Displaying all 17 results
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 1 - Educator's Tools
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Timothy A Wood, The Citadel; Stephanie Laughton, The Citadel
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
80 60 46 40 33 26 12 1613 17 14 14 20 6 1 9 4 2 4 0 0 A B C D F (>50) F (>40) F (>30) F (>20) F (>10) F (<
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 1 - Educator's Tools
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Quamrul H. Mazumder, University of Michigan, Flint; Sunzia Sultana, University of Michigan, Flint
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
. In a collaborative paper or proposal, allauthors will review and follow these guidelines. The appropriateness of the use of one's previouswork and the limitations was also discussed.Based on the statistical analyses conducted using the survey responses from individuals withresearch experience, significant differences were observed between different years of researchexperience and specific survey questions. The analysis revealed strong significance (p < 0.05) forthe following questions: Q1.a & Q1.b. These significant differences suggest that years ofresearch experience have an impact on respondents' perceptions of the importance andsatisfaction of scholarly works in those areas. However, for the remaining survey questions
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 1 - Educator's Tools
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Toluwalase Opanuga, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Logan Andrew Perry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
awareness of their learning, and demonstrate the appropriate attitude essential forindividual and collaborative learning. Despite these benefits, developing SDL skills inengineering students is often overlooked. To address this, educators have a facilitating role toplay in the development of engineering students’ SDL skills, however, this role can bechallenging for them due to the (a) high cost of using SDL instruments, especially in a largeclassroom and (b) uncertainty about the validity of SDL instruments. Moreover, these challengesmay be more pronounced for new engineering educators. This study addresses these challengesby reporting the validity evidence for an SDL assessment instrument called the Self-Rating Scaleof Self-Directed Learning
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 3 - Courses: development, logistics, and impact
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jennifer Mott, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
, and the due dates are allprominently displayed in the module overview.The following details were included in the Module Overview, which was organized using thesame format for every module: A. Unit overview: a brief overview of the subject and the skills that the student will learn. B. Learning Objectives: The module's specific learning objectives. These directly relate to the topic and are more detailed than the learning objectives for the course. C. Pre-class content: tasks students must complete prior to class. This section contains information about how long it should take outside of class and what learning objectives are covered in the content. Figure 3 below provides an example from the Canvas page. listed for
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 4 - Assessments: Grading and deadlines
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Cassie Wallwey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Michelle Soledad, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Carol Geary, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
; BackgroundAssigning grades as a practice in educational systems has been used commonly since the early1900’s [1]. Grades are globally ubiquitous to students’ academic success. Whether representedalphabetically (A, B, C, D, & F) or numerically (through percentages or grade-point averages)grades can be considered a universal language taught to nearly everyone as early as primary andelementary school.Grades are a practice tool and serve dual function in educational systems. Formative assessmentsare ideally low stakes assignments that happen multiple times in a way that scaffolds studentlearning and development and deliver frequent real-time feedback to students [2], [3], so anygrades that are a result of a formative assessments (e.g., homework, quizzes
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 3 - Courses: development, logistics, and impact
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Sarah Rajkumari Jayasekaran, University of Florida
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
During the COVID-19 Pandemic: an Exploration of STEM Teachers' Views, Successes, and Challenges," (in eng), no. 1059-0145 (Print).[5] L. Tichavsky, A. Hunt, A. Driscoll, and K. Jicha, "It’s Just Nice Having a Real Teacher”: Student Perceptions of Online versus Face-to-Face Instruction," International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 9, p. 2, 01/07 2015, doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2015.090202.[6] M. M. D. Daniel B. Jernigan, Influenza Division, "100 Years Since 1918: Are We Ready for the Next Pandemic?," ed. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.[7] K. A. J. Mohr and E. S. Mohr, "Understanding Generation Z students to promote a contemporary learning environment," Journal
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 4 - Assessments: Grading and deadlines
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jennifer Mott, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
on the right track but makes major errors. Meeting Standards - has correct process and correct answers. B 3 May have minor mistakes. Exceeding Standards - must go above and beyond meeting A 4 standards or is perfectWhile the instructor liked the idea of grading on standards and has kept it as part of thegrade, it was difficult to compute the grade, especially the final grade, solely onstandards. For starters, the standard grades should be averaged rather than expressed as apercentage or as a percentage of a total. Canvas will only calculate the percentage of atotal and not average assignment grades in a rubric. This method of
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 2 - Educator's experience and perspective
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Gokce Akcayir, University of Alberta; Marnie V Jamieson, University of Alberta; Kristian Basaraba, University of Alberta; Duncan Buchanan, University of Alberta; Qingna Jin; Mijung Kim, University of Alberta; Janelle McFeetors, University of Alberta; Kerry Rose, University of Alberta
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
came prepared to discuss the module content,regardless of whether they overtly responded to the questions in the forum, it seemed to be areasonable decision to eliminate the “mandatory” nature of the forum post activity. This wasreinforced by participants’ feedback that indicated they saw these written posts as “make work”tasks.To better serve the needs of the GTA participants, the Nature of Learning module (T1M2) inthe original professor PD program was divided into two parts. Part A focused on lessonintroduction and the first 5 minutes whereas Part B emphasized lesson planning and creatingeffective learning outcomes. It should be noted that the concept of a lesson plan and a lessonplan template were provided in the program orientation session
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 2 - Educator's experience and perspective
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Yuliana Flores, University of Washington; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington; Soraya Grace Barar; Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
Paper ID #42527Exploring the Connection Between Positioning Theory and Educator ExperiencesYuliana Flores, University of WashingtonDr. Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington Cynthia J. Atman is the founding director of the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a professor in Human Centered Design & Engineering, and the inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. Dr. Atman holds a Ph.D. in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University. Her research focuses on design expertise, engineering design learning, considering
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 1 - Educator's Tools
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jennifer Mott, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Steffen Peuker, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
Paper ID #42650Integrating Ethics into Engineering Education: A Case-Based Learning ApproachDr. Jennifer Mott, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jennifer Mott is an Assistant in Mechanical Engineering at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. Her research interests include Thermal Comfort, using Team Based Learning in engineering courses and improving teaching for engineers.Dr. Steffen Peuker, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Peuker holds the James L. Bartlett, Jr. Professor position in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the California Polytechnic State University in San Luis
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 4 - Assessments: Grading and deadlines
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Bob Schaffer, Mission College
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
class with 44% receiving an A, 29% receiving a B,and 16% receiving a C.Course DetailsThe Introduction to Programming for Engineers course is a 1st year course that teaches C++ andcovers hardware in the form of an Arduino. The grade is made up of multiple componentsincluding: - Attendance/Participation 5% - Labs 8% - Homeworks (and Updated Homeworks) 12% - Quizzes 10% - Midterm 1 15% - Midterm 2 15% - Final Project 15% - Final Exam 20%The final project is a “robot” that is designed from the circuit and Arduino material learned in thecourse.Material is offered in the text, but first covered in lecture. Lab assignments each week offer a firstlook at the material covered in lecture for the week. The weekly Homework
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 1 - Educator's Tools
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Laura Savage, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
players rolling a six-sided die (d6) to determine their starting square, one of sixnumbered squares at the bottom of the board, and placing their pawn on that square. From there,each round proceeded as follows: each color on the board corresponds to a different type of dice: Blue (B): 6-sided die (d6) Green (G): 10-sided die (d10) Yellow (Y): 20-sided die (d20) Orange (O): 4-sided die (d4) Red (R): 8-sided die (d8) Purple (P): roll a d4, move 1 space for odd numbers and 2 spaces for even numbers Figure 1: Markopoly board, side A They would then move their pawn the number of squares indicated on the die. In Game 1 (Basic), a player received $100 for landing on a purple
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 2 - Educator's experience and perspective
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Jessica R TerBush, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Caroline Cvetkovic, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Holly M Golecki, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Christopher D. Schmitz, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Katie Ansell, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; David Mussulman, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Chandrasekhar Radhakrishnan; Ilalee Harrison James, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
Innovation Fellow, Andre Schleife, for guidance and support.References[1] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005, doi: j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.[2] P. H. Borgstrom et al., “Science and engineering active learning (SEAL) system: A novel approach to controls laboratories,” presented at the 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, Jun. 2012. doi: 10.18260/1-2--21900.[3] W. E. Dixon, D. M. Dawson, B. T. Costic, and M. S. de Queiroz, “A MATLAB-based control systems laboratory experience for undergraduate students: toward standardization and shared resources,” IEEE Transactions on
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 3 - Courses: development, logistics, and impact
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Meghana Parameswarappa Jayalakshmamma, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Ashish D Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
, skilled, andmotivated workforce ready to address future technological challenges. Hence,encouraging educators and policymakers to reconsider the traditional separationbetween research and education, fostering a more agile and responsiveengineering workforce prepared for the challenges of the future.5. References[1] J. E. Froyd, "Evidence for the efficacy of student-active learning pedagogies," Project Kaleidoscope, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64-74, 2007.[2] J. Lucena, G. Downey, B. Jesiek, and S. Elber, "Competencies beyond countries: the re‐organization of engineering education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America," Journal of engineering education, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 433-447, 2008.[3] N. Spinks, N. Silburn
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 2 - Educator's experience and perspective
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Yuzhang Zang, Western Washington University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
Paper ID #44356Effective Strategies for New Faculty from the Perspective of an AssistantProfessor in the Early-Career StageDr. Yuzhang Zang, Western Washington University Yuzhang Zang is currently an assistant professor in the department of Engineering and Design at Western Washington University since Fall 2022. She was a visiting assistant professor at Valparaiso University from Aug 2021 to May 2022. Yuzhang received her Bachelor of Engineering (B. Eng.) in Electromagnetic Field & Wireless Technology Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT) in 2014, Master of Science (M.Sc.) in Electrical and Computer Engineering at
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 3 - Courses: development, logistics, and impact
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Sanaz Motamedi, University of Florida; Viktoria Medvedeva Marcus, University of Florida
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
: Generation Z Technology Acceptance of E-Learning Technology during COVID-19Abstract.The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a swift transition from in-person to online learning,eliciting a spectrum of responses from students and prompting numerous institutions to developonline programs. Our study explores the challenges Generation Z students faced during theCOVID-19 pandemic, with a specific focus on understanding how their backgrounds influencedtheir interactions with e-learning platforms, including their learning styles, personalities, GPA,housing, voluntariness of use, and quality of internet access. To acquire comprehensive data, weformulated an online survey targeting Generation Z university students with multiple
- Conference Session
- NEE Technical Session 4 - Assessments: Grading and deadlines
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
Paper ID #41489Relaxed Deadlines: Do They Provide an Unfair Advantage?Dr. Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University Dr. Smyser is a Teaching Professor in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering with research interests that include lab and design pedagogy, inclusive teaching, and neurodiversity in STEM. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Relaxed Deadlines: Do they provide an unfair advantage? Educators seeking academic rigor have historically included strict deadlines for studentwork as part of preparing students for the reality of life after college. However, during