irrespective of their ages. Byacquiring SDL skills, students can demonstrate a better handle or ownership of their learningprocess. Knowles described SDL as "a process in which individuals take the initiative, with orwithout the help of others, in diagnosing their learning needs, formulating learning goals,identifying human and material resources for learning, choosing, and implementing appropriatelearning strategies, and evaluating learning outcomes” [1, p. 18]. SDL skills are essentialcognitive skills for workplace [2] and society [3] that can be consciously cultivated over time.Self-Directed Learning entails autonomy and taking responsibility, many students may find thesecapabilities challenging to cultivate as instructors often bear significant
, newacademic professionals, and experienced researchers to manage scholarly work like papers,proposals, and other similar documents. To produce high-quality scholarly work, it is essential tofollow best practices that are designed to ensure that the research is rigorous, the writing is clearand concise, and the work is presented in a format that is appropriate for the intended audience.University education is anticipated to incorporate both a foundation in research and a focus onfostering a research-oriented mindset. In this approach, educators actively involve students inongoing knowledge-generation processes while simultaneously equipping them to tackle theevolving challenges they will encounter beyond the realm of academia [1]. Additionally
with their grades on the final exam. The average score on thatquestion was higher than last year, but the difference was not statistically significant. However,the initial results are promising, and more administrations of the course should yield more dataabout the value of Markopoly, and board games in general.Introduction Game-based learning (GBL), a learning strategy that involves embedding games intolessons to enhance learning, has been widely studied for years and shown to improve studentengagement and retention of material in many contexts [1]. This field, however, has beendominated by digital games – videogames and computer simulations. These digital games areundoubtedly useful for learning. They can provide everything from a
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 There's a Textbook for this Class? Scaffolding Reading and Notetaking in a Digital AgeAbstractInnovative engineers depend on technical reading as a primary means of lifelong learning.Several scaffolded course activities encourage the practice of reading and notetaking in acollaborative learning environment. In lower-level courses, students receive brief instruction inHow to Read a Book[1], Cornell notes[2], and Sketchnoting[3]. Student Note assignmentsrequire students to take hand-written notes while reading the textbook and post a picture of theirreading and class notes to an online discussion board. In later courses, students, well trained inthe Student Notes
underscores thesignificance of case-based learning in instilling ethical principles and critical thinking skills infuture engineers, ultimately contributing to the cultivation of responsible professionals in thefield.IntroductionIncorporating ethics into engineering education, particularly in senior design courses, has been atopic of interest and research, for example [1]-[6]. The Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) requires that all accredited engineering programs must ensure theirgraduates possess the capacity to identify ethical and professional obligations in engineeringscenarios and make well-informed decisions. These decisions must consider the consequences ofengineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and
western US which may have differentcosts of living depending on the area. The data were collected as secondary data to demonstratethe significant investments institutions have in early career faculty and that this was a potentialmotivator and/or variable for grant writing and research. Engineering Start-Up Packages: Mixed Methods Analysis of Composition and Implications for Early Career Professional Formation1. Introduction1.1 Inception of the StudyThis study was developed within a larger Action Research study published in [1]. The studycontained four iterative cycles as a part of a study [2] which developed an on-demand, onlineintervention for providing professional development for
verbal and written communication. The goal being toincrease teaching and learning effectiveness. Instructors are obligated to share knowledge, information, and skill sets with their students.However, many instructors are unaware of their students' preferred communication styles.Furthermore, even across different sections of the same course, each individual class canhave a completely different communication style. Many people are even unsure of their owncommunication style. As a result, each course should be adapted to meet the needs of eachdifferent group of students each semester the course is taught. According to the literature,engineering students are hands-on, active, and visual learners [1]-[4]. Comparisons of thestudent's self-assessment
established researcher in the social sciences. It ishoped that this work will provide a holistic summary of their pathway, and to also caution andguide faculty who are contemplating either a partial or complete shift in their research paradigmto EER.KeywordsFaculty development; mentoring; research initiation; engineering formation; RIEF1. IntroductionEngineering education research (EER) is an interdisciplinary field that addresses the uniquechallenges associated with the teaching and learning of engineering, and the pathways leading toengineers' professional formation and growth [1-3]. EER integrates a wide range of qualitativeand quantitative elements from the physical sciences, social sciences, mathematics, andengineering. The scope of EER was
theirknowledge and interest in the field. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of this course overthree years in two areas: (1) fostering interest in civil engineering among high school students,motivating more students to pursue this path in college, and (2) training graduate students (futureengineering educators) on best practices for student engagement, knowledge transfer, and coursedesign. Many data sources are reviewed for this study, including student artifacts, instructorlessons, and pre-and post- course reflections. These longitudinal data include the period impactedby COVID-19. As such, this evaluation also considers the effects of transitioning to online-onlydelivery, in-person teaching with COVID-related restrictions, and traditional on
engineering judgment to draw conclusions” [1] is a fundamental outcome of all engineeringprograms. Students conduct laboratory experiments in all areas of engineering and report on theirfindings. New faculty, however, have little experience or training in how to develop effective labreport assignments and instruct students on how to write laboratory reports. In an effort toimprove both the teaching and learning of laboratory report writing, engineering educators fromthree distinct universities (one large public research university, one small public polytechnicuniversity, and one private undergraduate university) developed a series of online laboratoryreport writing instructional modules. These modules were presented to laboratory instructors,half
project add in reinforcing material taught in theclassroom and often times help students gain a deeper knowledge of the material. In fact,product dissection style projects have been around since the mid- to late-1990s [1]. Hands-onprojects are often used in two applications: 1) to gain a deeper understanding of the course theorythrough application, 2) to motive learning of engineering topics. In this work the latter is thefocus for using a hands-on project in a first year engineering course. One goal of the hands-onproject development is to motivate the students make them excited to study mechanicalengineering. A second goal, is that the students leave the course with an introductory levelknowledge of the engineering design process. Specifically
individual and group lab assignments, the authors discovered that (1) students arecomfortable with both individual lab kits and benchtop equipment and view these two resourcesas complementary, (2) students see value in individually-completed labs but also like the peer-to-peer mentoring that can occur when working with a lab partner, and (3) students are using labkits outside of class for a variety of activities, including self-directed learning. Disadvantagesand limitations of lab kits are also reviewed and discussed.1. IntroductionIndividual lab kits have been evaluated as a tool to enhance active learning, even before thepandemic [1], and many types of lab kits have been designed for specific courses [2] [3] [4]. Thepandemic pushed many educators
of work rather than focusing on relieving the frustrations thatemployees face [1]. Thus, a shift in focus from eliminating external barriers to fulfillingemployee needs may lead to more effective interventions in improving organizational culture.Consistent with that shift, this workplace study emphasizes what faculty need, rather than thebarriers to success that they face, in academia. The basic psychological needs space of both menand women were explored using 31 faculty interviews. A qualitative analysis of the interviewssought to both identify the particular means by which the three basic psychological needs ofautonomy, competence, and relatedness are met or thwarted/frustrated and nuances within eachtype of need that affected faculty
AbstractAs engineering faculty, one of our core responsibilities is research. To be successful, you willneed to work with and mentor students, especially Ph.D. students. How should you find thesestudents, and once connected with them, how should you direct them? Unlike teaching, wheremyriad books and conferences can help you become a better teacher, there are few sources thatwill show you how to become a successful research mentor in any academic field, and fewer stillin the field of engineering. In this paper, three engineering professors with collectively morethan 100 years of experience on university faculties share their techniques, together with theadvice provided by more than a dozen highly successful faculty members and faculty developers.1
across all fourassignments, students were predominantly engaged in the Evaluating strategy during self-evaluation, whereas they predominantly engaged in Planning and Monitoring in the reflectionactivity. Student engagement was at the low and medium levels of the three metacognitivestrategies.Keywords: junior, reflection, metacognition, qualitativeI. IntroductionLifelong learning is one of the desired employability skills in today's job market. Forinstance, consider the technologies with which engineering work. The continuous evolutionof technology that results in the replacement of existing devices with new devices poses newchallenges and opportunities for engineers [1]. Working with new devices requires newknowledge and skillsets. To keep pace
(Hadzigeorgiou et al., 2012) and math education (James, 2006) to the informalstudy of literature (Stewart, 2014). Increasingly, IE is seen as a promising approach to supportingengineering students’ engagement with content, both by connecting to students’ emotions and byfacilitating the conceptual transfer of key engineering design concepts (Ellis & Thornton, 2011).IE is grounded in the development of five different and increasingly complex types ofunderstanding that correspond to theorized stages of language acquisition. Associated with eachtype of understanding is a set of “cognitive tools” or mental devices that have been characteristicof human cognition throughout time (see Table 1).Transmedia storytelling (Jenkins, 2006) is another approach to
application of sustainable platforms for the purification and detection of biomarkers. Has made research internships at the Michael Smith Laboratories at the University of British Columbia and the Water Center for Latin America and the Caribbean. In 2018 she was Coordinator at the Writing Lab of the Institute for the Future of Education. She is the co-author of 29 ISI indexed scientific publications, 1 book, 2 book chapters, and co-inventor of 4 intellectual properties. She is a member of the Mexican National System of Researchers. Her contributions in the field of sustainability have been in biotechnology, cereal sciences, energy efficiency; and active learning in education. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1568-4954Vianney Lara
with the population. However, for the earth to continue to supplyus with the resources, one must cooperate with the environment to ensure adequate resources forus and subsequent generations. It is at this phase where that sustainable engineering becomespertinent. Sustainable engineering is the process of developing or managing systems in such a waythat they use energy and resources sustainably, at a rate that does not harm the natural environmentor future generations' capacity to satisfy their requirements. There are several ways to defineoverall sustainability, but it is frequently seen to contain three key elements: sustainability in termsof the environment, the economy, and society [1].Innumerable nations throughout the world are
Canvas (due to campus-wide adoption of Canvas to replaceBlackboard) to do the same in Spring 2022 and Fall 2022. It takes time to set up such enhancedmulti-part problems on Blackboard or Canvas, but these problem sets are reusable, and thestudent responses are positive. This paper describes how to create such multi-part problems withrandom parameterization on Blackboard and Canvas, and presents the evolvement of studentperceptions from Fall 2019 to Fall 2022, to reflect on the impact of the pandemic.IntroductionActive learning is proven to be an effective pedagogy to improve student performance [1], wherethe students may be engaged in problem-solving, experiential learning, teamwork, a flippedclassroom, or other learning modalities. Timely
responsibilities. Studentswere also asked about their extracurricular responsibilities, such as how many hours they workedin an average week and whether they were a caregiver.Results: Of the 46 students in these courses, 19 (41%) responded to the survey, 12 (26%) ofwhich were complete. Of these, 8 students attended most or all classes in-person, 2 attended mostclasses via Zoom, 1 attended most classes via video, and 1 attended via a mixture of formats. The7 students who reported working during the semester worked an average of 18 hours per week.Two students reported being caregivers. Response to the HyFlex course format wasoverwhelmingly positive, with between 58% and 83% of respondents strongly agreeing, and anadditional 8% to 25% somewhat agreeing that
discussion,future improvements to the projects will be covered along with concluding remarks.BackgroundThe idea of implementing programming projects in engineering courses is not novel. In recentyears the number of projects involving the use of programming software such has MATLAB hasrapidly grown. This growth in the mechanical engineering field has occurred for two reasons: 1)it helps provide students with more exposure to programing which is desired skill in industry and2) allows instructors to assign problems that would otherwise be cumbersome to solve by hand.When designing an engineering curriculum, it is important to consider problems and projects toincorporate concepts from Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Project-Based Learning (PjBL).PBL
Education, 2023 Resources and Exercises for STEM Educators and Students Navigating the “Misinformation Age”Teaching students how to research a topic and navigate source usage is an important part ofpreparing future professionals in any discipline. In STEM/STEAM fields, both professionals andstudents must keep up with the fast pace of innovation, making information literacy essential toprofessional growth. Source evaluation instruction in students’ disciplines can help studentsidentify the information sources most applicable to their research. Moreover, reading credible,current publications helps students learn the discourse of their discipline [1]. However, thecomplex range of sources and ways of searching available to
teaching.Theoretical FrameworkA reflective teaching framework guided the framing of this article. In this adopted reflectiveframework, the instructor “focuses on themselves, their beliefs, and personalities, and how theseinform their classroom practices.” [1, p. 3]. In addition to this, the evocative theoretical approachto autoethnography in which the author carries out a systematic self-introspection and recall oftheir personal story is adopted in this study[2], [3]. Auto-ethnographers recall their livedexperience to understand and relate them [3].When writing this article, the first author reflected on her classroom experiences of whatpedagogical strategies have worked in the classroom. To further explore the first author's livedteaching experience, a team
, Elizabethtown College Dr. Mark Brinton currently teaches electrical and biomedical engineering courses at Elizabethtown Col- lege. Prior to joining Elizabethtown College, he studied advanced prosthetic limbs at the University of Utah (postdoc, Biomedical Engineering), taught Electrical Engineering at the Salt Lake Community College (adjunct faculty), and studied electro-neural stimulation for organ control at Stanford University (PhD, Electrical Engineering). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Design of Mastery-Based-Learning Course Structure to Assess Student Anxiety and BelongingIntroductionAlmost 1/3rd (31%) of U.S. adults will experience an anxiety
enablingLuhmann’s prolific publications [1].Ahrens [2], proposes six steps for using Zettelkasten in the writing process: focus on the task,read for understanding, take smart notes, develop ideas, share your insight, and make it a habit.In the reading step, the writer should have an open mind and focus on getting the main ideasfrom the source. When making smart notes, the key is to summarize and understand the source.In the developing ideas stage, the author looks for connections between notes and ideas andcategorizing notes. When working with slips of paper in physical boxes, Luhmann had a verysophisticated numbering and indexing system to keep track of notes. Modern digital Zettelkastensystems have eased indexing, however, the author must remain
available, and 20 (6.7%) items had ASL sign, example and definitionavailable. Preliminary results suggest this is a promising educational technology thathas the potential to help all students thrive in their engineering disciplines.1 Introduction Students in engineering classes have a wide variation in their prior knowledge and skills,which is due to several factors including large variations in high school learning opportunities,individual variations in knowledge acquisition modulated by challenges of moving to COVIDonline instruction, and students who have taken alternative degree pathways (e.g., transferfrom another college). These factors may lead to “knowledge-gaps,” meaning a student maybe inadequately prepared to understand a new topic
the teacher transforms from a preparer of coursecontent to a facilitator of student success (Chilukuri, 2020). Facilitation can occur through thedesign and implementation of various learning strategies, including project-based learning andcollaborative learning. Each approach will be described below in further detail.Project-Based Learning: For over twenty years, the concept of “project-based learning” (PBL)has woven its way into the education arena. As PBL gained in popularity, researchers at the BuckInstitute for Education (BIE) created a comprehensive, research-based model for PBL tomaintain the quality of this approach. Their “gold standard” for PBL includes seven essentialproject design elements: 1) a meaningful problem or question, 2
applaudedduring the classes and were encouraged to keep up with the good work in the courses. Thebenefits and challenges that new faculty experienced participating in this program are presentedwith the intention of guiding new faculty members who may be interested in implementingsimilar programs. 1. Introduction Engineering graduates remain in demand in the United States workforce and institutes ofhigher education continue to strive to improve educational practice and experience forengineering students. Issues related to student retention, persistence and academic successremain important topics of discussion and research within engineering education communities.Prioritization of diversity, equity and inclusion also prompts us to pay special