Conference Session

Inclusive and Reflective Practices in Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Hayes, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Jennifer Cross, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Elissa Milto, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

autistic students. STEM technology is, for the most part, not designed to reflectneeds for autistic users or to scaffold how they begin using the technology in a way that supportsCT and IEP skills.It is not enough to give autistic students access to CT and robotics. Just as curricula for coreacademics and other subjects should be designed to reflect the needs of autistic students,programs that teach CT robotics should also take into account these considerations. Interactionsshould be scaffolded so that they build on their strengths, address their needs, and lead themtoward independence. Since educators have first-hand experience working with their students, itis important that they be part of the development of materials that are for autistic

Conference Session

Inclusive and Reflective Practices in Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sopheak Seng, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); William Samuel Walker

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

total number of uniqueideas generated.Code: Limited Exploration of Solution SpaceDescription: This code focuses on the qualitative dimension of idea generation which indicatesstudents’ failure to consider diverse design approaches or categories and measures students’breadth of exploration. The code reflects a lack of variation in the types of ideas explored even ifthere are a sufficient quantity of ideas. The code is not just about repeating features but alsobeing limited in the variety of approaches being explored even if those approaches result indesigns with very different features.Key Differentiator: Unlike “Repetition of Initial Concept Features,” which is about therecurrence of specific features, “Limited Exploration of Solution Space” is

Conference Session

Inclusive and Reflective Practices in Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Krista Dulany Chisholm, University of Florida; Emersen Kronsnoble, University of Florida; Kassandra Fernandez, University of Florida; Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

Conference Session

Inclusive and Reflective Practices in Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ju Hui Kang, University of Cincinnati; Soo Hyeon Kim, Indiana University Indianapolis; Gi Woong Choi, University of Cincinnati; Mansi Rajendra Kasar, Indiana University, Indianapolis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

]. Malteseet al. [9] indicated the necessity of frustration that comes with children’s failure during a learningactivity. Their study showed that frustrations can promote individuals to embrace challenges andcontinuously seek out solutions during maker activities.Motivation and self-efficacy are strong factors that impact frustration. For elementary-agedchildren from grades 3 to 6, Vongkulluksn et al. [12] examined frustration as a factor inproviding moments of self-reflection and impacting subsequent activities. Frustration can alsoimpact situational interests and the motivation to continue with children’s activities. Knox et al.[7] focused on the influence of caregivers during frustrations that occur in home environments,where interaction is limited

Conference Session

Instructional Showcase

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Soo Won Shim, Illinois State University; Anthony Lorsbach

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Professional Interest Council (PIC)

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

: EMPATHIZE WITH THE USERSDevelop user-centered criteria: Define the problem based on users’perspectives. Capture users’ information, suggestions, values, andfeelings. Reflect on the potential impact of the criteria and outcomes. Develop user-centered criteria based on users’ needs, desires, and values.Plan: Generate multiple ideas with fluency and flexibility. Discuss teamperspectives and strengths. Generate various design ideas and recognize students' strengths in their design work. Collaboratively select a team design.Create: Build a prototype DAY 4: TEST WITH USERS Test: Present your design to users and gather feedback. Utilize

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 12: Resource Exchange

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stacy K. Firth

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

that accurately reflect the practice ofThe framework of 5 criteria becomes a system engineering without proper engineeringby which K-12 educators can evaluate the training can be difficult, potentiallyquality of an engineering activity. Educators miscommunicating engineering concepts toare introduced to and trained in using the students. Expensive third-party kits or "fun"framework during a professional development activities like Rube-Goldberg machines canworkshop. They work through qualityengineering activities and then rate other limit budgets and prioritize complexity overactivities that fit their subject or

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 12: Resource Exchange

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca D. Swanson, University of Nebraska - Lincoln ; Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University; Saundra Wever Frerichs, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Ann O'Connor

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

introduce each engineering practice and lead educators through a brief (<30 min) series of questions and reflections on the individual practices. Learning Blasts and Video-Learning Modules both include videos of youth engaging in engineering, as tools for educator reflection. Learning Activities In this section of the website, users will find vetted, high-quality, engaging, and authentic engineering activities for youth. These activities are selected to support youth engagement in engineering practices and can be readily adapted to

Conference Session

Harnessing AI and Collaborative Platforms to Personalize and Innovate K-12 STEM Curriculum

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yash Ajay Garje, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Shauna Adams, Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Bruce Wellman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

the program designers' engineering workforce development intentions? As a part of the summer program, participants produced multiple forms of reflection thatgenerated insights into the program’s design and impact, and recommendations for futureimprovement. These reflections included pre and post-surveys, daily reflections, post-activityreflections, and focus group discussions. Our research questions focus on investigating participant engagement and learningexperiences from the program activities. Hence, post-activity reflections are a suitable choice touse for this study. Since there are multiple ways to engage and draw from a single activity, weadopt a basic qualitative research design approach and photovoice as an investigation

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 3: Let's Get Thinking on Design

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Povinelli, Syracuse University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

number of studies also found that high school students who participatedin Project Lead the Way, robotics club, or STEM activity experiences had no significant impacton retention [4] - [8]. Due to the complex and multifaceted nature of education, researchers arestill exploring the correlations and causation between various pedagogies and their impacts onstudent retention rates. For senior high school students, cultural norms and other external factorscan influence their motivation and habits [9] - [11]. Research studies have demonstrated thatinterventions such as goal setting, self-reflection, and providing feedback are effective inenhancing student motivation and academic achievement. At the highest level, these factorsinclude the preparedness

Conference Session

Milhouse's Moment: Engineering Inclusivity, Everything's Coming Up Milhouse!

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meagan C Pollock, Engineer Inclusion; Lara Hebert, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Lynford Goddard, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Luisa-Maria Rosu, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

through project or problem-basedlearning (PBL). Most of this section of the rubric draws from the “Ensuring Equity in PBLReflection Tool”[14]. This part of the rubric examines the degree to which students are allowedto exert agency and participate in team-learning environments that reflect real-world contextsand social impacts. The rubric encourages activities that engage every student, ensuring that alleducational experiences are hands-on and relevant to students' lived experiences andsocioeconomic backgrounds.Each of these sections contains specific items, totaling 27, which describe behaviors andpractices ranging from those that perpetuate inequity to those that foster an inclusive atmosphere.For example, under the "Head" section, item 1

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Graffin, Curtin University of Technology; Rachel Sarah Sheffield, Curtin University of Technology; Rekha Bhan Koul

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

draw upon disciplinary-specific or epistemic ways of knowing,designing, decision-making, collaboration, and communication within their social andcultural context [5]. These are reflected in their use of specific tools and approaches whileproblem-solving, modelling, prototyping, evaluating, and sharing design solutions [5], [12],[13]. Many engineers use notebooks or design journals to document their knowledgeconstruction and reflections as they engage in the engineering design process andcommunicate with various audiences [9], [13], [14]. Engineers learn how to use thesenotebooks through a process of apprenticeship within their professional community ofpractice and practical experience [5], [9], [12], [13], [15]. As such, the notebook can

Conference Session

WIP Poster Session: Emerging Research and Practices in Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey D Radloff, SUNY, Cortland

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

integrate authentic engineering activities that connect with real-worldissues like sustainability. Storytelling about sustainable engineering offers a practical method ofintroducing PSTs to authentic engineering projects, practices, and careers. This work-in-progress, funded by ASEE’s Engineering for One Planet (EOP) initiative, illustrates the impactof engaging PSTs in reading and reflecting upon a set of “Sustainable Engineering Stories”during science teaching methods courses at two institutions.During the summer of 2024, the researchers interviewed engineers from various disciplinesabout projects oriented toward sustainability. From those interviews, we created a set of eightSustainable Engineering Stories for PSTs enrolled in their elementary

Conference Session

PCEE Instructional Showcases

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexis Grace Daniels, The Johns Hopkins University; Alisha Nicole Sparks, The Johns Hopkins University; Michael L Falk, The Johns Hopkins University; Allison Reigel, The Johns Hopkins University; Rachel E Durham; Margo K Williams, The Johns Hopkins University; Emily J Yanisko, American University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

model videos (one component of BOAST)develop students’ engineering career awareness, offer insights into preparing for college, and providereflection opportunities for how students’ own background and interests fit into an engineering pathway.ROLE MODEL VIDEOSTen role model videos feature predominantly minoritized students, professors, and other professionalsdescribing their work in engineering careers, how their interests developed, challenges theyencountered, and how they persisted. Each role model video also has a series of reflection questions (seeexample above). Videos can creatively be integrated into classes, clubs, advisory periods, and more.OUR ROLE MODELS JEREMY BROWN DUNCAN PARKE

Conference Session

PCEE Instructional Showcases

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Doan, frcdesign.org; Jonathan Mi, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

Onshape and necessary tools.Stage 1 Building top-down design and multi-body model CAD proficiencyusing relevant robot design.Stage 2 Integrating engineering principles into full subassembly mechanismdesign.Stage 3 WIP Top-Down full robot design with complex multi assemblydesigns.Stage 4 WIP Learning how to improve past the course through reflection andindependent learning. Course Design:Example exercises: Intentional information placement and scaffolding for maximum retention. Information is placed “Just in Timeˮ when the learner needs to use it

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Geniene K. Minkus, Geniene Minkus Consulting; Meagan C. Pollock, Engineer Inclusion

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

-based assessments, presentations, and reflections. Thesesections were distilled using a combination of classroom experience and research. Eachof these elements is powerful on its own but added together they create opportunitiesfor students to build self-efficacy, belonging, and inclusion. These qualities then lead toclassrooms that can foster students who can find resilience and joy in diversity andcreate equitable spaces. The framework I developed is visualized in Figure 1 below. Iwill describe each of these elements and the research that went into them.Before the Framework: While doing research around actionable science DEIB strategies, I encounteredand studied social-emotional learning (SEL). While the tenants of following theframework

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 13: Attitudes & Prespectives of Teachers

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrienne Decker, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Monica McGill, CSEdResearch.org

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

CSEdResearch.org 1 adrienne@buffalo.edu, 2 monica@csedresearch.orgAbstractWe recently hosted a workshop that brought together 12 K-8 teachers who teach computer science(CS) and/or computational thinking and 12 CS education researchers. Since there is a known gapbetween practices that researchers study and practices that teachers implement in a learningenvironment, the purpose of our full-day workshop was to create a meaningful space for teachersand researchers to meet and explore each others’ perspectives. The dialogue was framed aroundteachers’ classroom experiences with researchers reflecting on how they could improve theirresearch practice. The workshop, held during the 2022 CS Teachers Association (CSTA)conference

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 3: Let's Get Thinking on Design

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Johnson, Pennsylvania State University; Minyoung Gil, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

in engineering practices?Educational Intervention and Study Context Data for this study were collected as a part of a funded research project that seeks tounderstand how rural elementary classroom teachers learn engineering content and practicesthrough professional learning experiences and how a subset of them take those experiences intotheir classroom. Over the course of three years, teachers from rural school districts serving theepistemic practices of engineering [4] through participation in classroom engineering activities,reflecting on them using both their “student hat” (as a learner) and “teachers hat” (as a teacher)[32], and through learning the specific engineering units they will teach. In this case, we use theYouth

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Garza; Cory Andrew Scarborough; Lovekesh Singh, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Marsha Sowell, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Mohammad Motaher Hossain, Texas A&M University, Kingsville

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

practices, 5)provided coaching and expert support, 6) offered opportunities for feedback and reflection, and7) was of sustained duration [6].As specialists in renewable energy and data science, engineering faculty and graduate students aswell as industry advisors provided a content focus and model for effective practices inresearching specific STEM content areas. This was accomplished by giving teacher-participantshands-on active learning opportunities to explore the research process. Boz [5] found this type ofsupport was key to professional development that led teachers from theory to actualimplementation of practice. Education specialists provided coaching, support, and feedback forthe creation of content modules. Collaboration and sustained

Conference Session

Bart's Big Plan: Engaging High Schoolers in Engineering Adventures ... Ay Caramba!

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allison Antink-Meyer, Illinois State University; Jeritt Williams, Illinois State University; Matthew Aldeman, Illinois State University; Jin Ho Jo, Illinois State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

majors, referred to in the project and hereafter asdesigners. The designers’ perspectives, as examples of students who had chosen a STEM careerpathway, was of interest. They had gained access to STEM as a field of study and the researcherswere interested in whether their own pathways would be reflected in the activities they weredesigning. The other stakeholder group involved in the planning year was a group of teacherswho would become the afterschool facilitators of the STEM program. Those individuals valuedSTEM and students’ access to it. As a group that provided input and feedback on the activitiesthat were being developed, the researchers were interested in how their experiences andperspectives may or may not be reflected in the afterschool

Conference Session

Equity, Identity, and Pedagogy in Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Trini Sofia Balart, Texas A&M University; Sara Amani, Texas A&M University; Gibin Raju, Texas A&M University; Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

]. By introducing the EDP at early educational levels, educatorscan prepare students to approach real-world challenges with a mindset grounded in engineering practices.As educators strive to implement the EDP effectively, visual representations of the process have emergedas essential tools for communication and instruction. These visuals help translate abstract concepts intoconcrete stages that are accessible to diverse learners [3]. However, such representations varysignificantly in style, complexity, and alignment with educational standards, reflecting the influence ofclassroom-specific factors such as time limitations, subject matter constraints, or access to trainingresources. For instance, linear models often dominate in K-12 classrooms

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 6: Engineering in the Home

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jubie Tan, State University of New York at Binghamton; Amber Simpson, State University of New York at Binghamton; Peter N. Knox, University of Vermont; Sawsan Werfelli, State University of New York at Binghamton; Adam Maltese, Indiana University-Bloomington

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

forexpanding students’ higher order thinking, potential for lifelong learning, and sense of agency intheir learning experiences. HoM is defined as a set of learned or internalized dispositions thatinform an individual's behaviors when confronted with challenges. This study addressed tworesearch questions: (1) Which HoM were articulated by children as they reflected upon theirparticipation in a home-based engineering program? (2) What patterns of the children’svocabulary align with the HoM framework? Observational methods were used to examine youngchildren’s reflections upon the process of completing low-stakes engineering projects in theirhome. The participants were 23 children ranging from kindergarten to eighth grade. After theyengaged in the ill

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 1: Partnerships Making It Real!

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University; Anne E. Shea, Northeastern University; Christiane Amstutz

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

thecommunity, especially the needs of those who are under-served. It is reciprocal, valuespartnership, and recognizes the expertise brought by the community partner. It also includesreflection, which has been shown to enhance learning across academic subjects [14]. S-L isintegrated by educators in a way designed to meet needs and goals identified by the communitywhile being intricately linked with learning objectives and outcomes. Before, during, and aftertheir service, students also engage in structured reflection to help them gain further insight intocourse or program content, a broader appreciation of their academic disciplines, and a greatersense of civic responsibility.S-L relationships are mutually beneficialWhen properly implemented, service

Conference Session

WIP Poster Session: Emerging Research and Practices in Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mariam Manuel, University of Houston ; Jerrod A Henderson, University of Houston - COE; Bereket Mego, University of Houston

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

, including developing students’ funds of knowledgeand culturally responsive mentoring, supporting teachers in incorporating these practices intolesson planning and instruction. Pre-service teachers engaged in workshops, reflective journaling,interactive activities, and actual teaching experiences with students. Throughout the program,mentors were supported with training in culturally responsive mentoring practices to ensureongoing guidance.To assess the impact of this experience, data were collected through semi-structured interviewsconducted after the program and a post-program survey. Findings suggest that exposure to EDPand CRP with guided implementation experiences solidified participants’ beliefs, encouragedthem to apply these methods in real

Conference Session

Equity, Identity, and Pedagogy in Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica D Gale, Georgia Institute of Technology; Dyanne Baptiste Porter, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology; Abeera P. Rehmat, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jasmine Choi, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

PCK to investigate connectionsbetween teacher backgrounds, personal PCK (pPCK), the personalized professional knowledgeheld by teachers, and enacted PCK (ePCK), the knowledge teachers draw on to engage inpedagogical reasoning while planning, teaching, and reflecting on their practice. Observation,interview, and survey data were triangulated to develop narrative case summaries describingeach teacher’s PCK, which were then subjected to cross-case analysis to identify patterns andthemes across teachers.Findings describe how teachers’ backgrounds translated into diverse forms of pPCK thatinformed the pedagogical moves and decisions teachers made as they implemented thecurriculum (ePCK). Regardless of the previous subject taught (math, science, or

Conference Session

Building Community and Inclusion in Pre-College Engineering Learning

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chelsea Joy Andrews, Tufts University; Jessica Watkins, Vanderbilt University; Kristen B Wendell, Tufts University; Rae Woodcock; Shannon Jean Keaveney Rausch, Tufts University; Vera Gor, Tufts University; Naina Sood Fox, Tufts University; Rachel Bandi; Molly Malinowski

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

reported on the influence of Design Talks on participating teachers.This paper reports on a qualitative study focused on teacher reflections and perceptions of theirexperiences facilitating Design Talks in their classrooms. Specifically, we ask: How doelementary teachers perceive the benefits of intentionally facilitated whole-class conversationsduring engineering design units? Study participants were the six classroom teachers in ourDesign Talks community of practice.Background and Conceptual FrameworkWhole-class talk in science and math. By using “Design Talks” as a catchphrase, we havehoped (1) to emphasize the importance of discussion in the learning of engineering, and (2) toexplicitly align with seminal work on “science talks” (Gallas, 1995

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 6: Engineering in the Home

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter N. Knox, University of Vermont; Amber Simpson, State University of New York at Binghamton; Adam V. Maltese, Indiana University-Bloomington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

and aparent of two. His research focuses on how youth develop and maintain interest in STEMeducation across formal and informal learning contexts. As a parent, educator, and researcher hehas experienced multiple moments of failure in all of those roles and tried to make sense of theintersection of theories around learning through failure, experiences in supporting learnersthrough failure and seeing his children and other kids and parents experience failure, particularlyin STEM. These experiences and extensive self-reflection influenced his input on the design ofthis intervention and the interpretation of data produced.ResultsGuided by our research questions ‘How was failure perceived by participating families?’ and‘What was the subsequent

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 4: Engaging Authentic Engineering Practices

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Azizi Penn, Purdue University; Rachel E. Higbee, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Hillary E. Merzdorf, Texas A&M University; Siddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Tamara J Moore, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

shown that learning activities that reinforce concepts help students understand thecontent they previously struggled to master [12]. This approach also improves theirunderstanding of concepts, the principles that link concepts, and the linking of concepts andprinciples to conditions and procedures for application [13]. It is critical to allow students torelate concepts to their application by providing realistic scenarios for students to solve usingtheir knowledge of STEM. Integrated STEM activities can foster self-regulated/self-directedlearning in several ways. One is by prompting students for explanations via guiding questions,which help students reflect upon and integrate the knowledge they require to solve the problem[14]. For the

Conference Session

Supporting Teacher Practices for Inclusive and Culturally Relevant Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Muhammad Guntur Purwanto, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Gillian Roehrig, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Jeanna Wieselmann, Southern Methodist University; Elizabeth Stretch, University of Minnesota

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

authentic AQ These moves are used to: invite students to take a position; questions that inviteauthor accounts so that students own responsibility for their students to take atalk; position students’ accounts in relation to each other to positiondevelop coherence in dialogue; promote meta-talk so that Making explicit ExInstudents reflect on their reasons and views before sharing invitationsthem with the rest Authoring accounts AuthA Positioning accounts PosA4. Talk Organization​ Reformulation Ref Teachers

Conference Session

Building Engineering Identity and Practice in Rural and Pre-College Contexts

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natasha Wilkerson, Vivify, LLC; Joanne K Olson, Texas A&M University; Justin Wilkerson, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

study addressed three research questions: (1)How do students' reflections evolve over the course of the program? (2) Which engineeringdesign practices do students reference in their videos? (3) How do features of the designchallenge influence students' engagement with engineering design practices? Findings indicatethat student assessment videos primarily focused on the performance of the physical model inmeeting criteria, and despite explicit prompting, only 52% of students reflected on the designprocess, such as explaining design decisions. Additionally, two specific elements of the designchallenge —open-ended design constraints and the complexity of the building process —seem tohave promoted different types of engagement in the design process

Conference Session

Krusty's Creations: Robotics and Electronics in Springfield STEAM, Hey Hey!

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shauna Adams, Purdue University; Cristian Eduardo Vargas P.E., Purdue University; Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University; Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University; Peter Bermel, Purdue University; David R. Ely, Ivy Tech Community College, Indianapolis; Hayley Joy Grisez

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

manufacturing, visits to local companies usingsemiconductors in their production lines, tours of local higher education fabrication andexperimental lab facilities, and designing and prototyping various microelectronic systems. Theprogram and participant experience were evaluated based on understanding students’ change intheir sense of belonging and self-efficacy, career aspiration, and knowledge and skills associatedwith the semiconductor ecosystem. Data collection involved pre-post survey results, students’daily evaluations of the program activities and reflections, and focus group responses.The analysis, employing inductive coding of responses and related pairs analysis on pre- andpost-survey sections, revealed positive outcomes. These findings