ☐ Black or African American (not Hispanic) ☐ Hispanic or Latino ☐ White (not Hispanic) ☐ OtherPart B. Circle the best (only one) answer that fit best your experience...Scale: Strongly Agree (SA
Annual Conference & Exposition, June 24-27, 2001.6. L. Lenaburg, O. Aguirre, F. Goodchild and J. U. Kuhn, Expanding pathways: A summer bridge program for community college STEM students, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(3), 2012, pp. 153-168.7. C. A. Amenkhienan and L. R. Kogan, Engineering students' perceptions of academic activities and support services: Factors that influence their academic performance, College student journal, 38(4), 2004, pp. 523- 540.8. J. L. Groh and B. M. Holloway, Complementary pair and group mentoring programs for undergraduate women in engineering, Advancing Women: Transforming Engineering Education, 2011
course grades at the end of each quarter virtuallyimpossible. In addition, there were no mechanisms in place to give credit to students wanting toleave the program. Thus, the team agreed that the core values and objectives of the programcould still be met in a one year-program via semi-independent quarters. There were severalbenefits to running the program in the aforementioned format: (a) the new scheme does not havean impact on scheduling or grade assignment; (b) students have the option to leave the program Page 26.1385.9at the end of each quarter and, at the same time, new students can join it at any quarter as long aspre-requisites are met
enteringthe university. The City of Laredo sits on the boarder of Mexico and has a much lower per capitaincome when compared to both the state and national averages. Data from the U.S. CensusBureau 2010 and the 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates shows that theCity of Laredo has the following characteristics: (a) The Hispanic population is 95.41% (b) The per capita income is $15,114 compared to $53,042.0 nationally. (c) The percent of residents living at or below the poverty income level is 29% compare to 14.5% nationally. (d) Over 22.5% of the population has less than a 9th grade education compared to 6.4% nationally. (e) Only 12.8% hold a Bachelor’s degree compared to 17.4% nationally. (f) Only 5
employees in the tabulation. Page 26.862.5 (a) All Gender (b) Gender in Technology SectorFigure 1: Genders in Engineering vs. Genders in Silicon Valley: Female standard de-viation = ±1.91%. Source: Corporate data derived from respective company diversitysites 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28 . *Mean Engineering Degrees Awarded derived from ASEE Data Books(2009-13) 29,30 . Census data from U.S. Census Bureau 34 . ˆData not provided in respective com-pany’s diversity information for US demographics. +Data does not add up to 100% because someemployees are other or undisclosed.2.2 Data AnalysisDiversity data
). Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models for determining student attrition and success in engineering. The Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2). 5. Bova, B. (2000). Mentoring revisited: The Black woman's experience. Mentoring and Tutoring, 8(1), 5-16. 6. Bowman, P. J. (1991). Organizational psychology: African-American perspectives. In R. L. Jones (Ed.), Black Psychology. Berkeley, CA: Cobb and Henry Publications, 509-531. 7. Boykin, A. W. (1983). The academic performance of African-American children. Spence, James. Ed. Achievement and Academic Motives. San Francisco, CA: Freeman Press. 8. Boyle-Baise, M. (Ed.). (2002). Multicultural service learning: Educating teachers in diverse communities
mentoring, and summer bridge programs,6, 7 to be described in thenext sections. Page 26.1300.3 (a) (b)Figure 1: (a) A side-by-side comparison showing the extent of the mismatch in the demographics of the United States adultpopulation versus those of the STEM workforce.4 (b) A pronounced increase in the fraction of minority school age-children overa twenty year period highlights the urgency of raising minority participation and performance in STEM.5 Page 26.1300.4The Role of Community Colleges in
. Hernandez, J. C., & Lopez, M. A. (2004). Leaking pipeline: Issues impacting Latino/a college student retention. Journal of College Student Retention, 6(1), 37–60. 20. Chang, M. J., Eagan, M. K., Lin, M. H., & Hurtado, S. (2011). Considering the impact of racial stigmas and science identity: Persistence among biomedical and behavioral science aspirants. Journal of Higher Education, 82(5), 564–596. 21. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experience of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. 22. Sabatini, D. A. (1997). Teaching and research synergism: The undergraduate
, http://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/the-short-list-college/articles/2013/09/10/10-most-least- expensive-private-colleges-and-universities. (Last accessed: January 30, 2015).[5] K-B Yue and S. P. Hall, “Reflections on Proposal Writing and Management of a NSF STEM Scholarship Page 26.1325.13 Grant Program,” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 22(4), April 2007, p. 244-251.[6] Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, ASEE 2010 Edition.[7] Mathematical Association of America, http://www.maa.org/columns/launchings/launchings_09_09.html. (Last accessed: July 25, 2011).[8] P
. & Loui, M. C. Work in Progress-Why Many Smart Women Leave Engineering: A Preliminary Study of How Engineering Students Form Career Goals. in 40th ASEE/IEEE Front. Educ. Conf. 1–2 (IEEE, 2010). at 28. American Society for Engineering Education. Innovation with impact: Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering edcuation. 1–77 (American Society for Engineering Education, 2012).29. Cox, M. F., Cekic, O., Ahn, B. & Zhu, J. Engineering professionals’ expectations of undergraduate
and Legacies: A Guide to Qualitative Interviewing. Retrieved from http://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/~pchsiung/LAL/reflexivity.13. Kirby, S. & McKenna, K. (1989). Experience, Research, Social Change: Methods from the Margins. Toronto: Garamond Press.14. Kuh, G. D., & Love, P. G. (2000). A cultural perspective on student departure. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 196–212). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.15. Guiffrida, D. A. (2003). African American student organizations as agents of social integration. Journal of College Student Development, 44(3), 304-319.16. Thompson, C. E. & Fretz, B. R. (1991). Predicting the adjustment of Black students at predominately
Paper ID #12779Minority-focused Engagement through Research and Innovative Teaching(MERIT)Dr. Kai Jin, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Kai Jin is a Professor of Industrial Engineering and Co-PI of the MERIT project. Her research interests include Sustainable Energy, Green Manufacturing, Quality Control, and Multi Objective Decision Making and Optimization as well as Engineering Education. She has served as PI and Co-PI in several DoEd, DHS, NRC, and industry sponsored projects.Dr. Hua Li, Texas A&M University-Kingsville Dr. Hua Li, an Assistant Professor in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Texas A&
Paper ID #11803Interactive Panel: Improving the Experiences of Marginalized Students onEngineering Design TeamsDr. Lorelle A Meadows, Michigan Technological University Dr. Lorelle A. Meadows is the Dean of the Pavlis Honors College at Michigan Technological University.Prof. Denise Sekaquaptewa, University of Michigan Denise Sekaquaptewa, Ph.D., is Professor of Psychology at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Her research in experimental social psychology focuses on stereotyping and intergroup dynamics, in partic- ular how being in the numerical minority in terms of gender or race influences academic outcomes and
Paper ID #14124A Scaffolding Case Study for Teaching Engineering Problem Solving to Un-derrepresented MinoritiesDr. Morris M. Girgis, Central State University Morris Girgis is a professor at Central State University. He teaches undergraduate courses in manufactur- ing engineering. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Hannover University, Germany. His current research in engineering education focuses on developing and implementing new educational tools and approaches to enhance teaching, learning and assessment at the course and curriculum levels
Paper ID #12216Minority/Multicultural Engineering Program Impact: A Student Perspectiveof Co-Curricular SupportDr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech Walter Lee recently earned his PhD in engineering education at Virginia Tech, where he also served as a program assistant for the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity. His research interests include student retention & recruitment, diversity, motivation, and first-year experiences in engineering. Dr. Lee received an NSF-GRFP Fellowship in Spring 2012 focusing on how student support centers impact the experience of undergraduate engineering students, specifically
Paper ID #12958Understanding the Mentoring Needs of African-American Female Engineer-ing Students: A Phenomenographic Preliminary AnalysisMs. Courtney S Smith, Virginia Tech Courtney S. Smith is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests span the mentoring experiences of African American women in engineering, campus climate and best practices for diversity and inclusion in the STEM classroom.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center
Paper ID #11738Interactive Panel on Perspectives and Practical Skills for Men as Advocatesfor Gender EquityDr. Lawrence J. Genalo, Iowa State University Dr. Genalo is a University Professor and Associate Chair of the Materials Science and Engineering Department at Iowa State University. He is a Fellow of ASEE and has run the NSF Grantees Poster Session for nearly 20 years. He is a former chair of DELOS and the Freshman Programs Constituent Committee (the year before it became a Division).Dr. Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University Roger Green received the B.S. degree in electrical and computer engineering and the
Paper ID #12899The Impact of Federally Funded Scholarship Programs on the Success ofTransfer Students at a Public Engineering CollegeDr. David M. Ford, University of Massachusetts, Amherst David M. Ford is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering at UMass Amherst. He is also on the Faculty Advisory Board for the Diversity Programs Office (DPO) in the College. The DPO provides academic and non-academic support to increase enrollment, retention, and graduation among under-represented minorities and women.Dr. Paula Rees, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
mentor 7,14.This paper reports the pilot research study findings of the first author’s dissertation research.The dissertation research study examines the lives and mentoring experiences of ten selectAfrican-American STEM mentors. Study participants are African-Americans PhDs whopossesses at least one STEM degree and have: a) a history of impacting STEM undergraduatestudents as evidenced by their substantial track records for facilitating undergraduate studentsuccess in STEM fields, b) a history of commitment to mentoring underrepresented minorityundergraduates, and c) national acclamation and/or recognition by their peers and prestigiousorganizations and institutions as exemplars for their work with mentoring underrepresentedminorities.This
the Outreach Chair of the OSU American Society of Engineering Education Student Chapter. His research interests include: (a) technology use, (b) diversity and inclusion, and (c) retention and success, with a particular focus on students in STEM fields. To contact Dr. Long, e-mail long.914@osu.edu.Dr. Joseph Allen Kitchen, The Ohio State University Dr. Joseph (Joey) A. Kitchen is a postdoctoral researcher and program coordinator with the Center for Higher Education Enterprise (CHEE). Dr. Kitchen manages CHEE’s longitudinal, mixed-methods study of college outreach and academic support programs. He earned a Ph.D. in Higher Education and Student Affairs, a Master’s of City and Regional Planning, and a Bachelor’s in
undergraduate research.InstrumentsThe admissions survey, which was administered to entering freshman and transfer students at thestart of the years 2011, 2012 and 2013, is contained in Appendix A. This instrument wasdesigned to identify students who participated in the institution’s K-12 outreach activities priorto entering colleges. Students who participated in these activities were further asked to evaluatetheir effectiveness and provide basic demographic information. The graduate survey, which wasadministered to graduating students from the STEM fields in the years 2011, 2012 and 2014, iscontained in Appendix B. Students who completed the graduate survey were asked to identifyoutreach activities that they participated in as undergraduate students at
what I was doing, I know how to do this, I have taking calculus before, I just got nervous and I ended up getting a B+ in that class, which is huge [G1].This student addressed that her level of competence prior to arriving to college was at a 4.0,signifying that her motivation was not to perform better, but rather to avoid under-performing.Prior research has also shown that that students who assume the mastery avoidance goal haveachieved success in the past, which clearly illustrated in this student’s narrative41. Uncertaintyfor this participant was a threatening factor towards her goal, as she stated, “you don't know whatthe future holds for you or the job, you don't know if you’re going to like . . . you
phases.Future ImplicationsThis study shows results from a part for our research project. The instrument is being applied infive partner institutions to identify possible differences in perceptions in different types ofuniversities. We are aiming to identify relationships between the dimensions of culture and a)student choice of major, and b) student success within a major. In addition, we are conducting alongitudinal study to understand whether students’ perceptions about their academic programschange over time and under which circumstances, leading, to an actionable theory of engineering Page 26.369.12culture that can support pedagogies of inclusive
Page 26.555.7racial/gender stereotypes and Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) 6,7,8. SCCT, an offshoot ofAlbert Bandura’s social cognitive theory, attempts to address issues of culture, gender, geneticendowment, social context, and unexpected life events that may interact with and supersede theeffects of career-related choices. SCCT focuses on the connection of self-efficacy, outcomeexpectations, and personal goals that influence an individual’s career choice. SCCT proposes thatcareer choice is influenced by the beliefs the individual develops and refines from four majorsources: (a) personal performance accomplishments, (b) vicarious learning, (c) social persuasion,and (d) physiological states and reactions. How these aspects work together
experiences support science career decisions and active learning.” CBE Life Sciences Education 6: 297-306.3. Russell, S. H., M.P. Hancock, and J. McCullough. (2007 ). “The pipeline. Benefits of undergraduate research experiences.” Science 316(5824): 548-9.4. Kinkel, D. H. and S. E. Henke. (2006). “Impact of undergraduate research on academic performance, educational planning, and career development.” Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education 35: 194-201.5. Lanza, J. and G. C. Smith. (1988). Undergraduate research: A little experience goes a long way. J. Coll. Sci Teach. 18:118-1206. Hunter, A-B., S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour. (2007). “Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students
).Figure 4(a) shows that all of the five largest disciplines had a lower female fraction in2013 than in 2005 as shown in Table 3. Table 3 Change in female fraction by engineering BS discipline 2005 to 2013 (ASEE, 2014)ChE and BME are well known for having strong gender diversity, but it is apparent thatstrong growth in degrees overall is being accomplished by faster growth in male degreerecipients than for female degree recipients. Figure 4(b) shows that the female fractionfor African American engineering BS degrees declined substantially for ECE, CEE, ChEand BME across the past decade. Detail in BS degree changes are described in separatesections showing the changes in BS
. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. 2. American Society for Engineering Education. (2007). Profiles of engineering & engineering technology colleges 2006. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education. 3. Brown, S. V. & Clewell, B. C. (1998, January). Project talent flow: The non-SEM field choices of Black and Latino undergraduates with the aptitude for science, engineering and mathematics careers. Final report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. 4. Camara, W. J. & Schimdt, A. E. (1999). Group differences in standardized testing and social stratification. New York: College Board. 5. Campbell, Jr., G., Denes, R., & Morrison, C. (Eds.), Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and
Attitude towards Interdisciplinary Teamwork-A Attitude towards Interdisciplinary Teamwork-B Teacher Self-Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) – Survey 1 Teacher Self-Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) – Survey 2 Last day of the 5th Teacher Self-Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) – Survey 2 week of the after- Attitude towards Interdisciplinary Teamwork-A school program, 1 week after the Teacher Self-Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) – Survey 2 finishing date of Attitude towards Interdisciplinary Teamwork-A the after-school program implementation