in those same materials. “There aretwo primary fundamental of student engagement: (a) the amount of time and effort students putinto their studies and educationally purposeful activities, and (b) the way an institution uses itsresources and organizes the curriculum and other learning opportunities to encourage studentparticipation [45].” Current research has formulated a number of strategies for engaging students Page 24.719.13in this online digital format. Martin and Olsen [44] conclude that utilizing online socialnetworking as a medium for student interaction is a promising strategy for improving studentengagement. This strategy reflects a
Paper ID #9506I Did Not Anticipate This: Experiences from the Early YearsDr. Thomas Shepard, University of St. ThomasDr. Alison B. Hoxie, University of Minnesota Duluth Dr. Alison B. Hoxie is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department at the University of Minnesota Duluth. Her education includes a B.A. in Natural Science from the College of Saint Benedict (1999), a B.S.M.E (2001) and a Ph.D. (2007) from the University of Minnesota Twin Cities. She has held positions as a consulting engineering in power and energy sector, and as an Instructor at the University of Utah. Her current
team project experiences. These student-based assessments can be used in defining student performance grades for the project if desired.The Peer Evaluation Template can be easily adapted for use in an industrial or business setting tohelp project managers motivate team members to enhance project outcomes through increasedinvolvement in team activities, while simultaneously improving team dynamics andcommunication with team members and other stakeholders.References1. Barkley, B., & Saylor, J. (2001). Customer-driven project management. New York, NY: McGraw -Hill.2. Bonebright, D. A. (2010). 40 years of storming: A historical review of Tuckman's model of small group
Paper ID #9775Second-Year Enhancements to a Summer Faculty Immersion ProgramDr. Juan C. Morales, Universidad del Turabo Dr. Juan C. Morales, P.E., joined the Mechanical Engineering Department at Universidad del Turabo, Gurabo, Puerto Rico, in 1995. He has been Department Head since 2003. Dr. Morales also served as the ABET Coordinator of the School of Engineering between 2003 and 2010. As ABET Coordinator, Dr. Morales had the privilege of working closely with the entire engineering faculty in the process of establishing a systemic and sustainable Outcomes Assessment Program. Dr. Morales led the effort to obtain the
Paper ID #10117Engineers Assemble: The Use of Popular Culture in Engineering EducationMs. Melodie A. Selby PE, Walla Walla University Melodie Selby is a civil engineering and environmental science professor at Walla Walla University. A Walla Walla University graduate, she returned to the University in 2009 after 23 years during which she received a master’s degree in environmental engineering, worked as a civil and environmental engineering consultant, and worked in the Nuclear Waste Program and Water Quality Program for the Washington State Department of Ecology
ofbelonging in classes and major is strongly associated with academic engagement and otherpositive outcomes, and b) faculty and peer support of a student are correlated to the student’ssense of belonging primarily at the class and major level. Regarding academic engagement,students report in interviews that faculty behaviors influence student academic engagement, andthat small adjustments to faculty behavior could improve student engagement. When observingclasses, we observed that lecture still predominates in the engineering classroom; however, weobserved a modified lecture style that was occasionally used, in which we observed a highstudent academic engagement and faculty interaction that typically occurs only in active learningenvironments. Beyond
teach. The structure of the program was useful in providingthe context and the impetus for visiting other classes and meeting with other faculty members.However, some of the new faculty members indicated that the structure could be improved.Providing more guidance and better instructions before the start of shadowing will occur infuture programs.References1. Carpenter, J., Meng, D., Ponder, N., and Schroeder, B., Team Teaching Merged Sections as a Way of Mentoring Faculty, 2000 Frontiers in Education Conference2. Sherwood, J.L., Petersen, J.N., Grandzielwski, J.M., (1997) Faculty Mentoring: A Unique Approach to Training Graduate Students How to Teach. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(4), 119-123
Paper ID #8601On the Role of the Professor in Creating a Positive Learning EnvironmentDr. Waddah Akili, Iowa State University Page 24.951.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 On the Role of the Professor in Creating a Positive Learning EnvironmentAbstract: The paper focuses on the role of a “caring” faculty who believes that being adedicated, thoughtful, and passionate is as important as being professionally competent. Itis argued that faculty members can improve the quality of
Paper ID #10003Preparing Your Teaching PortfolioDr. Kay C Dee, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kay C Dee received a B.S. degree in chemical engineering from Carnegie Mellon University, and M.Eng. and Ph.D. degrees in biomedical engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. After completing her graduate work, Kay C joined the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Tulane University in New Orleans, Louisiana. She later joined the faculty at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She served as the founding Director of the Rose-Hulman Center for the Practice and Scholarship of Education, and is currently the
assessments were assigned and submitted online using Blackboard learning manage-ment system.14 Homework assessments were designed in two parts: Part A was multiple choiceand matching type questions, and Part B was computational based questions that required studentsto apply formulas to solve engineering problems. In an effort to curb copying, the computationalbased problems were designed so that the numerical values changed with each attempt. Home-works were graded with a two part mastery score, meaning students only received credit for thehomework if they mastered each part of the assignment. Students were permitted two attemptsto achieve the necessary mastery for Part A and an unlimited number attempts were permitted toachieve mastery of Part B
researchers and were generated based on experiencewith homework in STEM courses, both from a teaching and a student perspective. The surveywas composed of five main sections:1. General questions about the student’s school, year of study, major, and average number of problem sets assigned per week.2. Positive Homework Course. Questions relating to a homework experience in a STEM course that the student would describe as “positive.” a. Initial questions asked for the name of the course, and the type(s) of homework utilized in the course. The name of the professor was asked, but was optional. b. Then students were asked to rate on a scale from Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, to All of the Time, the amount to which they felt
Paper ID #10923Flipping the Engineering Classroom: Results and Observations with Non-Engineering StudentsMajor Steven Chene Chetcuti, United States Military Academy Major Steven C. Chetcuti serves as an Instructor of Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He has taught undergraduate courses in statics, mechanics of materials, thermal- fluid systems, and aerodynamics. Major Chetcuti graduated from West Point in 2002 with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering. He also holds a Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Michigan. Commissioned as an Aviation
, J.S., “A handbook for classroom management that works,” Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development (ASCD), Alexandria, VA, pp 166, 2005.3. B. Van Veen, “Flipping SignalProcessing Instruction, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine,” vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 145 – 150, 2013. DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2013.22766504. A. Seidman, “The Learning Killer: Disruptive Student Behavior in the Classroom”, Reading Improvement, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 4046, 2005.5. C. M. Clark, and P. J. Springer, , “Thoughts on incivility: student and faculty perceptions of uncivil behavior in nursing education,” Nursing Education Perspectives, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 93–97, Mar.–Apr. 2007.6. D. Wingert, and T. Molitor, “Best Practices: Preventing and
Learning, 2nd Edition, Kogan Page, London &Stylus Publishing Inc., VA, 2000vii Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Claire O’Malley, Ed. NATO ASI Series F: Computer and SystemsScience, Vol 128. 1995. Page 24.986.14viii Krause, U-M., Stark, R., and Mandl, H. The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e-learning instatistics. Learning and Instruction 19 (2009) 158-170ix Akour, H. Determinants of mobile learning acceptance: an empirical investigation in higher education, PhDDissertation, Oklahoma State University, July 2009x McCue, K. and Smyser, B. From Demonstration to Open-Ended: Revitalizing a
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Optimizing Your Teaching Load AbstractThe teaching responsibilities of faculty members are worked out with their respectivedepartments and/or colleges. Teaching loads are usually fixed, but individual facultymay have options on how to meet that load. They may choose more or fewer differentcourses, multiple sections of an individual course, a combination of undergraduate andgraduate classes, or a combination of face-to-face and distance-education classes. Onthe assumption that new faculty can learn from the experience of others, a survey wasadministered to faculty from across the country, primarily in engineering
GroupsAbstract: This paper describes two aspects of an ongoing faculty development model thatuses small interactive teaching development groups. We used the model with engineeringfaculty at five institutions. The groups focused their work on the design andimplementation of research-based, interactive teaching strategies.The focus of this work is using ongoing faculty development as a means to broaden theuse of research-proven instructional practices in engineering courses. Jamieson andLohmann explain the need for pedagogical research to connect with the needs ofinstructors 1. There is a long-standing gap between research about interactive teachingstrategies and the implementation of those strategies in classrooms. In our project, weattempted to bring
Paper ID #8922Mentoring Engineering Students:Challenges and Potential RewardsDr. Waddah Akili, Iowa State University Waddah Akili is an academician and a civil engineering consultant in Ames, Iowa. Has published in various fields including: geotechnical engineering, foundations, and pavement materials & design. He has been involved with contemporary engineering education issues, addressing a wide range of topics of interest and relevance to engineering institutions and practicing engineers, in the US and abroad
Paper ID #10286Initiation of Summer Camp Program as Outreach and Recruiting ToolDr. Amber L. Genau, University of Alabama at Birmingham Amber Genau is an assistant professor in the Materials Science and Engineering Department at the Uni- versity of Alabama at Birmingham. She received her BS and MS from Iowa State University and PhD from Northwestern University, all in materials engineering. Before coming to UAB, Dr. Genau spent two years as a guest scientist at the German Aerospace Center in Cologne, Germany, working on metal solid- ification and microstructural characterization. She is particularly interested in
Paper ID #8774What Can Reflections From an ”Innovation in Engineering Education” Work-shop Teach New Faculty?Emily Dringenberg, Purdue University, West Lafayette Emily Dringenberg is an NSF-funded PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University with a background in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. Her interests include qualitatively exploring the experience of engineering students, impacts of personal epistemology, and curriculum and pedagogical design. She also enjoys engaging with engineering outreach.Mel Chua, Purdue University Mel Chua is a contagiously enthusiastic hacker, writer, and educator with over
Paper ID #8785Taking the Leap: Moving from Industry to the AcademyDr. William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University Dr. William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering – Engineering Management from the University of Alabama in Huntsville and M.S. and B.S. degrees in Industrial and Management Engineering from Montana State University. He is an Assistant Professor of Industrial and Management Engineering at Montana State where his primary research interests are engineering education and the role of leadership and culture in process improvement with a focus on healthcare applications. Prior to
Paper ID #9834Scaffolded Structuring of Undergraduate Research ProjectsDr. Dirk Colbry, Michigan State UniversityDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Recruiting at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published nearly two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing
Paper ID #10303Pedagogy Including Differentiated Instruction That Enables Student Learn-ingDr. John Marshall, University of Southern Maine John Marshall received his Ph.D. from Texas A&M University and is the Departmental Internship Co- ordinator at the University of Southern Maine. His areas of specialization include Power and Energy Processing, Applied Process Control Engineering, Applied Automation Engineering, Fluid Power, and Facility Planning.Dr. Carl Nelson Blue, University of Southern Maine Associate Professor of Technology, in the Department of Technology - Technology Management Program / Information and
, service initiatives, and teaching various courses, leave many facultywith little time to develop teaching effectiveness.Classroom management is a critical concern in academia. Unfortunately, most universityfaculty have not had any formal training on classroom management. Consequently, manyare left on their own to figure out how to competently teach and manage their students’behavior and performance1. Often, faculty resort to trial and error experimentation, withsome imitating the techniques used by experienced colleagues or former instructors.Fortunately, successful classroom management skills can be learned and developed. Theauthor’s experience as a teacher and industrial supervisory-leadership trainer helped himto recognize that many leadership