Paper ID #42897Getting Started Teaching an Undergraduate Engineering LaboratoryDr. Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Rebecca M. Reck is a Teaching Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research includes alternative grading, entrepreneurial mindset, instructional laboratories, and equity-focused teaching. She teaches biomedical instrumentation, signal processing, and control systems. She earned a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State University, and a B.S
Paper ID #38589Assessing Faculty Implementation of Laboratory Report WritingInstructional ModulesDr. Sean St. Clair, Oregon Institute of Technology Sean St.Clair is a Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Oregon Tech, where he teaches struc- tural engineering courses and conducts research in engineering education. He is also a registered Profes- sional Engineer.Dr. Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineer- ing and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His teaching and research have
final rehearsal sessionwhere the teams received feedback from other students and the instructor before their finalpresentation to the invited external audience.Oral presentation was one of the alternative assignments that Lepek and Stock (2011)incorporated in their chemical engineering laboratory sequence. Students were evaluated basedon criteria such as time management, body language of the presenters, slides quality, technicalcontent, and the ability to engage with the audience and answer their questions.VideoIt is a well-known fact that visualization is an effective tool for teaching engineering topics.Among visual teaching aids, training videos are most efficient as they can provide real-worldexamples and applications, and explain how
Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Her teaching interests include formalized problem-solving technique in non-major introductory physics courses and encouraging open-ended exploration in introductory physics laboratory. She also develops and manages graduate TA training and professional development activitiesDr. Christopher D. Schmitz, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Christopher D. Schmitz received his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois in 2002.Chandrasekhar RadhakrishnanDr. Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Rebecca M. Reck is a Teaching Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research includes
William Murray, “A Take Home Laboratory to Support Teaching Electronics: Instructors Perspectives and Technical Revisions,” Journal on Teaching Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 15, 2015.[2] Massimo Ruo Roch, and Maurizio Martina, “VirtLAB: A Low-Cost Platform for Electronics Lab Experiments,” Sensors (Basel). 22(13):4840, Jun 2022.[3] Raul Onet, Marius Neag, Albert Fazakas, Paul Miresan, Gabriel Petrasuc, Iulian Sularea, Alessandro Battigelli, Michael Murray, and Martin Hill, “A Home Electronic Laboratory for Each Student - A Potential Paradigm Shift in Teaching Electronics,” 2022 International Semiconductor Conference (CAS), Poiana Brasov, Romania, 2022, pp. 141-147.[4] Abhijit Nagchaudhuri, Jesu Raj Pandya, Isaac
. ● Renewable Energy education towards integration in traditional powering grids.These technical areas also allow one to discuss two delivery methods that use software and aphysical setup. Our Renewable Energy courses best emphasize the application of physical systems,while our Mechatronic courses best show the use of simulation software for SustainableEngineering Education.Mechatronic Education. Resources for SAET’s mechatronic laboratory were previouslycharacterized as physical training systems and software enabling process simulation [11].Regarding the sustainable engineering learning objectives, both choices provide excellentresources. However, the fundamental benefit of the software-based method is that it is bothaffordable and accessible to
. Thisproject will provide the provide a visual, hands-on education that will provide students withexposure to complex parts and provide a foundation to improve their creativity in future projectdesigns.Mechanical dissection projects have been done several times and the product that has beendissected has ranged from simple children’s toys to more complex items such as engines [2, 3,4]. Commonly, the limiting factors to conducting a product dissection is the cost of the product,the laboratory/institute constrains on space and safety, and the handling of the waste once thedissection of the product has occurred [5,6]. Some of these issues can be addressed by obtainingsmall items that are meant to be assembled and disassembled multiple times. However
application of sustainable platforms for the purification and detection of biomarkers. Has made research internships at the Michael Smith Laboratories at the University of British Columbia and the Water Center for Latin America and the Caribbean. In 2018 she was Coordinator at the Writing Lab of the Institute for the Future of Education. She is the co-author of 29 ISI indexed scientific publications, 1 book, 2 book chapters, and co-inventor of 4 intellectual properties. She is a member of the Mexican National System of Researchers. Her contributions in the field of sustainability have been in biotechnology, cereal sciences, energy efficiency; and active learning in education. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1568-4954Vianney Lara
approximationerrors in a multi-step problem. As shown in Figure 9, the correct answer from Excel calculationis listed as the first correct answer, while a few other correct answers with a few digits off arealso listed to be correct, to allow tolerance. Figure 8. Question Group setting on CanvasFigure 9. An example of answer matching on CanvasFor other LMS such as Moodle or Brightspace, they provide similar quiz types, and the ideapresented in this paper could be implemented similarly on other LMSs.Usage of Multi-Part Problems with Parameter Randomization in Course DesignGiven the author’s teaching assignment, the following courses have incorporated such multi-partproblems with parameter randomization from Fall 2019 to Fall 2022. • Circuit Analysis II
Paper ID #38578Work in Progress: Design of Mastery-Based-Learning Course Structure toAssess Student Anxiety and BelongingMeghan Williams, Elizabethtown College I am a senior at Elizabethtown College pursuing a Secondary Physics Education degree with a minor in Mathematics and am currently student teaching. I am the treasurer for the Elizabethtown College Circle K, a volunteer organization, and am also a representative for Honors Council. After graduation, I plan to spend two months working as a volunteer in Australia.Dr. Elizabeth Dolin Dalton Assistant Professor of Psychology, Elizabethtown CollegeDr. Mark Brinton
following academic years, whilesatisfaction with the teacher and teaching materials rose each year [12]. Again, more detailedanalysis of student perceptions was not included [12]. Other studies focused on measures of academic performance across formats. Thepreviously mentioned study involving freshman mathematics students found that grades weresignificantly higher for female students from underrepresented minority groups taking the coursein virtual format and were not significantly different for all other groups [9]. The civilengineering program study found that performance varied by level, with scores of level 1students decreasing over the three years of the study and scores for level 3 students increasingover that same time interval [12
Paper ID #37081Implementing Transmedia Using a Narrative Framework for an Introduc-toryEngineering CourseDr. Jeremiah Pina, Smith College Jeremiah Pina is a postdoctoral researcher at Smith College. He received a B.S. in Psychology and a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Georgia. His current research focuses on developing alternative assessment methods for use in the prDr. Glenn W. Ellis, Smith College Glenn Ellis is a Professor of Engineering at Smith College who teaches courses in engineering science and methods for teaching science and engineering. He received a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Lehigh
hours per week for three months on this program. Most of thistime was dedicated to asynchronous, independent interaction with the online module contentand developing their teaching products. The instructional coach led the 80 minute weeklysynchronous CoP for each module. The instructional coach also visited the GTAs in theirteaching environments where possible and used this experience to contextualize the weeklyCoP module meetings. The GTAs had the opportunity to discuss their questions, observations,and experiences from the modules and their teaching or laboratory practices, relating them tothe module topics during the CoP meetings. Recognizing the necessity of the instructionalcoach sharing their experience and expertise during the weekly in
experiences and observations, this paper delves into crucial strate-gies for success in teaching, research, and service, offering essential principles to guide new facultymembers toward a successful start in academia. The paper discusses strategies for teaching acrossvarious undergraduate levels, establishing and cultivating research groups within undergraduate-focused programs, and actively engaging in service roles within the academic community. Addi-tionally, it emphasizes the importance of advising, mentorship, self-care, and achieving work-lifebalance, particularly with regard to the unique experiences and challenges faced by female facultymembers. By providing practical tools, resources, and best practices, this paper aims to empowernew faculty
community vision with Pitt’s core compe- tencies of research and education, Sanchez has built up Pitt Hydroponics in Homewood, founded Con- stellation Energy Inventor labs for K-12 students, and re-created the Mascaro Center’s Teach the Teacher sustainability program for science educators in the region. As a teacher he designed and created the Sustainability capstone course which has annually partnered with community stakeholders to address sustainability challenges at all scales. Past projects have in- cluded evaluating composting stations in Wilkinsburg, studying infrastructure resilience in Homewood, enabling community solar in PA, improving energy efficiency in McCandless Township, and improving water quality in
. Teaching gives us the opportunity totouch many lives, but to a limited depth for a limited period of time. As mentors, we becomemore deeply involved in the careers and lives of our students, cultivating professionalrelationships and, often, lifelong friendships. Just as we devote time to becoming a betterteacher, we should also avail ourselves of the collective wisdom of outstanding mentors. Thispaper has distilled the advice of more than a dozen successful faculty members and facultydevelopers on a wide range of topics related to recruiting students and helping those studentssucceed in research.7. ReferencesBarker, Kathy. At the Helm: Leading Your Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2010.Buckingham, Markus and Ashley Goodall, Work
Paper ID #46493Instructional Benefits of a Web-Based Students’ Concurrent Course RegistrationToolDr. Ke Tang, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Ke Tang is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Tang’s research focuses on engineering education, particularly on student-centered pedagogies, data-driven instruction, and interdisciplinary education.Dr. Thomas Golecki, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign I spent 10+ years in industry as an engineer in structural mechanics and structural health monitoring projects
necessityfor change in the ways that engineering instructors teach their students, instructors havegenerally been slow to adopt new teaching practices advised by researchers [2]. Interaction withstudents is a fundamental aspect of teaching that instructors have the ability to directly impact.Current literature in engineering education research points to the idea that increasing student-instructor interaction and communication contributes greatly to student success in engineeringand design courses [3], [4]. In Spring 2020, the COVID-19 outbreak resulted in a transition todistance learning for academic institutions across the globe, and this change required engineeringinstructors to reevaluate the ways in which they were able to interact and communicate
Dr. Brian Sanders is a distinguished aerospace engineer and former U.S. Air Force officer whose career spans over three decades. He began his service as an aircraft weapon systems technician and progressed through roles including acquisition officer and senior research scientist within the Air Force Research Laboratory. Sanders made significant contributions to adaptive structures and unmanned aerial systems, leading pioneering research on morphing aircraft technologies. He also served as Assistant Chief Scientist at Air Combat Command. Currently, he is an associate professor at Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University, where he continues to advance aerospace research and education. ©American
Paper ID #38464Tips for Creating a Functional Personal Knowledge Management System inAcademiaDr. Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Rebecca M. Reck is a Teaching Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign. Her research includes alternative grading, entrepreneurial mindset, instructional laboratories, and equity-focused teaching. She teaches biomedical instrumentation, signal processing, and control systems. She earned a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State
. Second,engineering researchers can narrowly isolate experimental variables and follow uniform andwidely-accepted laboratory testing standards. The results from engineering research are well-defined and replicable, and proposed models can be validated. Unlike engineering research,EER typically includes a broad range of uncontrollable confounding variables and a lack ofspecificity and guidance in the selection of appropriate theoretical frameworks and analyticalmethods [5,6].Since engineering faculty are often the initiators of EER studies, it is logical that faculty whoalready teach engineering courses and conduct engineering research may be inclined to pursueEER opportunities. Their motivation may be to either complement their ongoing
resourcesavailable to support their work goals. This might include having adequate staff support to allowfaculty to excel in their teaching and scholarship work: The staff critical from every perspective. They support … the advising side; we have laboratory facilities where staff are critical in making sure that the facilities are up and running and information technology that everything is working the way it should. (Female faculty member, doctoral university)On the other hand, tight budgets or some management decisions left faculty feeling frustrated andunable to do their jobs in a way that was satisfying for pursuing their autonomy: So it’s a direct result of having resources cut and creating an almost toxic
Paper ID #46385Reflection for Development of Metacognitive Regulation Strategies: A Two-YearImplementation StudyH. Schwab, The Ohio State University H. Schwab is pursuing a B.S. in Chemical Engineering with a minor in Humanitarian Engineering at The Ohio State University. Involvement includes working as an Undergraduate Research Associate and Lead Undergraduate Teaching Associate for the Fundamentals of Engineering Program within the Department of Engineering Education. Research interests focus on sense of belonging, concept mapping, instrument content validation, and metacognition.Prof. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of
Paper ID #47584A Review of Basic Factors on How to Recruit Young EngineersProf. Martin Karl Fislake, University of Koblenz Martin Fislake was trained as a mechanic during an apprenticeship in Germany before he got his first and second teacher exam as a vocational teacher for mechanical engineering in 1993. Following that he was hired at the University of Koblenz and is since then continuously working as researcher and full-time lecturer and head of the technology education department where he teaches primary and lower secondary student teachers. In 2001 he received his doctoral in engineering education, higher education