to create a repository with the results of thisand all subsequent projects and the ongoing test data to enable future teams of students to confidentlydevelop solutions and to enable faculty to organize and manage such projects.13References1. S. Murugesan, and I. Bojanova, "Encyclopedia of Cloud Computing", ISBN:9781118821978, Wiley,2016.2. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Trends, 2017-2022 White Paper,https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/white-paper-c11-741490.html3. S. T. Faraj Al-Janabi, A. Shehab, "Edge Computing: Review and Future Trends", ResearchGate (2019)https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335858067_Edge_Computing_Review_and_Future_Directions4. B. Varghese, R
mindset,2) providing opportunities to develop essential troubleshooting skills of hardware and softwareprograms, 3) encouraging programming multilingualism and 4) stimulating self-learning andexploration of new hardware to foster lifelong learning skills. Our approach drew inspiration fromcomputational and system thinking while promoting programming multilingualism to betterprepare students for the engineering challenges they will encounter in the 21st century. The classis designed to achieved the following ABET outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge ofmathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as wellas to analyze and interpret data (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (g) an
University Press; 2015.17. Katsaliaki K, Mustafee N. A survey of serious games on sustainable development.Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC); IEEE; 2012.18. Salah B, Abidi MH, Mian SH, Krid M, Alkhalefah H, Abdo A. Virtual reality-basedengineering education to enhance manufacturing sustainability in industry 4.0. Sustainability.2019;11(5):1477.19. Stanitsas M, Kirytopoulos K, Vareilles E. Facilitating sustainability transition throughserious games: A systematic literature review. J Clean Prod. 2019;208:924-36.
close family were invited to the presentations(figures 2 &3).Figure 1 (a): camp activities Figure 1 (b): camp activities 5Dr. AC. Megri 2020 ASEE Annual ConferenceFigure 2 (a): last day presentation Figure 2 (b): last day presentationFigure 3 (a): last day presentation Figure 3 (b): last day presentationWorkshop Activities:Camp activities are organized in a pedagogical manner, where teaching hours are separated byrelaxation and fun activities to facilitate learning and avoid boredom. Our teaching approachdoes not leave any student behind and try to make all the students active and contribute to
Engineering Education: Undergraduate Curriculum,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 575-580, 2003.[5] M. A. Gennert, and C. B. Putnam, “Robotics as an Undergraduate Major: 10 Years' Experience,” Proceedings of 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[6] V. V. Vantsevich, "Education in Mechatronics," Mechatronics in Action: Case Studies in Mechatronics – Applications and Education, D. Bradley and D. W. Russell, eds., pp. 197- 218, London: Springer London, 2010.[7] A. Hassan, V. Rault, and P. Truchot, "Implementing of Project-Based and Skill Assessment Pedagogy in Mechatronics Course." 2018 19th International Conference on Research and Education in
involved a course titled Learning to Co-Learn. In the timeleading up to the start of the co-design year, faculty felt that it was necessary to develop anextended onboarding experience to introduce students to the year ahead. This course experiencewas co-taught, with two to three faculty from different disciplines and backgrounds workingtogether with a group of around ten co-designers and had the following learning objectives.Students should: A. Uncover and articulate their motivation to be part of the co-design year. B. Develop and articulate their expectations for themselves and for each other, as well as faculty. C. Develop skills to provide effective feedback (e.g., active listening, etc.). D. Be able to identify strengths and
; Exposition, Tampa, Florida Jun 15-19, 2019, 26562. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32782.[15] P. M. Secola, B. A. Smiley, M. R. Anderson-Rowland, and D. R. Baker, "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Gender Equity Training in Engineering Summer Workshops With Pre- College Teachers and Counselors " presented at the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico Jun 24-27, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/9237.[16] G. Pfeifer and E. A. Stoddard, ""Equitable and Effective Teams: Creating and Managing Team Dynamics for Equitable Learning Outcomes" in Kristin Wobbe and Elisabeth A. Stoddard, eds. Beyond All Expectations: Project-Based Learning in the First Year," ed, 2019.
Mechatronics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–9, 1996. [2] A. Birk, “What is robotics? an interdisciplinary field is getting even more diverse,” IEEE robotics & automation magazine, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 94–95, 2011. [3] S. E. Lyshevski, “Mechatronic curriculum–retrospect and prospect,” Mechatronics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 195–205, 2002. [4] D. G. Alciatore and M. B. Histand, “Integrating mechatronics into a mechanical engineering curriculum,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 35–38, 2001. [5] R. Manseur, “Development of an undergraduate robotics course,” in Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change, vol. 2. IEEE, 1997, pp. 610–612. [6] T.-R. Hsu
," IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 89-99, 1997.[4] D. Bradley, "What is mechatronics and why teach it?," International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 275-291, 2004.[5] S. Boverie, D. D. Cho, H. Hashimoto, M. Tomizuka, W. Wei and D. Zühlke, "Mechatronics, robotics and components for automation and control: IFAC milestone report," in 17th IFAC World Congress (IFAC'08), 2008.[6] C. F. Auerbach and L. B. Silverstein, Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis, New York: New York University Press, 2003.[7] N. L. Ramo, A. Huang-Saad and B. Belmont, "What is Biomedical Engineering? Insights from Qualitative Analysis of Definitions Written by Undergraduate Students," in ASEE
(Figure 1). Figure 1: Workshop 3 Interactive Session.Each workshop concluded with a summary by the organizers of what was covered and learned.The schedule for workshop 3, shown below, was typical of all workshops in the series, althoughthe topics covered by the parallel sessions varied slightly among the workshops: 1. Introduction and Overview 2. Interactive parallel sessions I a. Mechatronic education knowledge base b. Robotics education knowledge base c. Project-based learning in Mechatronics and Robotics d. Advanced and open-source platforms for Mechatronics and Robotics 3. Report out I 4. Interactive parallel sessions II a. Reducing barriers to adoption b. Accreditation c. Preparation to teach
. 1836504. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] S. M. Lord and J. C. Chen, “Curriculum design in the middle years,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER), B. Olds and A. Johri, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 181–200.[2] J. C. Lucena and J. A. Leydens, “From Sacred Cow to Dairy Cow: Challenges and Opportunities in Integrating of Social Justice in Engineering Science Courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2015.[3] R. L. Lehrman, “Energy Is Not The Ability To Do Work,” Phys. Teach., 1973.[4] R. A. Lancor, “Using Student
: 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363494[9] G. Fowler, “The need for diversity in robotics,” WSJDLive conference, The Wall StreetJournal, Oct. 26, 2016. Available: https://www.wsj.com/video/the-need-for-diversity-in-robotics/E257BFA6-49B0-43F9-9FF2-AC5657E5C3E0.html [Accessed Jan. 30, 2020].[10] L. Nichols, “Robots for Everyone: The changing face of robotics.” Cloudreach, Jan 2018.Available: https://www.cloudreach.com/en/resources/blog/robots-for-everyone-the-changing-face-of-robotics/ [Accessed Jan. 30, 2020].[11] L. Greenemeir, “Can Robotics Solve Its Diversity Problem?” Scientific American, June 25,2018. Available: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/can-robotics-solve-its-diversity-problem/ [Accessed Jan. 30, 2020].[12] A. B. Williams and W
Paper ID #29650Self - Initiative Undergraduate ResearchDr. Chris A. O’Riordan-Adjah, Wake Technical Community College Chris A. O’Riordan-Adjah is a professional engineer with over fifteen years of experience in the structural engineering field as a bridge engineer and is currently the Department Head of Engineering at Wake Tech- nical Community College. He was the Director and Associate Professor with the Engineering Department at Principia College. Chris has a Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics from Principia College, Illinois, Mas- ter’s degree in Quality Engineering and a Doctorate in Civil Engineering from the
[51]. 10Raspbian, a Linux distribution, is the recommended operating system for Raspberry Pi but otherthird-party operating systems have also been developed for it [51]. Similarly, while the mainprogramming language for Raspberry Pi is Python, other languages could also be used and havebeen developed on Raspberry Pi. Some of the features of Raspberry Pi 4 Model B, the latest modelreleased on June 2019, which make it attractive for MRE education include ● Size: 85.60 mm × 56.5 mm × 17 mm ● Weight: 46 g ● Cost: $35/$45/$55 (For 1, 2, or 4 GB of SDRAM, respectively) ● Processing: 1.5 GHz 64-bit quad core ARM Cortex-A72 processor and Broadcom VideoCore VI @500 MHz GPU ● Connectivity
Paper ID #31644ASPiRe, a Ten-Week Summer One-to-One Mentoring Program and its Im-pact onUndergraduate Student Learning and ConfidenceDr. Lynn A. Albers, Hofstra University Dr. Lynn Albers is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering of the Fred DeMatteis School of Engineering and Applied Science at Hofstra University. Her previous academic contribution was as one of the founding five faculty/staff at Campbell University, helping the newly formed School of Engineering grow and establish roots in the community. A proponent of Hands-On Activities in the classroom and during out-of-school time programs, she believes that
tackled were data aggregation/fusion, distributed consen- sus, power control, scheduling and synchronization in wireless ad hoc networks, intrusion detection in a large scale wireless sensor network with Random Linear Network Coding (RLNC), and coordinated probabilistic map construction by the mobile robotic sensor network (a multi-agent system) such as a group of UAVs. Dr. Chen obtained his PhD from School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, USA. Prior to his PhD study, he was with Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories, CHTL, Taiwan. He is a 3GPP regular meeting delegate by the collaboration with ITRI, Taiwan.Prof. Edward J. Coyle, Georgia Institute of Technology Edward J. Coyle is the John B. Peatman
Paper ID #31129STRIDER(Semi-autonomous Tracking Robot with Instrumentation forData-acquisition and Environmental Research)-Pitfalls and Successes of aVertically Integrated Experiential Learning Project spanning MultipleYearsMr. Brandon Miles Gardner, University of Maryland Eastern Shore Junior general engineering student involved with undergraduate researchDr. Abhijit Nagchaudhuri, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore Dr. Abhijit Nagchaudhuri is currently a Professor in the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences at University of Maryland Eastern Shore. He is a member American Society for Mechanical Engineers (ASME
models had magnified displacements toallow students to easily visualize the deformation. While magnifying the displacements makesthe models less “real”, it helps students to understand how deformation occurs in the object,similar to the method of using physical foam models. A sample view of an AR model from thecourse being viewed on a computer and in AR is shown in Figure 1a and b, respectively. Therewere minimal technical challenges when using the Sketchfab application in class. One suchchallenge was that students with older cell phones, approximately 5 students out of over 100,were unable to use the AR feature (Figure 1b). However, these students were still able to viewand rotate the model on their cell phones using the online viewer in the
keep building on new knowledge in those WoTs, muchof it created through their research and scholarship.Table II summarizes the various sessions that were taught to students by Ways of Thinkingexperts in NEET during Fall 2018 and Fall 2019. A–D refer to the four threads in which theWays of Thinking were taught. In thread A, four sessions were taught in Fall 2018 and Fall2019; in thread B there were ten sessions (including one class co-taught with the regularinstructor); in thread C there were six; and in thread D there were five (including one classco-taught with the NEET instructor). The fifth thread has not yet had any Ways of Thinkingsessions. In total, 25 sessions were taught to students by experts during Fall 2018 and Fall2019.Table II
on similar efforts.2. Data Gathering: In order for the students to develop a revitalization plan for their assigned community, students must have a thorough understanding of the current conditions of the community and the residents’ needs. As part of this step, the students performed the following: Review of existing data and development plans. The students obtained demographic, socioeconomic and health data and studied nine different revitalization plans that pertain to our city and its communities. These plans include the City of Birmingham Comprehensive Plan, Sidewalk Master Plan, B- Active Plan, and others. Attended community meetings. During the meetings, the students learned
at each iteration based on feedback received and growth in their own andthe collective group’s understandings. Each group assignment extends the work from theprevious, culminating in a SOAR Portfolio. The portfolio includes: 1. Project vision and summary – This assignment requires students to: a. Briefly describe what the product-in-development is and what it can do. b. Examine what they need to do, how they are going to do it, what they will need to accomplish it, and then define what success looks like. They will be required to list several goals for their group to collectively envision the path to completion. c. Describe who will be impacted by the product. Think beyond the client and
). Teams were encouraged toidentify and develop their lessons based on engineering content aligned with the specific gradelevel.Teams used a collaboration platform, which included scaffolds (team member bios, a teamcharter, and a file repository including required assignment templates) to support projectcompletion (Pazos et al., 2019). Students used the platform to collaborate, store and submit allthe project related documents.MeasuresTeamwork effectiveness. The Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale version of the ComprehensiveAssessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME-B) was used to measure students’teamwork effectiveness. The CATME-B was developed and validated by Ohland et al. (2012) asan alternative version of the CATME proposed by Loughry et
2 1 1 and a Software Algorithm B 5 4 2 Designed a Website Designed Custom Hardware C 4 3 2 and a Software Algorithm Designed a Software Algorithm D 4 4 2 for Off-the-Shelf Hardware
. As part of thisreport, there were three specific questions targeting the teamwork modules that studentsanswered individually: • Consider the activities in part a) and b) below from the teamwork workshop you participated in. In what ways did each activity impact your team’s performance throughout this project? a) Introduction to Conflict: Types of Conflict, Tuckman’s model, Using the D.E.S.C. (Describe the behaviour, Express the impact, Specify desired outcome, State the Consequences) assertive communication model to deal with difficult conflict or difficult behavior b) Conflict Resolution: Conflict Handling Styles, Using missing team attributes and conflict handling
Analyze Canadian Engineering Leadership Curriculum,” Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), Dec. 2018, doi: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.12981.[10] B. Hooper, K. Atler, and W. Wood, “Strengths and Limitations of the Occupational Therapy Model Curriculum Guide as Illustrated in a Comprehensive Curriculum Revision Process,” Occupational Therapy In Health Care, vol. 25, no. 2–3, pp. 194–207, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.3109/07380577.2011.576748.[11] J. S. Stark, M. A. Lowther, S. Sharp, and G. L. Arnold, “Program-Level Curriculum Planning: An Exploration of Faculty Perspectives on Two Different Campuses,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 99–130, Feb. 1997, doi: 10.1023
the first semester to the last.References[1] S. Danielson, A. Kirkpatrick, and E. Ervin, “ASME Vision 2030: Helping to InformMechanical Engineering Education,” in Proceedings of the 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers inEducation Conference, Rapid City, SD October 12-15, 2011. [Online]. Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254048600_ASME_vision_2030_Helping_to_inform_mechanical_engineering_education. [Accessed Jan. 23, 2020].[2] J. A. Donnell, B. M. Aller, M. Alley, and A. A. Kedrowicz, “Why Industry Says ThatEngineering Graduates Have Poor Communication Skills: What the Literature Says,” inProceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, British Columbia,June 26-29, 2011. [Online]. Available:https://www.asee.org
this paper, we present findings from two instantiations of a newly designed graduate course incivil/environmental engineering that integrates the arts and humanities. The objective of ourcourse is to develop engineers who are more reflective than traditionally trained engineers andare thereby better able to: (a) understand and address the complexities of modern real-worldchallenges, (b) make better ethical decisions, and (c) serve the public not only with technicalengineering skills but with mindfulness of and sensitivity to the complex social, cultural, andenvironmental contexts their work. Thus far, results have been encouraging from both oursurveys (reported here) and our analyses of student interviews and writing samples (reportedelsewhere
University. She teaches elementary science methods and secondary science and mathematics methods courses with emphasis on multicultural education and equity pedagogies. Her research interests include both formal and informal STEM education, with specialization in the integration of engineering and computer science into science education through preservice and inservice educator development.Dr. Stacie I Ringleb, Old Dominion University Stacie Ringleb is an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Old Dominion University. Dr. Ringleb received a B.S. in biomedical engineering from Case Western Re- serve University in 1997, a M.S.E. from Temple University in Mechanical Engineering in 1999
Knowledge Worker inthe Dual Space of Engineering Knowledge and Rhetorical Process” Writing in Knowledge Societies, pp.321-350, 2011[13] Devitt, Amy., Writing Genres, Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press, 2004, pp. 1-32[14] Swales, John M., Feak, Christine B., Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks andSkills, 3rd Edition, The University of Michigan, pp. 17-37, 2012[15] Kmiec, David and Longo, Bernadette, The IEEE Guide to Writing in the Engineering and TechnicalFields IEEE Press Wiley, 2017[16] Smit, David, The End of Composition Studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2007[17] Bazerman, Charles, “‘Genre and Cognitive Development” Genre in a Changing World Fort Collins,CO: Parlor Press, pp. 279-294, 2011[18] Irish, Robert, Writing
., David. “The German Energiewende – History, Targets, Policies and Challenges.”Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review, vol. 3, no. 4, 2012, pp. 223–233.,www.jstor.org/stable/24324660. Accessed 2 Feb. 2020.[4] H. A. Linstone, A. J. Meltsner, M. Adelson, A. Mysior, L. Umbdenstock, B. Clary and J.Shuman, “The multiple perspective concept with applications to technology assessment andother decision areas,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 20(4), pp. 275–325,1981.[5] R. Adams, D. Evangelou, L. English, A. D. De Figueiredo, N. Mousoulides, A. L. Pawley, C.Schiefellite, R. Stevens, M. Svinicki, J. M. Trenor, and D. M. Wilson, “Multiple perspectives onengaging future engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, pp. 48-88, 2011