across all fourassignments, students were predominantly engaged in the Evaluating strategy during self-evaluation, whereas they predominantly engaged in Planning and Monitoring in the reflectionactivity. Student engagement was at the low and medium levels of the three metacognitivestrategies.Keywords: junior, reflection, metacognition, qualitativeI. IntroductionLifelong learning is one of the desired employability skills in today's job market. Forinstance, consider the technologies with which engineering work. The continuous evolutionof technology that results in the replacement of existing devices with new devices poses newchallenges and opportunities for engineers [1]. Working with new devices requires newknowledge and skillsets. To keep pace
, industry or government collaboration, and/or travel.Discussion topics will also include process requirements of applying, conducting, anddocumenting the outcomes of the sabbatical.The suggested layout of the panel session is: • 5-minute introduction of panel topic and panelists • Overview of each panelist’s sabbatical activity (5 minutes each) • Brief whole group Q&A session to engage audience and panelists • Small group activities with documentation of Q&A: o What resources did you find helpful in planning your sabbatical? o What was the timeframe of planning, applying for, conducting, and documenting your sabbatical? o What were the requirements of your sabbatical
evolution is not without barriers to entry andassociated risks.The objective of this paper is to share the experiences of three established civil engineeringfaculty and their mentor who are within two years of receiving their first NSF grants to supportEER projects at their home institution. Barriers to entry, challenges, and the lessons learnedassociated with their growth as emerging engineering education researchers are discussed.Strategies and resources are provided to assist new engineering educators to: lobby forinstitutional support, secure initial extramural funding, initiate collaborations, formulate short-and long-term career plans, build an Individual Development Plan (IDP), and develop aneffective mentor-mentee relationship with an
came prepared to discuss the module content,regardless of whether they overtly responded to the questions in the forum, it seemed to be areasonable decision to eliminate the “mandatory” nature of the forum post activity. This wasreinforced by participants’ feedback that indicated they saw these written posts as “make work”tasks.To better serve the needs of the GTA participants, the Nature of Learning module (T1M2) inthe original professor PD program was divided into two parts. Part A focused on lessonintroduction and the first 5 minutes whereas Part B emphasized lesson planning and creatingeffective learning outcomes. It should be noted that the concept of a lesson plan and a lessonplan template were provided in the program orientation session
from an engineeringstandpoint. In addition, use techniques to compare the sustainability performance of variousalternative solutions. The module content comprises sustainable designs, performance indicators,strategies, etc.[7] . Sustainable manufacturing can be categorized into four; Responsive ProductStrategy (RPS), Lean Practices (LP), Supply Chain Restructuring (SCR), and SustainableMaterial and Design [8]. Considering the possible effects of environmental issues on a business'soperations, financial performance, and reputation, as well as incorporating this knowledge intodecision-making and planning processes, constitutes integrating environmental risk intocorporate strategy. This may involve recognizing and evaluating environmental hazards
guest speaker to discuss the current methods andsoftware used to manage stormwater, green infrastructures, and microplastics.Students were then asked to participate in a group exercise with the followingprompts –Stormwater Mitigation Group Exercise Instructions:Pick a topic from the list below and discuss within your group how a GreenInfrastructure based solution would fit into this topic. Upload a summary of yourdiscussion to the appropriate submission portal.List of Topics to be Used for the Group Activity: 1. Safety Analysis of a Stormwater Management Basin 2. Watershed Management Plan 3. Low-Impact Development Design Project 4. Invitation Letter to Stakeholders 5. Task List for a Regional Stormwater Management Planning
-sponsored health insurance, and79% reported having a retirement plan through their employer, showing more engineers’ salariesand benefits continue to increase in the U.S [5].On the other side, engineering educators are needed to teach, support, and mentor the growingnumber of engineering students. Engineering educators often are Ph.D. holders who are expertsin various engineering subdisciplines. However, engineering graduate students have fewerteaching-related professional development opportunities than students in other STEM subjects[6]. In other words, although experts in their respective fields, new engineering educators areoften not education nor engineering education experts. Existing opportunities for professionaldevelopment in teaching often
asinstrumental approaches [21], organizational communities [25], and engineered formal CoP [22].Because of this wide range in definitions and implementations of CoPs, it is important to definethe CoP that was used in this study.This community is on the less formal side of the spectrum. It is a group of professors who allteach engineering labs and have a strong interest in improving their students’ writing skills andlaboratory reports. The participants described above volunteered to participate and receivedfunding to attend the first meeting of the CoP. This community plans to meet annually to shareideas and support each other’s efforts to improve engineering writing.The first meeting took place face-to-face on the campus of Washington State
wrong? Was it something related to the equipment? Was a step of the protocol missed?Were our tools and techniques not sufficiently accurate? Were conditions different than in thecited literature study?) Some errors can be quite subtle, while others are very well-known. Thestudents can also be asked for suggestions on how to improve the experiment or minimize theidentified errors.Another way to combat “bad” data is to have backup or example data sets available for studentsto use for reports. These data can be acquired while TAs are preparing for the lab, or they can begenerated from previous semesters if available. While it does not have to be perfect, the exampledata set will hopefully be more representative of the planned experiment’s expected
the student’s time and recognizing that myclass is not the only thing they have going on. To demonstrate this core value, I inform studentsthat I set a timer for myself every class period that will go off when the class is scheduled to end.And no matter how critical the thought is that I am sharing at that moment, I stop class so theycan move on to their next activity. This practice serves two purposes. First, it significantlyreduced the shuffling students would do in the last 10 minutes of class, typically intended toremind the instructor that the period was ending. Second, it increases the likelihood that studentswill have time to come up and ask questions right after class.Office hoursI do not plan office hours to check off a box. This is
the student starts to have problems completing the work, then you can either (a) help them or (b) you know that the student is not what you expected. If you give a new student a project that you don't know how to complete, then you don't know if it is the student or the problem.He also advises asking this question: “‘and how will you evaluate that?’ There are lots of greatresearch ideas, but if we can't evaluate it, we can't get a paper published on it.”Be sure to talk with your student and set goals for each year they are in the graduate program.An Individual Development Plan (IDP) can be used [Marcus 2016]. This involves identifyingcareer goals, assessing one’s own knowledge, and discussing how to overcome weaknesses
level of the assignment, acknowledging thediverse needs of students. Late Assignment Policy • Quizzes—need to be done on time; no make-up; for absences due to academic activities, let the instructor know before the quiz. • Applications and other assignments—1 to 2 days late, email the instructor; more than 2 days, email the instructor and tell them when you expect to get it done. • End Assessments—you must email the instructor and clear it with them first; make and communicate a plan of when it will be finished.Quizzes have the least impact on the grade and, thus, the least room for variation. Theyare also formative for the instructor to ensure students understand material
technological tools andbeing attentive to updates of those technological advances. These are very important since thesuccess of these resources in learning depends on their practical and appropriate use.Maybe the most advanced and established program in instructor training for COILexperiences in the world is the agenda of the Suny COIL Center of the Purchase Collegecampus at the State University of New York. This program was a pioneer and initiallydeveloped a COIL Course Orientation (CCO) of 5 weeks, introducing COIL designs and aseries of recommendations about what works and what does not in COIL [18]. In addition,this same center offers diverse training options for developing a COIL course for customizedor group online classes, support for planning
facilitating adult learning and pedagogy as the science of aiding children in theirlearning process. Self-directed learning became a model that distinguished adult learners by theirability to plan, carry out, and evaluate their learning at their own time, despite juggling job andschool responsibilities [23]. However, with the view that learners become increasingly self-directed as they mature, there was a growing argument that self-direction should be developed inyounger learners too [23].In recent times, the distinction between children and adults has become less distinct; somescholars argue that andragogy falls within pedagogy [25] and others have explored andragogicalmethods with participants aged 18 and above [26-27]. Studies have also highlighted
of the scoped articles described the influence that grades had on theirdecision making as a student. This included academic planning and big-picture decisions as wellas day-to-day decisions in courses and classes.Big-picture decisions described by students when it comes to choosing courses include whatcourses to choose and why they choose them. One research article reported students sharing thatthey rather take a course that was an easy A over a challenging course [25]. A different studydescribed students' displeasure with having to take courses that they deemed irrelevant to theircareer or “real life”, and their desire that these courses not impact their GPA [34]. These findingsrevealed that academic planning decisions are sometimes
Engineering Connect,was designed for the first-year students in an engineering department with the idea of increasingstudent success, engagement, and retention. The program was implemented into a CornerstoneEngineering Design course being offered for first-year students in the engineering department.The students were assigned to complete weekly reflections on the course Canvas space onmatters related to their learning and campus experiences as an engineering student. The inputsfrom these weekly reflections were analyzed by faculty each week and an engagement plan wasset in place with the students who were identified as needing help and guidance on courseworkand/or campus related matters. Also, the students having a successful week were
provide feedback to students - somestudents changed their representation to be design process while others did not. Paige emailedthe students who were still representing design products so they could meet outside the seminarand she could better explain the difference.Value: Diversity. The point of the following example is to demonstrate that a shared value ofincluding diverse perspectives can occur alongside different interpretations of what constitutesdiverse perspectives. As mentioned in the previous section, week 8 was a new addition to theDear Design curriculum. Fiona was excited about the responses she had received from hercolleagues, noting in her reflections that, “my plan was to ask experts to say what they thought was important and
preparation.2.1.1 Designing effective syllabiSyllabi serve as a contract between instructor and students. New faculty members should ensurethat their syllabi communicate course objectives, learning outcomes, grading criteria, and policiesin a transparent and accessible manner. Providing students with an alternative lecture schedulecan also show an outlining key date for assignments, exams, and other important milestones. Thisclarity enables students to plan their study schedule effectively, manage their time efficiently, andstay on track with coursework.2.1.2 Laboratory Design and real-world connectionDesigning laboratories with stronger connections to real-world examples and theoretical knowledgeinvolves several strategies, including selecting
Materials Science and Engineering Theater Electrical & Computer Engineering 3 pre-tenure Energy 3 Civil Engineering Clinical Psychology City and Regional Planning 1 tenured Mechanical Engineering 3 pre-tenure Movement 4 Music STEM Education Agricultural Education 1 tenured Astronomy 4 pre
overwhelmingly positive response. It may be too optimistic to credit students with self-awareness about their need for external motivation to continue reading; more likely, studentsappreciate the high degree of agency they can exercise over a portion of their course grade. a) Plans (n = 312) 139 120 42 11 b) Other Courses (n = 312) 140 102 53 17 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100
alone and keeps personal matters private. As a highly organized person,every event is meticulously planned before acting, even if it is for fun. Systematiccommunicators are distinguished by their frugal and prudent approach. They have very highexpectations for themselves and others, which can manifest as a critical and pessimisticapproach to communication. How do you communicate with someone who is SY? - Toeffectively communicate with a systematic person, avoid small talk about personal matters. Itis critical not to rush and to give the person time and space to think about the situation athand. Because the systematic communicator is likely to be skeptical of what you say, beprepared to provide detailed answers backed up by precise data. Also
Paper ID #38578Work in Progress: Design of Mastery-Based-Learning Course Structure toAssess Student Anxiety and BelongingMeghan Williams, Elizabethtown College I am a senior at Elizabethtown College pursuing a Secondary Physics Education degree with a minor in Mathematics and am currently student teaching. I am the treasurer for the Elizabethtown College Circle K, a volunteer organization, and am also a representative for Honors Council. After graduation, I plan to spend two months working as a volunteer in Australia.Dr. Elizabeth Dolin Dalton Assistant Professor of Psychology, Elizabethtown CollegeDr. Mark Brinton
with a note with an overview of the year, add a more specific note for each month that Icreate a few days before the month starts, and finally during my weekly planning meetings createanother note for each day. Obsidian has plugins that also support GTD processes and make acollective checklist based on date tags throughout a collection.When I started looking at how other people used Zettelkasten, I did not perceive myself as acontent curator like the bloggers, podcasters, and video creators that I was getting tips from.However, now that I have started the process, I realized there are two additional reasons I collectinformation: social sharing and mentoring.I manage the social media presence for committees in two professional organizations, so
majorsat the host institution to also register for the course if they are interested. The first iteration ofthis course ran in the Fall of 2022 with 11 students. The students were from engineering (1biomedical, 1 chemical, and 3 mechanical) and engineering technology majors (1 mechanicalengineering technology and 5 electrical and computer engineering technology). The course isbeing planned to run on a yearly basis.Preliminary FeedbackA mid-semester one-question feedback survey was run asking students what is the mostimportant/valuable thing they have learned in this course so far. Table 2 below summarizes theresults. There were three themes observed, namely Python programming, 3D modeling, anddesigning prototypes and making which match with the
oral presentation, theaudience were given a form to evaluate the presentation and give feedback according to theinstructions. Sharp (2003) mentions that the speakers enthusiastically welcomed the peerfeedback.Kmiec et al. (2003) reported on an NSF-funded project that aimed at improving students’ writtenand oral technical communication skills from a teamwork perspective. They implemented theproject in the chemical engineering’s “Unit Operations Lab”. The module on collaborative oralpresentation targeted proficiencies such as planning, designing, and conducting the presentationas a team. Their strategies for facilitating the development of these skills included multiple oraland communication consultation sessions with the teams and allowing a
performance and attendance. Furthermore, the research can group students into thosewho engaged with the online materials and those who were completely disengaged. Theinstructor plans to incorporate online and HyFlex options in future course offerings and expandthis study by monitoring attendance and its impact on performance. This study provides a basisfor exploring the relationship between attendance and student outcomes and will pave the wayfor further research into its underlying mechanisms.AcknowledgmentsTo assist the writing process, the help of AIs was used; for example, we used Grammarly AI tocorrect grammar, check sentence formations, and improve writing.References[1] A. Verde and J. M. Valero, "Teaching and Learning Modalities in Higher
and engage with seven othercase studies worked well within our given timeframe of nine weeks. We planned that studentswould dedicate three hours each week to this task over nine weeks. For larger classes, werecommend assigning students 6–8 case study discussions, assuming students have three hoursper week to work on the assignment. If less than nine weeks are available, adjustments to thetimeframes should be made accordingly. To help adjust to different scenarios, the followingequations can be used to adapt the approach. The crucial factor is how much time students haveto work on the assignment. We use hours per week (HW) in the following equations: 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎
engaging educationalenvironment. Seamless integration of Zoom, Calendly, and Canvas improved resourceaccessibility, teamwork, and communication. Each modality's synchronous and asynchronouscomponents were thoughtfully balanced to meet the needs and preferences of a wide range oflearners.The careful planning of course components made it clear how the design affected studentengagement and success. A supportive learning environment was enhanced by proactivecommunication through multiple channels, early course module release, and clear instructions.The well-organized Canvas pages, Zoom recordings, and utilization of formative assessmentsfacilitated comprehension and engagement, transcending the limitations of both physical andonline environments. The
instructor and student benefit.Plans for Future Research The results of this pilot study represent one semester’s worth of research across threecourses. Much more data is needed to be able to statistically support the preliminary observationsmade here, and to expand the level of detail of information captured by the survey. An attemptwas made to collect additional data in the fall 2022 semester. Unfortunately, due to thePI/instructor having fewer courses suited to a HyFlex format and a delay in the IRB process forthat semester, only one additional response was collected. Plans are in place to administer thesurvey in all relevant courses taught by the PI/instructor through spring 2024, and perhapsbeyond depending on the findings from these
describes the relationship between these factors, where perceived ease ofuse and perceived usefulness are predictors of behavioral intention to use, and behavioralintention to use predicts actual use [17]. In the TAM model, perceived usefulness is defined as the degree to which an individualbelieves that using a system would enhance their performance, perceived ease of use is definedas the degree to which a person believes that using a system would be free of physical or mentaleffort, behavioral intention to use is defined as the cognitive processes, plans, and motivations anindividual has to perform a behavior, and actual use is defined as the specific use of atechnology, including how frequency of use, time spent using it, and more [17